
Frustrated by his nagging wife, Hera, Zeus turned his eyes on the beautiful Trojan prince, Ganymede. Unable to deny himself, Zeus created a storm which covered all Troy, became an eagle, and swooped down to claim his lover-to-be. He carried Ganymede - no doubt awed but also unnerved by the great height - above the clouds to reside eternally on Olympus as the beloved cup bearer of the gods and foremost resident of his bed.
I love this story. As far as romances go, I think it's the best in all Greek mythology. I also love this wonderful picture, which is a very appealing visual take on the myth. Also, I empathize very much with Ganymede, here: his is a very enviable position for a mortal, but I'm also wary of heights.
furrypuddingthegreat created this, showing off his talent to fantastic extent.
readasaur commissioned this for me as a beautiful gift. Could he be any more generous? Thank you!
I love this story. As far as romances go, I think it's the best in all Greek mythology. I also love this wonderful picture, which is a very appealing visual take on the myth. Also, I empathize very much with Ganymede, here: his is a very enviable position for a mortal, but I'm also wary of heights.


Category Artwork (Digital) / Fantasy
Species Eagle
Size 1022 x 1061px
File Size 1.38 MB
Naw, that's just the artist's style of shading.
In the classical sense, "rape" doesn't refer to sex without consent, but to the taking of a person against the wishes of the authority under which they resided. For example, Helen was "raped," meaning she happily eloped with Paris to Troy while her family fumed at the indignity of it and began the Trojan War.
In the classical sense, "rape" doesn't refer to sex without consent, but to the taking of a person against the wishes of the authority under which they resided. For example, Helen was "raped," meaning she happily eloped with Paris to Troy while her family fumed at the indignity of it and began the Trojan War.
Uhh, you know that
A: Rape referred originally to any kind of abduction, whether sexual or not
B: There was never any intended sexual aspect to Zeus and Ganymede, in fact the theologians at the time went to great lengths to say there weren't, it was all about his mind, personality and intelligence. So no this is not a romantic anything :/
A: Rape referred originally to any kind of abduction, whether sexual or not
B: There was never any intended sexual aspect to Zeus and Ganymede, in fact the theologians at the time went to great lengths to say there weren't, it was all about his mind, personality and intelligence. So no this is not a romantic anything :/
A. Yup, I knew that. See my response to the comment prior to yours.
B. The myth has been interpreted many times throughout history, both in theology and art, and plenty of these interpretations are romantic. I don't consider any version to be any less valid than others. I'm sorry that you don't agree with this one.
B. The myth has been interpreted many times throughout history, both in theology and art, and plenty of these interpretations are romantic. I don't consider any version to be any less valid than others. I'm sorry that you don't agree with this one.
Well, fair enough. I guess I'm just a classics man m'self :p
I suppose my only gripe is when the original creators talk about what something exactly isn't... and then people twist it into exactly what they didn't want it to be.
And in terms of his relationship with Zeus, I think making it a straight-up romantic/sexual relationship cheapens the very meaning of the original, the fact that he in and of himself was amazing as to allow Zeus to drop his usual attitude and appreciate a being of such accomplishment and beauty of mind and soul, above and beyond any physical attraction. The fact that Zeus has this kind of relationship with any mortal is astonishingly fresh and unique. Ganymede can have as many homosexual relations with others as he likes, as indeed he does, but with Zeus? It feels wrong to me. Ya get where I'm coming from?
I suppose my only gripe is when the original creators talk about what something exactly isn't... and then people twist it into exactly what they didn't want it to be.
And in terms of his relationship with Zeus, I think making it a straight-up romantic/sexual relationship cheapens the very meaning of the original, the fact that he in and of himself was amazing as to allow Zeus to drop his usual attitude and appreciate a being of such accomplishment and beauty of mind and soul, above and beyond any physical attraction. The fact that Zeus has this kind of relationship with any mortal is astonishingly fresh and unique. Ganymede can have as many homosexual relations with others as he likes, as indeed he does, but with Zeus? It feels wrong to me. Ya get where I'm coming from?
I definitely understand where you're coming from, and that's a great way of looking at it. The only interpretations of the legend I don't *like* are the ones that turn it into a horror story, like the Xenophanes poem. Basically, we're looking at a very unique relationship between god and a mortal. Sex can definitely cheapen things, I agree, but the idea of a romance makes it more satisfying for me. Zeus would or had chased mortals before, which makes it sound more plausible.
I don't know who originally canonized the Ganymede tale, but the translations I've read - like the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite - seem to leave it pretty open as to whether this is a story of heavenly devotion or heavenly lust. That may just be my perspective. But seeing as even the original poet may very well have only written this story down instead of making it up on his own, I think all we have are interpretations, regardless of whether it's a poet or a theologian or a painter doing the telling.
I don't know who originally canonized the Ganymede tale, but the translations I've read - like the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite - seem to leave it pretty open as to whether this is a story of heavenly devotion or heavenly lust. That may just be my perspective. But seeing as even the original poet may very well have only written this story down instead of making it up on his own, I think all we have are interpretations, regardless of whether it's a poet or a theologian or a painter doing the telling.
I suppose I'm going with Plato and Socrates in their discussions of the myth, some of the oldest that exist, where they discuss the more personality-based aspects of the myths and flat-out deny the sexual aspects. I find it more meaningful in that way, though I see how the romanticised aspect of the story may appeal. In the end, I suppose it really is all up to interpretation and personal preference, like you said.
Thank you for this discussion, it's rare that I get to talk theology and meaningful interpretations of such myths with anyone, let alone on the internet :p
Thank you for this discussion, it's rare that I get to talk theology and meaningful interpretations of such myths with anyone, let alone on the internet :p
I may have to brush up on the myth and its various interpretations as well, I'm kinda going on memory from a little while ago talking about it with my dad. It's entirely possible I'm wrong about Plato, but I'm pretty certain it was Socrates that denied the sexual aspects of the relationship, or at least that Zeus was overtly interested in that aspect.
Comments