Views: 3594
Submissions: 55
Favs: 156
Digital Artist | Registered: January 15, 2014 08:59:49 AM
Hello folks; I just updated a profile information. As you should know, this account is made, for mature, yet clean art. Particularly, involving the artistic nude, or slightly more graphic violence.
Neither of course, being dirty, although showing respect, to art, itself.
Why is it mostly artistic nudity? Simple; to show others, that even with nudity, it doesn't hurt to keep things clean, tasteful, and respect, to the nude, "human" body. Knowing that the beauty of it, is NOT to be made, into some distasteful joke, either!
In other words? NO DIRTY EROTICA, HERE. (Also, the journal entries have descriptions themselves being NOWHERE beyond PG-13. So fortunately, there's no swearing, and no hate speech, either.)
----
And, of course, if you're going to view mature content, make sure you know of people who keep mature content clean, and nothing offensive, or anything.
To see my primary page for "general audiences" rated works, check here:
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/privatedoomsday/
Neither of course, being dirty, although showing respect, to art, itself.
Why is it mostly artistic nudity? Simple; to show others, that even with nudity, it doesn't hurt to keep things clean, tasteful, and respect, to the nude, "human" body. Knowing that the beauty of it, is NOT to be made, into some distasteful joke, either!
In other words? NO DIRTY EROTICA, HERE. (Also, the journal entries have descriptions themselves being NOWHERE beyond PG-13. So fortunately, there's no swearing, and no hate speech, either.)
----
And, of course, if you're going to view mature content, make sure you know of people who keep mature content clean, and nothing offensive, or anything.
To see my primary page for "general audiences" rated works, check here:
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/privatedoomsday/
Gallery
This user has no submissions.
Stats
Comments Earned: 948
Comments Made: 1442
Journals: 72
Comments Made: 1442
Journals: 72
Recent Journal
Online Safety Act - Good idea, but not effective, yet! (G)
2 weeks ago
WARNING: This journal entry is PG-13 rated due to suggestive references and dialogue.
I've seen the controversial "Online Safety Act" in the United Kingdom; it's something that's a good basic idea done VERY wrong.
If they wanted to do it RIGHT, they could have done it so it was built on TRUST rather than FEAR...also to try and make sure EVERYONE has a proper background check, and those who otherwise fail the proper background check should simply have NO access to the internet, and will be spied on by the government agency, just in case.
One guy who supported this controversial new law said this: "If you are against the Online Safety Act, you are siding with predators and pedophiles!"
Um...yeah; that's like saying, "If you are against Donald J Trump, you are siding with murderers and rapists!"; profiling is STILL profiling, when you don't even KNOW the person's own background or nature. Besides; are you trying to encourage people to pledge blindly WITHOUT question, like the Third Reich? The countries of the UK is supposed to be FREE countries; NOT a dictatorship!
The logical point is, based on constructive criticism, I think the Online Safety Act needs A LOT more work to be even REMOTELY effective. Besides; the way the law is done made A LOT of people either live in fear, or go so far to move elsewhere in the world in hopes of living somewhere nicer AND safer.
The UK is LUCKY that I'm not living there. Otherwise, i would stand up in protest by NOT having bought a new gaming PC, just buy a USED laptop, (with certain hardware requirements) and then have it to play old retro video games using Recal OS; not being for accessing the internet, but merely staying away from the internet and boycotting it (mostly) for my safety and well being...and to avoid giving the United Kingdom's authorities THE WRONG IDEA! (Where, if I HAD to use a computer for the internet at all, I'd just go to a local library for that, and then use it no more than an hour a day.)
In addition, I would also OPENLY encourage folks to do the same. (In hopes that the said law would impact the sales of computers failing and major video game consoles succeeding on sales in Britain, instead. Such as the Nintendo Switch 2, the Sony PlayStation 5, and the Xbox Series.) Because...Britain doesn't pay as much attention to CONSOLE GAMING, and basically could care less, as long as you behave and stay out of trouble.
But still; they do make a fair point about people who misuse the internet for dangerous criminal purposes, and that is why they simply should run PROPER background checks on people before allowing them access to the internet; just in case.
