
Chica from Five Nights at Freddy's.
Been playing it with my boyfriend the last few days.
Fun fun.
I might draw Foxy, maybe.
Been playing it with my boyfriend the last few days.
Fun fun.
I might draw Foxy, maybe.
Category Artwork (Digital) / General Furry Art
Species Avian (Other)
Size 917 x 1280px
File Size 353.4 kB
Listed in Folders
Fanart is one thing, but people like this are trying to turn what's meant to be a horror game into smut and porn for themselves and others.
That being the case, I find it odd that they have to change the ENTIRE character to make it that way. People are too goddamn desperate trying to get hard. Jesus.
That being the case, I find it odd that they have to change the ENTIRE character to make it that way. People are too goddamn desperate trying to get hard. Jesus.
Would you like Chica to be in a diaper instead, sir?
Sweet childlike "innocent" perhaps?
Once again EVERY artist has their own interpretation of a character.
If you are an artist this concept is basic.
Simple to understand.
If you wish to try and contest this further by all means send me a note.
I am not going to continue to comment on DimWitDog's art because your petty whining isn't relating to the artwork at all.
And once again, it's rude.
Sweet childlike "innocent" perhaps?
Once again EVERY artist has their own interpretation of a character.
If you are an artist this concept is basic.
Simple to understand.
If you wish to try and contest this further by all means send me a note.
I am not going to continue to comment on DimWitDog's art because your petty whining isn't relating to the artwork at all.
And once again, it's rude.
Enjoying or making rule/34/ art means you're desperate now? That's a pretty big assumption to make.
You yourself enjoy a subject matter that leaves you wide open to similar assumptions and judgements. What was that saying about glass houses and thrown stones?
But seriously, there's no need to be so judgemental, obnoxious and holier-than-thou.
This video may help you : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0la5DBtOVNI
You yourself enjoy a subject matter that leaves you wide open to similar assumptions and judgements. What was that saying about glass houses and thrown stones?
But seriously, there's no need to be so judgemental, obnoxious and holier-than-thou.
This video may help you : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0la5DBtOVNI
Desperate? Like you? Can't seem to get enough attention from snide opinionated and biased remarks. (unless you're ONLY a troll?)
P.S. FurAffinity has this thing called variety. Go browse through the categories. See there are different categories? Because anyone can draw whatever they want.
If I wanted to draw "SANTA CLAWS" as a DEMONIC SUCCUBUS with MONSTROUS TITS, then I would, and I'd post it here, and not you, your mother, or anyone else, is going to stop me.
P.S. I've had my say. If you don't like it, gtfo and keep your disapproval to yourself. (Unless you ENJOY slamming other people's art because it's not your cup-of-tea)
P.P.S. I don't even know WTF this Chica character is, but I like what I see here. DEAL WITH IT.
P.S. FurAffinity has this thing called variety. Go browse through the categories. See there are different categories? Because anyone can draw whatever they want.
If I wanted to draw "SANTA CLAWS" as a DEMONIC SUCCUBUS with MONSTROUS TITS, then I would, and I'd post it here, and not you, your mother, or anyone else, is going to stop me.
P.S. I've had my say. If you don't like it, gtfo and keep your disapproval to yourself. (Unless you ENJOY slamming other people's art because it's not your cup-of-tea)
P.P.S. I don't even know WTF this Chica character is, but I like what I see here. DEAL WITH IT.
Tl;dr: "Stop drawing what I don't like!"
And I disagree with your claim that it's just 1% Chica. It's literally impossible to asume it's a completely different character. I mean it's so simple that no matter how you turn it, if you show this to everyone who played 5NaF will instantly guess it's Chica.
Yellow robotic chicken? Yes. Point me to all the example of this where one could easily mix this interpretation of Chica up with any other robotic chicken character.
A "LET'S EAT!" sign? Yes. It's unique trait.
Purple eyes? Yes. Another trait unique to the character.
