
I guess i've been reading the wtf_fa livejournal a bit too much.
Category All / Comics
Species Rabbit / Hare
Size 427 x 1280px
File Size 135.3 kB
Actually the results of a test where showing that most furries are bisexual, then gay and then straight. And less than 1% furries where into zoophilia. But that's the statics. And i am not doubting one minute of the bisexual, gay and straight thing. There are really mostly bisexual furries out here.
And yeah.... The dog fuckers are scary..... They make me kinda disgusted when i look at my friends dog and know that some people likes to fuck them.... But yeah... It's their fetish. And their private life... But anyways... Aint that private if people where posting comments like that. <.<
And yeah.... The dog fuckers are scary..... They make me kinda disgusted when i look at my friends dog and know that some people likes to fuck them.... But yeah... It's their fetish. And their private life... But anyways... Aint that private if people where posting comments like that. <.<
I've written/drawn some freaky stuff,(not downright filthygrossnasty, but i'm sure at least one person will have that say) so it's expected to get those kinds of comments. But when you see them on even staining the most innocent of innocence...you just HAVE to lower your head and shake it in shame. ^.^; *sigh*
This is hilarious. I totally agree! There is a difference between a guy who likes Catwoman and creepy people who want to get sexual with animals of lesser intellect than themselves. A number of us furries seem to have problems distinguishing between the two -- especially the ones who have sex with their pets. YUCK!
Actually some dogs will recognize car keys, and understand the relationship between them and going for rides in the car. But even so, why would animal care about car keys? They don't drive. If it's not important to you why would you care about it? Intellect is relative to not only what you are, but what's important for you to know.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1904.....you-think.html
They now believe that crows can not only recognize antagonists, but pass that information on to other crows, and future generations of crows. It's very compelling, and it's what more and more scientists are discovering every day, that it's not that animals aren't intelligent, but that we have no idea how intelligent they are.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1904.....you-think.html
They now believe that crows can not only recognize antagonists, but pass that information on to other crows, and future generations of crows. It's very compelling, and it's what more and more scientists are discovering every day, that it's not that animals aren't intelligent, but that we have no idea how intelligent they are.
Actually some dogs will recognize car keys, and understand the relationship between them and going for rides in the car. But even so, why would animal care about car keys? They don't drive. If it's not important to you why would you care about it? Intellect is relative to not only what you are, but what's important for you to know.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1904.....you-think.html
They now believe that crows can not only recognize antagonists, but pass that information on to other crows, and future generations of crows. It's very compelling, and it's what more and more scientists are discovering every day, that it's not that animals aren't intelligent, but that we have no idea how intelligent they are.
WTF, man? You make a reply to a comment I made 3 years ago. THREE. FUCKING. YEARS. AGO. WTF?!
Anyway, three years ago, back in 2008, I was replying to Rosenkreuz who is arguing that beasts have intellect on par with human beings as a premise for an excuse for having sex with them. In fact, most of the argument in this thread promoting the idea that sub-sapient beasts are somehow intellectual equals with human beings are being made by sick twisted butthurt bestialists angry about the truth in the artist's comic posted above.
Obviously, since you are so very very very late, three years late, to the party, you missed most of this, and thus you are just being a stupid whiteknight furry coming to the automatic defense of another fur without understanding why the sickos replying to this submission are getting their ass handed to them for promoting the idiotic "animals as smart as humans" line in order to justify their desires to fuck something lower in the animal kingdom.
So, unless you are trying to say that animals are as smart as humans in order to justify fucking them, and are deliberately coming to the defense and trying to curry the favor of dog-fuckers, STFU, and walk away. Think next time about WHO you are defending and WHAT you are defending before opening your idiot mouth, furry dogfucker white-knighter. Oh, and once again, thanks for jumping into the fray three years late. That's awesome and special on many... many different levels.
http://www.cracked.com/article_1904.....you-think.html
They now believe that crows can not only recognize antagonists, but pass that information on to other crows, and future generations of crows. It's very compelling, and it's what more and more scientists are discovering every day, that it's not that animals aren't intelligent, but that we have no idea how intelligent they are.
WTF, man? You make a reply to a comment I made 3 years ago. THREE. FUCKING. YEARS. AGO. WTF?!
Anyway, three years ago, back in 2008, I was replying to Rosenkreuz who is arguing that beasts have intellect on par with human beings as a premise for an excuse for having sex with them. In fact, most of the argument in this thread promoting the idea that sub-sapient beasts are somehow intellectual equals with human beings are being made by sick twisted butthurt bestialists angry about the truth in the artist's comic posted above.
Obviously, since you are so very very very late, three years late, to the party, you missed most of this, and thus you are just being a stupid whiteknight furry coming to the automatic defense of another fur without understanding why the sickos replying to this submission are getting their ass handed to them for promoting the idiotic "animals as smart as humans" line in order to justify their desires to fuck something lower in the animal kingdom.
