Swat Kats Kickstarter
General | Posted 10 years agoMost of you have probably already seen a journal on this or just know about it some other way but I am going to mention it anyway. The Tremblay brothers now seem to own the rights to Swat Kats, they are the same ones who came up with the original concept for the show. They have a kickstarter page to raise funds to try to restart the show. https://www.kickstarter.com/project.....on/description . It already has enough money to meet base funding, though this does NOT mean that there will be a new show just that they have enough money to produce the basics to pitch it to networks. The more money they get the more likely it is a real show will result as the extra money allows them to produce more by themselves to give them more of an edge when pitching to networks. As it stands now they are less than $13,000 away from being able to produce a trailer. Please become a member and help support this. There is still more than 20 days left and if it reaches one million in funding than they will have enough to produce a 5 part mini-series event REGARDLESS if a network picks it up. I would love to see that and as a member of the furry community I am sure you would too. Plus some of the pledge rewards include stuff from Swat Kats t-shirts down to original production art from the show, to stuff signed by the voice actors. Pretty good rewards that you know you want to sign up for.
Birds
General | Posted 13 years agoA computer made computer game.
General | Posted 14 years agoThis is kind of cool or I guess creepy depending on your point of view. There is a new video game made almost entirely by an A.I. Let me explain, a man developed an A.I. program to develop video games. Though, it has to follow certain rules. According to what I read, The game randomly develops layouts, enemy positions, enemy functions, power up functions and positions for each level. Than according to rules it has been given it decides if the level is playable and if it is fun (like if the level is difficult but you can still play through with power up use = fun). It takes the fun levels and develops around 400 variations of them and again using the rules decides which one of the variations is the most fun than compares that fun level to other fun levels it has already made. It chooses the most fun levels than *bam* you have a game. There are some limitations, it does not know how to add music (let alone what would be appropriate), it does not add sound effects (same problem someone added them later), and a person is still needs to test, also characters designs are done by a person. So a person is still needed to do all of that, and even if this ends up being used a lot and greatly improved on I doubt it will replace game designers even at a small scale. Though the entirety of every level is built by the program and that is pretty cool. The game is at the level of some simple IPad kind of games and took about 12 hours to do including the human needed parts. In fact the man who made it said there is technically nothing stopping anyone from just using this and posting a new game to the app store every 12 hours. Been playing it, it is kind of cool. Though apparently the program thinks fun means a lot of jump power ups, do not even bother shooting the enemies it takes forever for them to die, and the game is only 3 levels. Still a great start, for a computer.
http://www.newscientist.com/movie/s.....ation-invaders
other more simple 1 level games here:
http://www.gamesbyangelina.org/games/
http://www.gamesbyangelina.org/games/garnet/
http://www.newscientist.com/movie/s.....ation-invaders
other more simple 1 level games here:
http://www.gamesbyangelina.org/games/
http://www.gamesbyangelina.org/games/garnet/
Swat Kats thing
General | Posted 14 years agoSo in case the one or two people who might end up reading this are Swat Kats fans I have been informed of this http://swatkats.info/letter-writing-campaign. I have seen a website try to start a campign before but it never went off. Hopefully though, it will do better this time that is assuming Mr. Tremblay (one of the shows creators) has real interest in restarting the show. This is a letter writting campaign, as in actual physcial mail. Harder to get people to do but I think if it is successful it has more of an impact than just doing something like click here to virtually sign this. If you like Swat Kats, than this is your admittdly slim but possibly only chance to see new stuff. Please write in. Show it still has a fanbase and feel free to point out in your letter that when the show was on the air (new) it was the highest rated cartoon.
Read
General | Posted 14 years agoI am just putting this up on the off chance someone reads it and than reads the original journal. Anyway, MarkWulfgar is streaming tonight, go see, get a commission. http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/2521100/
Thanks
General | Posted 15 years agoOk, so it turns out some people watch me now. *Shock and surprise* . *Gasps* there are even a small number of comments now. Anyway I have never bothered to thank anyone who watched me or favorited the commissions I had done. So, here it is thank you. I do not post or do much of anything and one something goes up you can be assured it is not my work but you watched or favorited anyway. So, Thanks.
