
an ass commission for
craniallyraped part 1 c:
Hope you like it <3
if ineterested, comment here: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/9142562/

Hope you like it <3
if ineterested, comment here: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/9142562/
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 720 x 720px
File Size 478 kB
Listed in Folders
The only one making this drawing about sex is you, who sees it as a sexual object. A persons body does NOT mean sex, no matter what part of it they may be viewing. To me, this picture is beautiful because of its line work, ability to color, and how she touched on anatomy that most people can't or won't do, because of how curvy a woman's body can be. How is this sexual? It's a pair of panties and someones backside. It's cute, it's playful. It doesn't scream "fuck me" it doesn't scream "take me".
In my art class we had to draw a nude woman. Was that sexual? No. It was anatomy. A persons body. A cute picture. Just like this one. Just because someone gets a picture of their bottom done does NOT mean that this person is "unoriginal" does NOT mean they are not creative and does NOT mean they aren't about love. You know nothing about them, or what they do, or who they are. So who are you to judge a beautiful artist based on a piece of art they do?
In my art class we had to draw a nude woman. Was that sexual? No. It was anatomy. A persons body. A cute picture. Just like this one. Just because someone gets a picture of their bottom done does NOT mean that this person is "unoriginal" does NOT mean they are not creative and does NOT mean they aren't about love. You know nothing about them, or what they do, or who they are. So who are you to judge a beautiful artist based on a piece of art they do?
Okay first of all, the internet is the world's vehicle of self importance, why else would it be so popular, look at how many websites are devoted to showing off one's self.
Second, think about this. You're getting on me for a sarcastic remark I made implying that perhaps an icon entitled "Bazinga Booty" which pictures the backside and only the backside of a character wearing panties that indeed say "Bazinga" might be sexual in nature, and your argument is that I'm unfairly judging it as sexual when it is, in actuality, a piece meant to represent the beauty of the female anatomy. I mean, REALLY think about that, sweety.
With that in mind, I'm sure it's largely because you're likely new to the fandom, and so when jerks like me say things to indicate that it's anything less than the perfect utopia you seek here, you feel you must defend it, even in the face (or booty) of undoubted error. This actually happens all the time, one of my watchers who now regularly says "I love you" in response to my snarky journals used to hate me and pan me as you do, now. So when you're here long enough to finally understand where I and anybody who's been here as long as I are coming from, come find me again, and we'll be best friends.
Second, think about this. You're getting on me for a sarcastic remark I made implying that perhaps an icon entitled "Bazinga Booty" which pictures the backside and only the backside of a character wearing panties that indeed say "Bazinga" might be sexual in nature, and your argument is that I'm unfairly judging it as sexual when it is, in actuality, a piece meant to represent the beauty of the female anatomy. I mean, REALLY think about that, sweety.
With that in mind, I'm sure it's largely because you're likely new to the fandom, and so when jerks like me say things to indicate that it's anything less than the perfect utopia you seek here, you feel you must defend it, even in the face (or booty) of undoubted error. This actually happens all the time, one of my watchers who now regularly says "I love you" in response to my snarky journals used to hate me and pan me as you do, now. So when you're here long enough to finally understand where I and anybody who's been here as long as I are coming from, come find me again, and we'll be best friends.
New to the fandom? Now you're making horrible assumptions, bad.
I've been in this fandom for ten years, I'd say that's a decent amount of time? I also make my money off erotic commissions, clean commissions, anything people want me to write. Why? Because that's who I am. Does that make me a bad person? No. Do I have the right to judge people on what they ask of me as a customer? Absolutely not. It's their work that they're paying me for.
What I'm saying is. You're judging the wrong person here. This is an artist who is an amazing person, who's been patient, sweet, and VERY polite towards you, even though you're wrongfully judging her. My girlfriend PAID for her to draw THIS. Does this make the ARTIST sexualized? No. It's what she's paid for. If anything she's showing respect for not judging and NOT sexualizing someones preferences.
So when you can sit there, and realize you're jumping to conclusions not only about the artist but about ME? You can come find me. But no, I do not think we'll be the "best of friends". Because I would hardly be friends with someone who leaps to conclusions about people.
Good day to you.
I've been in this fandom for ten years, I'd say that's a decent amount of time? I also make my money off erotic commissions, clean commissions, anything people want me to write. Why? Because that's who I am. Does that make me a bad person? No. Do I have the right to judge people on what they ask of me as a customer? Absolutely not. It's their work that they're paying me for.
What I'm saying is. You're judging the wrong person here. This is an artist who is an amazing person, who's been patient, sweet, and VERY polite towards you, even though you're wrongfully judging her. My girlfriend PAID for her to draw THIS. Does this make the ARTIST sexualized? No. It's what she's paid for. If anything she's showing respect for not judging and NOT sexualizing someones preferences.
So when you can sit there, and realize you're jumping to conclusions not only about the artist but about ME? You can come find me. But no, I do not think we'll be the "best of friends". Because I would hardly be friends with someone who leaps to conclusions about people.
Good day to you.
I think it was rather generous of me to assume you were new instead of just delusional. Of course now it makes sense, you have a personal attachment to it, so your insight and opinions are going to be one sided regardless. Although what I think is funny here is that for somebody getting on me for making assumptions, you're essentially having an argument with yourself because I've barely said anything that you've accused me of saying. Did I say anyone here was a bad person? No. I merely find it amusing that furries get up in arms about being judged as being smut-obsessed deviants, but don't do much to convince the outsiders to the contrary. And my comment merely stated that these icons are popular with the furries, it said nothing with regard to the artist, other than that she clearly knows where the money is. So when we consider only the words that I ACTUALLY said...what's worse, assuming somebody's new instead of just clueless to reality, or putting words in someone's mouth in an attempt to vilify them?
Oh, and, for those keeping score at home...it's a sexualized image, the fact that this is even up for debate is just silly.
Oh, and, for those keeping score at home...it's a sexualized image, the fact that this is even up for debate is just silly.
Trust me. You do. Your constant need to get attention by stating a rude (and rather assuming) "fact" tells me you're a very sad person. It's alright dear, really. Opinions are meant to be stated. But not in such a rude and biased way. Especially when you make assumptions not only about the artist, but about someone standing up for the artist.
I do hope you find a life worth living. I do hope you can get some tact. You need it.
And now, for the final time.
Good day to you.
I do hope you find a life worth living. I do hope you can get some tact. You need it.
And now, for the final time.
Good day to you.
Comments