FA+
Shop
Nanoff's "BMZ: Behind" — A 35-year-old furson's lament.
Posted 4 years agohttps://www.furaffinity.net/view/42825946/ — july 17, 2021
let's just say.. ..nanoff struck an accord with me — ´has struck on one of my "passion" nerves, by way of miles the tiger
you see: miles feels hell'a self-conscious that he isn't "successful," like the way (the louder members of our) society expects he's supposed to be
indeed: i saw in the comments to nanoff's comicº, a lot of people expressing a similar sentiment — of being older but not, necessarily, being commensurately mature
as i said, i didn't want to clog up nanoff's page with my diatribeÂą; in what i consider a risky move, I opt to leave my thoughts here in my own space
but!!
in an exciting, more-modern age compromise, i decided to do this work in a google doc: accessible here
with this, i have a little more flexibility in formatting my thoughts how i want them..
..and i won't have to worry about losing too much, should there be a crash in the middle of my composing — thanks to g-doc's autosaving
microsoft word was starting to piss me off anyway; in any event, i can (and i will) save my work to my personal drive, once i am done
for now, this is a work in progress — i am not close to being done.
i'll append an "ETA" here when i am
maybe some of you will like to see my updates live as i'm working on them?
Âş as of the time of this writing
Âą a consideration towards others, i can admit, i didn't used to make
let's just say.. ..nanoff struck an accord with me — ´has struck on one of my "passion" nerves, by way of miles the tiger
you see: miles feels hell'a self-conscious that he isn't "successful," like the way (the louder members of our) society expects he's supposed to be
indeed: i saw in the comments to nanoff's comicº, a lot of people expressing a similar sentiment — of being older but not, necessarily, being commensurately mature
as i said, i didn't want to clog up nanoff's page with my diatribeÂą; in what i consider a risky move, I opt to leave my thoughts here in my own space
but!!
in an exciting, more-modern age compromise, i decided to do this work in a google doc: accessible here
with this, i have a little more flexibility in formatting my thoughts how i want them..
..and i won't have to worry about losing too much, should there be a crash in the middle of my composing — thanks to g-doc's autosaving
microsoft word was starting to piss me off anyway; in any event, i can (and i will) save my work to my personal drive, once i am done
for now, this is a work in progress — i am not close to being done.
i'll append an "ETA" here when i am
maybe some of you will like to see my updates live as i'm working on them?
Âş as of the time of this writing
Âą a consideration towards others, i can admit, i didn't used to make
Defenders of Integrity — Ran Off This Platform?
Posted 4 years agoi return to the site after a few hours, to find that < indagare >'s left me a comment to my reply on one of his recent journals ..... when i click through, i discover he's since disabled his account
perturbed, i attempt to seek out < tonyasong > — in my sleuthful effort to determine if she has any insights on what happened. . . . .to see she's tanked her account also
i am confused.
gare and tonya were fighting off the colonizer- / oppressor-sympathizing < LongTom > & < HeavenSteed > ... so why are they not here right now?
my comrades were not gutter trash like the White Genocidist apologizers.
what gives?
.
perturbed, i attempt to seek out < tonyasong > — in my sleuthful effort to determine if she has any insights on what happened. . . . .to see she's tanked her account also
i am confused.
gare and tonya were fighting off the colonizer- / oppressor-sympathizing < LongTom > & < HeavenSteed > ... so why are they not here right now?
my comrades were not gutter trash like the White Genocidist apologizers.
what gives?
.
a confession.
Posted 7 years agotrue story: when i first started out here in fur•affinity, i really didn't know that Hyper was a thing
and has been A Thing, seemingly, long-before i even joined this group
regardless, i stand by what i first penned in my journal, almost 6 years ago — and probably even more staunchly so, now
however...i will also stand by what i wrote in response to a fellow member who'd commented on the entry: which is, while i won't endorse that level of Anatomical Unrealism. . . . .i won't go out of my way to tell others they can't enjoy Hyper, or that they can't create Hyper
(just.. ..don't go trying to force that on me, either — thks)
anyway.
i don't want to come off as a kill•joy.
you lot do as you please, as long as the activity-all is between those who give their uncoerced consent to partake.
and has been A Thing, seemingly, long-before i even joined this group
regardless, i stand by what i first penned in my journal, almost 6 years ago — and probably even more staunchly so, now
however...i will also stand by what i wrote in response to a fellow member who'd commented on the entry: which is, while i won't endorse that level of Anatomical Unrealism. . . . .i won't go out of my way to tell others they can't enjoy Hyper, or that they can't create Hyper
(just.. ..don't go trying to force that on me, either — thks)
anyway.
i don't want to come off as a kill•joy.
you lot do as you please, as long as the activity-all is between those who give their uncoerced consent to partake.
something new for 2018
Posted 7 years agoyes.
let's.
let's have something new on the face of my homepage, instead of what was there before.