Rant but informative.
General | Posted 15 years agoSorry I just need to rant. I know no one is really going to read it but maybe it will cathartic for me. Anyway. I guess I am going to start with PETA. I was watching CSPAN book coverage, lame I know. Anyway the guy was talking about the book a rat is a big is a dog is a boy. Anyway, I know PETA is full of arrogant stupid assholes but this is annoying me know so I am going to talk about it. One of the things discussed in the book was about the founder of PETA and how he still brags about being the first in the nation to get a scientist arrested on cruelty to animal charges. Well what he did was as a college student he signed up to be the student assistant to a professor doing research on chimps for stroke victims. Of course that meant damaging the chimps brains. Anyway when the Professor went on a two week vacation the Janitors that were supposed to keep the place clean stopped coming (they did not say why, which should be a big tip off) and as the student in charge of the lab with the professor gone he was to inform the administrative staff if there was a problem. Which he did not do. Instead he waited a week until the animals were in their own filth than called the police and the professor was arrested on animal cruelty charges when he got back from vacation. The charges were later dismissed but it ended up delaying his research by 8 years. Out of his research we got a method to re-teach stroke victims how to move a method that is now being applied to cerebral palsy patients. Anyway the guy still openly claims this as a victory. Well, yes and I am sure the stroke victims and cerebral palsy suffers agree with you I am sure they were happy not being able to move at least 1/2 there body over those 8 years because they get to know it stopped chimps from being hurt for 8 years. Like when people got upset over an experiment I studied in College were kittens eyes were sewn shut at birth Than unsewn at different stages and later had the brains studied. yes this may seem grotesque but the studied was need to see how optic never develop and effect the brain which could eventually be used to treat blindness in humans. I would rather do this experiments on animals and get some results, even if they end up failing they will at least show us which direction to or not to follow. When working for treatments for blindness or strokes even just that should be enough. Some people say for things like testing medicine on animals is stupid because animals can react differently. Yes, that is true (but incredibly rarely assuming land mammal to land mammal) and that might even be a problem if there were not at least another 5 stages of testing they have to go through. In fact as I studied something related to this in college there were only 1 and 1/2 medicines (I saw 1/2 because the the 2nd one did not get to FDA screening stage) were major medicines would have had different results in going to human trials. Granted that was a couple years ago but how many decades have we been doing this.
This is now my segue to some of Obama's Czars. No matter your opinion on Obama, which I do not want to hear and is unrelated to this rant, his choices on Czars are far more than questionably but rather disgusting. Cass Sunstein, openly admits to wanting to give animals the same constitutional rights as people, to actually be listed in the constitution. This would include the ability of animals to sue. Of course it would not be the animals that would be suing as they have no fricking idea what the hell is going on but rather extreme animal groups. Supporting ideas like a man in Europe who was prosecuted for animal cruelty because he did not reel a bass in fast enough causing undue suffering to the animal. He has also compared our use of animals in agriculture as something in the future people will see as morally as bad as the slavery and mass executions of human beings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaJ8VXYdBrg
about a minute in.
Really what kind of person in their right mind can make that comparison? He also thinks there should be some limits on free speech. Because it could be damaging to the government or cause emotional harm. In Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. He advocates that certain conspiracy theories should be outlawed, like the fake moon landing, JFK assassination, and that the government was behind 9/11. Granted to think these things people are either crazy or so horribly misinformed that the truth could never reach them even if you showed them direct proof. Either way outlawing it would make it worse. The things he suggests to accomplish this are fines and hiring impartial scientists to spread the truth and have agents infiltrate “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine”. Does no one see the irony in this? To control conspiracies have a conspiracy? He even advocates controlling other forms of media like blogs believing they should be held accountable for spreading rumors. He singles out Glen Beck for that. Never mind your political ideologies on the man, again I do not want to hear them. Though to suggest this at all let alone to single it out against someone who hate is crazy.