That is why, even if I was a UK citizen, I would not seek conflict with the Online Safety Act. Instead, I would just MOSTLY stay away from the internet (and stick with UK approved websites) in favor of the videp game console industry, as well as other hobbies. (As I'm a United States citizen, I simply remain neutral in the situation, because it's not my fight.)
My advice? DO NOT live in the United Kingdom, just yet; wait until the Online Safety Act is either removed or simply fixed and improved. Because the Online Safety Act? NOT a bad idea, but it really needs work, and should be built on TRUST rather than FEAR. After all; why not learn to handle criminal activity in humane directions, like the cops in "The Andy Griffith Show" are known for?
I think we need laws that are fair, humane, and built on trust. (That is all.)
I've seen the controversial "Online Safety Act" in the United Kingdom; it's something that's a good basic idea done VERY wrong.
If they wanted to do it RIGHT, they could have done it so it was built on TRUST rather than FEAR...also to try and make sure EVERYONE has a proper background check, and those who otherwise fail the proper background check should simply have NO access to the internet, and will be spied on by the government agency, just in case.
One guy who supported this controversial new law said this: "If you are against the Online Safety Act, you are siding with predators and pedophiles!"
Um...yeah; that's like saying, "If you are against Donald J Trump, you are siding with murderers and rapists!"; profiling is STILL profiling, when you don't even KNOW the person's own background or nature. Besides; are you trying to encourage people to pledge blindly WITHOUT question, like the Third Reich? The countries of the UK is supposed to be FREE countries; NOT a dictatorship!
The logical point is, based on constructive criticism, I think the Online Safety Act needs A LOT more work to be even REMOTELY effective. Besides; the way the law is done made A LOT of people either live in fear, or go so far to move elsewhere in the world in hopes of living somewhere nicer AND safer.
The UK is LUCKY that I'm not living there. Otherwise, i would stand up in protest by NOT having bought a new gaming PC, just buy a USED laptop, (with certain hardware requirements) and then have it to play old retro video games using Recal OS; not being for accessing the internet, but merely staying away from the internet and boycotting it (mostly) for my safety and well being...and to avoid giving the United Kingdom's authorities THE WRONG IDEA! (Where, if I HAD to use a computer for the internet at all, I'd just go to a local library for that, and then use it no more than an hour a day.)
In addition, I would also OPENLY encourage folks to do the same. (In hopes that the said law would impact the sales of computers failing and major video game consoles succeeding on sales in Britain, instead. Such as the Nintendo Switch 2, the Sony PlayStation 5, and the Xbox Series.) Because...Britain doesn't pay as much attention to CONSOLE GAMING, and basically could care less, as long as you behave and stay out of trouble.
But still; they do make a fair point about people who misuse the internet for dangerous criminal purposes, and that is why they simply should run PROPER background checks on people before allowing them access to the internet; just in case.
That is why, even if I was a UK citizen, I would not seek conflict with the Online Safety Act. Instead, I would just MOSTLY stay away from the internet (and stick with UK approved websites) in favor of the videp game console industry, as well as other hobbies. (As I'm a United States citizen, I simply remain neutral in the situation, because it's not my fight.)
My advice? DO NOT live in the United Kingdom, just yet; wait until the Online Safety Act is either removed or simply fixed and improved. Because the Online Safety Act? NOT a bad idea, but it really needs work, and should be built on TRUST rather than FEAR. After all; why not learn to handle criminal activity in humane directions, like the cops in "The Andy Griffith Show" are known for?
I think we need laws that are fair, humane, and built on trust. (That is all.)
User Profile
Accepting Trades
No Accepting Commissions
No
This user has not added any information to their profile.
Advertise |
Get FA+ |
Site Status |
Merch Store |
Memorial |
Terms of Service |
Privacy |
Code of Conduct |
Upload Policy
Get FA+ |
Site Status |
Merch Store |
Memorial |
Terms of Service |
Privacy |
Code of Conduct |
Upload Policy
73319 Users online —
3148 guests,
12611 registered
and 57560 other
Limit bot activity to periods with less than 10k registered users online.
© 2005-2026 Frost Dragon Art LLC
Server Time: May 2, 2026 08:17 AM