FA+
Shop
HAPPY (late) NEW YEAR!!
General | Posted 11 years agoWelp, my resolution is to draw more and get better :D
and get a job c:
and get a job c:
Drama :U
General | Posted 11 years agoReally FA, i just don't see why everyone has to act like its WW3 when something happens. Zidonuke has done some shit, but dose that give everyone the right to harass him and dragoneer? I mean simply the fact that we "were" getting a new coder was awesome! Dragoneer finally hiring someone, great, even with a past like that. this site has been running the same code for YEARS and its not like he could mess it up than all the other hackers did in the past. The amount of hate that i saw in the comment section was sickening. Why are you all still on this site if you clearly hate it so much.. I just think we not be pessimistic and give someone a chance for once.(Zaush :F) There is no call for all of this.
hoop bloop
General | Posted 11 years ago;3
Anyone have a furrymuck character?
Anyone have a furrymuck character?
Has Anyone Really Been Far As..
General | Posted 11 years agoHas Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?
that the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings should be a political system adopted by the United States of America in an effort to restabilize the sluggishly performing economy that has been afflicting this country since 2008. I will be arguing against this resolution by showing how the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification are already unreliable and hasnt yielded any concrete results, and that to use the understanding of those mechanical properties for modifying people to localized economic scenarios is both impossible, impractical, and immoral.
The quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification has its roots back to the ancient kings of ancient Sudan when Egypt was the greatest power in the world, but the science as we know it today wasnt really explored until the 1940's in the middle of World War II in modern France. While under Nazi occupation the French began to research the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings as a possible weapon or tactic that could be used to drive the Nazi's out of France or maybe even kill Nazi Germany itself. Their research yielded very limited results before eventually being abandoned due to the liberation of France by the United States and its allies in 1944. Research in the field lied dormant for years before being explored by the Soviet Union in the late 1980's, who wanted to use the technology to try to improve their own economy in the face of a rapidly growing America while their own country was sliding into collapse. It was the Russians who first found the initial big discoveries regarding the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification of people to localized economies, but al such findings could only potentially be exploited by countries whose economies had not yet emerged, not countries who were sliding into decay. Soon after, the Soviet Union abandoned their research, sold their findings to the Chinese, and then 3 years later the nation had dissolved.
That is the basic background, the rest is common knowledge where the chinese began implementing the system as they found themselves in the position of an emerging power to try to reap the benefits of the policies, and have since had resounding success and have vastly improved their economy. Many people have seen this success and have advocated implementing parts of the behavioral modification mechanical policies in the United States and Europe to see if the system can kick up sluggish economies that have not recently emerged, and also in the Middle East where much of the region is in a prime state to exploit the system and rise to power. People against such policies claim it is immoral among other things,but also have strong arguments in showing that numerous other factors could have caused such a rise in economic power that are not necessarily attributed to the quantum mechanics of the behavioral modifications of people. Dissidents contend that the rise of China's economy only coincided with the radical policies they implemented and that correlation =/= causation, while some have gone so far to speculate that such policies have actually held back how much their economy could have improved.
I'll spare you the moral arguments and instead focus on how the French speculated that implementing such policies makes it difficult to readily transition out of such radical policies to less intensive policies once the desired economic growth has been met. Ernest Gorbachev of Russia's experiment showed that due to the intrinsic human nature of resistance against successive economic policy change and how the neurological impact of behavioral modification can cause irrational dependencies, the idea of short term behavioral modification to localized economies for rampant improvement and growth is doomed to fail. Gorbachev's experiment showed that the system is not something you can easily switch in and out of, but it was Japanese economist Woo Chen who postulated that the benefits of behavioral modification for localized economic purposes is only effective when the modifications are done comprehensively on a behavioral level, meaning that the system will not work as well as intended unless it is fully invested into and implemented to people, which could be a problem since the morality of behavioral modification in minute amounts is questionable, let alone massive comprehensive amounts.
For these reasons, understanding the quantum mechanics behind behavioral modification for localized economical benefits to maximize short term economic growth is considered by many to be ineffective, immoral, and only cannot be applied to most westernized economies since they have progressed and emerged centuries ago while behavior modification is only something that can be utilized for emerging economies.
