
More guns! More shock! More Japanese Martens making fools of themselves! Just what you always wanted, huh?
Oh, and you guys don't have to tell me that the gun on the first panel is sorta kinda really totally fail. I'm not very familiar with revolvers and was a bit short on reference, but it was still fun to work some of the mechanics out. Dirty Harry's Smith & Wesson .44 is definitely an inspiration for Ruby's cannon.
http://www.jewelvixens.com
Written by Steven Swanson, all characters © Nick Hardin, Steven Swanson, and Charles "Fox" Champion, Art © Steven Swanson
2004-2008
Oh, and you guys don't have to tell me that the gun on the first panel is sorta kinda really totally fail. I'm not very familiar with revolvers and was a bit short on reference, but it was still fun to work some of the mechanics out. Dirty Harry's Smith & Wesson .44 is definitely an inspiration for Ruby's cannon.
http://www.jewelvixens.com
Written by Steven Swanson, all characters © Nick Hardin, Steven Swanson, and Charles "Fox" Champion, Art © Steven Swanson
2004-2008
Category Artwork (Digital) / Comics
Species Mammal (Other)
Size 690 x 966px
File Size 325.5 kB
Well, may I assit you with a handy link that sloves all troubles and problems regarding weapons? Well, here it is: http://world.guns.ru/main-e.htm
Well, I have more, so let me know if you ever need some info about guns.
Well, I have more, so let me know if you ever need some info about guns.
The gun looks totally convincing to me. I can't see anything wrong with it.
Then again, I don't know much about guns... But I suppose that the average comic appreciator doesn't know much about gun mechanics either, so I don't think you have to worry about the gun's design.
Then again, I don't know much about guns... But I suppose that the average comic appreciator doesn't know much about gun mechanics either, so I don't think you have to worry about the gun's design.
Perhaps I shouldn't. I try to achieve some authenticity because I like guns, but it puts me in a wierd place... there are a lot of gun aficionados who want a high level of precision when it comes to guns, but most comic books throw authenticity out in exchange for dramatic effect. Combine that with the fact that I'm still ironing out my artwork in general and you get a number of dissatisfied folks. Still, it's a relatively small concern- I don't think anyone's reading this particular comic just for the way I represent guns.
When reading comic books I usually look for three things when deciding whether the artist in question is very talented. It might sound silly, but for me they are guns, horses and cityscapes. All these are very hard to draw right and if you draw them wrong the results look horrible. One can try to hide the lack of skill by drawing the horse standing in a field of long grass or one can use the kind of lighting or inking that only shows the barrel of the gun... But it only works to some extent.
(I've tried to learn how to draw horses myself, but I'm not very good at that... Guns and cityscapes are an impossibility for me. I only know how to appreciate these things when I see them.)
(I've tried to learn how to draw horses myself, but I'm not very good at that... Guns and cityscapes are an impossibility for me. I only know how to appreciate these things when I see them.)
Now you need the Guns version. Mine is way out dated, but when it was new it had all guns made within 50 years, used by police, military, para military or terrorist groups that you could still buy ammo for.
In some cases it not only told you the production history but also how the Load and Safe work.
In some cases it not only told you the production history but also how the Load and Safe work.
Comments