Sparked from this journal: https://www.furaffinity.net/journal/8402377/

they are going to do their best and have a decision-making team to discuss every situation. They'll be careful.

History suggests otherwise.

Ben Shapiro, no one's idea of a neo-Nazi/white supremacist/Klansman (and who is anti-Trump) is being required to pay $15,000 for "security" by the University of California at Berkeley—to give a speech. As Iowahawk noted, Shapiro is paying UC:B for security from UC:B.

Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter were all shut down at various campuses for "security concerns." Neither are alt-right. Milo (who is, in fact, half Jewish, which doesn't really count for or against you on the alt-right), diagnosed the alt-right (correctly, I think) as a bunch of teenage edgelords who enjoy blowing the Left's minds ("I use that term in the broadest possible sense.") by posting helicopter and Nazi memes on /pol/. Hell, Andrew Anglin's Daily Stormer tried to "destroy" Milo for getting more attention than them. (Says it all, doesn't it?)

Charles Murray derides both Trump and the alt-right, yet he was attacked while leaving Middlebury U., and the female, left of center professor with him was injured by the "Antifa" mob:

“I didn’t see it happen, but someone grabbed Allison’s hair just as someone else shoved her from another direction, damaging muscles, tendons, and fascia in her neck,” Mr. Murray wrote. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news.....middlebury-co/

Middlebury later apologized to the rioters for inviting Murray:

http://thefederalist.com/2017/04/24.....harles-murray/

You can find many critiques of Murray's work online, but if you want to read something other than Leftist knuckle-dragging, I would recommend famed economist Thomas Sowell's original 1995 review, which can be read here:

http://www.holtz.org/Library/ToFile/Reading/IQ.htm

One Redditor I came across described the Weekly Standard as "Alt-Right" propaganda. Bill Kristol founded and still edits the WS. He is a neo-conservative, anti-Trump and despises the alt-right, but, you know, "new truths for new contingencies." The cause for this denunciation was this article:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/a-bea.....rticle/2009498

about a group attacked by Berkeley Antifa which, again, has nothing to do with the alt-right.

Lei-Lani says, "the Alt-Left does not exist." In one sense, she is absolutely correct. The black mask-wearing mobs first came to attention during the "Battle for Seattle," and their roots lie in the New Left of the 1960s. The New Left was a Trotskyite reaction to the Old Left, Stalinist to the core, who were discredited by Khrushchev's "Secret Speech." The old Democratic New Deal/Great Society troopers died off, leaving the New Left in charge. A short history:

http://claremont.org/crb/article/th.....-new-new-left/

The alt-right is the long-delayed reaction to the New Left (lately operating without adult supervision). Some random channer shouting "Pepe!" in the middle of Hillary "Super Predator" Clinton's anti-alt-right speech is probably as real world-involved as the alt-right gets, outside of voting, while Antifa is exactly as evil and vicious and on the streets as you might expect. How many of the windows smashed here hated Negroes and Jews?:

https://www.infowars.com/hillary-su.....sing-election/

(Info Wars link deliberately included.) Remember, the Leftist mobs attacked Trump supporters (including, or especially, black ones) before he won. When was the last time you read the mainstream media talk about the Bernie Bro who tried to murder US Rep Steve Scalise and Senator Rand Paul? Hell, the MSM still brings up Gabby Giffords more than Scalise.

Charlottesville was the great exception. A previous protest against the statue's removal got no press. Up to C-Ville, the Right made massive bank because the playbook ran: some conservative/libertarian shows up at a university (or a Trump rally is held), Antifa calls him or her a Nazi, attacks, all the world sees Antifa's moral bankruptcy. Of course nothing is foolproof, because fools are so clever: Dickie Spencer (David Duke's exact spiritual successor: i.e., a white Al Sharpton) decided, hey, if all these attacks on people falsely claimed to be Nazis creates press, I'll hold a rally in C-ville with real neo-Nazis and Klansmen! That'll get some press!

Spencer had been last seen in DC for the inauguration, where he got kicked from a convention hall, announced "Hail Trump!" to the press, and was later punched—since, apparently, he was not smart enough to keep his guard up during the inauguration riot. Gavin McInnes was also attacked while attending Mike Cernovich's Deplora-Ball, but Gavin actually had the sense to keep his eyes open and got his attacker back. (As did Andrew Bolt in Australia, when attacked without warning by the antipodean Antifa.)

Again: Gavin, Cernovich, Bolt: none of these people are alt-right! Cernovich publicly tweeted in Feb 2016 that he was not alt-right, and never changed his stance, yet Wikipedia calls him "alt-right" even now. Dickie Spencer is the only person I've mentioned who calls himself alt-right, even though he is strongly Socialist. Spencer didn't even coin the name "alternative right," a Jewish paleo-conservative named Paul Gottfried did:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263.....paul-gottfried

"We're only interested in one thing: punching Nazis." No. No, they aren't. Shapiro, Yiannopoulos, Murray, Cernovich, Bolt: they are vilified because they sin against the Left.

Most of you reading this are not alt-right. You may believe, or wish to believe, Lei-Lani when she says, "trust us." But don't be surprised if, someday, you are suddenly expelled to the alt-right. For what sin will you be banished? Denying the 57 genders? Disbelief in the ontological proof of the non-existence of racism among people of color? No one can say. But I leave you with this saying from the GamerGate kerfluffle of 2014:

No one "joins" GamerGate. They just get thrown down in the pit with the rest of us.