Allow me to summarize and condense my arguments in case I wasnt entirely clear:
If A, then B
If B, then C
If C, then Not D,
If Not D, then maybe G
If E then F
If E and A, then H
If G, then A and not E
If H and G, then E cannot be concluded
Since H and G exist, E both exists and doesnt exist.
For further elaboration, check out this ancient argument developed by the great philospher Mick Jagger:
P1: "and" is a girl word.
P2: "&" is a pretty manly symbol.
P3: A _ E's gender can be alternated.
P4: If A and E, then vagina.
P5: If A "&" E, then penis.
C: A&E is a dick.
By this, my original proof remains valid, my entire philosophical argument remains sound, and the resolution still stands.
that the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings should be a political system adopted by the United States of America in an effort to restabilize the sluggishly performing economy that has been afflicting this country since 2008. I will be arguing against this resolution by showing how the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification are already unreliable and hasnt yielded any concrete results, and that to use the understanding of those mechanical properties for modifying people to localized economic scenarios is both impossible, impractical, and immoral.
The quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification has its roots back to the ancient kings of ancient Sudan when Egypt was the greatest power in the world, but the science as we know it today wasnt really explored until the 1940's in the middle of World War II in modern France. While under Nazi occupation the French began to research the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings as a possible weapon or tactic that could be used to drive the Nazi's out of France or maybe even kill Nazi Germany itself. Their research yielded very limited results before eventually being abandoned due to the liberation of France by the United States and its allies in 1944. Research in the field lied dormant for years before being explored by the Soviet Union in the late 1980's, who wanted to use the technology to try to improve their own economy in the face of a rapidly growing America while their own country was sliding into collapse. It was the Russians who first found the initial big discoveries regarding the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification of people to localized economies, but al such findings could only potentially be exploited by countries whose economies had not yet emerged, not countries who were sliding into decay. Soon after, the Soviet Union abandoned their research, sold their findings to the Chinese, and then 3 years later the nation had dissolved.
That is the basic background, the rest is common knowledge where the chinese began implementing the system as they found themselves in the position of an emerging power to try to reap the benefits of the policies, and have since had resounding success and have vastly improved their economy. Many people have seen this success and have advocated implementing parts of the behavioral modification mechanical policies in the United States and Europe to see if the system can kick up sluggish economies that have not recently emerged, and also in the Middle East where much of the region is in a prime state to exploit the system and rise to power. People against such policies claim it is immoral among other things,but also have strong arguments in showing that numerous other factors could have caused such a rise in economic power that are not necessarily attributed to the quantum mechanics of the behavioral modifications of people. Dissidents contend that the rise of China's economy only coincided with the radical policies they implemented and that correlation =/= causation, while some have gone so far to speculate that such policies have actually held back how much their economy could have improved.
I'll spare you the moral arguments and instead focus on how the French speculated that implementing such policies makes it difficult to readily transition out of such radical policies to less intensive policies once the desired economic growth has been met. Ernest Gorbachev of Russia's experiment showed that due to the intrinsic human nature of resistance against successive economic policy change and how the neurological impact of behavioral modification can cause irrational dependencies, the idea of short term behavioral modification to localized economies for rampant improvement and growth is doomed to fail. Gorbachev's experiment showed that the system is not something you can easily switch in and out of, but it was Japanese economist Woo Chen who postulated that the benefits of behavioral modification for localized economic purposes is only effective when the modifications are done comprehensively on a behavioral level, meaning that the system will not work as well as intended unless it is fully invested into and implemented to people, which could be a problem since the morality of behavioral modification in minute amounts is questionable, let alone massive comprehensive amounts.
For these reasons, understanding the quantum mechanics behind behavioral modification for localized economical benefits to maximize short term economic growth is considered by many to be ineffective, immoral, and only cannot be applied to most westernized economies since they have progressed and emerged centuries ago while behavior modification is only something that can be utilized for emerging economies.
