
Sleepy baby likes to sleep with his head out of the box.
This is Soundwave, my new baby crow. He is non-releasable (He doesn't talk, and baby crows that do not talk are not fed by the adult crows) and therefore I am hand rearing him to work as an education bird to teach people about crows, and if he does start to vocalize once he's been imprinted, then he can help me with a labeling experiment in the same vein as was done with Alex the African Grey.
As always, I am a wildlife rehabber, and it is legal for me to have this bird. In the USA and much of Canada it is illegal to keep crows privately. Please do not kidnap healthy baby birds, once imprinted a crow cannot be safely returned to the wild. There is no Disney ending, research has shown imprinted birds are usually killed within 2 weeks of release into the wild.
This is Soundwave, my new baby crow. He is non-releasable (He doesn't talk, and baby crows that do not talk are not fed by the adult crows) and therefore I am hand rearing him to work as an education bird to teach people about crows, and if he does start to vocalize once he's been imprinted, then he can help me with a labeling experiment in the same vein as was done with Alex the African Grey.
As always, I am a wildlife rehabber, and it is legal for me to have this bird. In the USA and much of Canada it is illegal to keep crows privately. Please do not kidnap healthy baby birds, once imprinted a crow cannot be safely returned to the wild. There is no Disney ending, research has shown imprinted birds are usually killed within 2 weeks of release into the wild.
Category Photography / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Corvid
Size 1280 x 960px
File Size 157.6 kB
but technically speaking, if you save a Dying or left for dead bird and you do raise it, and obviously disregard law, wouldn't that be a Good thing? I'm not talking about later releasing it into the wild, I mean imprint it and keep it as a domestic bird? I understand the law is against that, but is that not good?
I always advocate taking an injured or dying bird to your local wildlife rehabilitation center. They have the training and tools to fix the bird and properly release it back into its habitat where applicable. They are also legally allowed to help these animals.
But most of the time what people pick up aren't dying birds, but what are called fledgelings. These are babies that have just left the nest, and they cannot yet fly. For crows, they stay on the ground for about a week, having their parents and last year's siblings feed and take care of them while they learn to fly.
Most people don't have the space or time for an imprinted bird. Crows in captivity can live between 30-60 years, and you cannot just stuff them in a cage while you're away working all day. They need lots of things to do and company, or they become psychotic, or in some cases suicidal. And if Fish and Wildlife discover you have an illegally kept bird, your bird will be confiscated, and euthanized, and you will be fined quite heavily. Keeping a migratory bird is a Federal offense in many places, including the USA.
But most of the time what people pick up aren't dying birds, but what are called fledgelings. These are babies that have just left the nest, and they cannot yet fly. For crows, they stay on the ground for about a week, having their parents and last year's siblings feed and take care of them while they learn to fly.
Most people don't have the space or time for an imprinted bird. Crows in captivity can live between 30-60 years, and you cannot just stuff them in a cage while you're away working all day. They need lots of things to do and company, or they become psychotic, or in some cases suicidal. And if Fish and Wildlife discover you have an illegally kept bird, your bird will be confiscated, and euthanized, and you will be fined quite heavily. Keeping a migratory bird is a Federal offense in many places, including the USA.
Animal laws are fucked up, though logical, I think rather than straight up outlawing ownership of animals, they should offer a care course for each specific species or breed, of course you would have to pay. but I think its just stupid to say "you wanna care for that animal, that's sweet, but if you do that, well come to your house fine you and fucking kill it. unless of course you breed them for furs(in the case of exotics like foxes)" I know keeping the animals is work, but if you do care about them and for them, you should be given atleast a chance? I'm considering leaving the "wonderland" of Canada for that exact reason, I want a fox, they are illegal unless you are a fur trader or a wildlife professional, though I understand why there are laws. if you can successfully domesticate and care for animal to the extent of it being happy. you should atleast have a chance of ownership? there was a colony I live by that recently saved and raised a deer. every one in the colony loved it and it was a happy deer, then Canadian wildlife authorities came into the colony, in front of the kids and mothers, and shot it in the street. I know this is biased from a civilian view, but don't you atleast half agree with what I'm saying?
Comments