So, unless you are trying to say that animals are as smart as humans in order to justify fucking them, and are deliberately coming to the defense and trying to curry the favor of dog-fuckers, STFU, and walk away. Think next time about WHO you are defending and WHAT you are defending before opening your idiot mouth, furry dogfucker white-knighter. Oh, and once again, thanks for jumping into the fray three years late. That's awesome and special on many... many different levels.
Haha, I must admit that I didn't realize just how old those comments were, I apologize for needlessly bringing it up, and had I realized that they were years old I might not have said anything.
However I must say that you entirely misunderstand my intent. Neither your comment or the comment that replied to you had anything to do with being pro-beastiality as far as I can see. It seems like the point of contention had turned to the intellect of animals in comparison to humans, and I felt compelled to point out to you that intelligence isn't measured in what you know, but the relativity of what you know compared to who and what you are.
I was at no point defending anyone or anything, save perhaps the intelligence of animals, and even to that end I never said they were equal to or above humans, simply that they are smarter than we realize. I'm sorry you had jumped to the conclusion that I was rallying for beastiality based on that point, but it is my own fault for commenting on a subject long forgotten. I confess at the time of writing it was tired, which often leads me to ponder things at length far beyond than they need to, and start discussions that are whole unnecessary.
However I must say that you entirely misunderstand my intent. Neither your comment or the comment that replied to you had anything to do with being pro-beastiality as far as I can see. It seems like the point of contention had turned to the intellect of animals in comparison to humans, and I felt compelled to point out to you that intelligence isn't measured in what you know, but the relativity of what you know compared to who and what you are.
I was at no point defending anyone or anything, save perhaps the intelligence of animals, and even to that end I never said they were equal to or above humans, simply that they are smarter than we realize. I'm sorry you had jumped to the conclusion that I was rallying for beastiality based on that point, but it is my own fault for commenting on a subject long forgotten. I confess at the time of writing it was tired, which often leads me to ponder things at length far beyond than they need to, and start discussions that are whole unnecessary.
My apologies for biting your head off. But as you can see my the nature of the submission above, the artist was making fun of people who leave creepy comments on innocent photos of animals. Of course, there would have to be at least one butthurt zoophile to come in here and start trying to make a case that animals were really of human intelligence in order to justify having sex with them.
I said in response to the comic posted:
This is hilarious. I totally agree! There is a difference between a guy who likes Catwoman and creepy people who want to get sexual with animals of lesser intellect than themselves. A number of us furries seem to have problems distinguishing between the two -- especially the ones who have sex with their pets. YUCK!
Then Rosenkreuz replied:
You honestly think the animals are of less intellect?
*shakes head sadly*
You're horridly mistaken.
Down below Wolfblade, arguing against bestiality, replied to Rosenkreuz and said:
The chief argument for why it's so messed up to have sex with your pet is that they're just animals and don't really understand what's going on, and they're being taken advantage of by their twisted owner. Take that argument away by saying animals are on the same intellectual level as people, and there'd be no good reason to criticize people who do their doggies. XP
I think dogs, and animals in general, are really awesome, and smart, and genuinely caring towards their owners and all that stuff. But they're still animals, and not on the same level of intellect as people.
and Rosenkreuz replied:
Interesting argument.
*shrugs*
To each his own.
"To each his own..." What? Sexual preferences, maybe? Is this a subtle admission of bestiality on Rosenkreuz's part?
So when you came in and started making, "animals are smarter than they seem" statements, I took that in context of Rosenkreuz's commenting on this art submission who are using the same "animals are really humans who can consent" argument to justify having sex with dogs, and I attacked you, mistakenly.
I said in response to the comic posted:
This is hilarious. I totally agree! There is a difference between a guy who likes Catwoman and creepy people who want to get sexual with animals of lesser intellect than themselves. A number of us furries seem to have problems distinguishing between the two -- especially the ones who have sex with their pets. YUCK!
Then Rosenkreuz replied:
You honestly think the animals are of less intellect?
*shakes head sadly*
You're horridly mistaken.
Down below Wolfblade, arguing against bestiality, replied to Rosenkreuz and said:
The chief argument for why it's so messed up to have sex with your pet is that they're just animals and don't really understand what's going on, and they're being taken advantage of by their twisted owner. Take that argument away by saying animals are on the same intellectual level as people, and there'd be no good reason to criticize people who do their doggies. XP
I think dogs, and animals in general, are really awesome, and smart, and genuinely caring towards their owners and all that stuff. But they're still animals, and not on the same level of intellect as people.
and Rosenkreuz replied:
Interesting argument.
*shrugs*
To each his own.
"To each his own..." What? Sexual preferences, maybe? Is this a subtle admission of bestiality on Rosenkreuz's part?
So when you came in and started making, "animals are smarter than they seem" statements, I took that in context of Rosenkreuz's commenting on this art submission who are using the same "animals are really humans who can consent" argument to justify having sex with dogs, and I attacked you, mistakenly.
If they're not of lesser intellect, then what's wrong with people who wanna screw them? If the animal is of equal intellect to a human, then they are equally capable of giving or withholding consent.