Allow me to summarize and condense my arguments in case I wasnt entirely clear:
If A, then B
If B, then C
If C, then Not D,
If Not D, then maybe G
If E then F
If E and A, then H
If G, then A and not E
If H and G, then E cannot be concluded
Since H and G exist, E both exists and doesnt exist.
For further elaboration, check out this ancient argument developed by the great philospher Mick Jagger:
P1: "and" is a girl word.
P2: "&" is a pretty manly symbol.
P3: A _ E's gender can be alternated.
P4: If A and E, then vagina.
P5: If A "&" E, then penis.
C: A&E is a dick.
By this, my original proof remains valid, my entire philosophical argument remains sound, and the resolution still stands.
Has Anyone Really Been Far As..
General | Posted 11 years agoHas Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?
that the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings should be a political system adopted by the United States of America in an effort to restabilize the sluggishly performing economy that has been afflicting this country since 2008. I will be arguing against this resolution by showing how the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification are already unreliable and hasnt yielded any concrete results, and that to use the understanding of those mechanical properties for modifying people to localized economic scenarios is both impossible, impractical, and immoral.
The quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification has its roots back to the ancient kings of ancient Sudan when Egypt was the greatest power in the world, but the science as we know it today wasnt really explored until the 1940's in the middle of World War II in modern France. While under Nazi occupation the French began to research the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings as a possible weapon or tactic that could be used to drive the Nazi's out of France or maybe even kill Nazi Germany itself. Their research yielded very limited results before eventually being abandoned due to the liberation of France by the United States and its allies in 1944. Research in the field lied dormant for years before being explored by the Soviet Union in the late 1980's, who wanted to use the technology to try to improve their own economy in the face of a rapidly growing America while their own country was sliding into collapse. It was the Russians who first found the initial big discoveries regarding the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification of people to localized economies, but al such findings could only potentially be exploited by countries whose economies had not yet emerged, not countries who were sliding into decay. Soon after, the Soviet Union abandoned their research, sold their findings to the Chinese, and then 3 years later the nation had dissolved.
That is the basic background, the rest is common knowledge where the chinese began implementing the system as they found themselves in the position of an emerging power to try to reap the benefits of the policies, and have since had resounding success and have vastly improved their economy. Many people have seen this success and have advocated implementing parts of the behavioral modification mechanical policies in the United States and Europe to see if the system can kick up sluggish economies that have not recently emerged, and also in the Middle East where much of the region is in a prime state to exploit the system and rise to power. People against such policies claim it is immoral among other things,but also have strong arguments in showing that numerous other factors could have caused such a rise in economic power that are not necessarily attributed to the quantum mechanics of the behavioral modifications of people. Dissidents contend that the rise of China's economy only coincided with the radical policies they implemented and that correlation =/= causation, while some have gone so far to speculate that such policies have actually held back how much their economy could have improved.
I'll spare you the moral arguments and instead focus on how the French speculated that implementing such policies makes it difficult to readily transition out of such radical policies to less intensive policies once the desired economic growth has been met. Ernest Gorbachev of Russia's experiment showed that due to the intrinsic human nature of resistance against successive economic policy change and how the neurological impact of behavioral modification can cause irrational dependencies, the idea of short term behavioral modification to localized economies for rampant improvement and growth is doomed to fail. Gorbachev's experiment showed that the system is not something you can easily switch in and out of, but it was Japanese economist Woo Chen who postulated that the benefits of behavioral modification for localized economic purposes is only effective when the modifications are done comprehensively on a behavioral level, meaning that the system will not work as well as intended unless it is fully invested into and implemented to people, which could be a problem since the morality of behavioral modification in minute amounts is questionable, let alone massive comprehensive amounts.
For these reasons, understanding the quantum mechanics behind behavioral modification for localized economical benefits to maximize short term economic growth is considered by many to be ineffective, immoral, and only cannot be applied to most westernized economies since they have progressed and emerged centuries ago while behavior modification is only something that can be utilized for emerging economies.
Allow me to summarize and condense my arguments in case I wasnt entirely clear:
If A, then B
If B, then C
If C, then Not D,
If Not D, then maybe G
If E then F
If E and A, then H
If G, then A and not E
If H and G, then E cannot be concluded
Since H and G exist, E both exists and doesnt exist.
