FA+
Shop
466
Views
Views
5
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Story / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 120 x 120
File Size 119 kB
Report this content
More from Hyosube
Listed in Folders
Herewith I introduce the new version of my formerly called "slow flow" theory !
I did some more thinking about the whole topic and increased the number of formerly 7 pages to a 12 page document now !
As for the name - due to the new thoughts I put into it and the added theories about how things work, I also changed the whole theory's name to "sinus slow flow theory" !
This time I don't only try to explain how everything began - I also display a first attempt on how it all works and might come to an end... or... start all over again !
Yet again -> I'm not a scientist, so this is all born from logical thinking and hardly carries maths or any proofs in it !
[EDIT 15.04.2015]
By now I think that the mentioned "mother rock" could be better described as a collection of rotation and concentrated mass... something like a giant black hole.. so the big bang might've not come from instability of the mother rock's core but the collapse and detonation of the most giant black hole ever.
[/EDIT]
Comments and feedback welcome !
However, I still don't need whole stories about your believings to discuss so just stick to comments please !
I did some more thinking about the whole topic and increased the number of formerly 7 pages to a 12 page document now !
As for the name - due to the new thoughts I put into it and the added theories about how things work, I also changed the whole theory's name to "sinus slow flow theory" !
This time I don't only try to explain how everything began - I also display a first attempt on how it all works and might come to an end... or... start all over again !
Yet again -> I'm not a scientist, so this is all born from logical thinking and hardly carries maths or any proofs in it !
[EDIT 15.04.2015]
By now I think that the mentioned "mother rock" could be better described as a collection of rotation and concentrated mass... something like a giant black hole.. so the big bang might've not come from instability of the mother rock's core but the collapse and detonation of the most giant black hole ever.
[/EDIT]
Comments and feedback welcome !
However, I still don't need whole stories about your believings to discuss so just stick to comments please !
Category Story / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 120 x 120px
File Size 119 kB
Listed in Folders
I just had a few more ideas while I took my walk during lunch break -> If my assumptions are correct (and my actual theory would be true as well) then I just roughly located the actual position of the last 'Big Bang' and therewith the position of the center of our current universe ! ö.Ö"!
Btw -> I found another fact about astronomy that would strenghten my theory ! :D
Btw -> I found another fact about astronomy that would strenghten my theory ! :D
This is an absolutely fascinating hypothesis you've proposed, but I'm wondering if you could perhaps devote a little more consideration for the concept and nature of time. For instance, it might be worth considering that the passage of time on Earth can be divided into two equidistant points, and from the disparity there between midday and midnight you can add a second pair of equidistant points perpendicular to the first two.
What appears to be a single day on Earth is in fact four days, simultaneously passing parallel to one another in what almost resembles a cubic form. Now consider how that could be applied to the universe as a whole, wherein time isn't relative to the orbit of individual satellites around a star.
Let me use this example: Imagine four spheres on a ledge. Say a direct copy of the sphere nearest the edge is sent to the back of the row of spheres and takes the place of the first sphere. The formerly first sphere becomes the second, the second becomes the third, and the fourth falls off the ledge.
Time works the same way.
What appears to be a single day on Earth is in fact four days, simultaneously passing parallel to one another in what almost resembles a cubic form. Now consider how that could be applied to the universe as a whole, wherein time isn't relative to the orbit of individual satellites around a star.
Let me use this example: Imagine four spheres on a ledge. Say a direct copy of the sphere nearest the edge is sent to the back of the row of spheres and takes the place of the first sphere. The formerly first sphere becomes the second, the second becomes the third, and the fourth falls off the ledge.
Time works the same way.
I actually did try to distance myself from the original way of relating everything to time and instead work with the simple aspects of movement and flow.
The shown graph is only put in relation between mass and 'time' because I did lack a better word for it.
In fact I think that since the relative time calculation works different depending on your positiona and your surroundings and is based on human time calculation it would be way easier to concentrate on the unavoidable basics behind it. This way we do not get lost in details and can maintain a proper view on the whole concept of the basic functionality of the unvierse in between it's cycle of recreation.
If by any chance I would try to add a time aspect to my theory it would easily fill 3 more pages but would not really add much of a background to the real content I did try to deliver.
I guess the only effect it would cause would be further confusion and propably just leads back to the basics themselves..
Well - let's say that I'll give it a thought but don't expect too much out of it !
The shown graph is only put in relation between mass and 'time' because I did lack a better word for it.
In fact I think that since the relative time calculation works different depending on your positiona and your surroundings and is based on human time calculation it would be way easier to concentrate on the unavoidable basics behind it. This way we do not get lost in details and can maintain a proper view on the whole concept of the basic functionality of the unvierse in between it's cycle of recreation.
If by any chance I would try to add a time aspect to my theory it would easily fill 3 more pages but would not really add much of a background to the real content I did try to deliver.
I guess the only effect it would cause would be further confusion and propably just leads back to the basics themselves..
Well - let's say that I'll give it a thought but don't expect too much out of it !
Comments