November, yecch. And obit.
Posted 5 years ago●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● (Nota bene: Long time no jrnl stuff, but this one, copied over from the FAWD account,
●● be worthy.)
●●
●● (Also Nota: For the sake of humour and snickers, I've been fantasizing/bald-faced
●● pretending that I've a got a gorgeous/stacked/outrageously sexy blonde polar bear girl for
●● a girlfriend. Only speaks in <Growfs!>, but that's what Google Translate is for. Too much,
●● fun, a great character, and a wunnerful foil for furry laughs [and erotic ones], so dere. :- )
●● If curious, see the FAWD jrnls for more on her.)
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● Och aye, and here we are in grey, grey November, this harbinger, this
●● preview of the frozen season that's vectoring in. Not an improvement on
●● Oct. November promises snow, snow, snow, wunnerful fluffy snow, that's
●● gonna come gently down and murder us all.
●●
●● To quote Shania Twain, this don't impress me much. A la an old short
●● story by Jack London, your continued survival is directly contingent on your
●● ability to light a fire. Remind me to buy some more 'lil propane canisters
●● [for the torch]. Oh, and a bucket of lighters. To quote an old good cop
●● show, let's... be careful out there.
●●
●● And wazzat about obit? Some of the grey has gone away, such to
●● break my heart. Scamper, my 14-year-ish grey-furred 'n white-pawed
●● feline friend, has died. By all rights the water that come to me eye [Ave
●● Belafonte] shoulda shorted this keyboard to sparky slag. 'Cause a lot of
●● water. 'Cause Scamper was very, deeply loved. Do cats love us? Do they
●● just act like they do, purr purr?
●●
●● King-helluva moot question. From the way our hearts are cratered
●● when they die, not a question that matters. Now. Double-cratered as we
●● bury them. Lemme tell you all about it, Bunky.
●●
●● Well no; haven't got a spare keyboard. Cause of death: A type of
●● feline carcinoma, that starts in the jaw then grows to the point... to the
●● point...
●●
●● ...
●●
●● ...Where the cat can't eat or drink. Happened before to another cat,
●● euthanasia was mandated, couldn't do it here 'cause $$$. Triple-cratered.
●● What, God, the angels in Heaven needed a purr so they took a certain
●● pretty grey-furred feline? Most uncool. Go kick their ass 'n wings for me,
●● will you, God? Find their own cat. I needed mine.
●●
●● Needed, you say? 'Nother good question. Our lives are richer with 'em,
●● and their lives are here period, and it is love enough, on both sides, and
●● the same with all 'pets'. (Had a dog a few years back; 'zactly the same).
●● Do they look on us as their pets? <Purrr!!>. The deponent saith not. :- )
●●
●● Named Scamper, BTW, because that's what she did. A lot of. V.
●● bouncy cat, esp. so as kitten, sure couldn't call her Turtle. The house's
●● champion mouser too, always could tell the noises, then peeled a hapless
●● or dead Muridae off her fangs to toss outside, then petted her. Good cat.
●● <Purrr!>. And she was.
●●
●● Cratered to the fourth power. Come night, Scamper often insisted on
●● sneaking/snuggling under the blankets for some industrial-strength petting.
●● And <Purrr-ing!!>. I'll appropriately quote Steve Earle: I still remember that
●● rumbling sound.
●●
●● And now '...Leaving just a memory,' to quote Pink Floyd. Nothing left
●● of heart but craters, I think. Jeeze, God, whaddya trying to do here? Teach
●● some lessons, about life and death? Or lessons in choosing grave goods?
●● Yah, mysterious ways and all that yadda yadda, but howzabout just putting
●● some labels on, easier for us to get the message. I know, I know, that's a
●● non-starter, but put the idea on the committee agenda, plz?
●●
●● Grave goods for a much-loved cat? Well, a lotta tears for a start.
●● Tobacco, coffee; She knew the smell of both. Water, kibble, a spot of
●● cream--outrageous her taste for cream. A spot of litter gravel. A bit of
●● firewood; she always snuggled up [almost too close] to the stove. A snip of
●● grass; reminder of green summer. A snip of my hair and snip of fur from
●● my other cat, Camouflage. [Symbolically] You do not go into the dark
●● alone, Scamper.
●●
●● Last, a snip from a certain blanket. Wherever you go in the dark,
●● Scamper, [symbolically] you will be warm. Annnd it took about ten
●● minutes, at this point, before I could finish the burial. May have left my
●● heart in there too. <Purrr!!> Not much left of it by now anyway.
●●
●● And is there a FAWDish takeaway here? Yes, believe there is. We're all
●● [furry] writers in the room, folks, with great unstoppable powers over
●● words 'n time 'n space 'n the fate of the [fictional] Universe. So: *Use* that
●● power. Care for the ones that love you. Love the ones who care for you. To
●● the limits of your heart. And put alla this into words. And if the readers pick
●● up on it, and take it up, good. In fact, that's the point. You're getting it,
●● you're getting it, God murmurs.
●●
●● Yeah well f**k, allow me some rage re. Your methods. Since a pretty
●● cat is dead, who never deserved such suffering, and I've got a heart to
●● spackle back together. Reaf spiffy, God, and... <Growf!>
●●
●● Oh. It's the cute fantasy polar bear girlfriend again. And as awesome
●● sexy as she is, I detect some mysterious ways afoot here too. Has to be:
●● She's making a hot black G-string look like funeral/mourning wear. Plus the
●● black choker on her neck. As usual, I think she's been reading what I've
●● been typing.
●●
●● <Growf!> Trans (Softly): I'm so sorry. Saw her with you, and no,
●● they're not sentient like us, but maybe sentient enough for love? What was
●● our first clue? Oh, and if anybody comes at you with that 'Circle of Life'
●● crap, send them to me and I'll eat them for you. She was a predator, I'm a
●● predator, you're a predator, and all predators--and all prey--know how
●● much Disney bullshit that metaphor is. There is only Life. There is only
●● Death. And the bright, bright line that divides them. There are fools who
●● think they will never cross that line. Or more foolish, that that line can
●● somehow be transcended. There is nothing more to say, or any more
●● meaning to it than that. In pain and suffering--no other way--now Scamper
●● has crossed that bright line, and... um... okay, now he's crying all over my
●● boobs, sure didn't see dat coming. 'S all right lover; they're waterproof. :- )
●●
●● . . .
●●
●● Well how about that? As they say, out of the mouths of [sexy stacked
●● polar bear] babes. Wait, nobody ever says that. Muzzles too, not mouth.
●● Always date the smart ones, gentlemen, always date the smart ones. And
●● ignore the fang count. :- )
●●
●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
●●
●●
●● (Nota bene: Long time no jrnl stuff, but this one, copied over from the FAWD account,
●● be worthy.)
●●
●● (Also Nota: For the sake of humour and snickers, I've been fantasizing/bald-faced
●● pretending that I've a got a gorgeous/stacked/outrageously sexy blonde polar bear girl for
●● a girlfriend. Only speaks in <Growfs!>, but that's what Google Translate is for. Too much,
●● fun, a great character, and a wunnerful foil for furry laughs [and erotic ones], so dere. :- )
●● If curious, see the FAWD jrnls for more on her.)
●●
●●
●●
●●
●● Och aye, and here we are in grey, grey November, this harbinger, this
●● preview of the frozen season that's vectoring in. Not an improvement on
●● Oct. November promises snow, snow, snow, wunnerful fluffy snow, that's
●● gonna come gently down and murder us all.
●●
●● To quote Shania Twain, this don't impress me much. A la an old short
●● story by Jack London, your continued survival is directly contingent on your
●● ability to light a fire. Remind me to buy some more 'lil propane canisters
●● [for the torch]. Oh, and a bucket of lighters. To quote an old good cop
●● show, let's... be careful out there.
●●
●● And wazzat about obit? Some of the grey has gone away, such to
●● break my heart. Scamper, my 14-year-ish grey-furred 'n white-pawed
●● feline friend, has died. By all rights the water that come to me eye [Ave
●● Belafonte] shoulda shorted this keyboard to sparky slag. 'Cause a lot of
●● water. 'Cause Scamper was very, deeply loved. Do cats love us? Do they
●● just act like they do, purr purr?
●●
●● King-helluva moot question. From the way our hearts are cratered
●● when they die, not a question that matters. Now. Double-cratered as we
●● bury them. Lemme tell you all about it, Bunky.
●●
●● Well no; haven't got a spare keyboard. Cause of death: A type of
●● feline carcinoma, that starts in the jaw then grows to the point... to the
●● point...
●●
●● ...
●●
●● ...Where the cat can't eat or drink. Happened before to another cat,
●● euthanasia was mandated, couldn't do it here 'cause $$$. Triple-cratered.
●● What, God, the angels in Heaven needed a purr so they took a certain
●● pretty grey-furred feline? Most uncool. Go kick their ass 'n wings for me,
●● will you, God? Find their own cat. I needed mine.
●●
●● Needed, you say? 'Nother good question. Our lives are richer with 'em,
●● and their lives are here period, and it is love enough, on both sides, and
●● the same with all 'pets'. (Had a dog a few years back; 'zactly the same).
●● Do they look on us as their pets? <Purrr!!>. The deponent saith not. :- )
●●
●● Named Scamper, BTW, because that's what she did. A lot of. V.
●● bouncy cat, esp. so as kitten, sure couldn't call her Turtle. The house's
●● champion mouser too, always could tell the noises, then peeled a hapless
●● or dead Muridae off her fangs to toss outside, then petted her. Good cat.
●● <Purrr!>. And she was.
●●
●● Cratered to the fourth power. Come night, Scamper often insisted on
●● sneaking/snuggling under the blankets for some industrial-strength petting.
●● And <Purrr-ing!!>. I'll appropriately quote Steve Earle: I still remember that
●● rumbling sound.
●●
●● And now '...Leaving just a memory,' to quote Pink Floyd. Nothing left
●● of heart but craters, I think. Jeeze, God, whaddya trying to do here? Teach
●● some lessons, about life and death? Or lessons in choosing grave goods?
●● Yah, mysterious ways and all that yadda yadda, but howzabout just putting
●● some labels on, easier for us to get the message. I know, I know, that's a
●● non-starter, but put the idea on the committee agenda, plz?
●●
●● Grave goods for a much-loved cat? Well, a lotta tears for a start.
●● Tobacco, coffee; She knew the smell of both. Water, kibble, a spot of
●● cream--outrageous her taste for cream. A spot of litter gravel. A bit of
●● firewood; she always snuggled up [almost too close] to the stove. A snip of
●● grass; reminder of green summer. A snip of my hair and snip of fur from
●● my other cat, Camouflage. [Symbolically] You do not go into the dark
●● alone, Scamper.
●●
●● Last, a snip from a certain blanket. Wherever you go in the dark,
●● Scamper, [symbolically] you will be warm. Annnd it took about ten
●● minutes, at this point, before I could finish the burial. May have left my
●● heart in there too. <Purrr!!> Not much left of it by now anyway.
●●
●● And is there a FAWDish takeaway here? Yes, believe there is. We're all
●● [furry] writers in the room, folks, with great unstoppable powers over
●● words 'n time 'n space 'n the fate of the [fictional] Universe. So: *Use* that
●● power. Care for the ones that love you. Love the ones who care for you. To
●● the limits of your heart. And put alla this into words. And if the readers pick
●● up on it, and take it up, good. In fact, that's the point. You're getting it,
●● you're getting it, God murmurs.
●●
●● Yeah well f**k, allow me some rage re. Your methods. Since a pretty
●● cat is dead, who never deserved such suffering, and I've got a heart to
●● spackle back together. Reaf spiffy, God, and... <Growf!>
●●
●● Oh. It's the cute fantasy polar bear girlfriend again. And as awesome
●● sexy as she is, I detect some mysterious ways afoot here too. Has to be:
●● She's making a hot black G-string look like funeral/mourning wear. Plus the
●● black choker on her neck. As usual, I think she's been reading what I've
●● been typing.
●●
●● <Growf!> Trans (Softly): I'm so sorry. Saw her with you, and no,
●● they're not sentient like us, but maybe sentient enough for love? What was
●● our first clue? Oh, and if anybody comes at you with that 'Circle of Life'
●● crap, send them to me and I'll eat them for you. She was a predator, I'm a
●● predator, you're a predator, and all predators--and all prey--know how
●● much Disney bullshit that metaphor is. There is only Life. There is only
●● Death. And the bright, bright line that divides them. There are fools who
●● think they will never cross that line. Or more foolish, that that line can
●● somehow be transcended. There is nothing more to say, or any more
●● meaning to it than that. In pain and suffering--no other way--now Scamper
●● has crossed that bright line, and... um... okay, now he's crying all over my
●● boobs, sure didn't see dat coming. 'S all right lover; they're waterproof. :- )
●●
●● . . .
●●
●● Well how about that? As they say, out of the mouths of [sexy stacked
●● polar bear] babes. Wait, nobody ever says that. Muzzles too, not mouth.
●● Always date the smart ones, gentlemen, always date the smart ones. And
●● ignore the fang count. :- )
●●
Nov 18/16: Dog died. Dammit.
Posted 9 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
== (Copied from FA Writers Directory main page, 'cause deserves to be)
==
==
== Dammit, dammit, dammit. And dammit some more. I'm tempted to
== just fill the page with 'dammits,' but nah, let's add a little information
== content. A deep furry friendship of thirteen years has ended. There: Can I
== say dammit some more now?
==
== Let's plug in a bit moah data. Clover, hight his name, a big beautiful
== Retriever-Shepherd mix; notable, the coloration. Most friendships don't
== involve paws, fur, fangy muzzle, tail, etc. Didn't slow Clover down a bit that
== I could tell.
==
== What did were signs of possible hip dysplasia growing over the past
== year. Or if not that, something similarly lethal? Small mercy, God, reeeal
== tiny, to make the end fairly swift. I'll only curse Your omnipotent ass for a
== few days or so.
==
== To be sure, an astonishingly enormous amount of work got plowed into
== the FAWD this week. Not. Lessee where I am next week-ish, and if progress
== can be made on a coupla things. Did get this week's update done--see box
== on the side--but definitely on autopilot as did so. Helpful hint: Grave
== digging can also be done on autopilot, which beats thinking about who's
== going into it.
==
== Sigh. Even typing this hurts. But only have to type it once. And about
== that 'A dog is a man's best friend' line? No: I dissent. They're not human,
== ergo can't be friends. But what they are... is better than that, the bond and
== the 'love' they feel for us being something that no human friend can
== give.**
==
== Of course, I say that now. :- ( Good-bye, Clover. Dammit.
==
==
== ** Unless they've got paws, fur, fangy muzzle, tail, etc. Wait a sec, around
== here that's, like, kinda the norm. :- )
==
==
==
== (Note: New work coming, esp. Backstage. Writing mojo seems to be returning over
== the past few months. As for where it's been for the past year or so, I dunno, fell
== down a hole or something? But *has* been a busy/rough year.)
==
==
===========================================================
==
== (Copied from FA Writers Directory main page, 'cause deserves to be)
==
==
== Dammit, dammit, dammit. And dammit some more. I'm tempted to
== just fill the page with 'dammits,' but nah, let's add a little information
== content. A deep furry friendship of thirteen years has ended. There: Can I
== say dammit some more now?
