you're really lacking in style since you're a tactless cat 8)

i saw 3 comments. I shoulda guessed they were all memery

Wuju style

sad

Doggy style

go away

you win

to be honest theyre pretty different, but they do have a few things in common. like the facial structure i guess ? you do muzzles in a distinct way that is mostly very similar if that makes sense...
i think you do haha
also the eyes are similar in the drawings...
XD

I honestly thought the way I did muzzles were fairly standard design. What would you say makes them distinct?

For canines theyre kinda edgy? I dont have enough english words to describe it but theyre very straight o3o :D i think its easy to tell them from others x3

That makes sense. Thank you~

Yes and no.
Your art is clearly recognizable but it differs strongly, even if the base is always the same. Which is far from a bad thing since it shows how versatile you are and still manage to keep a certain touch ;)

That makes sense. Thanks for the commentary ^^

On a more serious note, I would say yes and no. You definitely have a unique style of creating backgrounds that I haven't seen before and the way you draw characters is a different style as well to what else I have seen. The no part is that it can sometimes waiver a bit between pictures, they share common elements but look different enough where one could call them different styles so to say.

This is v helpful thanks lynxfriend.

What about my backgrounds makes them unique?

In pieces like http://www.furaffinity.net/view/21977571/ and http://www.furaffinity.net/view/21733991/ they have a style of being painted more so then drawn out and colored, and the strokes (heh) are a lot different, maybe broader, than the couple other artists I watch that paint stuff or at least look like it

Ahhhh gotcha. Thanks!

Fuck havin' a style. There's no need for it. It's better to be able to do ALL styles. That's how you get good jobs with stuff like character design. Flexibility, man! Just do the piece you want to do, and make the character look like you want to make them look. If you're gonna take commissions around here, feel free to offer to let them pick a pre-existing picture if they feel they want it done a certain way but hell, if I got something from you, I'd say make it however you wanted. :D

I'm not too concerned with shoehorning myself into a particular style. I just want to see what people think of my art P:

Though I do think it's important to be unique in a sense that you can produce consistent caricatures/illustrations etc. in a certain way that clients know exactly what they're getting

On a certain level, but I've also seen people go really wonky with their 'style' where it goes from looking nice to looking like a cheap version of their old work, and yet you look at it and can't even put a finger on what's missing other than the artist's soul...

But uhh, you know me, I'm a major cynic. Haha. But yeah, consistency can be a good thing, but I think that's separate from whether you should have a style or not. Style can be important for freelancers who do character commissions, but far less so when you move into the private stuff. There, personal style can actually get in the way of the work itself, unless you're the guy who does DBZ/Dragon Quest. XDDD (A style I personally do not like but ehh. :3)

Dunno shit about art theory/history, so I'm talking out of my ass, but I'd say you're a pretty standard romantic.

What immediately stands out is that when you do scenes, you pretty much always do the "insignificance in the face of the larger world" thing that romantics love. That is to say, you depict the subject as very small/fragile/lonely, while nature/society is so large/beautiful/terrifying/whatever around them. This is emphasized by your use of lighting, especially backlighting.

Your portraits also tend to emphasize the personality of the subject through their emotions. A common thing is that the subject's eyes are often looking at or reacting to something and it's just left up to the imagination as to what that thing is (well, assuming it's not the viewer themselves).

Tbh if a piece isn't able to be interpreted unless you have an art history education, it's probably not worth your time anyway. At least, that's how I think of it P:

But this is a really interesting perspective. I've also figured that I was a romantic/some people have told me that. I never really stopped to think if it influenced the way that I do art in any way, but this is definitely something I'll look more into. Thank you!

Short answer yes

Long answer

Y
E
S

w
e
o
w