
Everyone who ever flew one loved the eccentric flying qualities of the Hispano-Franco company's Aeromarine Runabout. It turned on a dime -- usually the moment you relaxed your death grip on the joy stick. It had a faster rate of dive than any other aircraft in the sky -- giving the pilot little chance of recovering from an momentary loss of attention before hitting the waves. Most of all, beware take-off in choppy seas. The spinning propeller had little enough clearance even in calm water. The plane's only real virtue was that it was easy to tie up at the dock, thanks to the handy claat attached to the fore deck, which hardly ever separated from the wood once the original four screws were increased to six. The example illustrated was briefly owned by William (Hopalong Cassidy) Boyd, who won it in a poker game. Thinking he had won a ranch, he had it sunk at first sight. It was raised 60 years later and restored for Michael Jackson's "Neverland."
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1500 x 1079px
File Size 344.5 kB
Interesting design and I love the creativity and the story but if I may throw a small wrench in your creativity, A engine offset like that would cause one side of the plane to accelerate faster and always pull to one side, also if you landing or trying to take off from water the propeller would be hitting the water and likely causing damage to itself or the engine, it would need to be raised so the proppeller is above the waterline at all times to remove any complications.
Im sorry if this is offencive or hurtful at all, Im kind of a sticker for details, perfectionist and was trained in drafting and design so its kinda become habbit to nitpick things.
Im sorry if this is offencive or hurtful at all, Im kind of a sticker for details, perfectionist and was trained in drafting and design so its kinda become habbit to nitpick things.
Oh, it's a horrible design! That's why I wrote the back story the way I did. There was the Blohm & Voss BV 141 reconnassance plane that was just as asymmetrical, though. It had a fuselage offset from the centre of the wing and an engine nacelle balancing it on the other side. I have no idea how it handled, but it was one inspiration for this mess.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_%26_Voss_BV_141
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blohm_%26_Voss_BV_141
My only reference until I looked up that Wiki page as a 1943 aircraft spotter's handbook that had belonged to my uncle. It had a very fuzzy, touched up photo and inaccurage shadow profile. I didn't look at the photo on the Wiki page too closely.
No, I doubt very much my HF contraption would have gotten off the ground. I doubt it would even float! It wasn't meant as a serious design ... not even remotely. Maybe I should have put a happy clown face on it?
No, I doubt very much my HF contraption would have gotten off the ground. I doubt it would even float! It wasn't meant as a serious design ... not even remotely. Maybe I should have put a happy clown face on it?
It would float rather well, less its filled with a ton of lead, Kind of looks like the front half of a hydroplane, if anything the Twin hull design (one for the seat, one for the engine) you have would be more stable when a single hulled boat/plane, similar to the pontoons on a battleship launched plane.
http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums.....2.jpg~original
Also now that I look at it a bit better, I love the over all design of it other then the little wrench I threw into its aero features. The pilot area kind of has this old boat like design combined with a WW2 sliding cockpit. Its a very interesting design and I think it fits very very well together.
http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums.....2.jpg~original
Also now that I look at it a bit better, I love the over all design of it other then the little wrench I threw into its aero features. The pilot area kind of has this old boat like design combined with a WW2 sliding cockpit. Its a very interesting design and I think it fits very very well together.
Thanks. It was, after all, just about how it looks. A practical float plane would have to be better balanced, and provide more clearance for the prop ... in fact, it would be somewhat difficult to make it look much different from float planes that existed.
Wait until I post the A.V. Roe Nootka Sea-Master! I don't think it would work either, but it just might ... if the wing platform didn't break in the middle.
Wait until I post the A.V. Roe Nootka Sea-Master! I don't think it would work either, but it just might ... if the wing platform didn't break in the middle.
It could look vastly differnt, the only thing that wouldnt really look differnt would be a high center placed engine, in which case the over all craft would probably have to be bigger to compensate for being a bit top heavy when in the water and the left side where the engine sits now would seat another person or counter weight
Hispano-Franco: Because We Can, And Therefore Should.
It might fly if you severely angle the prop. Pointing the whole motor 45 degrees away from the main body might (might!) crab enough to cancel out the moment of rotation. It's like a dancing bear trying to do a J-stroke.
It might fly if you severely angle the prop. Pointing the whole motor 45 degrees away from the main body might (might!) crab enough to cancel out the moment of rotation. It's like a dancing bear trying to do a J-stroke.
I'm looking at this thing and "Zen" building a model of it. I even fancied how it would look if "Requisitioned" into the Italian navy as a spotter craft in the late 1930s. But I digress. I figure if fitted with a turboprop engine with counter-rotating propellers and a wider wing span, this crazy contraption might just fly. ...At least in miniature form.
Comments