This brings me to another Obama appointee that I have a big issue with. federal school safety czar Kevin Jennings. Who is homosexual. Well ok no big deal so am I. Though his ideologies and teaching methods are the problem. First he is a founding member of Gay, Lesbian Straight Education Network. The problem is their books and who they are marketed too. Ones of the books was about a 1st grader who explores his sexuality by having sex with his male classmates. Too show that homosexuality is natural and kids should be excepting of it. He has distanced himself saying he does not have any direct influence in choosing the books. Though these are the books they recommend to schools. I also believe the recommend reading list has now been changed, not to remove the books but to downplay them by removing them from the top choices. Like reflections of a rock lobster were he talks about avoiding venereal disease as a toddler. Or this book for 7th graders http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4SY_3FmMcc . Though that is not all He also wrote the forward for a book called Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. Um excuse me but there should be no sexual discussion of any kind in an elementary school. Also why is there very little reporting of this only 12 Senators asked Obama for his removal and most media is not covering it. There is some on Fox and a safe family Website mostly the safe family site. With this being virtually the only news I could find
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.co.....-media-silent/
Hell with the books list different now it took me forever to find a list of the books that caused the problem in the first place: Growing Up Gay, One Teenager in Ten: Writings by Gay and Lesbian Youth, Reflections of a Rock Lobster: A Story of Growing Up Gay, Becoming a Man. Films include The Disco Years and Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. He was also part of what became known as fistgate. Where he set up a workshop for students and teachers, where teachers got classroom credit, and the kids were as young as 12 and lectures include things like how fisting can be pleasureable. Though the network he was a part of sued and a court prevented the release of the tapes a safe family group made. The order was latter reversed (as the boston court had no right to do it) but they still prevented the family group from showing the audio. So, you have to right in to a newspaper in Massachussets that covered the story in 2000 (before than ban) to receive an unedited copy. So, the best I could find was an edited copy here. Edited in length and with commentary.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/.....te/tape01.html
His groups explanation for this problem was 1. none of the underage students took the sexually explicit pamplet home and 2 it was not the organizaers fault because they were not the ones who brought up the idea of fisting as part of the discussion. Well even if that is true they should not have responded and no 12 years old should be part of any discussion with an adult where fisting could ever be a topic. Also if there was nothing to be ashmed about why sue to stop its release. They also would say but mos tof these are based on people's real life experiences. Well I do not care what the hell real life experiences these people say that they had there is no reason to ever have a book depicting sex with 1st graders in a middle school.
He also advocated the showing of a dvd called gay pioneers. It is supposed to be about the 'heroes' of the gay movement. Though those include a man who has been quoted as saying Nambla should be allowed to speak their mind and work to change the laws and that Bestiality , even though he is not into it, is no big deal because the animal does not get hurt. Most of use here would consider ourselves furries but I would hope no of us would ever do that. The biggest problem though is his open acception of pedophiles. As a teacher a 15 year old reported to him that a man took him home and had sex with him. His response was that he told him that in the future to make sure you were a condom. No action no following a state law to report. In fact when another teacher found out he threated to sue her because he said saying he did something wrong was inflammatory. He claimed he had no knowledge of the statutury rape but an audio tape from last year of him giving a speech he tells the story of tell the kid to wear a condom when he has sex with the adult and in his own book he says that after the condom discussion he was happy to see the kid walk out with a smile. Ok, so now he admits he would hadle it differently but he admits no fault and the fact he brags and says the kid smiled it seems more like he is proud of himself. In fact after an hour of searching I could only get this article that went into any detail. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news.....ents-pleasure/ . I followed stories that referenced it until one of the links brought me to a story that said the washintontimes had an editorial on it. Really an editorial thats it.
How horrible is it that Obama's choice for school safety though allowing a pedophilic relationship was a good idea?
Another editorial at the same time as that one mentions that there has not even been 14 total news stories about this.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news.....uble-standard/
This editorial is really to point out a double standard with a Republican sex scandal. If you hated that sex scandal again I do not want to hear about it. the hell not? Why the hell is this man not under arrest? What the hell is Obama thinking?
