FA+
Shop
Changes to content, feral nsfw, and other opinions
5 years ago
It's come to my attention recently, that many people are uncomfortable with depictions of irl feral species in NSFW situations.
I will not be taking any more comissions of that subject matter or drawing it any longer. Ive gone through my gallery/scraps and deleted anything I believe could be offensive.
The exceptions to this rule are: obviously not real species, aka mythical beasts, for example: Kelpies, unicorns, dragons, gryphons and Taurs.
Unnacceptable species under this rule are any natural exsisting species with natural coloration and anatomy. I do not want to be associated with this. I dont want to cater to or encourage sexualization of species that cannot consent the way a human does.
None of my art was ever intended to be realistic in that way. Anything depicted was fantasy, and the characters were sentient, verbally humanly consenting adults. That being said, I absolutely understand the arguements presented by the uncomfortable parties and have decided this is not the hill I want to die on.
Is it a form of censorship? Technically yes, but I dont think it's in any way unreasonable to my personal standards because I am not attracted to irl animals sexually and have no reason to advocate for that type of artwork going forward. There is no excuse in my opinion for allowing this kind of comission or personal artwork in my gallery anymore.
Will I block you for drawing feral porn? No, not unless I believe it is indicitive of something less savory in content, or sexual tastes. I am much more likely to be accepting of feral x feral artwork (what happens in the natural world all the time) than any human, anthro or humaniod x feral artwork.
That's about it. If you take issue with what I do with my gallery, feel free to block me or leave my watchlist. I dont have time for bullshit. If you find something you think is questionable in my gallery, ask me about it and I will tell you my reasoning for keeping it, review it for removal, remove it and apologize for missing it ect.
Even though I believe some good artwork makes people uncomfortable, this is not the type of discomfort or questionable morality I want to encourage. Zoophilia is not an acceptable sexual interest in my mind. If I discomfort your views on world issues then that is fine but Im not using my art or my time to advocate for things I dont believe are okay. That's it.
I will not be taking any more comissions of that subject matter or drawing it any longer. Ive gone through my gallery/scraps and deleted anything I believe could be offensive.
The exceptions to this rule are: obviously not real species, aka mythical beasts, for example: Kelpies, unicorns, dragons, gryphons and Taurs.
Unnacceptable species under this rule are any natural exsisting species with natural coloration and anatomy. I do not want to be associated with this. I dont want to cater to or encourage sexualization of species that cannot consent the way a human does.
None of my art was ever intended to be realistic in that way. Anything depicted was fantasy, and the characters were sentient, verbally humanly consenting adults. That being said, I absolutely understand the arguements presented by the uncomfortable parties and have decided this is not the hill I want to die on.
Is it a form of censorship? Technically yes, but I dont think it's in any way unreasonable to my personal standards because I am not attracted to irl animals sexually and have no reason to advocate for that type of artwork going forward. There is no excuse in my opinion for allowing this kind of comission or personal artwork in my gallery anymore.
Will I block you for drawing feral porn? No, not unless I believe it is indicitive of something less savory in content, or sexual tastes. I am much more likely to be accepting of feral x feral artwork (what happens in the natural world all the time) than any human, anthro or humaniod x feral artwork.
That's about it. If you take issue with what I do with my gallery, feel free to block me or leave my watchlist. I dont have time for bullshit. If you find something you think is questionable in my gallery, ask me about it and I will tell you my reasoning for keeping it, review it for removal, remove it and apologize for missing it ect.
Even though I believe some good artwork makes people uncomfortable, this is not the type of discomfort or questionable morality I want to encourage. Zoophilia is not an acceptable sexual interest in my mind. If I discomfort your views on world issues then that is fine but Im not using my art or my time to advocate for things I dont believe are okay. That's it.
I’m guessing either a human or anthro was asking a different character a couple of questions one being “do you want to f***?” In the first one the other character made feral sounds and in the second one the character gave verbal consent thus showing it was sentient.
That said I completely understand and respect your decision.