FA+
Shop
Reminder Regarding Standards
7 years ago
General
Some people have resurged calling me "picky" or having "unreasonable standards".
I can to that just take the time to point out that: I still am, and have always judged an artists work based on THEIR own standards.
So if you think I am being too harsh; You're not applying the same lens when viewing them.
For example: Any of the numerous hacks that people "defend their right" to be inept at female anatomy and ex: Refuse to learn how to draw proper horse junk on their females. Do keep in mind that that same artist REFUSE to draw human dongs on those horses. Contradicting their own excuse on why they've said they don't draw equine on female, with the reason given to why they don't draw human on males. Their two reasons are mutually exclusive, yet they use both at the same time. (Like the: "It would look retarded to give a horse human anatomy" and "I don't draw animal genitalia, I'm not a zoophile". You can only use one of those at a time.)
And on said note: They are also committing a special pleading fallacy. As more or less: Not a SINGLE customer of theirs, are willing to give them money UNLESS the artist cater to their extremely specific demands on how the penises should look.
These people think its perfectly reasonable to demand that artist HAVE to be willing and able to draw their extremely specific sparkledog dicks. But then think it's madness that people with female characters want even the most bare bones option of choice when it comes to their characters genitalia.
I don't mind if people want to argue for a position or similar.
But doing so is usually easier if they come with something other than a decade old, debunked apologetics, or crawl in with no legs to stand on, and try to make a stance for a point that they refuse to defend.
Immediately withdrawing support and instead trying to lynch an artist by changing a single word is kinda the opposite of solid ground to stand on.
Biases and fallacies are pretty useless unless you're trying to mentally masturbate... which granted: a lot of these popufurs are, as they can't handle being proven wrong. But, seriously people: Try to introspect more. If an artist would refuse to purchase art from themselves, as they think the service is too shitty, and the quality too low, then how the fuck can I be too picky when the artist wouldn't even support themselves? Heck, their own diehard fans REFUSE to give them money unless their extremely specific demands are met. Yet I'm not allowed to have ANY demands, because... I'm not asking for something with a dick?
I can to that just take the time to point out that: I still am, and have always judged an artists work based on THEIR own standards.
So if you think I am being too harsh; You're not applying the same lens when viewing them.
For example: Any of the numerous hacks that people "defend their right" to be inept at female anatomy and ex: Refuse to learn how to draw proper horse junk on their females. Do keep in mind that that same artist REFUSE to draw human dongs on those horses. Contradicting their own excuse on why they've said they don't draw equine on female, with the reason given to why they don't draw human on males. Their two reasons are mutually exclusive, yet they use both at the same time. (Like the: "It would look retarded to give a horse human anatomy" and "I don't draw animal genitalia, I'm not a zoophile". You can only use one of those at a time.)
And on said note: They are also committing a special pleading fallacy. As more or less: Not a SINGLE customer of theirs, are willing to give them money UNLESS the artist cater to their extremely specific demands on how the penises should look.
These people think its perfectly reasonable to demand that artist HAVE to be willing and able to draw their extremely specific sparkledog dicks. But then think it's madness that people with female characters want even the most bare bones option of choice when it comes to their characters genitalia.
I don't mind if people want to argue for a position or similar.
But doing so is usually easier if they come with something other than a decade old, debunked apologetics, or crawl in with no legs to stand on, and try to make a stance for a point that they refuse to defend.
Immediately withdrawing support and instead trying to lynch an artist by changing a single word is kinda the opposite of solid ground to stand on.
Biases and fallacies are pretty useless unless you're trying to mentally masturbate... which granted: a lot of these popufurs are, as they can't handle being proven wrong. But, seriously people: Try to introspect more. If an artist would refuse to purchase art from themselves, as they think the service is too shitty, and the quality too low, then how the fuck can I be too picky when the artist wouldn't even support themselves? Heck, their own diehard fans REFUSE to give them money unless their extremely specific demands are met. Yet I'm not allowed to have ANY demands, because... I'm not asking for something with a dick?