Now to finish my rant. Some old stuff That I have been thinking about because they voted to see if Puerto Rico wants to become a state. Which does not really matter what the Senate votes because Puerot Rico would have to open it for votes. Though that got me thinking The United States undertook a massive Eugenics program there. Why have we never apologized for that? In the end the United States forceable starelized 64,000 people. Our Eugencis program started in 1907 but we carreid it on long after the second world war. With the last law last enforeced in 1978. One of the ways we did this was to deem them mentaly insane and hence unfit you would be arrested and steralized. Though this include the bias practices of skull measuring. Which is not only true but only works if you fudge the numbers and really unfair IQ tests. One of the IQ questions is about proper rules in Racquetball. What the hell I can not answer that. In fact our Eugencis program was quoted by Hitler as a reason to start Nazi Germany's and the fact The U.S. had Eugenic laws was used as a defense by Nazi war criminal at Nuremburg. If you have ever done something Hitler can quote has a good idea you have issues. Even after the Court declared we could not do that, by than how many people had been locked up in Asylums how many had had there god given ability to procreate taken away, well at least 64,000. Than the Eugenics laws did not go away instead it just went to forced abortions. Now no matter your opions on abortions, again I do not want to hear it, If would have to agree forcing an abortion on a mother because you find her unfit is beyond unfair. Since we only stopped in 1978 there are a lot of people left alive from this, why have we never apologized to them? why has the Democratic Party never tried to make amends for supporting Eugenics laws before the 2nd world war? I only ask this becuase By 1965 The U.S. had sterilized alomst 1/3 of Puerto Rican women or 1/6 of the total population. Which if I am not mistaken is not included in the 64,000 total. You might say but most here were not forced. Yes, well they were not informed either. The U.S. would provide this service at little or no money and they did not inform people that sterilization was irreversiable. In fact laws promoted the idea. So even in a case like this why would they want to become a state? We never appologized. That said I would still like them as a state. And the last vote in the 80's showed just as much support in Puerto Rico for being a state as remaining a common wealth. Now it might be even higher.
Again this is really just for me to say these things. Over the past 2 days they have weighed on my mind and my mother probably does not want to hear them anymore. I just needed to say them to someone, even if it is just pretending that someone is listening.
This is now my segue to some of Obama's Czars. No matter your opinion on Obama, which I do not want to hear and is unrelated to this rant, his choices on Czars are far more than questionably but rather disgusting. Cass Sunstein, openly admits to wanting to give animals the same constitutional rights as people, to actually be listed in the constitution. This would include the ability of animals to sue. Of course it would not be the animals that would be suing as they have no fricking idea what the hell is going on but rather extreme animal groups. Supporting ideas like a man in Europe who was prosecuted for animal cruelty because he did not reel a bass in fast enough causing undue suffering to the animal. He has also compared our use of animals in agriculture as something in the future people will see as morally as bad as the slavery and mass executions of human beings.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaJ8VXYdBrg
about a minute in.
Really what kind of person in their right mind can make that comparison? He also thinks there should be some limits on free speech. Because it could be damaging to the government or cause emotional harm. In Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. He advocates that certain conspiracy theories should be outlawed, like the fake moon landing, JFK assassination, and that the government was behind 9/11. Granted to think these things people are either crazy or so horribly misinformed that the truth could never reach them even if you showed them direct proof. Either way outlawing it would make it worse. The things he suggests to accomplish this are fines and hiring impartial scientists to spread the truth and have agents infiltrate “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine”. Does no one see the irony in this? To control conspiracies have a conspiracy? He even advocates controlling other forms of media like blogs believing they should be held accountable for spreading rumors. He singles out Glen Beck for that. Never mind your political ideologies on the man, again I do not want to hear them. Though to suggest this at all let alone to single it out against someone who hate is crazy.
