At least he wasn't stuck on an MD-11 with only that and Twilight to watch.

That's what books are for!

And cyanide pills

Ugh! I'd have to order 10 drinks and knock myself out to avoid the temptation of using the emergency exit!

Oh... my goodness.

You mean.. it's worse than ZARDOZ ?

No. Nothing is worse than Zardoz. You must not speak of it again!

Lol
Do you do Twitter questions as well?

It's easier if you submit through Tumblr (you don't need an account to post). I lose track of tweets :P

Ah ok, I sent one I hope you like it ^^

I watched the Cinemasins review of that movie and it was still painful

Haha, they did one? I need to see it

Worse than "Plan 9 From Outer Space"?

~Gives cookie for awesome movie knowledge~

Thanks! *gives you a cookie and glass of milk* I've been watching movie reviews from CineMassacre. http://cinemassacre.com/2008/10/14/.....a-thon-part-1/

XD

Could be worse... You could be stuck watching the CBC Newsworld channel on a Sunday because it's the only channel with no signal drop.... THAT was torture.

I wonder if they meant the David Niven Version...

wait, are we talking about the Casino Royale comedy from the late 70s, or the Casino Royale with Daniel Craig? because that one was badass.

"What did you change my WOW password to, Wolf?! I have ways of making you talk!"

I haven't seen that movie. What happened during the torture scene?

They tied a naked James Bond to a chair with a big hole cut in the seat, and the guy swung a knotted length of rope into his balls several times while interrogating him. You don't actually see anything, but it's a very vivid scene. :x

Okay, which version of CASINO ROYALE... The overproduced 1967 James Bond spoof, or the serious one with Daniel Craig? If it's the '67 version, the big torture scene was where Peter Sellers get tossed into a gaudy psychedelic hell by Orson Welles. If it's the recent version- The whole film is torture to watch, and it should be banned by the Geneva Convention as cruel and unusual punishment. At least (I think) the 1967 version is watchable- In an Ed Wood kind of way.

The 1967 version is screamingly funny, and I enjoy it very much every time it's on.

Geez, am I the ONLY one here who LIKES both versions?

Oh, I know. He's watching the 1954 TV adaptation with Peter Lorre as Le Chiffre. THAT was unwatchable.

The TV adaptation was a case of Nice Try, No Cigar. If I remember this correctly, Welles played Le Chiffre in the 1967 version. Welles and Sellers hated each other, so they never appear in the same scene together. Instead, they just simply played their dialogue to the camera separately, and it was all carefully edited together. The '67 CASINO ROYAL is interesting to watch, and sometimes is very funny (And sometimes downright amazing, like the sequence where a flying saucer lands in Trafalgar Square while the Queen's horse guards are on parade), but on the whole, was an excessively expensive failure. The CASINO ROYAL theme was pretty good, though.