==
== Let's plug in a bit moah data. Clover, hight his name, a big beautiful
== Retriever-Shepherd mix; notable, the coloration. Most friendships don't
== involve paws, fur, fangy muzzle, tail, etc. Didn't slow Clover down a bit that
== I could tell.
==
== What did were signs of possible hip dysplasia growing over the past
== year. Or if not that, something similarly lethal? Small mercy, God, reeeal
== tiny, to make the end fairly swift. I'll only curse Your omnipotent ass for a
== few days or so.
==
== To be sure, an astonishingly enormous amount of work got plowed into
== the FAWD this week. Not. Lessee where I am next week-ish, and if progress
== can be made on a coupla things. Did get this week's update done--see box
== on the side--but definitely on autopilot as did so. Helpful hint: Grave
== digging can also be done on autopilot, which beats thinking about who's
== going into it.
==
== Sigh. Even typing this hurts. But only have to type it once. And about
== that 'A dog is a man's best friend' line? No: I dissent. They're not human,
== ergo can't be friends. But what they are... is better than that, the bond and
== the 'love' they feel for us being something that no human friend can
== give.**
==
== Of course, I say that now. :- ( Good-bye, Clover. Dammit.
==
==
== ** Unless they've got paws, fur, fangy muzzle, tail, etc. Wait a sec, around
== here that's, like, kinda the norm. :- )
==
==
==
== (Note: New work coming, esp. Backstage. Writing mojo seems to be returning over
== the past few months. As for where it's been for the past year or so, I dunno, fell
== down a hole or something? But *has* been a busy/rough year.)
==
==
NEWS FROM THE FRONT. AND THE BACK. AND THE SIDE...
Posted 10 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
== Has to be said, winter in Canada has never done me a power of good.
== Coped physically well enough with the winter just past, but psychologically,
== oh bleagh.
==
== The writing work ground to a near-complete halt, brain empty of
== words. As much the darkness as the persistent cold. Those who live in
== Northern climates know exactly what I'm talking about. Something about
== snow that freezes up one's imagination? It's a theory.
==
== On the other paw, come spring--and now summer--the writing comes
== back as it always does. So do the mosquitos and the blackflies. I don't think
== there's a causal connection.
==
== Work on a number of projects has picked up, which is to say I can now
== hit the keyboard and actually crank out a workable para. Like this journal,
== for example.
==
== I think I'm safe in saying there'll be more Backstage Pass soonish,
== among other things. A SexyFur story has also gotten though the editing
== grinder. Plan is to post that when BP chap 13 gets done.
==
==
==
== That said, writing work is competing with RL construction work, and it's
== difficult to say which is the harder. Thought to take some pics.
==
== Ergo there's a short photo essay posted HERE, in case folks are
== curious about what I'm up to. Or if anyone's got a fetish for construction
== stuff.
==
== It would seem that I do. :- )
==
==
==
fwbrown61
==
==
==
===========================================================
==
==
== Has to be said, winter in Canada has never done me a power of good.
== Coped physically well enough with the winter just past, but psychologically,
== oh bleagh.
==
== The writing work ground to a near-complete halt, brain empty of
== words. As much the darkness as the persistent cold. Those who live in
== Northern climates know exactly what I'm talking about. Something about
== snow that freezes up one's imagination? It's a theory.
==
== On the other paw, come spring--and now summer--the writing comes
== back as it always does. So do the mosquitos and the blackflies. I don't think
== there's a causal connection.
==
== Work on a number of projects has picked up, which is to say I can now
== hit the keyboard and actually crank out a workable para. Like this journal,
== for example.
==
== I think I'm safe in saying there'll be more Backstage Pass soonish,
== among other things. A SexyFur story has also gotten though the editing
== grinder. Plan is to post that when BP chap 13 gets done.
==
==
==
== That said, writing work is competing with RL construction work, and it's
== difficult to say which is the harder. Thought to take some pics.
==
== Ergo there's a short photo essay posted HERE, in case folks are
== curious about what I'm up to. Or if anyone's got a fetish for construction
== stuff.
==
== It would seem that I do. :- )
==
==
==

==
==
==
Backstage Pass delayed. Severe power shortage.
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
== And I mean shortage. Have to go offline for a day or so to recharge
== things. Ergo posting of chap 13 has to wait.
==
== I'm on solar, as in completely. This time of year has never been good
== for sun. But this year's cloudy weather has been extra bad.
==
== Batteries are all but flat, and the laptop battery says 1 hr 8 min left.
== Nope, time to shut down. Well, don't have a choice.
==
== Hoping to be alive again by Sunday; weather forecast is positive.
== Sorry. Thought I'd added enough new panel capacity to avoid this.
==
==
fwbrown61
==
==
==
===========================================================
==
==
== And I mean shortage. Have to go offline for a day or so to recharge
== things. Ergo posting of chap 13 has to wait.
==
== I'm on solar, as in completely. This time of year has never been good
== for sun. But this year's cloudy weather has been extra bad.
==
== Batteries are all but flat, and the laptop battery says 1 hr 8 min left.
== Nope, time to shut down. Well, don't have a choice.
==
== Hoping to be alive again by Sunday; weather forecast is positive.
== Sorry. Thought I'd added enough new panel capacity to avoid this.
==
==

==
==
==
Glahhh: Backstage Pass Chap 11 & 12 are POSTED!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== And I mean glahhh, but I've really underestimated how much work it's
== taking to get this posted.
==
== Chap 11 (enhanced text) Is HERE.
==
== Chap 11 (standard text) Is HERE.
==
== Or I should say, underestimated how much *other* work has hit the
== plate recently, such that I'm running too close to overloaded. Well, to be
== fair this doesn't really come as much of a surprise.
==
==
==
== So command decision: Dial it back a notch, and next week will see just
== chap 13 posted. Week after that: Chap 14.
==
== Which is undergoing some last minute tune-up due to all the rereading
== that's been done lately. A meerkat and a tiger are sorta barfing at the
== words I put into their muzzles. Edit edit edit...
==
== Also, things are approaching an emergency situation regarding the
== dead snowblower. A neglected RL is demanding some attention, lest I face
== a grim choice, and soon.
==
== Shovel the driveway. Tunnel it. Or nuke it. (Oh but wait, us Canucks
== aren't supposed to have any bombs. Heh heh heh... :- > )
==
==
fwbrown61
===========================================================
==
==
==
== And I mean glahhh, but I've really underestimated how much work it's
== taking to get this posted.
==
== Chap 11 (enhanced text) Is HERE.
==
== Chap 11 (standard text) Is HERE.
==
== Or I should say, underestimated how much *other* work has hit the
== plate recently, such that I'm running too close to overloaded. Well, to be
== fair this doesn't really come as much of a surprise.
==
==
==
== So command decision: Dial it back a notch, and next week will see just
== chap 13 posted. Week after that: Chap 14.
==
== Which is undergoing some last minute tune-up due to all the rereading
== that's been done lately. A meerkat and a tiger are sorta barfing at the
== words I put into their muzzles. Edit edit edit...
==
== Also, things are approaching an emergency situation regarding the
== dead snowblower. A neglected RL is demanding some attention, lest I face
== a grim choice, and soon.
==
== Shovel the driveway. Tunnel it. Or nuke it. (Oh but wait, us Canucks
== aren't supposed to have any bombs. Heh heh heh... :- > )
==
==

Remarkable: Backstage Pass Chap 9 & 10 are POSTED!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Remarkable, insofar as it's been a lousy week, full of RL BS and winter
== coldness that made me wonder if I'd get anything done. Much less posting
== this lot.
==
== Chap 9 (enhanced text) Is HERE.
==
== Chap 9 (standard text) Is HERE.
==
== Fun, we're not having much recently. But in the immortal words of
== Gilda Radner, never mind. Adjusting to the onslaught of the white killing
== season always takes us Canucks a few weeks to get into the spirit of things.
==
== Northern optimism: Nah, that first dump of snow isn't going to stick
== around. I've got time to do the maintenance on the snowblower. Oh no I
== don't, and who's the wiseass engineer who made this %^@#&*@ machine
== so hard to take apart? (Fuel problem; won't start. <Snarl!!>)
==
== If a story shows up wherein a frustrated-furious Canadian wolf fur
== takes a sledgehammer to a dead snowblower, welp, now you know where
== that came from. :- ) And I think I know who he is too.
==
== Chaps 11 and 12 shall arrive next week.
==
fwbrown61
(PS: Doing some renewed editing on chap 14, in light of
all the rereading lately. May be on course to post it and
chap 13 as scheduled, but I warn in case of delay. What
could possibly go wrong? :- / )
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Remarkable, insofar as it's been a lousy week, full of RL BS and winter
== coldness that made me wonder if I'd get anything done. Much less posting
== this lot.
==
== Chap 9 (enhanced text) Is HERE.
==
== Chap 9 (standard text) Is HERE.
==
== Fun, we're not having much recently. But in the immortal words of
== Gilda Radner, never mind. Adjusting to the onslaught of the white killing
== season always takes us Canucks a few weeks to get into the spirit of things.
==
== Northern optimism: Nah, that first dump of snow isn't going to stick
== around. I've got time to do the maintenance on the snowblower. Oh no I
== don't, and who's the wiseass engineer who made this %^@#&*@ machine
== so hard to take apart? (Fuel problem; won't start. <Snarl!!>)
==
== If a story shows up wherein a frustrated-furious Canadian wolf fur
== takes a sledgehammer to a dead snowblower, welp, now you know where
== that came from. :- ) And I think I know who he is too.
==
== Chaps 11 and 12 shall arrive next week.
==

(PS: Doing some renewed editing on chap 14, in light of
all the rereading lately. May be on course to post it and
chap 13 as scheduled, but I warn in case of delay. What
could possibly go wrong? :- / )
Struggled, but Backstage Pass Chap 7 & 8 are POSTED!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Definitely a battle this time, but job done, and on schedule. Some
== pesky Cloudflare trouble interfered (see this week's FAWD journal). Also
== had trouble budgeting time for the task.
==
== De nada. Chap 9 and 10 are in progress; a little shorter. Fortunately. I
== expect to be busy this week. And in chap 9 and 10, so is Kylah.
==
== Still, close study of this thing [to get it all posted] does not disappoint
== me. You reread your stuff too much, it loses something. Not here. Bueno.
==
== Until next week, adios. :- )
==
==
fwbrown61
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Definitely a battle this time, but job done, and on schedule. Some
== pesky Cloudflare trouble interfered (see this week's FAWD journal). Also
== had trouble budgeting time for the task.
==
== De nada. Chap 9 and 10 are in progress; a little shorter. Fortunately. I
== expect to be busy this week. And in chap 9 and 10, so is Kylah.
==
== Still, close study of this thing [to get it all posted] does not disappoint
== me. You reread your stuff too much, it loses something. Not here. Bueno.
==
== Until next week, adios. :- )
==
==

Made it: Backstage Pass chap 5 & 6 are POSTED!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== And so a chilly sunny Saturday rises slowly out of the East, signifying
== the end of another week of flailing away in all directions. Some things got
== accomplished, but too exhausted right now to remember 'em.
==
== Should get the first coffee of the day into me. <Poing!!>. Ahhh, that's
== better. Oh right, large accomplishment remembered: Backstage Pass
== chapters five and six are POSTED!! (Yea!)
==
==
==
== Much flailing required this time. Since much larger (and chap seven
== and eight are gonna be huuuge). But went a bit faster too since practice
== pays off. I seem to have condemned myself to an incredibly finicky method
== of posting stories. Are the results worth it?
==
== Oh yah. Something as big as this just *can't* be thrown onscreen,
== splat, and expect anybody to read it. Has to look good. Has to look as
== immaculate as possible. Credit to FA for making it [fairly] easy to post
== stories. But negative gazillion points for the readability of the actual text,
== which, at the end of the day, is as least as crucial as what the text itself
== actually is.
==
== Journalism course a long time back thumped that into me. Typography
== matters. The most superb ever story written, if it's printed like crap,
== converts spontaneously into crap. Since crap was what us student
== journalists specialized in we all took a lot of thumpin'. Wonder why.
==
==
==
== None of that took me into journalism, but important lessons learned
== nonetheless. Attitude towards the text: Ultra-crucial. Easy to forget during
== the writing. Somebody's gonna read this stuff someday, y'know?
==
== By the time they're finished, their eyeballs should not have melted out
== of their head. Bad for repeat business.
==
== (As for how badly the story's melted the reader's mind, oh hey, that's
== a different topic. :- ) )
==
==
fwbrown61
(PS: May or may not have fubarred Chap 3 page 13. But definitely
fixed it, maybe. :- / )
===========================================================
==
==
==
== And so a chilly sunny Saturday rises slowly out of the East, signifying
== the end of another week of flailing away in all directions. Some things got
== accomplished, but too exhausted right now to remember 'em.
==
== Should get the first coffee of the day into me. <Poing!!>. Ahhh, that's
== better. Oh right, large accomplishment remembered: Backstage Pass
== chapters five and six are POSTED!! (Yea!)
==
==
==
== Much flailing required this time. Since much larger (and chap seven
== and eight are gonna be huuuge). But went a bit faster too since practice
== pays off. I seem to have condemned myself to an incredibly finicky method
== of posting stories. Are the results worth it?
==
== Oh yah. Something as big as this just *can't* be thrown onscreen,
== splat, and expect anybody to read it. Has to look good. Has to look as
== immaculate as possible. Credit to FA for making it [fairly] easy to post
== stories. But negative gazillion points for the readability of the actual text,
== which, at the end of the day, is as least as crucial as what the text itself
== actually is.
==
== Journalism course a long time back thumped that into me. Typography
== matters. The most superb ever story written, if it's printed like crap,
== converts spontaneously into crap. Since crap was what us student
== journalists specialized in we all took a lot of thumpin'. Wonder why.
==
==
==
== None of that took me into journalism, but important lessons learned
== nonetheless. Attitude towards the text: Ultra-crucial. Easy to forget during
== the writing. Somebody's gonna read this stuff someday, y'know?
==
== By the time they're finished, their eyeballs should not have melted out
== of their head. Bad for repeat business.
==
== (As for how badly the story's melted the reader's mind, oh hey, that's
== a different topic. :- ) )
==
==

(PS: May or may not have fubarred Chap 3 page 13. But definitely
fixed it, maybe. :- / )
Got it: Backstage Pass chap 3 & 4 are UP!!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Ha! Got it done. Backstage Pass chapters three and four are posted,
== and in good order. And a thang of [literary] beauty they are too. Alert the
== media.
==
== Then pour 'em a ton of whiskey and get 'em drunk as skunks. Turn
== that press conference into party. Reporters don't use those superlative
== adjectives and adverbs unless they're properly lubed up, y'know. :- )
==
== See here for: Chapter Three -- Enhanced text.
==
== And here for: Chapter Three -- Standard text.
==
== Bit of a challenge this time, in part due to RL events--minor blizzard
== yesterday, and struggling with construction crap--but chaps 5 & 6 should go
== easier. Snarl, that FA makes posting large work such a pain.
==
==
==
== To quote: And there's more where that came from, Moriarty. Stay
== tuned.*
==
==
==
fwbrown61
==
==
==
== (Oh dear, the NY Times literary critic is doing his Hemmingway imitation
== again while dressed as Joan Rivers. Get the fire hoses... :- ) )
==
==
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Ha! Got it done. Backstage Pass chapters three and four are posted,
== and in good order. And a thang of [literary] beauty they are too. Alert the
== media.
