I think you misunderstanding the rules, if you act in a racist way they'll act accordingly, and depending on how you phrase things you may be able to criticize a group's actions, again provided your phrasing does not have a inherently racist intent.

the issue is ANY criticism of BLM is considered "racist" in the eyes of It's supporters.

I've yet to see any criticism of the movement that has not any inherently bad faith bias or racist connotations at least on this website.
That's simply cuz in principle you will criticize something as simple as "black lives matter" and every "criticism" I see goes to a tangent like "all lives matter" which is a racist statement.
If you want to criticize the "bad actors" that cause trouble within the ideology then you have to decouple the two, because, yes, in the end you can not argue in good faith against simple things like human rights.

i am referring to those "bad actors" I have seen some reasonable points mostly people speaking out against the violence and destruction and only that. but they are attacked for it. I have also seen a few journal by people supporting or trying to justify things such as tearing down statues and defacing monuments, looting and so on and they basically hide behind the" its only property" or the" businesses can be replaced" excuse. My worry is other cant or wont tell the two apart

Mm but then those that criticize them how do they phrase it? Because those that advoca for violence, aren't being really reasonable here, yet the person that engages in that conversation will automatically 'lose' if they don't manage to thread carefully on that thin thread between the bad actors and the ideology itself.

Ultimately is a very risky conversation in itself and you ain't convincing someone that has harmful intent in doing otherwise in the internet.

I literally got called racist for saying "all lives matter" once. Because its simply true, everyone's lives matter, and we should -all- be treated equally. The fact that they only show black deaths and black abuse by cops on news shows that they ignore all the white deaths and white abuse. Lots of white people have been beaten or mistreated by cops, but those get ignored and excuses get made. Any black man gets arrested and people immediately scream racist at cops, a white man? Nah, thats a normal shitty white man getting arrested.

I called certain news outlets left biased and providing low quality information, and people claimed I was just racist against blacks because all those news outlets portrayed was blacks only and cops being evil.

FA's rules aren't only on the BLM movement. Its now a bannable offense to accidentally misgender someone. I once laughed at a youtube video of a hypersensitive manly trans who sounded manly, looked like a man, wore gender neutral colors, flipping the fuck out and destroying store property simply because the guy at the desk said "You guys" (not referring to gender in the first place) and then accidentally saying "sir" after when trying to calm the trans down who was having a manly adrenaline anger fit. I got labeled transphobe because I laughed at a moron flipping out over nothing. I wasn't laughing at a trans, I was laughing at a moron who needs a lot of psychological therapy. I have several trans friends, and the few I've kept around are great decent people. Yet I got labeled transphobe because I offended someone once and got insta-perma-banned and they spread rumors about me to everyone there and blah blah.

FA is becoming the same thing. They'll wait till you offend someone somewhere on the site, then issue a suspension or a ban against you. Free speech is dying.

P.S.
You stated in your second post, you claim "all lives matter", is racist; therefor you're as leftwing as the people who sit there trying to ban everyone from the internet for saying something they don't like. Whats racist about "all lives matter"?

Tell me, was it right for them to forbid a march for the white woman who was murdered saying all lives matter?
What about the fact that on the same day they allowed a BLM march in the same place?
Both had concerns about Coronavirus, but the white woman was ignored for the safety of people keeping Corona down but BLM was allowed because only black lives are worth the risk?

Look closer at whats going on. Don't sit there thinking that black people are shit on so badly that they are the only ones in the world who have problems. Its bullshit. Yes, they have been treated badly. Yes, there are racist police and bad actors out there who need to be held accountable. It doesn't make it right to treat everyone else like shit while they have their movement. It doesn't make it right to burn down buildings and throw explosives at police burning them alive inside their own vehicles. Honestly I think if anyone is holding a motov, they should be shot to death as a terrorist. Lit or not. White or not.

Theres a lot more going on than just black people being mistreated. The media is trying to blow the entire thing out of proportion. Certain anarchists are using the chaos to create more chaos unrelated to BLM too. Claiming to be BLM while they go burn things down to create anarchy. I had a trans friend who said she wants this, she wants people to die for her amusement. Because it'd be fun to watch civil war. Who knows how many anarchists are using BLM as a way to create chaos trying to spark a war. I know that in my area, police are great people, I don't see racism anywhere except in private when the christian neighbor bitches about black people all the time and I ignore her cause she's just an elderly christian idiot who is stuck in the old times but she doesn't show any sort of racism in public.

Anyway, I'm rambling at this point. The fact is, I feel that FA, is starting to become uber leftwing, and will ban all free speech. Thats what the leftists want, because anything offensive is evil and must be silenced. If we continue down this path... This will be our future.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM

The reason folks think saying all lives matter is racist is because you are invalidating the ideology and their call for power.

http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com.....-black-people/

https://www.cleveland.com/entertain.....-ignorant.html

Nuance of course is limited, I don't think you are racist but in their eyes you are and that's all that matters for them and in this website it is what it is.

You have to know that FA is hammered on twitter all the time if they fail to cather to them and every "incident"/callout makes them bleed users, you have to understand they get put in a very uncomfortable position and basically bullied into doing it.

"their call for power", so they want superior power?
Otherwise you should have said, their call for equality.

Your other URL is broken by the way.
I firmly believe that all lives should matter, and I'm not invalidating their struggle if I say that I agree that they need justice for whats happened but they need to look at the real issues behind it instead of only focusing on one small part. Of course, leftists, and racists (ironically), will cut out parts of what you say to reduce you to the worst possible light. I say "all lives matter because x", they cut that short and tell everyone you said "all lives matter and thus you invalidated their struggle!".

Bleed users my ass, what a load of bullshit. #InsertPopufurArtistNameHere# threatened to "leave this shithole" before, posted a ragequit journal and everything. Then came back when no one followed her ass. No one's leaving the center of all furry community. No matter how shit this site becomes.

Not my saying, you go to twitter and that's what they explain at least

I am black irl and I have seen news reports from all that too. dont forget all the kids who lost their lives in Chicago in july and those same outlets couldn't care less didnt even bother covering it. look at what happened to that poor kid in the chaz zone. the mayor didn't say two words to that kids' farther until the father called her out and shamed her on fox news live THEN she reached out to him only protect her image of course

Thats what politicians do. :P

That CHAZ zone was funny. I was hoping we could do it on a larger scale, just so I could laugh at how bad of an idea it was. Like, clear out an entire state, declare it an autonomous zone for 1 year. Anyone living there is subject to the rules they make up there and can not contest anything in court outside the zone. Anyone who resides there does not get taxes or government aid in any way shape or form, and is officially a non-citizen as long as they live there.

I predicted we'd see a high volume of murder and rape and other horrible things in such a place. Not as bad as what you'd see in a tiny 3 block area. I wonder, is that zone still open or did they finally shut it down as a huge failure? xD

Nah, the zone got shut down by the mayor of Seattle.

Only because they protested at her house. she didnt care that it was ruining everyone else's lives. it wasnt until it became i an inconvenience for HER did she finally do something. XD

Sadly. FA is owned. Like FB and the others. The only thing is FA is not immune from is being sued like FB and the others. Which it does look like FB and such are about to get that lifted since they are not being a natural place to post free speech. But FA can do anything it likes to do. And for any reason it likes to. I believe that would cost them money in the long run. But DA did a whole format change and lost thousands of users. So I do not know anymore. Free Speech on the Net is fading fast. Google offered everything for free. And no one in government thought to ask. Well. What if they are the only ones left? Then they control the search results and posts.

doesn't surprise me at all. I have seen how brutally people who dare have opinions they got against the "crowd" out get treated.