Furry Network
9 years ago
General
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ

โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โผ โณ โผ Commission Queue โ Commission Prices โ Commission ToS โ Patreon โ SubcribeStar โผ โณ โผ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฑโน โฝ โ
โพ โนโฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
FA+





other than taht i think i would want to get you to do more bisa stuff as well. i think she totally needs love. i wouldn't think any sort of fetish or mature things. i'm not personally into it myself.
Hey, did you find any Terms of Service or other legal stuff for the use of the site? Can't seem to find any legal info on the site without handing them information to sign up. The closest link to rules gets to a "That's not here" state. How far into the sign-up do you have to go (Handing them personal info) before you can see the legal contract you're agreeing to with them and stuff like their privacy policy and such?
So... people are just throwing personal information... including FA login passwords... at a site with no legal obligation, rules, or promise to them... Why does this strike me as a Bad Ideaโข?
There was a massive set of people pointing out (accurately) the various storage methods of passwords. Hash + Salt = Good. Encrypted is the same as plain text.
Due to FN storing FA passwords in a manner that can be presented to FA in plain text, FN is now the biggest security threat to FA accounts.
And did you ever have a Deviant Art? You had to LOOK for their Code of Conduct and Acceptable Upload policy.
If those are the "two clicks" you have, they're missing some VERY critical stuff that allows the site to run legally and not have somebody sign up, upload ten art pieces, have them show up on the site, and then sue the site for copyright infringement straight out with a VERY solid case of the basic "I never gave them the rights to display that to people."
Point out a Privacy Policy and how to get to it.
Point out a document that, upon acceptance by the user, gives the site the right to display the artwork on behalf of the user and various other legal obligations of the user and of the site.
I see bandwagoning into a poorly-thought-out site that has no legalese (At least FA states clearly in their terms of service what they allow, what they don't, and so on)
FN doesn't even have the proper set-up for DMCA safe harbor, so quite literally in their current state, somebody could post a picture and then turn around and sue FN over it since there is no contractual assignment of rights and no safe harbor compliance.
FA's big "crime" is getting hacked, but they're up front about their policies and responsibilities.
FN is acting straight out like hackers themselves and are definitely not doing it right given the amount of legal risk they're putting themselves under.
Leaving then ?