==
== Then pour 'em a ton of whiskey and get 'em drunk as skunks. Turn
== that press conference into party. Reporters don't use those superlative
== adjectives and adverbs unless they're properly lubed up, y'know. :- )
==
== See here for: Chapter Three -- Enhanced text.
==
== And here for: Chapter Three -- Standard text.
==
== Bit of a challenge this time, in part due to RL events--minor blizzard
== yesterday, and struggling with construction crap--but chaps 5 & 6 should go
== easier. Snarl, that FA makes posting large work such a pain.
==
==
==
== To quote: And there's more where that came from, Moriarty. Stay
== tuned.*
==
==
==

==
==
==
== (Oh dear, the NY Times literary critic is doing his Hemmingway imitation
== again while dressed as Joan Rivers. Get the fire hoses... :- ) )
==
==
Hmmm, should I journal this? Yah: Backstage Pass is POSTED!!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Or should say, it's started. The novel is nearly 300K words long. Can't
== be posted all in one shot.
==
== Yes, pups and kittens, Backstage Pass is [finally] as ready as it's
== gonna be. Will the cute meerkat get the hot tigress? And will the hot tigress
== get the cute meerkat? Oh, well, not gonna give away the ending now.
== They'll kick me outta the union. :- )
==
== For sure the biggest story I've ever written. Didn't I start this thing
== back in 2009-ish? Think so. Might've been finished in late 2012-ish save for
== certain events; de nada.
==
==
==
== The battle plan is post two chapters a week until done, which should
== mean mid-December-ish. Merry Christmas. In the new year, I dip footpaws
== into the wunnerful fun world of e-books, so stay tuned.
==
== Ideally without getting said footpaws nommed off; the sharks, the
== sharks...
==
== But I want my work on FA first, since this is more or less where the
== readers are. Weasyl, SoF, IB: Possible in the new year, but that may be part
== of a wholesale 'port' operation. Gotta think about that, and how to manage
== it.
==
==
==
== Dunno if this project will generate art spin-offs [like the novel Don't Go
== Near The Sorceress], but we'll see. Seem to have a particularly visual
== writing style; lotsa stuff to draw here. I throw the gauntlet down, anyway.
==
== I think I could keep
victorianothechief busy for years. :- )
== Excellent story icon, just excellent.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Closing note: This novel comes with a bit of a soundtrack. As in, three
== pieces that really helped stoke the imagination and bolster the mood. And
== didn't wear out on repeated play.
==
==
==
== Sister Awake Remix, by the Tea Party (Canadian band, yea!), from the
== album Alhambra. Tres powerful and evocative. In chapter 4, this is the song
== that Jamati strips to.
==
== I've got a naked beautiful tigress dancer stuck in my head. This is not
== really a problem. :- )
==
==
==
== Second: It's All About Believin', by Def Leppard, from the Mirror Ball
== album, came over the radio one time and smacked me in the muzzle. Oh
== fuck yes, gotta have it, 'cause it definitely speaks to Kylah's character [the
== meerkat].
==
== (Sidebar 1: Also fires up a mind's-eye vid of Black Widow [from On
== Route 69] and her new band doing this song in a concert setting. And
== blowing audience tails off. Sequel idea to OR69 posits BW getting back into
== the music biz, and more.)
==
==
==
== Third, I heartily recommend I Can See Clearly Now, by Holly Cole,
== from the Don't Smoke In Bed album. Bloody astonishing, and maybe sums
== up the spirit of the whole novel.
==
== (Sidebar 2: Another novel idea is wholly keyed on this song. Glah, but
== for some animation skill. 'Cause this mind's-eye vid really boosts for orbit.
== Literally.)
==
==
==
==
==
== 'Nuff said for now, I think. Back to RL work, and a construction project
== that's hanging fire. Until it gets buried in snow.
==
== If the next novel shows some characters hacking up 2x6s with Skilsaws
== and pounding nails, well, now ya know where that came from. :- )
==
==
fwbrown61
==
==
== Nov 1/14
==
==
==
===========================================================
==
==
==
== Or should say, it's started. The novel is nearly 300K words long. Can't
== be posted all in one shot.
==
== Yes, pups and kittens, Backstage Pass is [finally] as ready as it's
== gonna be. Will the cute meerkat get the hot tigress? And will the hot tigress
== get the cute meerkat? Oh, well, not gonna give away the ending now.
== They'll kick me outta the union. :- )
==
== For sure the biggest story I've ever written. Didn't I start this thing
== back in 2009-ish? Think so. Might've been finished in late 2012-ish save for
== certain events; de nada.
==
==
==
== The battle plan is post two chapters a week until done, which should
== mean mid-December-ish. Merry Christmas. In the new year, I dip footpaws
== into the wunnerful fun world of e-books, so stay tuned.
==
== Ideally without getting said footpaws nommed off; the sharks, the
== sharks...
==
== But I want my work on FA first, since this is more or less where the
== readers are. Weasyl, SoF, IB: Possible in the new year, but that may be part
== of a wholesale 'port' operation. Gotta think about that, and how to manage
== it.
==
==
==
== Dunno if this project will generate art spin-offs [like the novel Don't Go
== Near The Sorceress], but we'll see. Seem to have a particularly visual
== writing style; lotsa stuff to draw here. I throw the gauntlet down, anyway.
==
== I think I could keep

== Excellent story icon, just excellent.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Closing note: This novel comes with a bit of a soundtrack. As in, three
== pieces that really helped stoke the imagination and bolster the mood. And
== didn't wear out on repeated play.
==
==
==
== Sister Awake Remix, by the Tea Party (Canadian band, yea!), from the
== album Alhambra. Tres powerful and evocative. In chapter 4, this is the song
== that Jamati strips to.
==
== I've got a naked beautiful tigress dancer stuck in my head. This is not
== really a problem. :- )
==
==
==
== Second: It's All About Believin', by Def Leppard, from the Mirror Ball
== album, came over the radio one time and smacked me in the muzzle. Oh
== fuck yes, gotta have it, 'cause it definitely speaks to Kylah's character [the
== meerkat].
==
== (Sidebar 1: Also fires up a mind's-eye vid of Black Widow [from On
== Route 69] and her new band doing this song in a concert setting. And
== blowing audience tails off. Sequel idea to OR69 posits BW getting back into
== the music biz, and more.)
==
==
==
== Third, I heartily recommend I Can See Clearly Now, by Holly Cole,
== from the Don't Smoke In Bed album. Bloody astonishing, and maybe sums
== up the spirit of the whole novel.
==
== (Sidebar 2: Another novel idea is wholly keyed on this song. Glah, but
== for some animation skill. 'Cause this mind's-eye vid really boosts for orbit.
== Literally.)
==
==
==
==
==
== 'Nuff said for now, I think. Back to RL work, and a construction project
== that's hanging fire. Until it gets buried in snow.
==
== If the next novel shows some characters hacking up 2x6s with Skilsaws
== and pounding nails, well, now ya know where that came from. :- )
==
==

==
==
== Nov 1/14
==
==
==
Awright, time to blow the horn a bit: NEW PROFILE!!!
Posted 11 years ago===========================================================
===========================================================
==
==
==
== TA-RA!! TA-SQUONK!! TA-HRRK!! RAWK-RAWK!!
==
== Okay, so it's been over twenty-five years since I picked up my
== trumpet. I'm hellish out of practice. It's music to somebody's ears (but
== they have to have really weird ears. :- ) )
==
==
==
== Still, there's cause for at least a couple of celebratory squonks. When
== I got on FA, I was dismayed in the extreme at some of it's limitations.
== Especially when it came to text formatting and layout (and fonts).
==
== Three years later, I've gotten some tricks on this front down cold. So
== now it's time to use 'em, and redo the profile. And make it work *right*,
== dammit.
==
==
==
== Or at least, work the way I want it. I'm a writer. To my thinking, the
== profile page for a writer ought to be the entry-point onto the work.
== Something a reader will see and go, hmmm, that looks interesting. Then
== they go and read.
==
== FA will allow us some formatting tools, but not enough [to do what I
== want]. Writing is not art. A writer needs a different kind of profile from an
== artist. Something that looks sorta Table of Contents-ish.
==
== Now I've got it. In spades. At last.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Naturally, I'm curious to find out what people think of this. Took the
== time to do a journal about it, anyway.
==
== More to the point, I'm *intensely* curious about people's reaction to
== the columns/full justification trick, and the 'faux-folders' trick.
==
== As in, is there a possible demand for these things, sufficient to be
== worth doing up some software? To let people do it for themselves?
==
==
==
== The full justification thing is pretty mature; been using it for more'n a
== year now. Developing a web app, similar to Patorjk's Text Color Fader,
== looks perfectly doable. Or should it be something more standalone and
== packaged? Then given away for free?
==
== The folder thing, meanwhile, is still sorta in beta. But shows promise.
== Should software be developed to make this easier and more effective?
== (Oh jeeze yes, or nobody's ever gonna use it.)
==
== Notwithstanding how/if Phoenix will turn FA into a 'rich full text'
== environment, with folders, like SoF or Weasyl or IB. 'S just that when is
== the question here. Obviously I'm not waiting.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Anyway. New profile is new. Whaddya think? A long-ago journalism
== course beat a ton of graphics arts skills into me. If I handed in this lot as
== assignment I'm pretty sure it'd earn a pass (No small feat; the graphics
== arts teacher was an ultra-critical bear).
==
== TA-RA!! There: Doesn't take much practice to get back in form. :- )
==
==
==
== Jul 28/14
==
==
==
===========================================================
==
==
==
== TA-RA!! TA-SQUONK!! TA-HRRK!! RAWK-RAWK!!
==
== Okay, so it's been over twenty-five years since I picked up my
== trumpet. I'm hellish out of practice. It's music to somebody's ears (but
== they have to have really weird ears. :- ) )
==
==
==
== Still, there's cause for at least a couple of celebratory squonks. When
== I got on FA, I was dismayed in the extreme at some of it's limitations.
== Especially when it came to text formatting and layout (and fonts).
==
== Three years later, I've gotten some tricks on this front down cold. So
== now it's time to use 'em, and redo the profile. And make it work *right*,
== dammit.
==
==
==
== Or at least, work the way I want it. I'm a writer. To my thinking, the
== profile page for a writer ought to be the entry-point onto the work.
== Something a reader will see and go, hmmm, that looks interesting. Then
== they go and read.
==
== FA will allow us some formatting tools, but not enough [to do what I
== want]. Writing is not art. A writer needs a different kind of profile from an
== artist. Something that looks sorta Table of Contents-ish.
==
== Now I've got it. In spades. At last.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Naturally, I'm curious to find out what people think of this. Took the
== time to do a journal about it, anyway.
==
== More to the point, I'm *intensely* curious about people's reaction to
== the columns/full justification trick, and the 'faux-folders' trick.
==
== As in, is there a possible demand for these things, sufficient to be
== worth doing up some software? To let people do it for themselves?
==
==
==
== The full justification thing is pretty mature; been using it for more'n a
== year now. Developing a web app, similar to Patorjk's Text Color Fader,
== looks perfectly doable. Or should it be something more standalone and
== packaged? Then given away for free?
==
== The folder thing, meanwhile, is still sorta in beta. But shows promise.
== Should software be developed to make this easier and more effective?
== (Oh jeeze yes, or nobody's ever gonna use it.)
==
== Notwithstanding how/if Phoenix will turn FA into a 'rich full text'
== environment, with folders, like SoF or Weasyl or IB. 'S just that when is
== the question here. Obviously I'm not waiting.
==
==
==
==
==
==
== Anyway. New profile is new. Whaddya think? A long-ago journalism
== course beat a ton of graphics arts skills into me. If I handed in this lot as
== assignment I'm pretty sure it'd earn a pass (No small feat; the graphics
== arts teacher was an ultra-critical bear).
==
== TA-RA!! There: Doesn't take much practice to get back in form. :- )
==
==
==
== Jul 28/14
==
==
==
Reporting on a Win-Win re. Recent Events
Posted 12 years ago*******************************************************************
.......
.......
.......
March 10:
So it's a sunny Sunday AM. The coffee's hot (writer fuel). Time, I do
believes, to fire up the rusty 'ol journalism skills. There's a Good
News™ story to be cut.
Leastwise it is so from my PoV. Win-win is not a term to throw
around casually. Must be backed up.
The core of the news is simple. I've been writing for SexyFur since
Oct 2007 (that is to say, Monitor Studios). Almost a million words of
spicy 'n fine-quality furry fiction have been done up. Notice my bias here.
This relationship is now over. I've left Monitor Studios. And/or
Monitor Studios has left me. We've left each other? Potato, potahto.
Those who are aware of this situation, fer sure you wanna know
more. Those who are reading about this for the first time, ibid. And for
more sure, this story needs to be written right (which is why it's taken a
few weeks).
To generate a little extra PR bump, this is being done as a
Journal/Submission combo. Which will show up as journal and on the
New Subs page. Think it deserves it.
Gotta like FA for many reasons, but jeeze, if a fur writer ever won
the Nobel Prize for Lit we'd never hear about it from just FA news traffic
alone. PR's a non-trivial problem around this place.
Read on, and all shall be revealed. The veil lifted. The truth laid
bare. The facts exposed.
(Hmmm. Good intro para to a story about furry strippers. Must make
a note... :- ) )
>>> Reporting on a win-win re. Recent Events
.......
.......
.......
*******************************************************************
.......
.......
.......
March 10:
So it's a sunny Sunday AM. The coffee's hot (writer fuel). Time, I do
believes, to fire up the rusty 'ol journalism skills. There's a Good
News™ story to be cut.
Leastwise it is so from my PoV. Win-win is not a term to throw
around casually. Must be backed up.
The core of the news is simple. I've been writing for SexyFur since
Oct 2007 (that is to say, Monitor Studios). Almost a million words of
spicy 'n fine-quality furry fiction have been done up. Notice my bias here.
This relationship is now over. I've left Monitor Studios. And/or
Monitor Studios has left me. We've left each other? Potato, potahto.
Those who are aware of this situation, fer sure you wanna know
more. Those who are reading about this for the first time, ibid. And for
more sure, this story needs to be written right (which is why it's taken a
few weeks).
To generate a little extra PR bump, this is being done as a
Journal/Submission combo. Which will show up as journal and on the
New Subs page. Think it deserves it.
Gotta like FA for many reasons, but jeeze, if a fur writer ever won
the Nobel Prize for Lit we'd never hear about it from just FA news traffic
alone. PR's a non-trivial problem around this place.
Read on, and all shall be revealed. The veil lifted. The truth laid
bare. The facts exposed.
(Hmmm. Good intro para to a story about furry strippers. Must make
a note... :- ) )
>>> Reporting on a win-win re. Recent Events
.......
.......
.......
*******************************************************************
Semi-odd Ideas Herein. Feedback [Cautiously] Solicited
Posted 13 years ago*******************************************************************
.......
.......
.......
I'm wondering about writing this journal. The other night, I got
whacked with some moderately weird ideas, arising out of some thinking
about matters furry.
Now I find myself just damn curious to see what others might think.
Usually I'd just go ahead and write a story.
This time , nahhh, screw it. Too much work. But could be fun to
watch folks gnaw away at all this. Or at me for thinking of it.