Now if you complained about something like this: http://i.imgur.com/fEsbekK.png then MAYBE I would agree with you. But the way you worded your argument about this pic made you come off as disrespectful of other people's preferences, and rude.
And I disagree with your claim that it's just 1% Chica. It's literally impossible to asume it's a completely different character. I mean it's so simple that no matter how you turn it, if you show this to everyone who played 5NaF will instantly guess it's Chica.
Yellow robotic chicken? Yes. Point me to all the example of this where one could easily mix this interpretation of Chica up with any other robotic chicken character.
A "LET'S EAT!" sign? Yes. It's unique trait.
Purple eyes? Yes. Another trait unique to the character.
Now if you complained about something like this: http://i.imgur.com/fEsbekK.png then MAYBE I would agree with you. But the way you worded your argument about this pic made you come off as disrespectful of other people's preferences, and rude.
hah good luck in telling alot of other artists that, wont do you no good its just going to make you look silly
EVERY artist has the damn right to do what ever they damn well please.
Go tell the fans of hundreds of video game characters that drew krystal fox renamon ect. , tell EVERY SINGLE ONE of em that same thing right now. cant do it can ya?
EVERY artist has the damn right to do what ever they damn well please.
Go tell the fans of hundreds of video game characters that drew krystal fox renamon ect. , tell EVERY SINGLE ONE of em that same thing right now. cant do it can ya?
This translates roughly to "People shouldn't be allowed to do things if I, a perfect stranger, don't approve of them. Because reasons."
Think about that for a moment. Seriously, don't you feel at embarrassed doing all this?
I can appreciate that after certain degrees of alteration tribute art doesn't strongly resemble it's source any more, but that's far from any rational reason to make it a personal issue with people who enjoy or make the art, dude.
Think about that for a moment. Seriously, don't you feel at embarrassed doing all this?
I can appreciate that after certain degrees of alteration tribute art doesn't strongly resemble it's source any more, but that's far from any rational reason to make it a personal issue with people who enjoy or make the art, dude.
Hey, interesting concept, here: , stop to consider, for a moment, that everybody has their own fetishes. Everybody enjoys one thing or another. And I'm sure you realize that some folks have fetishes that intersect and or cross over to other fetishes. now, that being the case, theres ALWAYS a fetish for something, let us say, in this scenario, that someone has a fetish for drawing porn, or 'perverted' pictures of different characters in their own style.
Now, I know your not going to say something like "Your fetish is wrong"
Because if thats the case:
Ya'll need to stop with them diapers.
See what I'm sayin here?
Now, I know your not going to say something like "Your fetish is wrong"
Because if thats the case:
Ya'll need to stop with them diapers.
See what I'm sayin here?
If this piece of art had the characters from the game looking reasonably normal - somewhat altered because of the artist's style is acceptable - still trying to be perverted then I wouldn't mind as much.
If you find murderer animatronics who are supposed to be scary erotic as they are, that's your own problem.
Personally, finding out about Rule 34 since several years ago has ruined how I see everything.
As an example, this portrayal of the character is kind of mudslinging against how the game portrays itself.
It's degrading, and even more so because they are deliberately altering the image of the game for the sole purpose of making it seem attractive and contributing to Rule 34.
If you find murderer animatronics who are supposed to be scary erotic as they are, that's your own problem.
Personally, finding out about Rule 34 since several years ago has ruined how I see everything.
As an example, this portrayal of the character is kind of mudslinging against how the game portrays itself.
It's degrading, and even more so because they are deliberately altering the image of the game for the sole purpose of making it seem attractive and contributing to Rule 34.
Personally, finding out about Rule 34 since several years ago has ruined how I see everything.
That sounds like your own problem, because I'm sure most of us would look at an image like this, say "Huh, well that's interesting", and then go back to playing FNAF without letting it ruin anything. You need to stop taking this shit so seriously.
That sounds like your own problem, because I'm sure most of us would look at an image like this, say "Huh, well that's interesting", and then go back to playing FNAF without letting it ruin anything. You need to stop taking this shit so seriously.
