FA+
Shop
Thats it for Radio
General | Posted 5 months agoMay upload some fursuiting photos later, and ill be introducing my other suits also!
Upload spam now
General | Posted 5 months agoMay came and went an July is here and i am finally bringing this account active and uploading.
Over the past month ive started selling off OCs i don't have suits/pooltoys of. About 60 OCs, and only a handful have sold so far.....
This all the uploads i have the energy for tonight. Ive been in 5 different states this week alone and i am exhausted.
More uploads tomorrow hopefully!
Over the past month ive started selling off OCs i don't have suits/pooltoys of. About 60 OCs, and only a handful have sold so far.....
This all the uploads i have the energy for tonight. Ive been in 5 different states this week alone and i am exhausted.
More uploads tomorrow hopefully!
Its been a while
General | Posted 7 months agoI basically abandoned this account 8 months ago when the puritans almost took control of this site.
3 months ago i got a response on the dispute trouble ticket against some chibi art i posted, saying i can resubmit it now that everything is cleared up.
Im gonna try again. This is a notice i will be mass uploading over the span of the rest of May
3 months ago i got a response on the dispute trouble ticket against some chibi art i posted, saying i can resubmit it now that everything is cleared up.
Im gonna try again. This is a notice i will be mass uploading over the span of the rest of May
On the legal side of closed species -
General | Posted 3 years agoSaw this in another illegal Primagens F-list. Decided it would be good armor for here too~
Paraquoted from Runes f-list:
The US Patent Office (https://www.uspto.gov) does not have any entries from Malice-Risu for either Primagen or Protogen.
Neither do either of these terms return records from the European Patent Office (epo.org)
In the Australian Intellectual Property Office (https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/), patent 2034501 for Primagen has been declined trademark protections.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (https://www.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/introduction.html) has no references to Primagen and Protogen outside of medical technologies, none of which relates to Malice-Risu/Koinu.
Likewise, the Japan Patent Office (https://www.jpo.go.jp/e/) returned zero results for trademark of Primagen, and one result of Protogen linked to pharmaceutical technologies, similar to Canada.
This does not support the claim of closed-species, nor does Malice-Risu/Koinu have any legal authority to restrict the creation and use of Primagens or Protogens. You need not take my word for these things, you can cross-check these patent offices yourselves.
While these are only five Patent and Trademark Offices and an exhaustive search of other regions was not performed, I am confident these five are sufficient to support my assertion that Primagens and Protogens do not enjoy any trademark protections.
tl;dr Primagen and Protogen are open species. So is pretty much every other "closed species"
You don't need to believe me, you can go read up on it yourself. This is a compilation of the Copyright Act 1968 that shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 23 June 2017 [legislation.gov.au]
Relevant sections include Part III Divisions 1, 2, 3, 4B, 7, and 8. Feel free to read up on these sections yourself.
And again, from the protogen/primagen originator's home country, comes some more knowledge on beginner information concerning IP [ipaustralia.gov.au] including, but not limited to, the following excerpt;
Quote:
Copyright
The moment an idea or creative concept is documented on paper or electronically it is automatically protected by copyright in Australia.
We do not handle copyright. The responsibility for copyright belongs to the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications.
Copyright protects the original expression of ideas, but not the ideas themselves.
A species falls under the article of an idea, and is inherently not covered as copyright. Unique and specific characters of said species do get inherent protections. The idea of closed species is inherently inhibitive of innovation and creativity, and only opens up opportunity for harassment.
If you are still sour about me having "illegal" closed species OCs, you can leave.
Have a good day~
Paraquoted from Runes f-list:
The US Patent Office (https://www.uspto.gov) does not have any entries from Malice-Risu for either Primagen or Protogen.
Neither do either of these terms return records from the European Patent Office (epo.org)
In the Australian Intellectual Property Office (https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/), patent 2034501 for Primagen has been declined trademark protections.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (https://www.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/introduction.html) has no references to Primagen and Protogen outside of medical technologies, none of which relates to Malice-Risu/Koinu.
Likewise, the Japan Patent Office (https://www.jpo.go.jp/e/) returned zero results for trademark of Primagen, and one result of Protogen linked to pharmaceutical technologies, similar to Canada.
This does not support the claim of closed-species, nor does Malice-Risu/Koinu have any legal authority to restrict the creation and use of Primagens or Protogens. You need not take my word for these things, you can cross-check these patent offices yourselves.
While these are only five Patent and Trademark Offices and an exhaustive search of other regions was not performed, I am confident these five are sufficient to support my assertion that Primagens and Protogens do not enjoy any trademark protections.
tl;dr Primagen and Protogen are open species. So is pretty much every other "closed species"
You don't need to believe me, you can go read up on it yourself. This is a compilation of the Copyright Act 1968 that shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 23 June 2017 [legislation.gov.au]
Relevant sections include Part III Divisions 1, 2, 3, 4B, 7, and 8. Feel free to read up on these sections yourself.
And again, from the protogen/primagen originator's home country, comes some more knowledge on beginner information concerning IP [ipaustralia.gov.au] including, but not limited to, the following excerpt;
Quote:
Copyright
The moment an idea or creative concept is documented on paper or electronically it is automatically protected by copyright in Australia.
We do not handle copyright. The responsibility for copyright belongs to the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications.
Copyright protects the original expression of ideas, but not the ideas themselves.
A species falls under the article of an idea, and is inherently not covered as copyright. Unique and specific characters of said species do get inherent protections. The idea of closed species is inherently inhibitive of innovation and creativity, and only opens up opportunity for harassment.
If you are still sour about me having "illegal" closed species OCs, you can leave.
Have a good day~
The closed species SIMPing strangeness continues
General | Posted 3 years agoI find it strange that a lot of accounts that defended closed species seem to disappear.....
Just yesterday a post of an Illegal Primagen called "Light" ended up on my timeline.
One of the comments was something along the lines of "But isn't that illegal?"
My response to that was "Nobody cares. Closed species is a legally meaningless buzzword."
Today, the account that said "But isn't that illegal?" is gone.... And its not like it was an inactive account before either.... And its gone gone. Gone on both my main and my alt.
Just some strangeness ive noticed, and i can't quite tell if the "illegals" are fighting back, and getting accounts banned, or if im seeing alts of closed species SIMPs that they just toss after a little bit of pushback.
Anyone have any insight on this, plz DM. Thank
Just yesterday a post of an Illegal Primagen called "Light" ended up on my timeline.
One of the comments was something along the lines of "But isn't that illegal?"
My response to that was "Nobody cares. Closed species is a legally meaningless buzzword."
Today, the account that said "But isn't that illegal?" is gone.... And its not like it was an inactive account before either.... And its gone gone. Gone on both my main and my alt.
Just some strangeness ive noticed, and i can't quite tell if the "illegals" are fighting back, and getting accounts banned, or if im seeing alts of closed species SIMPs that they just toss after a little bit of pushback.
Anyone have any insight on this, plz DM. Thank