For further elaboration, check out this ancient argument developed by the great philospher Mick Jagger:
P1: "and" is a girl word.
P2: "&" is a pretty manly symbol.
P3: A _ E's gender can be alternated.
P4: If A and E, then vagina.
P5: If A "&" E, then penis.
C: A&E is a dick.
By this, my original proof remains valid, my entire philosophical argument remains sound, and the resolution still stands.
that the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings should be a political system adopted by the United States of America in an effort to restabilize the sluggishly performing economy that has been afflicting this country since 2008. I will be arguing against this resolution by showing how the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification are already unreliable and hasnt yielded any concrete results, and that to use the understanding of those mechanical properties for modifying people to localized economic scenarios is both impossible, impractical, and immoral.
The quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification has its roots back to the ancient kings of ancient Sudan when Egypt was the greatest power in the world, but the science as we know it today wasnt really explored until the 1940's in the middle of World War II in modern France. While under Nazi occupation the French began to research the quantum mechanics of human behavioral modification based on localized economic surroundings as a possible weapon or tactic that could be used to drive the Nazi's out of France or maybe even kill Nazi Germany itself. Their research yielded very limited results before eventually being abandoned due to the liberation of France by the United States and its allies in 1944. Research in the field lied dormant for years before being explored by the Soviet Union in the late 1980's, who wanted to use the technology to try to improve their own economy in the face of a rapidly growing America while their own country was sliding into collapse. It was the Russians who first found the initial big discoveries regarding the quantum mechanics of behavioral modification of people to localized economies, but al such findings could only potentially be exploited by countries whose economies had not yet emerged, not countries who were sliding into decay. Soon after, the Soviet Union abandoned their research, sold their findings to the Chinese, and then 3 years later the nation had dissolved.
That is the basic background, the rest is common knowledge where the chinese began implementing the system as they found themselves in the position of an emerging power to try to reap the benefits of the policies, and have since had resounding success and have vastly improved their economy. Many people have seen this success and have advocated implementing parts of the behavioral modification mechanical policies in the United States and Europe to see if the system can kick up sluggish economies that have not recently emerged, and also in the Middle East where much of the region is in a prime state to exploit the system and rise to power. People against such policies claim it is immoral among other things,but also have strong arguments in showing that numerous other factors could have caused such a rise in economic power that are not necessarily attributed to the quantum mechanics of the behavioral modifications of people. Dissidents contend that the rise of China's economy only coincided with the radical policies they implemented and that correlation =/= causation, while some have gone so far to speculate that such policies have actually held back how much their economy could have improved.
I'll spare you the moral arguments and instead focus on how the French speculated that implementing such policies makes it difficult to readily transition out of such radical policies to less intensive policies once the desired economic growth has been met. Ernest Gorbachev of Russia's experiment showed that due to the intrinsic human nature of resistance against successive economic policy change and how the neurological impact of behavioral modification can cause irrational dependencies, the idea of short term behavioral modification to localized economies for rampant improvement and growth is doomed to fail. Gorbachev's experiment showed that the system is not something you can easily switch in and out of, but it was Japanese economist Woo Chen who postulated that the benefits of behavioral modification for localized economic purposes is only effective when the modifications are done comprehensively on a behavioral level, meaning that the system will not work as well as intended unless it is fully invested into and implemented to people, which could be a problem since the morality of behavioral modification in minute amounts is questionable, let alone massive comprehensive amounts.
For these reasons, understanding the quantum mechanics behind behavioral modification for localized economical benefits to maximize short term economic growth is considered by many to be ineffective, immoral, and only cannot be applied to most westernized economies since they have progressed and emerged centuries ago while behavior modification is only something that can be utilized for emerging economies.
Allow me to summarize and condense my arguments in case I wasnt entirely clear:
If A, then B
If B, then C
If C, then Not D,
If Not D, then maybe G
If E then F
If E and A, then H
If G, then A and not E
If H and G, then E cannot be concluded
Since H and G exist, E both exists and doesnt exist.