(´cuz at this point anyway, i think the poor guy's suffered enough)
how are you guys doin'?
let's.
let's have something new on the face of my homepage, instead of what was there before.
(´cuz at this point anyway, i think the poor guy's suffered enough)
how are you guys doin'?
i've been blocked by RedRusker, apparently.
Posted 12 years agoso, in the description of one of his recent submissions (which, apparently, has since been deleted), rusker levied some complaint regarding a certain aspect of his art; in return i left a response in the submission's comment section towards the effect of, try going outside of your comfort zone, dude-a-rino, if you wish to discover a way to mitigate your concern
fast forward about 10 days or so, and when i attempt to add one of rusker's newer submissions to my favourites... ...i find, i cannot.
because i'd been blocked.
isn't that too bad?
so, i'm just curious if this was intentional, or if it was a mistake.
i'd hate to think that what apparently was a benign suggestion, from me, would make the fellow feel compelled to give me the kibosh.
fast forward about 10 days or so, and when i attempt to add one of rusker's newer submissions to my favourites... ...i find, i cannot.
because i'd been blocked.
isn't that too bad?
so, i'm just curious if this was intentional, or if it was a mistake.
i'd hate to think that what apparently was a benign suggestion, from me, would make the fellow feel compelled to give me the kibosh.
am i the only one who gets disappointed when...
Posted 13 years ago...coming across someone's artwork, that you want to add to your favourites so much, but because of one detail (i.e. "hyper-sized genitalia"), you refrain, because you fear that other people will get the "wrong idea" about what you're into (or, should it be posited, what's "important" to you)?
as it so happens, i guess i'm turned off by hyper-sexuality (glorifying/fetishizing the act of Sex itself, without, at least, providing some sort of context or story for why this "hot sex" is happening); and i've never been able to get into those clown-sized, disproportionate phalluses either.
that's just Me.
all the same, i become disheartened when i see what is otherwise an æsthetically-pleasing character model yet there's a big inappropriate wang hitting me straight in my face, first thing i enlarge the thumbnail (usually to take a look at what could have been).
i am far from conservative (as any cursory scan through my faved items will easily reveal) but.. ..i guess i prefer investing my emotions in things that can (in theory) observe the laws of physics.
(do these hyper furries only need the head of their dicks to be in their sucklers' mouths to be satisfied?
how can you fit in the entire length of the 3 foot wang through the mouth of a 6 foot body without the wang's being burned by the acids/enzymes of his digestive tract?)
i'm sure several others have made posts about this sort of cognitive dissonance before.. ..but that's fine: i have the right to chime in my assent here.
ne?
as it so happens, i guess i'm turned off by hyper-sexuality (glorifying/fetishizing the act of Sex itself, without, at least, providing some sort of context or story for why this "hot sex" is happening); and i've never been able to get into those clown-sized, disproportionate phalluses either.
that's just Me.
all the same, i become disheartened when i see what is otherwise an æsthetically-pleasing character model yet there's a big inappropriate wang hitting me straight in my face, first thing i enlarge the thumbnail (usually to take a look at what could have been).
i am far from conservative (as any cursory scan through my faved items will easily reveal) but.. ..i guess i prefer investing my emotions in things that can (in theory) observe the laws of physics.
(do these hyper furries only need the head of their dicks to be in their sucklers' mouths to be satisfied?
how can you fit in the entire length of the 3 foot wang through the mouth of a 6 foot body without the wang's being burned by the acids/enzymes of his digestive tract?)
i'm sure several others have made posts about this sort of cognitive dissonance before.. ..but that's fine: i have the right to chime in my assent here.
ne?
