So it just came to my attention that a user (who I won't name as *I DO NOT CONDONE HARASSMENT OF ANY KIND*) made hate art out of me over a request I made to someone else (and blocked me to boot), and all I want to say is this: if you don't like someone, just block them and move on. Don't make hate art of them and slander them because that just makes you look more like an insecure man-child rather than someone who's in control of their own mentality (and that's coming from someone who started taking axeinty medications for a little over 3 years).

Now with my preamble out of the way, I want to get to the claims made in said hate art.

However, they only had one argument to make: that I constantly requested them to make toilet art of a character.
This is completely false for two reasons:

1. I never heard of said user until the hate art was made
2. I only request art involving topics the artist is comfortable with (and even ask for their do's and don'ts when they aren't visible)

To further disprove their claims, I would like to point out a couple of red flags I noticed on their profile.

Red Flag 1, grammar: the description lacked punctuation, had noticeable mistakes with their wording, and was typed exclusively in capital letters.

Red Flag 2, fandom(s): the user shows a liking to both Sprunki and TADC, which have been used in content farms as of recently.

Red Flag 3, rules: this one is the most damning of the three, they straight up have this as part of their rules: "NO ignoring my Requests or Trades [...] If you break the rules you'll be blocked in all site I have and you have!!" This almost certainly sounds like like someone who is entitled and petty.

Just to summarize: ignoring someone you dislike is better than making a big stink out of it.

Edit: they got rid of any damning evidence that I brought up, further pushing my narrative that they're a man-child