For further elaboration, check out this ancient argument developed by the great philospher Mick Jagger:
P1: "and" is a girl word.
P2: "&" is a pretty manly symbol.
P3: A _ E's gender can be alternated.
P4: If A and E, then vagina.
P5: If A "&" E, then penis.
C: A&E is a dick.
By this, my original proof remains valid, my entire philosophical argument remains sound, and the resolution still stands.
Its Ma B-Day!!
General | Posted 11 years agoAsdf..
Give me free art :U
Give me free art :U
Its Ma B-Day!!
General | Posted 11 years agoAsdf..
Give me free art :U
Give me free art :U
Its Ma B-Day!!
General | Posted 11 years agoAsdf..
Give me free art :U
Give me free art :U
Hapy New Year!!!
General | Posted 12 years agoYay! (And holy fuck am I glad 2013 is over)
So.. 2014, I hope this year is better than 2013.
PS. Dose any one read these? Or am I writing this to my
self lol.
So.. 2014, I hope this year is better than 2013.
PS. Dose any one read these? Or am I writing this to my
self lol.
Furaffinity(fully funching and perfect website)
General | Posted 12 years agoSo FA was down for an ENTIRE FUCKING WEEK!!
Great job guys(claps). You managed to break my favorite website yet again..
What ever... maby ill get a DA or so furry, something allong those lines
Great job guys(claps). You managed to break my favorite website yet again..
What ever... maby ill get a DA or so furry, something allong those lines
BACK! Well.. sorta
General | Posted 12 years agoOk so.. i have figured out a few things. One i can be a bit melowdramatic about stuff when things happen :/. Two all i can think about are furries/ just the fandom in genral. I also went to see a therapist, no im not crazy, you dont need to be to see one. In fact he said that talking to crazy people dosent even help. Any way im ALLOT better and that night some shit had happend that made me question allot, but im better. I feel allot more conifident about myself and about other people which helps my shyness. So yeah :P. Also ive started drawing agean!!! I think that not having to judge myself on all the stuff i see on fa was a big problem since i had an areblock for the better part of this and last year. So expect some shitty sketches and stuff later on. I will be returning to fa and skypw butnow, i wont just focas on porn.(Well.. maby a little >:D). So.. thats what has happend for about of a week for me.
Thank you who ever took the time to read this or helped me out
c:
Thank you who ever took the time to read this or helped me out
c:
Good by(for now)
General | Posted 12 years agoI'm going to leave for a bit and I don't know if ill be back..
I'm trying to figure out myself.. I don't know what I like, what I hate, or anything... I like both boys and girls with an affection toward furries. I cant take it anymore, I don't know if I want to stay alive. I hate myself soo much I just cant take it anymore idk what to do. So good by for now.. I'm probably not going to get on Skype for a wile just because its hard to talk to people I have fun with and love.. I'm having allot of problems with myself I cant control my anger, and.. I really don't know who I am! I spend my life on the computer too afraid to talk using a microphone, I pretend to be a kangaroo and all I do is pretend.. I cant take it being like this every day, one after the other, hiding behind a screen, thinking and pretending. I have no friends IRL except for like two who ive met online but even then we don't really talk. I have this one really good friend that I've knows for a few years and kind of like. Hes nice and kind and we kid allot but I just feel empty because that's all we do, talk.. I wish I could meet him but im so shy that idk what would happen, if we'id really match. so good by for now the "furry Fandom" I hope to come back someday when I figure out if I really do like this stuff. No one is probably going to read this but it feels good to let it out. And I was inspired a little bit by this: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5173115/
I really feel for him, but he's made me realize that my life is going no were...
Im not one for to many words so this journal Is a bit smaller that his but that's just because I don't want to share too much with just anyone who stumbles upon my page. Good by everyone..
I may be gone a wile!
