
A side-project which is heavily inspired from
Trunchbull 's Magazine design. Working with some product design and promotion involving with furries.
The first time ever I've done the latex shading nicely (if not correctly), I am satisfied of the result.

The first time ever I've done the latex shading nicely (if not correctly), I am satisfied of the result.
Category Designs / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 905 x 1280px
File Size 122.2 kB
I think you did a good job with the latex work ^^ Especially with the dynamacy of the speculars, that it is not one giant blotch of white. :) Though since it's goo latex, it could probably use a bit more black to sculpt a more tangible feeling for it.
i am confused as to what the product is actually called. there's almost too many brands listed here, and words that could be misconstrued as it. Xotica, Googo, glassified, smartphone?? i'm no expert in ads, though, so i could be wrong :p
And while monochrome would be tactiful in most cases, it almost seems detrimental to the product. I think it's because of the font used for the top text and the text underneath the "SCREEN PROTECTION PRODUCT!" It's really distracting for me because of how it doesn't really fit with the text that you're using for the rest of the page [slim text]. . .
but as i have said before, it is always interesting to see what people come up with. i like the uniform layout that you've done here, and uses negative space quite well. :)
i am confused as to what the product is actually called. there's almost too many brands listed here, and words that could be misconstrued as it. Xotica, Googo, glassified, smartphone?? i'm no expert in ads, though, so i could be wrong :p
And while monochrome would be tactiful in most cases, it almost seems detrimental to the product. I think it's because of the font used for the top text and the text underneath the "SCREEN PROTECTION PRODUCT!" It's really distracting for me because of how it doesn't really fit with the text that you're using for the rest of the page [slim text]. . .
but as i have said before, it is always interesting to see what people come up with. i like the uniform layout that you've done here, and uses negative space quite well. :)
Thank you. It's not my first attempt already, and because of the time issue I have quite rushed out at white reflection part. I must agree to use with near-black shading for goo's base color, but the background is absolute black, so it's very difficult to get it right. (Even my monitor had adjusted to sRGB color configuration, it's still easily brighten the shading in a wrong way.)
I use those fake product names for copyright reason, but mostly for blending in furry verse (or put them along with furries whatsoever). Xotica is a combination of Sony and Nokia, while Googo is base on 'goo-gone', and easily mispronounce to Google, but I find it rather funny to have such name so I change it to Googo. As for 'glassified', it's based of a word 'classified'.
The 'introducing ...' line is used with thin font is based on the product's thin glass feature. Using bold text like Impact isn't look so right in my taste.
There will be more A4 sized commercial design I am working on at this week. Stay tuned.
I use those fake product names for copyright reason, but mostly for blending in furry verse (or put them along with furries whatsoever). Xotica is a combination of Sony and Nokia, while Googo is base on 'goo-gone', and easily mispronounce to Google, but I find it rather funny to have such name so I change it to Googo. As for 'glassified', it's based of a word 'classified'.
The 'introducing ...' line is used with thin font is based on the product's thin glass feature. Using bold text like Impact isn't look so right in my taste.
There will be more A4 sized commercial design I am working on at this week. Stay tuned.
Comments