This brings me to another Obama appointee that I have a big issue with. federal school safety czar Kevin Jennings. Who is homosexual. Well ok no big deal so am I. Though his ideologies and teaching methods are the problem. First he is a founding member of Gay, Lesbian Straight Education Network. The problem is their books and who they are marketed too. Ones of the books was about a 1st grader who explores his sexuality by having sex with his male classmates. Too show that homosexuality is natural and kids should be excepting of it. He has distanced himself saying he does not have any direct influence in choosing the books. Though these are the books they recommend to schools. I also believe the recommend reading list has now been changed, not to remove the books but to downplay them by removing them from the top choices. Like reflections of a rock lobster were he talks about avoiding venereal disease as a toddler. Or this book for 7th graders http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4SY_3FmMcc . Though that is not all He also wrote the forward for a book called Queering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling. Um excuse me but there should be no sexual discussion of any kind in an elementary school. Also why is there very little reporting of this only 12 Senators asked Obama for his removal and most media is not covering it. There is some on Fox and a safe family Website mostly the safe family site. With this being virtually the only news I could find
http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.co.....-media-silent/
Hell with the books list different now it took me forever to find a list of the books that caused the problem in the first place: Growing Up Gay, One Teenager in Ten: Writings by Gay and Lesbian Youth, Reflections of a Rock Lobster: A Story of Growing Up Gay, Becoming a Man. Films include The Disco Years and Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. He was also part of what became known as fistgate. Where he set up a workshop for students and teachers, where teachers got classroom credit, and the kids were as young as 12 and lectures include things like how fisting can be pleasureable. Though the network he was a part of sued and a court prevented the release of the tapes a safe family group made. The order was latter reversed (as the boston court had no right to do it) but they still prevented the family group from showing the audio. So, you have to right in to a newspaper in Massachussets that covered the story in 2000 (before than ban) to receive an unedited copy. So, the best I could find was an edited copy here. Edited in length and with commentary.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/.....te/tape01.html
His groups explanation for this problem was 1. none of the underage students took the sexually explicit pamplet home and 2 it was not the organizaers fault because they were not the ones who brought up the idea of fisting as part of the discussion. Well even if that is true they should not have responded and no 12 years old should be part of any discussion with an adult where fisting could ever be a topic. Also if there was nothing to be ashmed about why sue to stop its release. They also would say but mos tof these are based on people's real life experiences. Well I do not care what the hell real life experiences these people say that they had there is no reason to ever have a book depicting sex with 1st graders in a middle school.
He also advocated the showing of a dvd called gay pioneers. It is supposed to be about the 'heroes' of the gay movement. Though those include a man who has been quoted as saying Nambla should be allowed to speak their mind and work to change the laws and that Bestiality , even though he is not into it, is no big deal because the animal does not get hurt. Most of use here would consider ourselves furries but I would hope no of us would ever do that. The biggest problem though is his open acception of pedophiles. As a teacher a 15 year old reported to him that a man took him home and had sex with him. His response was that he told him that in the future to make sure you were a condom. No action no following a state law to report. In fact when another teacher found out he threated to sue her because he said saying he did something wrong was inflammatory. He claimed he had no knowledge of the statutury rape but an audio tape from last year of him giving a speech he tells the story of tell the kid to wear a condom when he has sex with the adult and in his own book he says that after the condom discussion he was happy to see the kid walk out with a smile. Ok, so now he admits he would hadle it differently but he admits no fault and the fact he brags and says the kid smiled it seems more like he is proud of himself. In fact after an hour of searching I could only get this article that went into any detail. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news.....ents-pleasure/ . I followed stories that referenced it until one of the links brought me to a story that said the washintontimes had an editorial on it. Really an editorial thats it.
How horrible is it that Obama's choice for school safety though allowing a pedophilic relationship was a good idea?
Another editorial at the same time as that one mentions that there has not even been 14 total news stories about this.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news.....uble-standard/
This editorial is really to point out a double standard with a Republican sex scandal. If you hated that sex scandal again I do not want to hear about it. the hell not? Why the hell is this man not under arrest? What the hell is Obama thinking?