I'm trying to figure out myself.. I don't know what I like, what I hate, or anything... I like both boys and girls with an affection toward furries. I cant take it anymore, I don't know if I want to stay alive. I hate myself soo much I just cant take it anymore idk what to do. So good by for now.. I'm probably not going to get on Skype for a wile just because its hard to talk to people I have fun with and love.. I'm having allot of problems with myself I cant control my anger, and.. I really don't know who I am! I spend my life on the computer too afraid to talk using a microphone, I pretend to be a kangaroo and all I do is pretend.. I cant take it being like this every day, one after the other, hiding behind a screen, thinking and pretending. I have no friends IRL except for like two who ive met online but even then we don't really talk. I have this one really good friend that I've knows for a few years and kind of like. Hes nice and kind and we kid allot but I just feel empty because that's all we do, talk.. I wish I could meet him but im so shy that idk what would happen, if we'id really match. so good by for now the "furry Fandom" I hope to come back someday when I figure out if I really do like this stuff. No one is probably going to read this but it feels good to let it out. And I was inspired a little bit by this: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5173115/
I really feel for him, but he's made me realize that my life is going no were...
Im not one for to many words so this journal Is a bit smaller that his but that's just because I don't want to share too much with just anyone who stumbles upon my page. Good by everyone..
I may be gone a wile!
Athus Eternia~
General | Posted 12 years agoYou may not of known him personally, and neather did i, but he was an amazing artist and helped allot of people.
If you did't know, he died in a car accident in 2011. He is greatly missed by many people including myself. (for more info go to this journal http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2813220/ )
More to the point is that an artist who was greatly inspired by him has been drawing and coloring this piece for just over 2 years and he finnaly finished the it and he deservs to have this shown to the world!!
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/11640776/
(^please give him all the favorites^)
Rest In Piece Athus
1•18•1982 - ∞
You will live forver in your art,
and in the hearts of everyone
If you did't know, he died in a car accident in 2011. He is greatly missed by many people including myself. (for more info go to this journal http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2813220/ )
More to the point is that an artist who was greatly inspired by him has been drawing and coloring this piece for just over 2 years and he finnaly finished the it and he deservs to have this shown to the world!!
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/11640776/
(^please give him all the favorites^)
Rest In Piece Athus
1•18•1982 - ∞
You will live forver in your art,
and in the hearts of everyone
Streaming Team fortres 2
General | Posted 12 years agoIt Is Sad Day :C
General | Posted 12 years agoOne of my favorite websites crashed and all of the pics on the forms got deleted.
Idk if you care or not but if you do here is a link to the website.
http://pawsru.org/pawsX/paws/
Idk if you care or not but if you do here is a link to the website.
http://pawsru.org/pawsX/paws/
FIRST JOURNAL 'bout deer's, dicks, and other stuff
General | Posted 12 years agoHello who ever cares, I haven't been doing much lately because I've been having some problems in my life and basically hating everything I draw, so no submissions for awhile. Also I've managed to fuck up both my computers so I wont be able to get on as much (sorry for not skypeing you binxB)
Any way on to the cocks and hot stags *murr
I've been out and lately been taking a liking deer more and more. Why? There just soo hot!! ^=^ probably the dicks, yep its the dicks. Also I am Bi and I like dicks more than chicks :3 but don't get me wrong im fine with RP'n with any girls that want to, and any one else who reads this im going to be a watcher for a while so don't expect too many submissions. I hope I can get back to drawing soon and get out of this writers block so I can start Drawing again. Also I miss RP'n It's fun and I miss the people I usto talk to here on FA, so hope to be back soon! ~LWS
Ps. Still working on fursona if u care. Also check out this its soo HOT
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/9539408/
Any way on to the cocks and hot stags *murr
I've been out and lately been taking a liking deer more and more. Why? There just soo hot!! ^=^ probably the dicks, yep its the dicks. Also I am Bi and I like dicks more than chicks :3 but don't get me wrong im fine with RP'n with any girls that want to, and any one else who reads this im going to be a watcher for a while so don't expect too many submissions. I hope I can get back to drawing soon and get out of this writers block so I can start Drawing again. Also I miss RP'n It's fun and I miss the people I usto talk to here on FA, so hope to be back soon! ~LWS
Ps. Still working on fursona if u care. Also check out this its soo HOT
https://www.furaffinity.net/view/9539408/
