"Are you a good person? Am I? Is anyone?"
16 years ago
General
I'm sure most of us have faced a situation where we've asked ourselves, or someone has asked us "Am I a good person?". At first glance the answer is generally pretty simple, if you don't do bad things intentionally then you're probably a good person. However there is another deeper interpretation of this same question. Rather than asking if we qualify as either good or evil we should be asking ourselves, "Am I being a good human?". That is to say are our beliefs, thoughts and actions appropriate for a successful human being? Doing good deeds is a simple thing we can look at on the surface, but do such simple actions define us as a successful and good human being?
If we are acting out of fear, or false beliefs, selfishness or due to an imagined law that we must follow, are we being good?
I cannot claim to be a good person because I have not been as successful a human as I would like, or am capable of being. Do we not owe it to ourselves to fulfill our potential?
"Am I a good person?" is a simple question on the surface, "Am I a good soldier in TF2?" is an apt analogy for how to perceive the question. I believe we should think of those questions in the same way.
We are all people, but are we all good at being people?
If we are acting out of fear, or false beliefs, selfishness or due to an imagined law that we must follow, are we being good?
I cannot claim to be a good person because I have not been as successful a human as I would like, or am capable of being. Do we not owe it to ourselves to fulfill our potential?
"Am I a good person?" is a simple question on the surface, "Am I a good soldier in TF2?" is an apt analogy for how to perceive the question. I believe we should think of those questions in the same way.
We are all people, but are we all good at being people?
FA+

Plus my cat loves me, so I gotta be at least a little good.
-B.
Have I lived up to these standards I've set? No, but it's something I've always wanted to try. Right now, I still haven't figured out who I am.
i dont have an answer to this question, all i have is more and more questions, the more i think about it.
What is good from one person's point of view can be bad from another person's point of view.
Personally I find myself too often in the position when my opinion is the total opposite of everyone else in moral or ethical matters. I have a very low opinion of some historical figures who practically everyone on Earth considers mankind’s great heroes. And some of my personal heroes are considered villains by most people.
My favorite virtues are in the list of mortal sins of half a dozen religions.
So... am I a good person? Judged by most people’s standards I could be a very bad person.
How do I judge myself? That’s a silly question, since my opinion would always be biased. I’m my own favorite guy.
And pain is a magnificent teaching tool.
and as said in LeonandRenei's reply above:
Most of the world consists of "bad people" by your terms, mostly because the humans are a terrible species. We care about everything every other species doesn't. Humans are probably the most selfish species on our planet as well.
Those are two things I perfectly agree with. I think there are way, way worse humans than I, but I also think there are some way better people than I. I'd like to be in those few good people, but I've made too many mistakes and I've been too much an annoyance, mostly due to personal issues and immaturity, to be considered a good people.
This is part of why I relate myself as me hyena side Luka Sclayène, which I somewhat consider as my "good side", and it's more than probably an escape from that terrible species I belong to, when I wanna think about more positive things, or when I wanna express something deeper through art.
It is evil to kill someone, yet some would say that it is just and right to kill a rapist.
But, since the majority of humans won't commit gross crimes of the conscious as killing and theft, it becomes a discussion of the minute actions taken by individuals, all of which are subject to personal views. A Hasidic Jew considers women wearing clothing above the elbows (or other "non-conservative" forms of dress as short skirts and pants) to be a sin, while many other people would not find fault in wearing whatever you want.
So, if all views on "goodness" are divided, then one may only assess themselves based upon personal, and therefore selfish and skewed, views.
So then we cannot say that "all humanity is not good" or "all humanity is good", as there is no universal comparison for goodness in everyday life.
What is the point then in considering whether you are "good" or "evil"? When you consider yourself you will attempt to justify what you do. In this manner you may defend "evil" actions (according to some) and thus reinforce them.
Humans are. That's it. And if one feels that "humanity is evil" then they may only take personal action towards attempting to rectify its problems, perhaps even convincing others what they feel is the "right" way to act.
- If you do not force your beliefs onto others and accept others for who they are
- If you do no harm to others (including leeching off of people) while helping to protect other's well being
Then you're being a good human. Potential aside since even those with potential may never make it due to outside interference.