
Mista Chops the... toony?... wolf?
I got bored. Real bored, amongst other negative feelings.
So I decided to try something new, or at least new-ish. That is, drawing a more "cartoony" character.
So, here we have Mista Chops, the tooney (I think?) wolfy of noms. His name is both a joke off of "licking your chops", and because the end of his tail was chopped off, probably by an asshole hunter fuck who will be his arch enemy.
I imagine him with that accent where "Mister" becomes "Mista". He only lets his close friends call him simply "Chops"--- to everyone else, it had bettah be Mista Chops, or you bettah believe he's gonna belly ya! ;3
So yeah, tried more "cartoony". Tada. whee.
Mista Chops, characters, artwork and everything are © me.
Hope you enjoy.
So I decided to try something new, or at least new-ish. That is, drawing a more "cartoony" character.
So, here we have Mista Chops, the tooney (I think?) wolfy of noms. His name is both a joke off of "licking your chops", and because the end of his tail was chopped off, probably by an asshole hunter fuck who will be his arch enemy.
I imagine him with that accent where "Mister" becomes "Mista". He only lets his close friends call him simply "Chops"--- to everyone else, it had bettah be Mista Chops, or you bettah believe he's gonna belly ya! ;3
So yeah, tried more "cartoony". Tada. whee.
Mista Chops, characters, artwork and everything are © me.
Hope you enjoy.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Vore
Species Wolf
Size 837 x 1075px
File Size 520 kB
Listed in Folders
It's allowed to be under general? What the hell's wrong with that. It's not sexual or anything, there's nothing weird showing, no wetness, and if a 13 year old saw it nothing weird would come. They might THINK it's kinda weird, but they'd ignore it and not click it and think nothing of it. And the SFW on this site is ONLY for things that are okay for 13 year olds to see.
I personally find the stuff your draw quite disturbing, frankly. Not to be rude, though. Diapers are a kink to you, lets be honest and you only let it pass because there is no exposed genitalia, right? Do you SEE even a side boob here? Naaah, move along with your life dude, this website has had its rules chiseled in stone.
Here are [some of the] qualifications for General Audiences [there might be more]
No Sexual organs exposed.
No Blood, Guts, or extreme Torture.
No Sex, or overly suggestive [grey area but, if you 'want' to ride that line...] content.
Suggestive as in: Hip grinding even without genitalia, or stuff that is blatantly trying to pass by as stuff not meant for general audiences.
Tip for the future however, just ignore content that you personally find objectionable, I do respect that you are looking out for a younger crowd, however there is vore in cartoons and even worse in the history channel, BOTH things open to minors. It is up to the parents to police what they do on the internet, NOT up to you or me to police the internet as a whole due to something being objectionable to our own tastes or moral standards.
P.S.: If you need examples of things on the History channel or in Cartoons meant for ANY age, please feel free to ask.
Here are [some of the] qualifications for General Audiences [there might be more]
No Sexual organs exposed.
No Blood, Guts, or extreme Torture.
No Sex, or overly suggestive [grey area but, if you 'want' to ride that line...] content.
Suggestive as in: Hip grinding even without genitalia, or stuff that is blatantly trying to pass by as stuff not meant for general audiences.
Tip for the future however, just ignore content that you personally find objectionable, I do respect that you are looking out for a younger crowd, however there is vore in cartoons and even worse in the history channel, BOTH things open to minors. It is up to the parents to police what they do on the internet, NOT up to you or me to police the internet as a whole due to something being objectionable to our own tastes or moral standards.
P.S.: If you need examples of things on the History channel or in Cartoons meant for ANY age, please feel free to ask.
To be honest I don't really see how this is NSFW.
There's no sexual body parts being shown, nothing even remotely sexual being shown. People look at real animals devouring other animals and you don't see people going "This should be considered NSFW!"
Please, learn what "NSFW" means before you post.
There's no sexual body parts being shown, nothing even remotely sexual being shown. People look at real animals devouring other animals and you don't see people going "This should be considered NSFW!"
Please, learn what "NSFW" means before you post.
News flash: This sort of thing happens in cartoons a lot. So seeing it here wouldn't be any different than seeing it on a kids cartoon show.
Definition of NSFW: "Anything with nudity, profanity, pornography or violence that wouldn't be accepted in a general workplace"
This in my opinion would be SFW, because it's generally just cartoons.
Definition of NSFW: "Anything with nudity, profanity, pornography or violence that wouldn't be accepted in a general workplace"
This in my opinion would be SFW, because it's generally just cartoons.
I've seen worse on the history channel, and similar in cartoons dude, just because you find it objectionable does not mean that it is more objectionable than stuff you like.
No exposed genitalia and or breasts? Check
No blood? Check
No Sex? Check x2
This is mild, and you know it. You don't like it, so just don't comment, you are trying to pressure this artist into hiding a perfectly tame piece of artwork. I mean really, how long have you been here [im not asking this unkindly] because I've seen much MUCH more, do yourself a favor [even though you apparently don't like the content] and look at the other General Tame Vore here. It is only shocking to you because you dislike it, I think.