(Risk ya just gotta run around here. Should be mentioned in the
TOS: Everybody's got fangs. They *will* use 'em. :- ) )
The ideas relate to abortion.
HA! Oy vay iz mir, will *this* get the choppers bared or what? No
faster way to polarize people, right here. Furry or not.
As much as Momma Nature does it without blinking (in at least 1/3
of all conceptions), hellish dicey thing for us to do it. There's only a
gazillion reasons for and against. The fur really does fly over this (sic).
So it would be dubious to even hint at this subject in a fur story
(which was sorta on my mind). Furlit may be allegorical and fable-ish in
many ways. Fur characters can let you tell stories that otherwise can't be
done.
But a story with abortion in it? Oh dear. Lemme pull out those 5-
kilo bricks of plutonium, get in some juggling practice. Much safer. Mainly
because all readers are in fact so polarized in RL. It'd be difficult to say
anything new that would not be interpreted in the light of everybody's
existing attitudes and opinions.
We-ll, let's not speak too soon. For the stories I've been writing, my
'take' on fur origins is a pretty plain-vanilla SF approach.
There are furs in the world due to a ton of biotech research and lotsa
spiffy comp hardware (needed to simulate things and do design). The
new viral DNA technology allows the docs to go tinkering with cellular
machinery about as easily as mechanics change tires. Cancer is as
serious as a pimple on your bum, and the retirement age is now waaay
up there.
Of course, once those crazy California plastic surgeons got hold of
this stuff, anybody who wanted fur, ears, muzzle, tail, footpaws, hooves,
wings, scales, whatever, could have it all with a swipe of the 'ol credit
card. Don't forget to drop in on the DMV to get a new driver's license
photo.
(Novel is brewing about who the first fur was, and why she wanted
a set of real bunny ears, and then the whole deal. Gonna be a glorious
amount of fun.)
So here's the abortion-related spinoff. Today, in order to end a
pregnancy, there's only one option: End the embryo. Or past a few weeks
call it the fetus. Nobody has abortions for fun, that's for sure.
Certainly there's no nice way to do this. Absent a hospital or clinic,
there are many ghastly desperate ways to do this, often lethal to all
parties involved. Some drugs are available to interfere with the
implantation of a fertilized egg, which is arguably a little nicer (although
not for the egg).
Would highly advanced biotech change anything in this [unarguably
troublesome] picture? Would the biotech that allows for furs make
possible a different outcome here?
Scenario: A fur woman is pregnant, doesn't want to be. A five-
minute procedure retrieves a cell sample from the embryo/fetus. The
sample is preserved. A standard abortion is performed.
At some point, perhaps years later, the cell sample is unthawed and
treated. Then in another five-minute procedure, reimplanted. The
pregnancy continues to term and a healthy fur baby is born. She's got
her Momma's ears and her Daddy's tail.
YEOW!! At a single stroke, soooo many applecarts overturned. Has
an abortion even happened? Well, yes. And has a fur baby been born?
Also yes. So what just happened here?
Notice that there's nothing to say a fur baby *will* be born. That cell
sample might just stay frozen, thus creating a different kind of ethical
hornet's nest compared to what we're stomping on these days.
Still, if we've got the biotech to go right down the level of the
chromosomes (and go tinkering), it stands to reason that 'reinitiating' a
cell sample would be a piece of cake. Likely part and parcel of cloning
technology, but put to a different purpose.
Most of that five-minute procedure would be signing the paperwork.
Yes, a pawprint is fine.
Indeed, this technology is likely required if two different furs are
going to have a child. The kind of DNA 'mods' it takes to make a bunny
fur won't match those in, say, a wolf fur. Some tinkering will have to
happen. This also means most furs won't have to worry about unwanted
pregnancy (and can get in more sex, which is very helpful to a writer).
Scenario: Some furs are big, really big. Pregnancy is not a problem
for a real animal mommy, but could be deadly for a fur mommy. Since
we now know our biology down to the hull rivets, this allows for the
manufacture of workable uterine replicators. Artificial wombs.
This may be the only way equine furs can have children. A few
months of normal pregnancy proceeds, then pop, out you come, kid, and
into the uterine replicator for another few months. Lest you kick your
Momma's belly button into the next county.
As a result, for a fur woman who doesn't want to be pregnant, the
word abortion just dropped stone-dead. One half-hour procedure later,
and all the lights are green on the replicator, and sign these adoption
papers here and here, please. Yes, a pawprint is just fine again.
(Full disclosure: Lois McMaster-Bujold has mined this ore body
before me. I derive and revise for fur purposes.)
Or sign the papers that puts the embryo/fetus into cold storage for
an indefinite period of time. It can be revived and reimplanted, of course.
But it doesn't necessarily have to go back into the same mommy, does
it?
Or into any mommy. Just has to be a parent/parents waiting after
nine months to change the diapers. The special ones with the holes for
the tail cost a bit more but trust me, they're worth it.
Regardless that we're punting at another hornet's nest here, the
take-home is that nobody's ending up in a medical incinerator. Has an
abortion happened? If a birth never takes place, maybe? But a death
hasn't happened either. Maybe not.
Scenario: Just because fur gametes can't match up doesn't mean
they know it. Everybody's chromosomes are still mostly functionally
human, so a bunny fur egg and a wolf fur sperm are still likely to try and
make it work. Once all the arrooos and squeals have died down.
But it won't work. Sometimes nobody even notices; completely non-
viable blastocyst. In many cases, however, things do work far enough to
result in a miscarriage. Which is far and away more ghastly than any
male can imagine.
Ergo furs are going to have to worry about contraception, although
not precisely for the same birth control reason that we do. Unless two
same-species furs have their mods almost precisely matched, the birth
control is sorta built in.
Oh, but wait: For all furs, complete knowledge of their biochemistry
is a given. Meaning complete knowledge of their reproductive
biochemistry is a given.
So any doctor or pharmacist or clinic with the right hardware can
synthesize a custom-tailored vaccine that will turn said repro biology off.
Or turn it back on again if needed. Ideally most fur children will get this
done sometime before puberty. They're gonna be a leetle busy later on.
For a female fur, all her eggs will now resist any sperm that tries to
wriggle in. For a male fur, every sperm cell he makes will now have a
change in the structure of the head. Can't lock on and penetrate an egg
cell wall. This means a little tinkering with certain cells in the testes, and
we're good to not-go.
In short, the biotech that leads to furs also leads to 100% effective,
one-shot, non-drug, zero-side-effect, reversible contraception for fur
males and females. Ditto for the humans around, if the story needs
some.
Current contraceptives tinker with hormones, not the actual
mechanics at the gamete level, which isn't ideal for a lot of reasons (or
failsafe). That said, workable contraceptives only go partway to solving
the issue of abortion. Ya gotta use 'em first, and that's not as simple as it
sounds. They do, however, make a helluva dent in the issue.
But contraceptive tech that's *this* good? Game-changer, no
argument, especially given the different moral equation (ie., aimed at
preventing miscarriages, not pregnancy). This wouldn't necessarily be
true for human characters, so there are still some hornets in the room.
Good: A story might be able to get some mileage out of the buzzing.
Does any of this ring true? Meaning to say, plausible enough in an
SF sense? It's a background detail to a fur story, not likely to become a plot
hook, one element of the fur world that would add some crucial depth.
You follow the [fur] logic of the biotech-based story, this is where you
can end up.
OR: It's going to smack the reader in the muzzle so hard it comes
off. Existing attitudes and opinions about abortion are challenged here. At
least in part by raising the possibility of a practical solution.
Twenty-ish years from now this kind of biotech could well be kicking
the door down. Doubt it'll be a hoof or footpaw doing the kicking, and SF
writers who try and predict the future are generally fools, but still. The
reader who goes gobsmacked-boggled at all this has, by definition,
stopped reading. Uh oh.
Worse, there could be high hostility raised. These ideas suggest that
both sides of the current battle are wrong, at least to some degree.
Insofar as everybody's wasting time and energy in not going after a
solution like this, but rather preferring to fight to the death, both
metaphorically and literally.
(There are people reading this who are either in that fight, or who
have had genuine experience with abortion. There's neck fur standing up
right now, for certain.)
At the core, abortion is proxy for a megaton of deeply-felt and
deeply personal life-and-death social issues. None of any of that is
resolved by any biotech 'quick-fix,' or any fix period. Which may explain
why we haven't got one after over fifty years of claws-and-fang combat.
So there might actually be a solution? On paper anyway. What's
written here could be thought of as similar to snatching the puck off the
ice in the middle of the last Stanley Cup game. *Everybody's* gonna
come after you. Then use your head to finish the game.
Pardon me for a sec. Lemme just tighten up the helmet strap, get
the tail through the hole in the body armour, fasten all that up. Heavy
boots. armoured gloves on the paws, protective goggles: All good. Now
just <Ummph!>... pull the hatch closed on this bomb shelter and fire up
the anti-missile system...
There. So, whaddya think? Don't hold back. :- )
Dec 3/12
.......
.......
.......
I'm wondering about writing this journal. The other night, I got
whacked with some moderately weird ideas, arising out of some thinking
about matters furry.
Now I find myself just damn curious to see what others might think.
Usually I'd just go ahead and write a story.
This time , nahhh, screw it. Too much work. But could be fun to
watch folks gnaw away at all this. Or at me for thinking of it.
(Risk ya just gotta run around here. Should be mentioned in the
TOS: Everybody's got fangs. They *will* use 'em. :- ) )
The ideas relate to abortion.
HA! Oy vay iz mir, will *this* get the choppers bared or what? No
faster way to polarize people, right here. Furry or not.
As much as Momma Nature does it without blinking (in at least 1/3
of all conceptions), hellish dicey thing for us to do it. There's only a
gazillion reasons for and against. The fur really does fly over this (sic).
So it would be dubious to even hint at this subject in a fur story
(which was sorta on my mind). Furlit may be allegorical and fable-ish in
many ways. Fur characters can let you tell stories that otherwise can't be
done.
But a story with abortion in it? Oh dear. Lemme pull out those 5-
kilo bricks of plutonium, get in some juggling practice. Much safer. Mainly
because all readers are in fact so polarized in RL. It'd be difficult to say
anything new that would not be interpreted in the light of everybody's
existing attitudes and opinions.
We-ll, let's not speak too soon. For the stories I've been writing, my
'take' on fur origins is a pretty plain-vanilla SF approach.
There are furs in the world due to a ton of biotech research and lotsa
spiffy comp hardware (needed to simulate things and do design). The
new viral DNA technology allows the docs to go tinkering with cellular
machinery about as easily as mechanics change tires. Cancer is as
serious as a pimple on your bum, and the retirement age is now waaay
up there.
Of course, once those crazy California plastic surgeons got hold of
this stuff, anybody who wanted fur, ears, muzzle, tail, footpaws, hooves,
wings, scales, whatever, could have it all with a swipe of the 'ol credit
card. Don't forget to drop in on the DMV to get a new driver's license
photo.
(Novel is brewing about who the first fur was, and why she wanted
a set of real bunny ears, and then the whole deal. Gonna be a glorious
amount of fun.)
So here's the abortion-related spinoff. Today, in order to end a
pregnancy, there's only one option: End the embryo. Or past a few weeks
call it the fetus. Nobody has abortions for fun, that's for sure.
Certainly there's no nice way to do this. Absent a hospital or clinic,
there are many ghastly desperate ways to do this, often lethal to all
parties involved. Some drugs are available to interfere with the
implantation of a fertilized egg, which is arguably a little nicer (although
not for the egg).
Would highly advanced biotech change anything in this [unarguably
troublesome] picture? Would the biotech that allows for furs make
possible a different outcome here?
Scenario: A fur woman is pregnant, doesn't want to be. A five-
minute procedure retrieves a cell sample from the embryo/fetus. The
sample is preserved. A standard abortion is performed.
At some point, perhaps years later, the cell sample is unthawed and
treated. Then in another five-minute procedure, reimplanted. The
pregnancy continues to term and a healthy fur baby is born. She's got
her Momma's ears and her Daddy's tail.
YEOW!! At a single stroke, soooo many applecarts overturned. Has
an abortion even happened? Well, yes. And has a fur baby been born?
Also yes. So what just happened here?
Notice that there's nothing to say a fur baby *will* be born. That cell
sample might just stay frozen, thus creating a different kind of ethical
hornet's nest compared to what we're stomping on these days.
Still, if we've got the biotech to go right down the level of the
chromosomes (and go tinkering), it stands to reason that 'reinitiating' a
cell sample would be a piece of cake. Likely part and parcel of cloning
technology, but put to a different purpose.
Most of that five-minute procedure would be signing the paperwork.
Yes, a pawprint is fine.
Indeed, this technology is likely required if two different furs are
going to have a child. The kind of DNA 'mods' it takes to make a bunny
fur won't match those in, say, a wolf fur. Some tinkering will have to
happen. This also means most furs won't have to worry about unwanted
pregnancy (and can get in more sex, which is very helpful to a writer).
Scenario: Some furs are big, really big. Pregnancy is not a problem
for a real animal mommy, but could be deadly for a fur mommy. Since
we now know our biology down to the hull rivets, this allows for the
manufacture of workable uterine replicators. Artificial wombs.
This may be the only way equine furs can have children. A few
months of normal pregnancy proceeds, then pop, out you come, kid, and
into the uterine replicator for another few months. Lest you kick your
Momma's belly button into the next county.
As a result, for a fur woman who doesn't want to be pregnant, the
word abortion just dropped stone-dead. One half-hour procedure later,
and all the lights are green on the replicator, and sign these adoption
papers here and here, please. Yes, a pawprint is just fine again.
(Full disclosure: Lois McMaster-Bujold has mined this ore body
before me. I derive and revise for fur purposes.)
Or sign the papers that puts the embryo/fetus into cold storage for
an indefinite period of time. It can be revived and reimplanted, of course.
But it doesn't necessarily have to go back into the same mommy, does
it?
Or into any mommy. Just has to be a parent/parents waiting after
nine months to change the diapers. The special ones with the holes for
the tail cost a bit more but trust me, they're worth it.
Regardless that we're punting at another hornet's nest here, the
take-home is that nobody's ending up in a medical incinerator. Has an
abortion happened? If a birth never takes place, maybe? But a death
hasn't happened either. Maybe not.
Scenario: Just because fur gametes can't match up doesn't mean
they know it. Everybody's chromosomes are still mostly functionally
human, so a bunny fur egg and a wolf fur sperm are still likely to try and
make it work. Once all the arrooos and squeals have died down.
But it won't work. Sometimes nobody even notices; completely non-
viable blastocyst. In many cases, however, things do work far enough to
result in a miscarriage. Which is far and away more ghastly than any
male can imagine.
Ergo furs are going to have to worry about contraception, although
not precisely for the same birth control reason that we do. Unless two
same-species furs have their mods almost precisely matched, the birth
control is sorta built in.
Oh, but wait: For all furs, complete knowledge of their biochemistry
is a given. Meaning complete knowledge of their reproductive
biochemistry is a given.
So any doctor or pharmacist or clinic with the right hardware can
synthesize a custom-tailored vaccine that will turn said repro biology off.
Or turn it back on again if needed. Ideally most fur children will get this
done sometime before puberty. They're gonna be a leetle busy later on.
