
High altitude is not my friend.
Yay for simultaneous contrast. It probably looks more interesting on a CRT due to color misregistrations. I get a very small black border between the contrasting colors on the left side of contours. Then again, it may be due to how the phosphors are arranged (in that case the border should be even more evident on an LCD).
One of these days I will finally succeed at making you puke.
[series description]
Yay for simultaneous contrast. It probably looks more interesting on a CRT due to color misregistrations. I get a very small black border between the contrasting colors on the left side of contours. Then again, it may be due to how the phosphors are arranged (in that case the border should be even more evident on an LCD).
One of these days I will finally succeed at making you puke.
[series description]
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1100 x 780px
File Size 157.7 kB
Hmm. it moves? That's interesting. In theory it might, but to me it just looks vibrating. I get the impression that both eyes see slightly different colors (even though I work on a CRT). It was quite a trip painting this thing... %)
The 3d effect might be due to this shift of the red color leftwards - it looks on a different plane. And there red's a fog, being another indicator of depth. Other than that, I don't think there's any magic here.
The 3d effect might be due to this shift of the red color leftwards - it looks on a different plane. And there red's a fog, being another indicator of depth. Other than that, I don't think there's any magic here.
When you wear glasses with strong correction (as I do) you live with constant chromatic aberration (not to mention spherical aberration, but that's another issue). Blues refract more than reds, so I can shift the mis-registration around just by moving my head. Colors with pure spectra, like LEDs, present this effect spectacularly, to the point where they actually seem to focus at different depths due to parallax. To think — Matisse thought red was relaxing (e.g. The Red Studio). I bow to your command of anatomy.
I fetched a pair of stronger glasses - I see what you mean. :) In theory, if you turn your head left (for -) or right (for +), you should make the red align perfectly and the contours look symetric.
Interesting you mention that - I don't "get" Matisse's colors. At all. I have a suspition he was from mars...
Interesting you mention that - I don't "get" Matisse's colors. At all. I have a suspition he was from mars...
I don't get borders on my LCD screen, but tilting the screen and shifting my head (strong glasses here, too) is very fun. I like how the faint background image comes out purple-ish when you look at the picture from above and close to the screen.
On the other hand, the LCD makes it impossible for me to determine which exact shade of red you intended, which sucks.
On the other hand, the LCD makes it impossible for me to determine which exact shade of red you intended, which sucks.
Inaccurate colors are no longer much of an issue with LCDs. Cheap LCDs, maybe, but then again, cheap CRTs suck big hairy wanker, too. LCD monitors like the LaCie or Eizo are nowadays preferred by proofing wonks (can't even get the CRT version of the Electron Blue anymore). But any monitor has to be profiled, or you're just guessing at the colors, and it should be re-profiled every year at least.
Yes, LCDs have got better, that's true, but I still see quite substantial color differences depending on angle. I can't get over it... It drives me nuts.
I have the electron blue crt. It's magic, alright, but the magnets are already failing, so it'll hold no more than a year. LaCie have been making top notch monitors, but look at the lcd prices now... Their crts were pricy (worth every cent, though) but atleast they were somewhat affordable. Now a good affordable monitor is hard to find (well, there still are viewsonic crts - they're ok).
I have the electron blue crt. It's magic, alright, but the magnets are already failing, so it'll hold no more than a year. LaCie have been making top notch monitors, but look at the lcd prices now... Their crts were pricy (worth every cent, though) but atleast they were somewhat affordable. Now a good affordable monitor is hard to find (well, there still are viewsonic crts - they're ok).
Actually, inaccurate colours can be quite nice because you can work with very low contrasts by tilting your head and screen. It's very fun and intuitive, even if it does influence the end result.
But then again, I don't have a head for colours anyway, so even if the colours are "correct" (whatever that means, seeing as they come out differently depending on the screen settings, frame and light colour etc.), the subtleties are lost on me.
PS: I can barely lift my (fancy big expensive) LCD screen. Does that mean it's almost a proper monitor?
But then again, I don't have a head for colours anyway, so even if the colours are "correct" (whatever that means, seeing as they come out differently depending on the screen settings, frame and light colour etc.), the subtleties are lost on me.
PS: I can barely lift my (fancy big expensive) LCD screen. Does that mean it's almost a proper monitor?
Comments