Now to finish my rant. Some old stuff That I have been thinking about because they voted to see if Puerto Rico wants to become a state. Which does not really matter what the Senate votes because Puerot Rico would have to open it for votes. Though that got me thinking The United States undertook a massive Eugenics program there. Why have we never apologized for that? In the end the United States forceable starelized 64,000 people. Our Eugencis program started in 1907 but we carreid it on long after the second world war. With the last law last enforeced in 1978. One of the ways we did this was to deem them mentaly insane and hence unfit you would be arrested and steralized. Though this include the bias practices of skull measuring. Which is not only true but only works if you fudge the numbers and really unfair IQ tests. One of the IQ questions is about proper rules in Racquetball. What the hell I can not answer that. In fact our Eugencis program was quoted by Hitler as a reason to start Nazi Germany's and the fact The U.S. had Eugenic laws was used as a defense by Nazi war criminal at Nuremburg. If you have ever done something Hitler can quote has a good idea you have issues. Even after the Court declared we could not do that, by than how many people had been locked up in Asylums how many had had there god given ability to procreate taken away, well at least 64,000. Than the Eugenics laws did not go away instead it just went to forced abortions. Now no matter your opions on abortions, again I do not want to hear it, If would have to agree forcing an abortion on a mother because you find her unfit is beyond unfair. Since we only stopped in 1978 there are a lot of people left alive from this, why have we never apologized to them? why has the Democratic Party never tried to make amends for supporting Eugenics laws before the 2nd world war? I only ask this becuase By 1965 The U.S. had sterilized alomst 1/3 of Puerto Rican women or 1/6 of the total population. Which if I am not mistaken is not included in the 64,000 total. You might say but most here were not forced. Yes, well they were not informed either. The U.S. would provide this service at little or no money and they did not inform people that sterilization was irreversiable. In fact laws promoted the idea. So even in a case like this why would they want to become a state? We never appologized. That said I would still like them as a state. And the last vote in the 80's showed just as much support in Puerto Rico for being a state as remaining a common wealth. Now it might be even higher.
Again this is really just for me to say these things. Over the past 2 days they have weighed on my mind and my mother probably does not want to hear them anymore. I just needed to say them to someone, even if it is just pretending that someone is listening.
A Sale, I guess.
General | Posted 16 years agoOk recently I order some gay japanese bara porn stuff. Six things to be exact. I got the order on the 4th but two of the products were not the products I ordered. Now I have tried to contact the company three times, twice by thier website and once through direct e-mail. I offered to mail the wrong products back and asked for the correct products. The only thing is they have not responded to any of my e-mails. Now this does not turn me off to the company or anything I mean they have been more helpful than any other internet compnay I have ever dealt with on privous issues I have had. My problem is this I have two gay bara porn products I do not need, I already owned them. Since the compnay has not responded to me at this point I am going to assume that they are not going to. So, I think I want to sell them. The Products are a gay game Incubus the 21st http://www.rainbow-shoppers.com/en/.....G000518100078. http://www.rainbow-shoppers.com/photo/G000518100078S0000-2.jpg I would sell that for 40 dollars not including shipping and handling. The game was never used and is still in this plastic wrap. I know that is the same price the website sells it for except with me you would not need to pay 20 bucks for shipping from Japan. The game itself I think is great fun you play a wizard that is no longer in wizard school who captures a Incubus and uses him to invade other peoples dreams/minds and gets them to have sex. Though how well you are at getting them to want to have gay sex depends on these little pseudo mini games you play. The other product is a graphic novel thing called EXPERIENCE http://www.rainbow-shoppers.com/pho.....030S0000-2.jpg it contains 6 short stories by Tsukasa Matsuzaki. A great artist who does alot of these comics. I guess I would sell that for 6 dollars not including shipping and handling. Also, since I do not want to be responsible for something lost in the mail it might be best for you to get shipping insurance too. That is if I can figure out how to do that. If anyone is intrested in this stuff please contact me. Also money would have to go through paypal.
Question.
General | Posted 17 years agoWhile I myself do not really draw and have said I will not be posting art here, I have over the time I have been here I have gotten several commissions done. I was just wondering, for all of you people who watch someone who does nothing, would anyone want me to post the commissions I have had done. I should point out that the commissions would be the same ones already posted on the other artist's pages, they would not be posted in any better quality, and there would be some commissions I do not post. Now, with all that said would anyone be intrested in having me do this?
Hey!
General | Posted 19 years agoLook, I figured out the completely obvious journal system. Yeah Me. Anyway this journal is really more of a notice to anyone who by some freakish accident ends up here. You don't need to be here. Really I am not going to do anything like ever. I am just here to watch others. So, you can stop reading and leave if you want. Really stop reading. and stop. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Are you still reading this? wow. I told you not to continue. but noooo your still reading. Just kept reading even though nothing is being said. really, I am going to stop talking now so you don't need to continue.
Told ya.
Told ya.
FA+
