FA+
Shop
Amusing Analogy
6 years ago
General
A friend of mine pointed out something that I found funny: One of my roles in this fandom has basically been me going around to couples, and showing them irrefutable proof that their partner is cheating on them.
Whether its photo evidence, chat logs or what have you. For over a decade, I haven’t been wrong once. And the majority of people that try to claim I am lying, are proven pathological lairs, or have a history of cheating with their partners. So they have no leg to stand on against the objective truth. And people’s response is to go living and scream at the top of their lungs at me, for “ruining their relationship!” because “they were doing fine until I brought this to their attention.”.
And go on a tirade about how this is all my fault. And how they were gonna get married and shit. But because I had to go and flap my lips, and expose that they were fucking their best friend, or stealing money from them or what have you. Then I’m simply the worst for "hating love”. Since: If I simply hadn’t told them their partner was paying people, with money they stole from their partner, to suck his dick behind their back, no-one would have a problem with it. And it’s 100 % my fault for letting them know about it.
Ah, it’s like watching people try to defend anti-consumer practices and/or trickle down economics or etc, proven to be shit, just cuz they gotta defend their “daddy” and “trigger the opposition” xP
Feels like with all the readily available info nowadays, people should be able to launch an argument that doesn’t crumble against itself. Yet people still use the same old shit that was debunked 20 years ago. (Like, time and against people tell me that they would refuse to give an artist ANY money if they didn’t draw their exact, specific sparkle-dog dick. Then flips 180 and whines on me that customers shouldn’t be allowed to refuse their business just because an artist doesn’t know how to draw proper pussy. And its rude to expect service.) The special pleading fallacy was old and shit back 2000+ years ago when it was invented. Its not made any better by people demanding that furry artists HAVE to draw animal penis. Then flip the usual 180, and argue that if anyone doesn’t want to learn how to draw non-loli pussy, they should be allowed to be inept, because that’s a “style”.
(And just as a clarification, since people get butthurt over it: If their style is actually consistent and matches. Then yes: Then its actually a “style”. Likewise: You still need to be able to know HOW to draw X, in order to make it a “style”. Since otherwise you don’t know what you are changing anatomy wise, in order to stylize it. As: There’s actually a difference in drawing a ex: hand with four fingers. And drawing boxing gloves on ALL characters and going “I refuse to learn how to draw fingers. It’s my preference.”. Shocking, I know. But there’s actually a tiny, subtle difference between those two xP)
Whether its photo evidence, chat logs or what have you. For over a decade, I haven’t been wrong once. And the majority of people that try to claim I am lying, are proven pathological lairs, or have a history of cheating with their partners. So they have no leg to stand on against the objective truth. And people’s response is to go living and scream at the top of their lungs at me, for “ruining their relationship!” because “they were doing fine until I brought this to their attention.”.
And go on a tirade about how this is all my fault. And how they were gonna get married and shit. But because I had to go and flap my lips, and expose that they were fucking their best friend, or stealing money from them or what have you. Then I’m simply the worst for "hating love”. Since: If I simply hadn’t told them their partner was paying people, with money they stole from their partner, to suck his dick behind their back, no-one would have a problem with it. And it’s 100 % my fault for letting them know about it.
Ah, it’s like watching people try to defend anti-consumer practices and/or trickle down economics or etc, proven to be shit, just cuz they gotta defend their “daddy” and “trigger the opposition” xP
Feels like with all the readily available info nowadays, people should be able to launch an argument that doesn’t crumble against itself. Yet people still use the same old shit that was debunked 20 years ago. (Like, time and against people tell me that they would refuse to give an artist ANY money if they didn’t draw their exact, specific sparkle-dog dick. Then flips 180 and whines on me that customers shouldn’t be allowed to refuse their business just because an artist doesn’t know how to draw proper pussy. And its rude to expect service.) The special pleading fallacy was old and shit back 2000+ years ago when it was invented. Its not made any better by people demanding that furry artists HAVE to draw animal penis. Then flip the usual 180, and argue that if anyone doesn’t want to learn how to draw non-loli pussy, they should be allowed to be inept, because that’s a “style”.
(And just as a clarification, since people get butthurt over it: If their style is actually consistent and matches. Then yes: Then its actually a “style”. Likewise: You still need to be able to know HOW to draw X, in order to make it a “style”. Since otherwise you don’t know what you are changing anatomy wise, in order to stylize it. As: There’s actually a difference in drawing a ex: hand with four fingers. And drawing boxing gloves on ALL characters and going “I refuse to learn how to draw fingers. It’s my preference.”. Shocking, I know. But there’s actually a tiny, subtle difference between those two xP)
And of course, the fact it'd only come back to destroy them in the future if they stuck with it.
I'm sure they know this, and only yell at you in the moment when emotions and tensions burst. I'd hope they'd come to terms with the facts once they calm down and think about it.
The real question becomes, how does one draw all that pernus with boxing gloves on?!