
Today I got an awesome sketch (which is the icon here!) from stigmata. I asked him to draw me while thinking about the piece. And boy am I impressed. I hope you enjoy my rendition. This is also from my Master's concert, randomonlooker was on the harpsichord.
Part 2
Stay tuned for the second half, which has the cadenza!
Part 2
Stay tuned for the second half, which has the cadenza!
Category Music / Classical
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 120 x 120px
File Size 7.77 MB
Yes, I do realize the original doesn't have a string orchestra. However, it does contain a basso continuo. All printed editions I've found of this piece have a fully realized "piano" part, and I believe the violin part has been altered slightly too. I've never been able to find the original edition with the basso continuo.
Yeah, it's self evident, haha! I just thought it would be funny to mention, but internet tone and all.
Now, from the fully realized accompaniment you can recreate the original continuo (assuming they worked from the original) by looking at the lowest note (usually) and the chord, you have to be careful not to assume that embellishments in the bass line are actual changes in the continuo, this can be done by analyzing the chord progression - it's most common for the bass to change or be repeated (in the case of inversions) for every chord, though sometimes there are rhythmic repetitions. I guess you checked IMSLP - that's as far as I know it, heh. In that sense the harpsichord part here was an improvized realization of the continuo, the string section was pre-arranged. I don't remember any-more if it was a bona-fide baroque version but I assure you that the next time you listen to this in my gallery it will be!
Now, from the fully realized accompaniment you can recreate the original continuo (assuming they worked from the original) by looking at the lowest note (usually) and the chord, you have to be careful not to assume that embellishments in the bass line are actual changes in the continuo, this can be done by analyzing the chord progression - it's most common for the bass to change or be repeated (in the case of inversions) for every chord, though sometimes there are rhythmic repetitions. I guess you checked IMSLP - that's as far as I know it, heh. In that sense the harpsichord part here was an improvized realization of the continuo, the string section was pre-arranged. I don't remember any-more if it was a bona-fide baroque version but I assure you that the next time you listen to this in my gallery it will be!
A natural, expected success that your ' jury' was fortunate enough to have been blessed to witness. I like the interplay with the harpiscord. And.. well, that transition 5.5 minutes in is to die for; devilishly wily! Both in original composition and your furiously beautiful execution.
Well, let's see how it ends!
Well, let's see how it ends!
Much of the jury helped me become what I was then and now! Mustn't forget that - some of my teachers would make still make me sound like a student. I blame it on them having original romantic/classical violins rather than my reconstructions.
And thank you! I always saw that part as when the devil begins playing to Tartini, the music is almost maddening as if it were dancing around a soul, mocking its mortality and limited comprehension at the eternal.
And thank you! I always saw that part as when the devil begins playing to Tartini, the music is almost maddening as if it were dancing around a soul, mocking its mortality and limited comprehension at the eternal.
Comments