For a female fur, all her eggs will now resist any sperm that tries to
wriggle in. For a male fur, every sperm cell he makes will now have a
change in the structure of the head. Can't lock on and penetrate an egg
cell wall. This means a little tinkering with certain cells in the testes, and
we're good to not-go.
In short, the biotech that leads to furs also leads to 100% effective,
one-shot, non-drug, zero-side-effect, reversible contraception for fur
males and females. Ditto for the humans around, if the story needs
some.
Current contraceptives tinker with hormones, not the actual
mechanics at the gamete level, which isn't ideal for a lot of reasons (or
failsafe). That said, workable contraceptives only go partway to solving
the issue of abortion. Ya gotta use 'em first, and that's not as simple as it
sounds. They do, however, make a helluva dent in the issue.
But contraceptive tech that's *this* good? Game-changer, no
argument, especially given the different moral equation (ie., aimed at
preventing miscarriages, not pregnancy). This wouldn't necessarily be
true for human characters, so there are still some hornets in the room.
Good: A story might be able to get some mileage out of the buzzing.
Does any of this ring true? Meaning to say, plausible enough in an
SF sense? It's a background detail to a fur story, not likely to become a plot
hook, one element of the fur world that would add some crucial depth.
You follow the [fur] logic of the biotech-based story, this is where you
can end up.
OR: It's going to smack the reader in the muzzle so hard it comes
off. Existing attitudes and opinions about abortion are challenged here. At
least in part by raising the possibility of a practical solution.
Twenty-ish years from now this kind of biotech could well be kicking
the door down. Doubt it'll be a hoof or footpaw doing the kicking, and SF
writers who try and predict the future are generally fools, but still. The
reader who goes gobsmacked-boggled at all this has, by definition,
stopped reading. Uh oh.
Worse, there could be high hostility raised. These ideas suggest that
both sides of the current battle are wrong, at least to some degree.
Insofar as everybody's wasting time and energy in not going after a
solution like this, but rather preferring to fight to the death, both
metaphorically and literally.
(There are people reading this who are either in that fight, or who
have had genuine experience with abortion. There's neck fur standing up
right now, for certain.)
At the core, abortion is proxy for a megaton of deeply-felt and
deeply personal life-and-death social issues. None of any of that is
resolved by any biotech 'quick-fix,' or any fix period. Which may explain
why we haven't got one after over fifty years of claws-and-fang combat.
So there might actually be a solution? On paper anyway. What's
written here could be thought of as similar to snatching the puck off the
ice in the middle of the last Stanley Cup game. *Everybody's* gonna
come after you. Then use your head to finish the game.
Pardon me for a sec. Lemme just tighten up the helmet strap, get
the tail through the hole in the body armour, fasten all that up. Heavy
boots. armoured gloves on the paws, protective goggles: All good. Now
just <Ummph!>... pull the hatch closed on this bomb shelter and fire up
the anti-missile system...
There. So, whaddya think? Don't hold back. :- )
Dec 3/12
At last! The FA Writers Directory v1.0! Huzzah!!
Posted 13 years ago*******************************************************************
.......
.......
.......
And to be frank, there should also be fireworks, one king-helluva
band, and a platinum-haired vixen stripper jumping out of a cake.
For what reason, you ask? This journal is to announce the official
opening of the FA Writers Directory v1.0. A summer of flailing away is
done. The FAWD is ready for business. Or it's as ready as it's going to get.
Time to fling open the doors and throw a party to celebrate.
Budgetary constraints render this a party-of-the-mind, unfortunately.
Imagine that that vixen stripper will let us lick the chocolate icing off her
fur and you can take it from there.
What is the FA Writers Directory v1.0? For starters, it's set up in an
ordinary FA account. Username: FAWD.V1.
Just to repeat that as a link: FAWD.V1 = FA Writers Directory v1.0
This thing is *on* FA, in other words. It's not a website. As of this
writing there are close to 15,000 names listed. Not quite all FA writers,
but we're getting there.
And this goes beyond the idea of a mundane directory. Find a writer,
then click on the search query links beside the name.
Sphinx, FA's search engine, retrieves all stories or poetry by that
writer. The FAWD is a new interface on the FA DB. And it works pretty
well if I do say so. It took enough work to make it work.
As for why it was built, that's all in the FAQ, article #1. No sense
reprinting it here. Except to say that the FAWD should make it highly easy
to find writers on FA. One more click, and you're reading their work.
Will this mean more people will read more furfic around here?
Mmmm, maybe.
Will this mean more writers will pick up a few more views, faves, and
comments? Mmmm, maybe.
Will you be able to find good writers you're never heard of before?
Mmmm...
...What? Oh. *Oh*. Of course my dear. Pardon me, a pretty fox
stripper and her drunk bunny fur girlfriend want me to smear chocolate
icing all over their tails. The party seems to be taking off...
(Check out the link and see why there is one.)
PS: Tell your friends. And their dog. Seriously. Advertising is planned
for this project, but the more buzz the better. Bzzz, bzzz.
.......
.......
.......
And to be frank, there should also be fireworks, one king-helluva
band, and a platinum-haired vixen stripper jumping out of a cake.
For what reason, you ask? This journal is to announce the official
opening of the FA Writers Directory v1.0. A summer of flailing away is
done. The FAWD is ready for business. Or it's as ready as it's going to get.
Time to fling open the doors and throw a party to celebrate.
Budgetary constraints render this a party-of-the-mind, unfortunately.
Imagine that that vixen stripper will let us lick the chocolate icing off her
fur and you can take it from there.
What is the FA Writers Directory v1.0? For starters, it's set up in an
ordinary FA account. Username: FAWD.V1.
Just to repeat that as a link: FAWD.V1 = FA Writers Directory v1.0
This thing is *on* FA, in other words. It's not a website. As of this
writing there are close to 15,000 names listed. Not quite all FA writers,
but we're getting there.
And this goes beyond the idea of a mundane directory. Find a writer,
then click on the search query links beside the name.
Sphinx, FA's search engine, retrieves all stories or poetry by that
writer. The FAWD is a new interface on the FA DB. And it works pretty
well if I do say so. It took enough work to make it work.
As for why it was built, that's all in the FAQ, article #1. No sense
reprinting it here. Except to say that the FAWD should make it highly easy
to find writers on FA. One more click, and you're reading their work.
Will this mean more people will read more furfic around here?
Mmmm, maybe.
Will this mean more writers will pick up a few more views, faves, and
comments? Mmmm, maybe.
Will you be able to find good writers you're never heard of before?
Mmmm...
...What? Oh. *Oh*. Of course my dear. Pardon me, a pretty fox
stripper and her drunk bunny fur girlfriend want me to smear chocolate
icing all over their tails. The party seems to be taking off...
(Check out the link and see why there is one.)
PS: Tell your friends. And their dog. Seriously. Advertising is planned
for this project, but the more buzz the better. Bzzz, bzzz.
Water Come To Me Eye. On Annamarie: A Eulogy
Posted 13 years ago*******************************************************************
.......
.......
.......
Near midnight, summer nights in Canada can be chill. But a mostly
clear night it was, with some high clouds, and bright, very bright, from a
near-full Moon.
And as high clouds will sometimes do to moonlight, there was the
illusion of a bright ring around the Moon. A moondog, as I think it's called.
But not complete, this one.
A broken ring.
Symbolism enough for me. I took a last sip of Glenfiddich, then
gently poured the sip remaining onto the ground. I took a final smoke off
the joint that was burning, then stubbed it out, a third left, and laid it
down on the ground.
Good-bye Annamarie, I whispered, then turned and went back inside
my house. I know she really liked mead; brewed up her own. Would
Glenfiddich do as a [symbolic] grave libation? I trust so.
(Seem to recall that grave gifts were also intended to ensure safe
passage to the Other Side, ways to pay off whoever needed paying. That
dude paddling that boat across the Styx must like weed. Now you can
give him a couple of tokes, Annamarie.)
That was all the wake I allowed myself. No records were set, but it
sorta served the purpose. A time and a place to really, deeply, say
good-bye to someone, this is what the wake is for. Half grieving, half
celebrating who that person was. Enough Glenfiddich was drunk to help
this along.
Except maybe it wasn't enough. Annamarie is dead. Not by cancer or
stroke, both of which she was fighting. Rather, it was heart that failed
her. The bunny has left the cottage, so to speak. Date of death is not yet
known; some time in the past couple of months. The only good news: Not
a traumatic death, and in the company of friends and loved ones. Less
one friend a thousand watery miles removed.
And now here we are. Grey, rainy Canadian morning; bad day to
write this. Who would have thought an eye could have so much water in
it? Enough to match the rain. At least half a box of Kleenex is doomed.
(Recall also that you're only supposed to weep while you were
actually standing over someone's grave. Anywhere else it's tears wasted;
how are they going know if they don't feel 'em fall? This notion fails a bit
when all you've got to weep over is an FA webpage.)
I can weep or I can write. Can I do both at the same time? I suppose
I'm going to have to try.
Yes, and there's the odd thing about this. There *was* only
Annamarie's FA page. And her stories, and her journals, and some email
traffic with her. At one point she wanted some editing help with a story.
Gave her my best work. She had ambitions to write some furry SF (and a
lot more than that). Advised at length (and was looking forward to helping
further).
And there was her avatar. Bunny fur, par excellence. No way of
knowing what she was really like, but I have a feeling her fursona was an
*exact* duplicate of the RL Annamarie. Perfect fit, in a way that's
probably familiar to many around here.
On my main page beside this journal: Her avatar. Credit to
Tygurstar. That image says so much about her spirit. A chubby, smart,
British bunny. Who's got a sunny, cheerful, never-surrender attitude.
Can-do bunny. Just look at her. And from all accounts there was a lot of
life lived to back that up. Annamarie came to furdom not at all as a young
lapine.
(Apparently one of her very first real jobs was data entry at an IBM
keypunching machine, back in the day when computers took punched
cards. I know what that keypunch machine looks like, used one myself,
which dates both of us to greyfur status. Foo to that, I can just hear
Annamarie say.)
I'm not going to kid myself here. I'm grieving over the death of not
Annamarie per se, but who I believed Annamarie to be. How did I come to
this belief? FA page, stories, journal, email. Text and art on a comp
screen.
Friend, yes, I can say Annamarie was one. She had many friends;
MIRC and RPG gaming were interests. But still: Text and art on a comp
screen. That was all. Never met her. Never heard her voice. Doesn't seem
to matter. Stone-fact: More than a few tears have been shed recently
over her, and by many others than me.
Or maybe it doesn't really take that much, to do it to us? To give us
these feelings that someone else is so very important to us. A little bit of
text or art are exchanged, and lookithat: A friendship is started. Maybe
even a strong one. Heck, easy to escalate it into a lot more than that.
Curious business, this new Internet thing. This couldn't be harder if
Annamarie had been my next-door neighbour of twenty years.
(Oh, beyond doubt, she would've *loved* this part of Eastern
Canada. She made an emmigration attempt one time. Green growing stuff
everywhere, and birds, and bees, and critters, alla over the place. A
country bunny at heart. Before her cancer and then her stroke, Annamarie
owned country land and a cottage. Beekeeping was a constant passion,
even when she had to move into city. Some English cities have an
'allotment' system. She was able to continue the beekeeping.)
On the other paw, maybe I shouldn't be too surprised here, at this
depth of feeling. The fact is, Annamarie was a writer. And there is a
curious thing about writing. The story itself may take center stage. But
who the writer is cannot fail to shine through the story. We do not learn
directly, as we learn about the characters. Calls for some reading between
lines.
What do Annamarie's stories say about Annamarie the writer? Well, I
could say go read 'em and see for yourself (if you haven't already). What
I'll only say here is that Annamarie *had* it, the whole nine yards worth
of storytelling skill, a full set of literary chops. And get this: She said she'd
never done any serious fiction writing up until a few years ago.
Really? Lucky the rest of us fur writers. Had she started writing any
earlier she'd be so so damn good by now we'd all be lost in her dust
(bunnies are supposed to be speedy, aren't they?). As a skillset, writing
comes to you largely by osmosis. And as said, Annamarie was not young.
That just gave her a whole lifetime of reading to draw upon. She knew
what a good story was supposed to look like, what it's supposed to do.
Then took imagination in paw, pen in the other one (so to speak),
and Just Did It. These are her first efforts? Good Lord, there were novels
in this bunny. Dead certain of it. Apart from the fact that she is dead.
Right. There is that.
The Ballad of Deleon must remain unfinished. Likewise Orchestra
and Being True. We will never know what Jack and Mary might have done
together (a couple of short stories that smelled like a novel brewing).
Annamarie had a rock-solid sense of character, something that's usually
acquired only after years of work. It showed, along with a grasp of style.
Annnnd I'm not sure this is helping much. There is a bitterness in
me when I think about her writing. A late in life thing for her? Not a
factor. Annamarie had some strong ambition regarding fur fiction. I would
be the one to approve of this. She so wanted to get better at it (and to
recover enough from the stroke; a serious blow).
What could she have written? No way of knowing, but it would have
been great. What she's written shows where she was going. Too soon,
Lord, just too soon. Have to say that complaint out loud at least once, get
the bitterness off of chest.
Still doesn't help.
Something else to say out loud. For the record, I'll confess to it. To
read her stories was to experience a brief flash of green-eyed writer's
jealousy. Damn, that's a sweet piece. How'd she do that? 'Cause I'd like to
do it too.
Annamarie did not leave us much work, unfortunately. But it stands
out. This is what furlit can be when it's done really right. Now I get to
regret never getting a chance to say that to her. I think I'm digging
myself in deeper.
So maybe I should stop about here. More writing will not ease the
heartache, and the day has changed from rain to semi-sunny afternoon.
Seems like a good time to clip the dog to leash and go out for a looong
walk in nearby fields.
Lemme show you around the place, Annamarie. Lotta bees to be
found. And we've got raspberries everywhere this time of year. And
bunnies. Plenty in the forests around here. I don't dare let the dog off the
leash, given what would likely happen next.
One line of theology holds that we never really leave, but come back
over and over again. This is not an uncomforting thought. If, on some
doggy walk, we happen to spot a slightly plump bunny along the treeline,
standing alertly upright and staring at us, perhaps I'll have my clue?
Although please, my dear, there *have* to be easier ways to own a
bunny fursuit than this. (I am totally positive she’d laugh at that joke.)
Good-bye, Annamarie.
Sept 5/12
.......
.......
.......
Near midnight, summer nights in Canada can be chill. But a mostly
clear night it was, with some high clouds, and bright, very bright, from a
near-full Moon.
And as high clouds will sometimes do to moonlight, there was the
illusion of a bright ring around the Moon. A moondog, as I think it's called.
But not complete, this one.
A broken ring.
Symbolism enough for me. I took a last sip of Glenfiddich, then
gently poured the sip remaining onto the ground. I took a final smoke off
the joint that was burning, then stubbed it out, a third left, and laid it
down on the ground.
Good-bye Annamarie, I whispered, then turned and went back inside
my house. I know she really liked mead; brewed up her own. Would
Glenfiddich do as a [symbolic] grave libation? I trust so.
(Seem to recall that grave gifts were also intended to ensure safe
passage to the Other Side, ways to pay off whoever needed paying. That
dude paddling that boat across the Styx must like weed. Now you can
give him a couple of tokes, Annamarie.)