No exposed genitalia and or breasts? Check
No blood? Check
No Sex? Check x2
This is mild, and you know it. You don't like it, so just don't comment, you are trying to pressure this artist into hiding a perfectly tame piece of artwork. I mean really, how long have you been here [im not asking this unkindly] because I've seen much MUCH more, do yourself a favor [even though you apparently don't like the content] and look at the other General Tame Vore here. It is only shocking to you because you dislike it, I think.
According to their page, they've been here for a year and a half. And it seems like they've got a bit of the stuff back through their favourites, so I'm not sure what the deal was. I mean, I sort of agree that it needs to be marked under mature, but not NSFW. I know my 14 year old brother would be creeped out seeing this.
Not trying to be rude, but I seen worse when I was 13... I learned NOT to google things so flippantly... With great power comes great... bad memorys.
Either way, I don't understand why you [or him] want this marked as mature. Seems trollish to me just because you find the content [or your 14 year old brother finds the content] disturbing you want it marked as mature. Why? Because people/furs wearing diapers creep me out [seriously, though you wont ever see me going out of my way to ask them to mark that as mature, I mean do you want people to get the idea that wearing diapers is a normal thing?]. However, I am under the mindset of live-and-let-live.
Your brother should know well enough 'not' to force himself to look at things he does not like and like any good person he should let people enjoy and be happy with what they are doing as long as they are not physically harming eachother or someone he knows... or anyone in general.
Either way, I don't understand why you [or him] want this marked as mature. Seems trollish to me just because you find the content [or your 14 year old brother finds the content] disturbing you want it marked as mature. Why? Because people/furs wearing diapers creep me out [seriously, though you wont ever see me going out of my way to ask them to mark that as mature, I mean do you want people to get the idea that wearing diapers is a normal thing?]. However, I am under the mindset of live-and-let-live.
Your brother should know well enough 'not' to force himself to look at things he does not like and like any good person he should let people enjoy and be happy with what they are doing as long as they are not physically harming eachother or someone he knows... or anyone in general.
I saw worse when I was 13 too. I'm not saying that it NEEDS to be put under mature, I'm just saying that that's what I personally would put it under. It isn't my job to go around telling people to correct their submission ratings, as if it's under the wrong rating, and admin will say something.
However, to be perfectly frank, wearing diapers isn't going to harm anyone, so I don't care if people think it's normal. What's the difference between older folks that have to either wear them or rush to the bathroom and hope they make it and people who wear them to avoid the grossness of public restrooms, or someone who wears them because they think they're cute and comfortable? It's a choice of underwear. It's no different than someone decided to wear a thong and getting pictures of their fursona in thongs, and it's only taboo because people think of them as something only babies should wear. I'm sure elderly folks/folks with bladder/bowel disorders that are required to wear them are discreet because they know people will thing of them strangly and differently because of the taboo behind such a thing. Even when it's a medical requirement.
Anyhow, I'm not going to tell someone to stop something I don't like, unless it's illegal or harming them/others, because their life is none of my business.
(Also, yeah, I'm also into diapers, but it isn't sexual? It's a convenience thing, and it makes me feel safe and young again.)
However, to be perfectly frank, wearing diapers isn't going to harm anyone, so I don't care if people think it's normal. What's the difference between older folks that have to either wear them or rush to the bathroom and hope they make it and people who wear them to avoid the grossness of public restrooms, or someone who wears them because they think they're cute and comfortable? It's a choice of underwear. It's no different than someone decided to wear a thong and getting pictures of their fursona in thongs, and it's only taboo because people think of them as something only babies should wear. I'm sure elderly folks/folks with bladder/bowel disorders that are required to wear them are discreet because they know people will thing of them strangly and differently because of the taboo behind such a thing. Even when it's a medical requirement.
Anyhow, I'm not going to tell someone to stop something I don't like, unless it's illegal or harming them/others, because their life is none of my business.
(Also, yeah, I'm also into diapers, but it isn't sexual? It's a convenience thing, and it makes me feel safe and young again.)
Eh, like i said. Live and let live, I know that some people 'have to' wear them due to medical stuff, however some people do sexualize the whole diaper wearing stuff. I've seen it, im not new here, so maybe just you or some people you've seen or know don't [I mean rule 34 exists for a reason] So lets just stop this whole discussion as is, because again, would you tell a producer at Cartoon Network, or Nickolodeon to censor the vore on there? Nah, you wouldn't bother, you'd just change the channel and even if you did, [which some people probably have] it still happens. Still will, and it is on par with this and this isn't me being biased.
Why thank ya very much ^-^! It is fun to change it up now and then hehe~
Also, I never thought I'd get to the point where THIS STUFF *cough cough looks above* happens on my submissions xD I feared the time was coming, and, well, premonition realized. BLOCK LIST, ACTIVATE!!! All part of the timeline of being on FA, I spose~
Also, I never thought I'd get to the point where THIS STUFF *cough cough looks above* happens on my submissions xD I feared the time was coming, and, well, premonition realized. BLOCK LIST, ACTIVATE!!! All part of the timeline of being on FA, I spose~
I don't think they were trolling, I think they just had a misunderstood and uncared for opinion. IMO the comment they made should have just been hidden and left at that. (Also I don't think I've ever seen vore on kids TV. Got any examples? Not doubting you, just actually curious. :o)
Nice pic though, btw.
Nice pic though, btw.
Comments