Ten-year-old art changed from ‘general’ to ‘mature...
5 years ago
I just got a note from FA stating that two of my pieces have had their rating changed.
The two pieces (9 and 10 years old) had nude male characters with just the hint of sheath showing. No bulge, knot or tips.
Well, okay, if that is what they have to do, no worries.
But now I guess I have to go thru my whole gallery (at least ten years worth of stuff) to make sure no hints of nipples (female only) or sheaths are shown.
And they mean showing thru clothing too....
Wow, I wonder whose job it is to go thru years worth of art looking for nips and bulges...?
The two pieces (9 and 10 years old) had nude male characters with just the hint of sheath showing. No bulge, knot or tips.
Well, okay, if that is what they have to do, no worries.
But now I guess I have to go thru my whole gallery (at least ten years worth of stuff) to make sure no hints of nipples (female only) or sheaths are shown.
And they mean showing thru clothing too....
Wow, I wonder whose job it is to go thru years worth of art looking for nips and bulges...?
"I'm being productive, I'm looking for policy violations!"
They said they would be going thru things for the updated policies,
somehow I just didn’t believe it.
It's stupid, and vile.
I dunno, maybe I'm being overly-conservative?
There's literally people on FA staff that are scouring the site every day to find the stupidest crap to whine about and remove or change it so they aren't butthurt. In my opinion from my near 14 years here, I've never felt more like a victim of a gestapo or concentration camp than I have in my time here on FA.
Source: was a mod. Unless things have drastically changed, they aren't scouring folks' entries, there are too many people for that. Literally. They generally go after reported pieces.