That was all the wake I allowed myself. No records were set, but it
sorta served the purpose. A time and a place to really, deeply, say
good-bye to someone, this is what the wake is for. Half grieving, half
celebrating who that person was. Enough Glenfiddich was drunk to help
this along.
Except maybe it wasn't enough. Annamarie is dead. Not by cancer or
stroke, both of which she was fighting. Rather, it was heart that failed
her. The bunny has left the cottage, so to speak. Date of death is not yet
known; some time in the past couple of months. The only good news: Not
a traumatic death, and in the company of friends and loved ones. Less
one friend a thousand watery miles removed.
And now here we are. Grey, rainy Canadian morning; bad day to
write this. Who would have thought an eye could have so much water in
it? Enough to match the rain. At least half a box of Kleenex is doomed.
(Recall also that you're only supposed to weep while you were
actually standing over someone's grave. Anywhere else it's tears wasted;
how are they going know if they don't feel 'em fall? This notion fails a bit
when all you've got to weep over is an FA webpage.)
I can weep or I can write. Can I do both at the same time? I suppose
I'm going to have to try.
Yes, and there's the odd thing about this. There *was* only
Annamarie's FA page. And her stories, and her journals, and some email
traffic with her. At one point she wanted some editing help with a story.
Gave her my best work. She had ambitions to write some furry SF (and a
lot more than that). Advised at length (and was looking forward to helping
further).
And there was her avatar. Bunny fur, par excellence. No way of
knowing what she was really like, but I have a feeling her fursona was an
*exact* duplicate of the RL Annamarie. Perfect fit, in a way that's
probably familiar to many around here.
On my main page beside this journal: Her avatar. Credit to
Tygurstar. That image says so much about her spirit. A chubby, smart,
British bunny. Who's got a sunny, cheerful, never-surrender attitude.
Can-do bunny. Just look at her. And from all accounts there was a lot of
life lived to back that up. Annamarie came to furdom not at all as a young
lapine.
(Apparently one of her very first real jobs was data entry at an IBM
keypunching machine, back in the day when computers took punched
cards. I know what that keypunch machine looks like, used one myself,
which dates both of us to greyfur status. Foo to that, I can just hear
Annamarie say.)
I'm not going to kid myself here. I'm grieving over the death of not
Annamarie per se, but who I believed Annamarie to be. How did I come to
this belief? FA page, stories, journal, email. Text and art on a comp
screen.
Friend, yes, I can say Annamarie was one. She had many friends;
MIRC and RPG gaming were interests. But still: Text and art on a comp
screen. That was all. Never met her. Never heard her voice. Doesn't seem
to matter. Stone-fact: More than a few tears have been shed recently
over her, and by many others than me.
Or maybe it doesn't really take that much, to do it to us? To give us
these feelings that someone else is so very important to us. A little bit of
text or art are exchanged, and lookithat: A friendship is started. Maybe
even a strong one. Heck, easy to escalate it into a lot more than that.
Curious business, this new Internet thing. This couldn't be harder if
Annamarie had been my next-door neighbour of twenty years.
(Oh, beyond doubt, she would've *loved* this part of Eastern
Canada. She made an emmigration attempt one time. Green growing stuff
everywhere, and birds, and bees, and critters, alla over the place. A
country bunny at heart. Before her cancer and then her stroke, Annamarie
owned country land and a cottage. Beekeeping was a constant passion,
even when she had to move into city. Some English cities have an
'allotment' system. She was able to continue the beekeeping.)
On the other paw, maybe I shouldn't be too surprised here, at this
depth of feeling. The fact is, Annamarie was a writer. And there is a
curious thing about writing. The story itself may take center stage. But
who the writer is cannot fail to shine through the story. We do not learn
directly, as we learn about the characters. Calls for some reading between
lines.
What do Annamarie's stories say about Annamarie the writer? Well, I
could say go read 'em and see for yourself (if you haven't already). What
I'll only say here is that Annamarie *had* it, the whole nine yards worth
of storytelling skill, a full set of literary chops. And get this: She said she'd
never done any serious fiction writing up until a few years ago.
Really? Lucky the rest of us fur writers. Had she started writing any
earlier she'd be so so damn good by now we'd all be lost in her dust
(bunnies are supposed to be speedy, aren't they?). As a skillset, writing
comes to you largely by osmosis. And as said, Annamarie was not young.
That just gave her a whole lifetime of reading to draw upon. She knew
what a good story was supposed to look like, what it's supposed to do.
Then took imagination in paw, pen in the other one (so to speak),
and Just Did It. These are her first efforts? Good Lord, there were novels
in this bunny. Dead certain of it. Apart from the fact that she is dead.
Right. There is that.
The Ballad of Deleon must remain unfinished. Likewise Orchestra
and Being True. We will never know what Jack and Mary might have done
together (a couple of short stories that smelled like a novel brewing).
Annamarie had a rock-solid sense of character, something that's usually
acquired only after years of work. It showed, along with a grasp of style.
Annnnd I'm not sure this is helping much. There is a bitterness in
me when I think about her writing. A late in life thing for her? Not a
factor. Annamarie had some strong ambition regarding fur fiction. I would
be the one to approve of this. She so wanted to get better at it (and to
recover enough from the stroke; a serious blow).
What could she have written? No way of knowing, but it would have
been great. What she's written shows where she was going. Too soon,
Lord, just too soon. Have to say that complaint out loud at least once, get
the bitterness off of chest.
Still doesn't help.
Something else to say out loud. For the record, I'll confess to it. To
read her stories was to experience a brief flash of green-eyed writer's
jealousy. Damn, that's a sweet piece. How'd she do that? 'Cause I'd like to
do it too.
Annamarie did not leave us much work, unfortunately. But it stands
out. This is what furlit can be when it's done really right. Now I get to
regret never getting a chance to say that to her. I think I'm digging
myself in deeper.
So maybe I should stop about here. More writing will not ease the
heartache, and the day has changed from rain to semi-sunny afternoon.
Seems like a good time to clip the dog to leash and go out for a looong
walk in nearby fields.
Lemme show you around the place, Annamarie. Lotta bees to be
found. And we've got raspberries everywhere this time of year. And
bunnies. Plenty in the forests around here. I don't dare let the dog off the
leash, given what would likely happen next.
One line of theology holds that we never really leave, but come back
over and over again. This is not an uncomforting thought. If, on some
doggy walk, we happen to spot a slightly plump bunny along the treeline,
standing alertly upright and staring at us, perhaps I'll have my clue?
Although please, my dear, there *have* to be easier ways to own a
bunny fursuit than this. (I am totally positive she’d laugh at that joke.)
Good-bye, Annamarie.
Sept 5/12
On Enhanced Text On FA―A Short Typographic Manifesto
Posted 13 years ago*******************************************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Here’s a literary truth you’ll almost never hear in English class (or any
place else):
A good story that’s hard to read spontaneously converts into a bad story.
Whuffo? Because the readers just had such a jeezly joyful and pleasant
experience reading it. My, don’t they feel sooo happy for plowing through
that wonderfully written text?
Not.
This took on meaning for me when I walked onto FA about nine months
ago, looked around, and said to myself, oh fweepin’ hell. This is gonna
be a challenge.
Note that there are over 120,000 stories posted to FA. They range
in quality from incredibly fantastic, to good, to okay, points for trying.
But all, repeat *all* of them instantly undergo a downgrade the instant
a reader clicks the mouse. Whoa: a screenful of hard-to-read text. I know
I’m going to enjoy this story.
Remarkably, many people do, and God bless you, you furry little
masochists you. But I’ve had some journalism training.
And we beat our heads total bloody on those stupid MacIntoshes trying
to make the text look good on paper. Typography matters for journalism
(or nobody reads what you wrote).
Typographically, we on FA are the beneficiaries of a hidden assumption
on the part of the designers, about the way text is displayed. I doubt that
anybody actually spoke of it when the code was cut.
Simply put, if the text is good enough so it can be read in comments
and journals and what-not, then it’s good enough for stories.
This is not true. Reading small chunks of text interspersed with other
tasks (like replying to comments, looking at art, etc.) just isn’t the same kind
of visual and mental experience as reading a story.
With a story, you’re staring straight at the screen for fifteen-twenty
minutes (or more) as a large block of text tries to fight its way into your
eyeballs. You’re not looking away or being interrupted. You’re putting
intense concentration on the words. Say, why are those opthamologists over
there wincing?
Text on screen is not the same as text on the printed page. Duh.
So putting a story up on FA (or anywhere online) has *got* to be done so
the reader can have as easy a read as possible.
Riiiight. And this is to be done exactly how? At the end of the day,
whatever pretty text we submit comes off the server, gets turned into an
HTML page, and is then thrown at the reader’s screen, splat. Reader
winces. What’s a writer to do?
(Browser plug-ins like Adobe, or Java-enabled text display/editing
packages, or preprocessors that can handle multiple file formats, are not
good answers. Great way to spend tons of $$$, blow up FA’s codebase, and
clog up thousands of people’s browsers, though).
The saving grace about FA is that it’s just good enough [at displaying
stories] that people can read ‘em, and get some satisfaction. Writers actually
have several choices:
1) Submit the story as a downloadable file (but not displayed on the
submission page)
2) Submit as a .TXT file, or
3) Submit the story in the Comment/Info box of a sub, with the fully-
formatted story available as a download.
Now, the download file idea is an essential feature for artists. It helps
writers too, however, because when a reader clicks download they know
they're going to get a more readable, hopefully well-formatted story.
The downside: the reader has to make an active decision to do the
download, and read. The reward for this action is uncertain; could be a lousy
story. Stories posted as download only don’t get read as much, QED.
The ideal situation is to have the story *there* on the screen, when the
readers visit the submission. They have made a reading decision. So give
them the story before they change their mind.
This returns us to the original problem: how FA displays text. Whether as
a .TXT file or as text in the Comment/Info box, FA handles both the same
way.
Oh, and just to make our life more jubilant, FA happens to have two
different display modes, or templates: 1) White text on dark background,
and 2) Black text on Cyan background. (See the Stylesheet option in
Account Settings in the Control Panel).
The White/Dark mode is good with art, which is the most important thing
about FA. Images viewed on this screen look great. And white text on black is
fine for dealing with comments, journals, etc. In theory you’re not doing too
much reading this way.
However, the White/Dark mode is *not* good for reading stories. Duh
again. From birth, our eyes and visual cortex and mind have been trained to
read black text on white background. Try reading a large amount of text
on a White/Dark screen and you will feel pain. This is one reason why a lot of
stories on FA are so very short.
The Black/Cyan mode is waaay better for text, much closer to what our
eyes are used to. But it’s still not ideal, mainly because it renders the whole
screen fairly bright. This tends to ‘wash out’ the art that’s viewed this way
(makes links a bitch to figure out too).
But the black text: now this would seem to be the cat’s meowr, no? Text
shown this way has good contrast to it, and is easier for our eyeballs to
process in large quantities [without dying].
Except…
Close inspection of the Black/Cyan screen reveals a clever fact: the text
color is not *quite* ‘true black.’ It’s close to it, but it’s not black. Actually
a shade of darkish grey.
Whuffo clever? It’s a nod to the reality that most of the reading done
around here is in fact comments, journals, etc., not stories. The dark grey
is a little softer on the eyes. The text doesn’t grab our attention quite as
strongly. And I’ll never know who decided this, but from the point of view
of user interface design it was the right decision.
Now: what about stories? Where we *do* want text that grabs the reader’s
attention?
We-ll, if the text color isn’t true black, what happens if we try to make it
so? Say, by dropping in a color tag? Ie., [ color=black ]? (Omit spaces).
Jackpot. Insert sound of exploding slot machine here.
The color tag yields true black text. Sharp, crisp, clear. Higher contrast
than the dark grey. And readable as all bejesus.
Now who the hell is gonna think to throw a black color tag at text
that's already black? Ex-journalism students who know their damn typography,
that’s who.
If a reader has the screen set to ‘Black’/Cyan, and if you plug that
color tag into your story, the reader will have a *MUCH* easier time reading it.
You will be more likely to pick up a fave or a comment. And the reader
will likely return for more. This is not subject to argument.
Is it that simple? Just a dinky little color tag? Yes. Does it really mean
that much?
No. This is not The Revolution. This is not better than sliced bread. This
will not cure your asthma too. This is a small trick that takes advantage of an
FA feature and produces highly readable text. Notice how many $$$ we spent
doing it.
Given that FA readers are used to crappy-looking text (and therefore hold
stories in lower opinion), I sorta doubt that this method will change very
much any time soon. It depends on how many people think highly readable
text is important.
Note also that if you want to be courteous, you might want to remove the
color tag and submit a second copy of the story, marked as readable on
White/Dark screens. This takes how much work, did we say?
To be even more courteous, put links in the two stories to point to
each other. A reader using the White/Dark screen can’t read the enhanced
text (it’s black text on a black screen). You want that reader to go to the
'standard' version before he/she/it changes their mind. Click this link here… *
If this sounds a little awkward, congratulations on your intelligence: it
IS awkward. Welcome to FA. As such, many people reading this may well
say, nahhh, the way text is displayed right now is good enough. If we want
better we’ll just wait until FA upgrades things.
. . .
Why wait?
FB.
Mar 22/2012
* Memo to FA’s codemonkeys, what’s really needed here is a conditional
color tag. It detects the display mode, then decides whether to apply or
not. This sounds easier than it likely would be to do, of course.
*****************************************************************
Journal Submission is here:
Jrnl: On Enhanced Text On FA―A Short Typographic Manifesto
*****************************************************************
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Here’s a literary truth you’ll almost never hear in English class (or any
place else):
A good story that’s hard to read spontaneously converts into a bad story.
Whuffo? Because the readers just had such a jeezly joyful and pleasant
experience reading it. My, don’t they feel sooo happy for plowing through
that wonderfully written text?
Not.
This took on meaning for me when I walked onto FA about nine months
ago, looked around, and said to myself, oh fweepin’ hell. This is gonna
be a challenge.
Note that there are over 120,000 stories posted to FA. They range
in quality from incredibly fantastic, to good, to okay, points for trying.
But all, repeat *all* of them instantly undergo a downgrade the instant
a reader clicks the mouse. Whoa: a screenful of hard-to-read text. I know
I’m going to enjoy this story.
Remarkably, many people do, and God bless you, you furry little
masochists you. But I’ve had some journalism training.
And we beat our heads total bloody on those stupid MacIntoshes trying
to make the text look good on paper. Typography matters for journalism
(or nobody reads what you wrote).
Typographically, we on FA are the beneficiaries of a hidden assumption
on the part of the designers, about the way text is displayed. I doubt that
anybody actually spoke of it when the code was cut.
Simply put, if the text is good enough so it can be read in comments
and journals and what-not, then it’s good enough for stories.
This is not true. Reading small chunks of text interspersed with other
tasks (like replying to comments, looking at art, etc.) just isn’t the same kind
of visual and mental experience as reading a story.
With a story, you’re staring straight at the screen for fifteen-twenty
minutes (or more) as a large block of text tries to fight its way into your
eyeballs. You’re not looking away or being interrupted. You’re putting
intense concentration on the words. Say, why are those opthamologists over
there wincing?
Text on screen is not the same as text on the printed page. Duh.
So putting a story up on FA (or anywhere online) has *got* to be done so
the reader can have as easy a read as possible.