"They shouldn't when it's for perverted purposes."
Whelp there goes like 95% of
narse 's drawings then D:
Whelp there goes like 95% of

Well damn, guess I should stop looking at digiporn cause some guy on the internet told me it was wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y72tsHP2LR0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y72tsHP2LR0
The eyes just looked tired to me--though I suppose if one looked hard enough maybe it looks like she's smiling, thus turning the corners of her eyes up?
Blush, is that what the glowing is? To take blush to mean a character is being sexual would imply that blush can't come from any other reason. In the game, the animatronics are running around Freddy's trying to get you. She could be blushing from exertion. Or shame! (Which to some people I know is sexy, but again, it's not supposed to be.) Maybe she feels bad that she's going to nab you and shove you into a fake animal machine? (I kid.)
--anyway, my point was that I don't see how this picture is sexualized. Sure, this artist is clearly used to sexualizing characters from popular shows and games. This is probably one of the least sexualized pictures in their gallery. There are no traditional imagery of sexuality here. To find anything sexy about this picture, you have to want to find it. Blush and "soft eyes" are kind of pushing it.
Blush, is that what the glowing is? To take blush to mean a character is being sexual would imply that blush can't come from any other reason. In the game, the animatronics are running around Freddy's trying to get you. She could be blushing from exertion. Or shame! (Which to some people I know is sexy, but again, it's not supposed to be.) Maybe she feels bad that she's going to nab you and shove you into a fake animal machine? (I kid.)
--anyway, my point was that I don't see how this picture is sexualized. Sure, this artist is clearly used to sexualizing characters from popular shows and games. This is probably one of the least sexualized pictures in their gallery. There are no traditional imagery of sexuality here. To find anything sexy about this picture, you have to want to find it. Blush and "soft eyes" are kind of pushing it.
Because she wants to. Plus Rule 34 - there's porn of everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_3.....ternet_meme%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_3.....ternet_meme%29
Kayla brings up an interesting point - you're into diapers. You don't want people judging you because you're into something that can be considered gross to others, right?
Unless you have a legitimate medical issue which would require you to wear adult diapers - but even then you wouldn't be parading it around loud and proud.
Unless you have a legitimate medical issue which would require you to wear adult diapers - but even then you wouldn't be parading it around loud and proud.
Hahahahahaha one look at your profile and i know your comment is already totally invalid.
But i must say if your intention was to troll, you did a great job sir.
although with the FA community, trolling isnt such a grand thing here since its something so achievable anyway. Like taking candy from a baby. Great job.
But i must say if your intention was to troll, you did a great job sir.
although with the FA community, trolling isnt such a grand thing here since its something so achievable anyway. Like taking candy from a baby. Great job.
It's a duck.
It's an animatronic duck.
It's a yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a female, yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck with a 'Let's Eat!' shirt on.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck with a 'Let's Eat!' shirt onher big breasts
I don't know if you can't in-to math, but if that is equal to only 1% you better show me an impressive list.
It's an animatronic duck.
It's a yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a female, yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck with a 'Let's Eat!' shirt on.
It's a creepy, female, yellow, animatronic duck with a 'Let's Eat!' shirt on
I don't know if you can't in-to math, but if that is equal to only 1% you better show me an impressive list.
its a game on steam. You play as a security guard monitoring camera's in a pizza joint to keep an eye on the robots, like Chica there, Freddy, Foxxy etc. Each robot has it's own "personality". All of them see the guard as a robot outside of it's suit and try to stuff it inside one.....the problem is said suits are full of wires, support bars etc, meaning death.
Heh. A terrified security guard trying to survive the night without being molested by malfunctioning sex-crazed robots.
"Can't sleep, furries will get me"
I suppose it does take the edge off the dumb screamer scare if its immediately followed by what appears to be an impending deepthroat~
"Can't sleep, furries will get me"
I suppose it does take the edge off the dumb screamer scare if its immediately followed by what appears to be an impending deepthroat~
Comments