Ok, now, I'm not a furry and so there's a lot about the general furry-dom that doesn't sit right with me. A lot of people say being a furry is more than just a sexual kink. Alright, whatever. If you want people to believe that, then prove it.

There are tabletop RPGs with anthropomorphic races that are fine. In fact, some, even people who don't like furries can enjoy.

And then stuff like this comes along. The official anthropomorphic supplement for Paizo's Pathfinder game. And it's a fetish book. Fursona includes rules for vore, male pregnancy, and the ability to lactate 24/7 to feed the party. This really didn't need to be published for an official RPG. Sex books rarely go over well. And they're even worse when the rules are truly there just for living out your sex life. The rules also specifically say homosexual characters must be prominent. I have nothing against gays, but this is just plain offensive. To make an NPC gay, that means you need to specifically point out "gay traits" unless the game is completely sexual and it then goes on to say that there are entire cities of all gay populations that breed only gays, which again, seems pretty damn offensive to me. "Homosexual" is never a good description of a character because you're assuming there's some pre-determined features of that person due to sexuality.

I'm probably going to get tons of hate over this, but seriously people, keep the sex life separate, especially if you're as a whole going to complain "Being a furry isn't all about sex."