Riiiight. And this is to be done exactly how? At the end of the day,
whatever pretty text we submit comes off the server, gets turned into an
HTML page, and is then thrown at the reader’s screen, splat. Reader
winces. What’s a writer to do?
(Browser plug-ins like Adobe, or Java-enabled text display/editing
packages, or preprocessors that can handle multiple file formats, are not
good answers. Great way to spend tons of $$$, blow up FA’s codebase, and
clog up thousands of people’s browsers, though).
The saving grace about FA is that it’s just good enough [at displaying
stories] that people can read ‘em, and get some satisfaction. Writers actually
have several choices:
1) Submit the story as a downloadable file (but not displayed on the
submission page)
2) Submit as a .TXT file, or
3) Submit the story in the Comment/Info box of a sub, with the fully-
formatted story available as a download.
Now, the download file idea is an essential feature for artists. It helps
writers too, however, because when a reader clicks download they know
they're going to get a more readable, hopefully well-formatted story.
The downside: the reader has to make an active decision to do the
download, and read. The reward for this action is uncertain; could be a lousy
story. Stories posted as download only don’t get read as much, QED.
The ideal situation is to have the story *there* on the screen, when the
readers visit the submission. They have made a reading decision. So give
them the story before they change their mind.
This returns us to the original problem: how FA displays text. Whether as
a .TXT file or as text in the Comment/Info box, FA handles both the same
way.
Oh, and just to make our life more jubilant, FA happens to have two
different display modes, or templates: 1) White text on dark background,
and 2) Black text on Cyan background. (See the Stylesheet option in
Account Settings in the Control Panel).
The White/Dark mode is good with art, which is the most important thing
about FA. Images viewed on this screen look great. And white text on black is
fine for dealing with comments, journals, etc. In theory you’re not doing too
much reading this way.
However, the White/Dark mode is *not* good for reading stories. Duh
again. From birth, our eyes and visual cortex and mind have been trained to
read black text on white background. Try reading a large amount of text
on a White/Dark screen and you will feel pain. This is one reason why a lot of
stories on FA are so very short.
The Black/Cyan mode is waaay better for text, much closer to what our
eyes are used to. But it’s still not ideal, mainly because it renders the whole
screen fairly bright. This tends to ‘wash out’ the art that’s viewed this way
(makes links a bitch to figure out too).
But the black text: now this would seem to be the cat’s meowr, no? Text
shown this way has good contrast to it, and is easier for our eyeballs to
process in large quantities [without dying].
Except…
Close inspection of the Black/Cyan screen reveals a clever fact: the text
color is not *quite* ‘true black.’ It’s close to it, but it’s not black. Actually
a shade of darkish grey.
Whuffo clever? It’s a nod to the reality that most of the reading done
around here is in fact comments, journals, etc., not stories. The dark grey
is a little softer on the eyes. The text doesn’t grab our attention quite as
strongly. And I’ll never know who decided this, but from the point of view
of user interface design it was the right decision.
Now: what about stories? Where we *do* want text that grabs the reader’s
attention?
We-ll, if the text color isn’t true black, what happens if we try to make it
so? Say, by dropping in a color tag? Ie., [ color=black ]? (Omit spaces).
Jackpot. Insert sound of exploding slot machine here.
The color tag yields true black text. Sharp, crisp, clear. Higher contrast
than the dark grey. And readable as all bejesus.
Now who the hell is gonna think to throw a black color tag at text
that's already black? Ex-journalism students who know their damn typography,
that’s who.
If a reader has the screen set to ‘Black’/Cyan, and if you plug that
color tag into your story, the reader will have a *MUCH* easier time reading it.
You will be more likely to pick up a fave or a comment. And the reader
will likely return for more. This is not subject to argument.
Is it that simple? Just a dinky little color tag? Yes. Does it really mean
that much?
No. This is not The Revolution. This is not better than sliced bread. This
will not cure your asthma too. This is a small trick that takes advantage of an
FA feature and produces highly readable text. Notice how many $$$ we spent
doing it.
Given that FA readers are used to crappy-looking text (and therefore hold
stories in lower opinion), I sorta doubt that this method will change very
much any time soon. It depends on how many people think highly readable
text is important.
Note also that if you want to be courteous, you might want to remove the
color tag and submit a second copy of the story, marked as readable on
White/Dark screens. This takes how much work, did we say?
To be even more courteous, put links in the two stories to point to
each other. A reader using the White/Dark screen can’t read the enhanced
text (it’s black text on a black screen). You want that reader to go to the
'standard' version before he/she/it changes their mind. Click this link here… *
If this sounds a little awkward, congratulations on your intelligence: it
IS awkward. Welcome to FA. As such, many people reading this may well
say, nahhh, the way text is displayed right now is good enough. If we want
better we’ll just wait until FA upgrades things.
. . .
Why wait?
FB.
Mar 22/2012
* Memo to FA’s codemonkeys, what’s really needed here is a conditional
color tag. It detects the display mode, then decides whether to apply or
not. This sounds easier than it likely would be to do, of course.
*****************************************************************
Journal Submission is here:
Jrnl: On Enhanced Text On FA―A Short Typographic Manifesto
*****************************************************************
The kitten cautiously pokes the door with the knifepoint...
Posted 13 years ago>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
…And the heavy door opens slowly, creaking on its hinges. The kitten winces; quietly, quietly. But then the door
hasn’t been used in a while.
Even more cautiously, the kitten pushes his muzzle around the corner and peers in, ears up and quivering. The
room is dim-lit and dusty. Also hasn’t been used in a while, but there was a reason for that.
Knife at the ready and on the hyper-alert, the kitten advances, slowly, scanning intently around for traps, pitfalls,
tripwires, landmines, booby traps, ambush points, crossfire zones, sniper positions, IEDs, zombies, killer clowns, and open
cans of salmon that inexplicably blow your muzzle off on the first taste.
Not that being hyper-alert will help much. There was certainly one the last time.
There will be more.
No: all quiet. Or so it seems. All safe? Oh please. But that didn’t stop the kitten the last time. He pads over the
office chair and leaps up gracefully, knife in one paw. The seat of the chair is lightly coated with fur where he'd fallen asleep
so many times before.
Leap again, and he is on the desktop. It’s the usual cluttered mess. Doesn’t anybody clean up around here? No
matter. The knife stabs at the power button on the computer, then at the monitor. Digital light bathes the kitten as the
system fires up, then delivers that insufferable Microsoft musical jingle. The well-scratched mouse is retrieved from under some papers.
The kitten grins wryly at the inadvertent feline sadism involved in using it. One imagines there are masochist mice
out there who enjoy being clawed in the butt. Click, click. Translation: Squeak, squeak. More, more.
Then a click, and another, and the browser comes alive, the Internet connection buzzing and snarling its way
to life a moment later. To the kitten’s ears that sound is even more irritating, but it passes. The website loads in the
usual way, click again to deliver the username and password to the logon page, and the kitten is in.
Knife clutched in his tiny fangs, and with his short tail flicking a little, the kitten reaches forward with small paws--just
the right size for the keyboard--and begins to type. . .
(On the Internet no one knows you’re a dog? Well now, funny you should say. :- ) )
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
…And the heavy door opens slowly, creaking on its hinges. The kitten winces; quietly, quietly. But then the door
hasn’t been used in a while.
Even more cautiously, the kitten pushes his muzzle around the corner and peers in, ears up and quivering. The
room is dim-lit and dusty. Also hasn’t been used in a while, but there was a reason for that.
Knife at the ready and on the hyper-alert, the kitten advances, slowly, scanning intently around for traps, pitfalls,
tripwires, landmines, booby traps, ambush points, crossfire zones, sniper positions, IEDs, zombies, killer clowns, and open
cans of salmon that inexplicably blow your muzzle off on the first taste.
Not that being hyper-alert will help much. There was certainly one the last time.
There will be more.
No: all quiet. Or so it seems. All safe? Oh please. But that didn’t stop the kitten the last time. He pads over the
office chair and leaps up gracefully, knife in one paw. The seat of the chair is lightly coated with fur where he'd fallen asleep
so many times before.
Leap again, and he is on the desktop. It’s the usual cluttered mess. Doesn’t anybody clean up around here? No
matter. The knife stabs at the power button on the computer, then at the monitor. Digital light bathes the kitten as the
system fires up, then delivers that insufferable Microsoft musical jingle. The well-scratched mouse is retrieved from under some papers.
The kitten grins wryly at the inadvertent feline sadism involved in using it. One imagines there are masochist mice
out there who enjoy being clawed in the butt. Click, click. Translation: Squeak, squeak. More, more.
Then a click, and another, and the browser comes alive, the Internet connection buzzing and snarling its way
to life a moment later. To the kitten’s ears that sound is even more irritating, but it passes. The website loads in the
usual way, click again to deliver the username and password to the logon page, and the kitten is in.
Knife clutched in his tiny fangs, and with his short tail flicking a little, the kitten reaches forward with small paws--just
the right size for the keyboard--and begins to type. . .
(On the Internet no one knows you’re a dog? Well now, funny you should say. :- ) )
ATTN: Self-banned until Jan 17
Posted 14 years ago>>>>>>
>>>>>>
I have made a large mistake in dealings with another person on FA.
Who, and what happened, is not the point for here. Say only that an attempt
to take public responsibility for a screw-up only created a bigger one. Beware
of snap decisions. They got fangs.
Since Admin is looking at this, I will make a more considered decision: self-ban
for a month, until Jan 17. There: for once a good decision. Maybe.
If anybody *absolutely* needs to reach me, I've given FA permission to
release my email address (delivered in Trouble ticket #39951). Let's see
if this works.
I am incandescently disgusted with myself over this, about prior events and
current ones. It may not be very useful to say this [now], but as last words
go--until Jan--it fits nicely.
Fred Brown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
I have made a large mistake in dealings with another person on FA.
Who, and what happened, is not the point for here. Say only that an attempt
to take public responsibility for a screw-up only created a bigger one. Beware
of snap decisions. They got fangs.
Since Admin is looking at this, I will make a more considered decision: self-ban
for a month, until Jan 17. There: for once a good decision. Maybe.
If anybody *absolutely* needs to reach me, I've given FA permission to
release my email address (delivered in Trouble ticket #39951). Let's see
if this works.
I am incandescently disgusted with myself over this, about prior events and
current ones. It may not be very useful to say this [now], but as last words
go--until Jan--it fits nicely.
Fred Brown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Bump Journal (With a little bit of content)
Posted 14 years ago********
********
Hate to delete journals, but hate to post these 'bump' puppies too.
Still, sounds like Zanerus dodged a bullet (sic) and landed on his
footpaws (see previous journal). Good.
So let's add a little content to this journal just for appearance's sake.
Found an oldddd item for the absolute hardcore programmers out there.
So dropped it into Scraps. Everybody else is likely to just go what th'...?
The Seven Days of Creation (according to a systems programmer)
Ferdamnsure we've come a long way from this kind of code. History of
a sort: you're looking at it.
********
Hate to delete journals, but hate to post these 'bump' puppies too.
Still, sounds like Zanerus dodged a bullet (sic) and landed on his
footpaws (see previous journal). Good.
So let's add a little content to this journal just for appearance's sake.
Found an oldddd item for the absolute hardcore programmers out there.
So dropped it into Scraps. Everybody else is likely to just go what th'...?
The Seven Days of Creation (according to a systems programmer)
Ferdamnsure we've come a long way from this kind of code. History of
a sort: you're looking at it.
Call-Out to Gulf Coast Furs: Good Writer in Bad Fix...
Posted 14 years ago*******
*******
Anybody with a tail on the Florida Gulf Coast, lend me yours ears.
Zanerus has had unexpected crap dumped on his position. As such, his living situation has gone to worse crap.
Homeless looks too damn close to possible. For all the pleasant details, see two journals:
Bye bye
*swearing here*
Rather not see this one run over by a steamroller. His poetry's good, so's his writing, and he's definitely a musician.
The much broader problem, of course, is joblessness. Finding one means finding a friend who knows a
friend who knows a job. Is there any other way?
wildicecat[at]hotmail.com is where a PayPal-type gift should go. I say let's surprise the snot out of him.
But more important, fwd and crosspost this, please, at earliest opportunity. I notice that this journal will be
seen by 109 watchers.
Great, but if enough people crosspost to *their* journal, this msg might reach between 8-10,000 viewers (I did the
math, plus or minus guessing).
Somewhere in that number are some Florida furs in a position to assist (in some way).
Let's find them. Before the steamroller gets there, hmmm? :- /
*******
*******
*******
Anybody with a tail on the Florida Gulf Coast, lend me yours ears.

Homeless looks too damn close to possible. For all the pleasant details, see two journals:
Bye bye
*swearing here*
Rather not see this one run over by a steamroller. His poetry's good, so's his writing, and he's definitely a musician.
The much broader problem, of course, is joblessness. Finding one means finding a friend who knows a
friend who knows a job. Is there any other way?
wildicecat[at]hotmail.com is where a PayPal-type gift should go. I say let's surprise the snot out of him.
But more important, fwd and crosspost this, please, at earliest opportunity. I notice that this journal will be
seen by 109 watchers.
Great, but if enough people crosspost to *their* journal, this msg might reach between 8-10,000 viewers (I did the
math, plus or minus guessing).
Somewhere in that number are some Florida furs in a position to assist (in some way).
Let's find them. Before the steamroller gets there, hmmm? :- /
*******
*******
One For The Writers: Found a small FA trick...
Posted 14 years ago********
********
This might be useful. Or might be useless? Tricks are like that.
So FA's poor at handling text. Ya, news. Still, readers can read it.
Submit a .txt file or copy the story into the sub's comment field and
there it is. Enjoy.
But the way FA handles text inflicts a small dirty. Paragraph first
line indents get zapped.
The BBcode parser doesn't know what a Tab char is. Oops. What
about just five or six blank spaces instead? Nope: stripped out. Bad
parser.
This is a small thing but a genuine piss-off. We've all learned to
read text that's got that para first line indent. We read better with it.
The trick? Found a way to get it back. Look at what you've been
reading.
HowTo: In Windows, dig out an obscure utility called Character Map
(charmap.exe). Other OS's have something similar. Choose Verdana
font (what FA uses).
Then select and copy char #160. Should be on the fifth line, right
after the ~ char. Looks like a space. Technically speaking, this is
called the 'hard space, or the 'no-break' space.
It isn't treated as a space char. For some reason, FA doesn't strip
it out. But it *looks* like a space. To the parser it's just another
ordinary character.
Surprise: it works like an ordinary space. Five of 'em are indenting each
para of this journal. And everything else I've been posting around here
(been wondering if anybody would notice).
Ctrl-V = Paste. Once you've selected it, go to where you want to put
those five hard spaces, Ctrl-V five times, and you're ready to rock. And
your text will read waaaay better. (Don't forget an extra blank line
between paras; even better.)
OR: Best idea so far, use the italics tags: [ i ], five Ctrl-Vs, then [ /i ]
(less the spaces there). This tells you where you *put* the indent
spaces. Do it once, then copy the whole string and paste that
wherever you like. Saves time.
But char #160 will work by itself. When I'm creating a .txt doc I put
search-and-replace to use to convert Tabs to this italic string. Eats
another few minutes work. Pfff...
This is FA. Nobody said it was going to be easy. :- )
********
********
NOTA BENE: To make this fave-able, here's a
copy as a sub: Indent Trick -- Copy of Nov 27/11 Journal
********
********
********
This might be useful. Or might be useless? Tricks are like that.
So FA's poor at handling text. Ya, news. Still, readers can read it.
Submit a .txt file or copy the story into the sub's comment field and
there it is. Enjoy.
But the way FA handles text inflicts a small dirty. Paragraph first
line indents get zapped.
The BBcode parser doesn't know what a Tab char is. Oops. What
about just five or six blank spaces instead? Nope: stripped out. Bad
parser.
This is a small thing but a genuine piss-off. We've all learned to
read text that's got that para first line indent. We read better with it.
The trick? Found a way to get it back. Look at what you've been
reading.
HowTo: In Windows, dig out an obscure utility called Character Map
(charmap.exe). Other OS's have something similar. Choose Verdana
font (what FA uses).
Then select and copy char #160. Should be on the fifth line, right
after the ~ char. Looks like a space. Technically speaking, this is
called the 'hard space, or the 'no-break' space.
It isn't treated as a space char. For some reason, FA doesn't strip
it out. But it *looks* like a space. To the parser it's just another
ordinary character.
Surprise: it works like an ordinary space. Five of 'em are indenting each
para of this journal. And everything else I've been posting around here
(been wondering if anybody would notice).
Ctrl-V = Paste. Once you've selected it, go to where you want to put
those five hard spaces, Ctrl-V five times, and you're ready to rock. And
your text will read waaaay better. (Don't forget an extra blank line
between paras; even better.)
OR: Best idea so far, use the italics tags: [ i ], five Ctrl-Vs, then [ /i ]
(less the spaces there). This tells you where you *put* the indent
spaces. Do it once, then copy the whole string and paste that
wherever you like. Saves time.
But char #160 will work by itself. When I'm creating a .txt doc I put
search-and-replace to use to convert Tabs to this italic string. Eats
another few minutes work. Pfff...
This is FA. Nobody said it was going to be easy. :- )
********
********
NOTA BENE: To make this fave-able, here's a
copy as a sub: Indent Trick -- Copy of Nov 27/11 Journal
********
********
Empty bump Journal is empty (And/or it's a really Zen haiku)
Posted 14 years agoFB.
One to crosspost: Fur artist in deep trouble...
Posted 14 years ago**********
...And as is the way of these situations, looks headed for even deeper trouble pretty fast.
Now, on any given day there's a fur or ten in trouble around here. One supposes one can only
do so much. And you have to choose.
Okay: I'll choose. As an artist,
Furryguild strikes me as fairly decent, has a good eye for
the kinky, and could be A-grade in a few years.
However, it appears that husband is ill, jobs have vaporized, home is lousy-to-disintegrating,
and oh spiffy, there's a 17-month-old baby too.
(Jobs don't appear total-hopeless, but that presumes still being alive to take one. Ummm...)
Her journal: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2911296/ , entitled bluntly Will be evicted come dec 10th.....
Previous journals provide evidence of desperation levels, very cheerful, she sounds so happy.
As said, spiffy. May I encourage you to crosspost that journal? Smallest possible thing that
might help. Also easiest thing.
>>> BULLETIN BULLETIN: This journal went up on the 16th. On the 18th
Furryguild reported news of some improvements in her situation. Some help
has arrrived. And she deleted the above-mentioned journal. Oh. This
journal is now slightly 'non-operative,' shall we say? Or less so. Me, I'm a
writer, I never delete anything. I just edit. :- ) Righteous and Many Thanx
to those who helped.
>>> END BULLETIN
(That I'd like to commission her for a large project is a factor here; intend to front some dinero.
Can't commish a scrap from a destroyed artist, which seems imminent.)
I'll go further: her PayPal is shared with her mate and is: shadow_guild[at]yahoo.com
If you're flush by a bit (some of you must be), now seems to be a very good time to deliver a small
early Christmas present. This could ensure there *is* one and not an exploding Christmas tree.
Tell PayPal to attach a wagging tail with a big red bow on it. Seasonal touch.
That's it. If you're not reaching for the mouse by now, do at least think about it (and crosspost at mininum).
Thank you for reading. Let's see what happens.
FB.
**********
...And as is the way of these situations, looks headed for even deeper trouble pretty fast.
Now, on any given day there's a fur or ten in trouble around here. One supposes one can only
do so much. And you have to choose.
Okay: I'll choose. As an artist,

the kinky, and could be A-grade in a few years.
However, it appears that husband is ill, jobs have vaporized, home is lousy-to-disintegrating,
and oh spiffy, there's a 17-month-old baby too.
(Jobs don't appear total-hopeless, but that presumes still being alive to take one. Ummm...)
Her journal: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2911296/ , entitled bluntly Will be evicted come dec 10th.....
Previous journals provide evidence of desperation levels, very cheerful, she sounds so happy.
As said, spiffy. May I encourage you to crosspost that journal? Smallest possible thing that
might help. Also easiest thing.
>>> BULLETIN BULLETIN: This journal went up on the 16th. On the 18th
Furryguild reported news of some improvements in her situation. Some help
has arrrived. And she deleted the above-mentioned journal. Oh. This
journal is now slightly 'non-operative,' shall we say? Or less so. Me, I'm a
writer, I never delete anything. I just edit. :- ) Righteous and Many Thanx
to those who helped.
>>> END BULLETIN
(That I'd like to commission her for a large project is a factor here; intend to front some dinero.
Can't commish a scrap from a destroyed artist, which seems imminent.)
I'll go further: her PayPal is shared with her mate and is: shadow_guild[at]yahoo.com
If you're flush by a bit (some of you must be), now seems to be a very good time to deliver a small
early Christmas present. This could ensure there *is* one and not an exploding Christmas tree.
Tell PayPal to attach a wagging tail with a big red bow on it. Seasonal touch.
That's it. If you're not reaching for the mouse by now, do at least think about it (and crosspost at mininum).
Thank you for reading. Let's see what happens.
FB.
**********
Commentary On The Dragon And Unicorn Stories
Posted 14 years ago>>>>> Commentary on <<<<<
>>>>> The Dragon And Unicorn Stories <<<<<
As may be obvious by now I'm not using the Journal in the 'blog-like/diary-like' way it's designed for. Leastwise that's how everybody else is using it.
Can't knock that. I read the daily crop of Journals and it's the life of FA on parade. Whee, how the fur flies. Until they put The Fur Channel on basic cable this'll do just fine. (If there was such a network; hey Dragoneer, can we talk spin-off projects?)
Me, I want my journals to add to the stories I'm submitting. Commentary, that's the keyword. A story might be good? Fine. Here's some 'value-added' to go with it. Enjoy.
The point being that by the time a story's finished I've usually put a ton of thinking into the puppy to make it work right. And that's often as worth talking about as the story. At least I'm hoping it is to other writers.
(It's probably also obvious that I'm taking fur fiction waaaay more seriously than most would think it deserves. Those who've questioned this, please, keep doing so, and you know who you are. Every good writer needs good critics. Food supply runs short sometimes. . . :- > )
For example, take the two stories that are subject of today's journal: The Dragon's Deal, and Been Reading A Little Tanith Lee Lately.
Clever wicked suckers, no? Yiffy to a degree, or at least on the kinky side, even though nothing explicit happens. Oh, and once again, written long before I knew what 'yiff' or 'fur' even meant.
So there is a story behind how they came to be. More to the point, if that story hadn't happened I might not be a fraction of the writer I am now.
On top of which, it could be downright crucial to make that story public now and right here. It's not really a comfortable one for me. But then any writer looking back on his or her early work and where it came from is guaranteed to cringe.
Won't say I'm doing that but I do wonder what I was smoking back then. It's worth talking about.
It's also linked to the odd thing I've noticed about the furfic I'm reading on FA. And thank God I decided to get some new glasses because there's a *lot* of furfic here (art site, huh? <Ppphhbt!> :- ) ). I intend to read damnear everything I can find, pursuant to getting better as a fur writer.
But whuffo the large volume of erotic material? What is it about this genre such that so many writers go arrow-straight for the snuffling around in the crotches? Artists too. A good sound FX to attach to FA's main page would be some wild gleeful yipping.
All fun stuff to be sure, and often reasonable enough in quality to arouse. The whole point about erotica, you'll agree. Somebody once said that all writers start out with porn? Maybe so, but this *much* of it?
Give me a few months of story study and I should be able to say more about this. And guess who's posted some stories to contribute to it? And more to come (no pun).
Still: name me any, repeat any other literary genre where sexual material is so abundant. And sitting side-by-side with an equal amount of non-sexual material, and considered about equal in status by the readers. Any other literary genre, sexual work is distinctly 'ghettoized' and held in low value. Not furlit.
I've got a few theories about this that derive from that backstory I mentioned. Guess what? I started out writing erotic stuff too.
Time and distance have given me some perspective on that, such that I now look at fur writing and say, hmmm. . .
To find out what I [might have] figured out, go to:
The Real Commentary On The Dragon And Unicorn Stories
>>>>> The Dragon And Unicorn Stories <<<<<
As may be obvious by now I'm not using the Journal in the 'blog-like/diary-like' way it's designed for. Leastwise that's how everybody else is using it.
Can't knock that. I read the daily crop of Journals and it's the life of FA on parade. Whee, how the fur flies. Until they put The Fur Channel on basic cable this'll do just fine. (If there was such a network; hey Dragoneer, can we talk spin-off projects?)
Me, I want my journals to add to the stories I'm submitting. Commentary, that's the keyword. A story might be good? Fine. Here's some 'value-added' to go with it. Enjoy.
The point being that by the time a story's finished I've usually put a ton of thinking into the puppy to make it work right. And that's often as worth talking about as the story. At least I'm hoping it is to other writers.
(It's probably also obvious that I'm taking fur fiction waaaay more seriously than most would think it deserves. Those who've questioned this, please, keep doing so, and you know who you are. Every good writer needs good critics. Food supply runs short sometimes. . . :- > )
For example, take the two stories that are subject of today's journal: The Dragon's Deal, and Been Reading A Little Tanith Lee Lately.
Clever wicked suckers, no? Yiffy to a degree, or at least on the kinky side, even though nothing explicit happens. Oh, and once again, written long before I knew what 'yiff' or 'fur' even meant.
So there is a story behind how they came to be. More to the point, if that story hadn't happened I might not be a fraction of the writer I am now.
On top of which, it could be downright crucial to make that story public now and right here. It's not really a comfortable one for me. But then any writer looking back on his or her early work and where it came from is guaranteed to cringe.
Won't say I'm doing that but I do wonder what I was smoking back then. It's worth talking about.
It's also linked to the odd thing I've noticed about the furfic I'm reading on FA. And thank God I decided to get some new glasses because there's a *lot* of furfic here (art site, huh? <Ppphhbt!> :- ) ). I intend to read damnear everything I can find, pursuant to getting better as a fur writer.
But whuffo the large volume of erotic material? What is it about this genre such that so many writers go arrow-straight for the snuffling around in the crotches? Artists too. A good sound FX to attach to FA's main page would be some wild gleeful yipping.
All fun stuff to be sure, and often reasonable enough in quality to arouse. The whole point about erotica, you'll agree. Somebody once said that all writers start out with porn? Maybe so, but this *much* of it?
Give me a few months of story study and I should be able to say more about this. And guess who's posted some stories to contribute to it? And more to come (no pun).
Still: name me any, repeat any other literary genre where sexual material is so abundant. And sitting side-by-side with an equal amount of non-sexual material, and considered about equal in status by the readers. Any other literary genre, sexual work is distinctly 'ghettoized' and held in low value. Not furlit.
I've got a few theories about this that derive from that backstory I mentioned. Guess what? I started out writing erotic stuff too.
Time and distance have given me some perspective on that, such that I now look at fur writing and say, hmmm. . .
To find out what I [might have] figured out, go to:
The Real Commentary On The Dragon And Unicorn Stories
Commentary On The Big Bird Santa Claus
Posted 14 years ago>>>>> Commentary on <<<<<
>>>>> The Big Bird Santa Claus <<<<<
Okay, and didn't I say this would be posted on Sunday? Glah. . .
God help my future editors, but getting me to meet a deadline takes a laser cannon, a platoon of ill-tempered Marines, and a very determined gorilla with a baseball bat.
(That last will probably be my future agent, BTW. Fifteen percent of any bananas I earn? Fair deal, I say. :- ) )
But to quote Gilda Radner, never mind. This Journal-ne-submission intends to dive deep with regards to The Big Bird Santa Claus. The story is located HERE.
And it's going to do it the same way as the last one: short-short-short Journal entry here to catch your attention and promo my subject, then a link to the text itself.
The reviews on when I did this for the Betty Heavy story are in: Good idea, it works fine. Now if anybody wants to fave this Journal, they can. And I get a count of how many read it. Sweet.
(There's *no* way I'm the first to think of this. Somebody tell me they've seen this before?)
So right at the top, there are two special things about BB Santa Claus that need explaining. Pride level on this one is high for a couple of reasons. Worth saying here.
But as important is that feathered dude in the story, the Ximerfell-Captain. Where he came from should be revealed to the enquiring, eager-to-know masses (that'd be, like, you).
Touchy things, enquiring, eager-to-know masses. Can't let 'em get grumpy. Gotta tell all. So I will.
More to the point, I think this story might actually reveal something very important about fur characters in general. This certainly wasn't obvious when I wrote it [as a pure SF piece].
But I look at it now, with a few years of fur writing under my belt? It just about jumps off the page at me. Did better than I knew with this one. Gotta love it when that happens.
To find out what I'm talking about, click here:
The REAL Commentary on The Big Bird Santa Claus
>>>>> The Big Bird Santa Claus <<<<<
Okay, and didn't I say this would be posted on Sunday? Glah. . .
God help my future editors, but getting me to meet a deadline takes a laser cannon, a platoon of ill-tempered Marines, and a very determined gorilla with a baseball bat.
(That last will probably be my future agent, BTW. Fifteen percent of any bananas I earn? Fair deal, I say. :- ) )
But to quote Gilda Radner, never mind. This Journal-ne-submission intends to dive deep with regards to The Big Bird Santa Claus. The story is located HERE.
And it's going to do it the same way as the last one: short-short-short Journal entry here to catch your attention and promo my subject, then a link to the text itself.
The reviews on when I did this for the Betty Heavy story are in: Good idea, it works fine. Now if anybody wants to fave this Journal, they can. And I get a count of how many read it. Sweet.
(There's *no* way I'm the first to think of this. Somebody tell me they've seen this before?)
So right at the top, there are two special things about BB Santa Claus that need explaining. Pride level on this one is high for a couple of reasons. Worth saying here.
But as important is that feathered dude in the story, the Ximerfell-Captain. Where he came from should be revealed to the enquiring, eager-to-know masses (that'd be, like, you).
Touchy things, enquiring, eager-to-know masses. Can't let 'em get grumpy. Gotta tell all. So I will.
More to the point, I think this story might actually reveal something very important about fur characters in general. This certainly wasn't obvious when I wrote it [as a pure SF piece].
But I look at it now, with a few years of fur writing under my belt? It just about jumps off the page at me. Did better than I knew with this one. Gotta love it when that happens.
To find out what I'm talking about, click here:
The REAL Commentary on The Big Bird Santa Claus