The chief argument for why it's so messed up to have sex with your pet is that they're just animals and don't really understand what's going on, and they're being taken advantage of by their twisted owner. Take that argument away by saying animals are on the same intellectual level as people, and there'd be no good reason to criticize people who do their doggies. XP
I think dogs, and animals in general, are really awesome, and smart, and genuinely caring towards their owners and all that stuff. But they're still animals, and not on the same level of intellect as people.
The chief argument for why it's so messed up to have sex with your pet is that they're just animals and don't really understand what's going on, and they're being taken advantage of by their twisted owner. Take that argument away by saying animals are on the same intellectual level as people, and there'd be no good reason to criticize people who do their doggies. XP
I think dogs, and animals in general, are really awesome, and smart, and genuinely caring towards their owners and all that stuff. But they're still animals, and not on the same level of intellect as people.
Personally I believe Humans are the most advance intellect wise. They can do things that animals can't even begin to comprehend.
Meanwhile, there are things that animals can do, that we can't. Ever watched "Planet Earth", some of the things animals can do and go through is amazing.
We are only above animals by intelligence, speech, the sciences, pretty much everything knowledge based. We also have creativity down, and our ability to build things with our hands.
What animals have that we don't, are natural self-defenses (not including immune system), super physical capabilities, hearing, smelling, seeing, running, climbing, jumping, etc.
So in conclusion, every species is special.
Meanwhile, there are things that animals can do, that we can't. Ever watched "Planet Earth", some of the things animals can do and go through is amazing.
We are only above animals by intelligence, speech, the sciences, pretty much everything knowledge based. We also have creativity down, and our ability to build things with our hands.
What animals have that we don't, are natural self-defenses (not including immune system), super physical capabilities, hearing, smelling, seeing, running, climbing, jumping, etc.
So in conclusion, every species is special.
Oh, I know, animals tend to have us beat in everything BUT brains and thumbs, I was just saying that arguing that sex with animals is a horrible thing, while also saying that they are intellectually equal to humans, is silly. X3
Personally I think the whole argument is retarded. If the animal doesn't have the mental capacity to be able to give consent by like, not biting the person's dick off, then they don't have the mental capacity to be OMG TRAUMATISING RAEPED. I'm not gonna go support it or anything, but I think people who get all bent out of shape over it are dumb.
I'm more pissed about the fact that people are so screwed up over the whole topic that a guy who lets his dog fuck him will go to jail for abusing an animal, but a guy who KILLS his neighbor's dog just gets a fine for destruction of property.
Personally I think the whole argument is retarded. If the animal doesn't have the mental capacity to be able to give consent by like, not biting the person's dick off, then they don't have the mental capacity to be OMG TRAUMATISING RAEPED. I'm not gonna go support it or anything, but I think people who get all bent out of shape over it are dumb.
I'm more pissed about the fact that people are so screwed up over the whole topic that a guy who lets his dog fuck him will go to jail for abusing an animal, but a guy who KILLS his neighbor's dog just gets a fine for destruction of property.
That kind of fits my hate for abortion, but I'm definately NOT going into that. Dx
Yeah, so you get what I saying. Yeah, sex with and animal=bad.
I only need one reason to prove it (I believe me there are many more and better reasons.)
You have no idea where they've been and what they've been up to! xD
Yeah, so you get what I saying. Yeah, sex with and animal=bad.
I only need one reason to prove it (I believe me there are many more and better reasons.)
You have no idea where they've been and what they've been up to! xD
actually humans in my opinion are more intelligent technologically/comprehension wise, where as other animals are more intelligent in the terms that they always seem to be NEEDED to keep nature in balance where as humans seems to be ruining it rapidly
but in any case agreed, sex with animals is rather disgusting and foolish, not only is it Inter species, but as others have said, they don't understand the reason why therefore cannot give consent, In the basic idea its like a pedophile to extremes.
but in any case agreed, sex with animals is rather disgusting and foolish, not only is it Inter species, but as others have said, they don't understand the reason why therefore cannot give consent, In the basic idea its like a pedophile to extremes.
"I'm more pissed about the fact that people are so screwed up over the whole topic that a guy who lets his dog fuck him will go to jail for abusing an animal, but a guy who KILLS his neighbor's dog just gets a fine for destruction of property"
I have never heard truer words in my life.
*bows*
I have never heard truer words in my life.
*bows*
Okay, lemme settle this.
MOST animals are fucking retarded...
...However, there are several that are HIGLY intelligent, and one or two that even rival human intellect. Possibly even crossing the border into sentience and self-awareness.
Notably intelligent animals are canids (although it depends on the species and breed. A golden retriever or wolf can seem almost human at times, whereas one of those little yippy bastards will repeatedly run into the same wall over and over again), crows (specifically ravens), certain tipes of ape (ESPECIALLY orangutans... ...>.=.> And us, though even that's in doubt sometinmes...), and cetaceans.
And with cetaceans, you of course have everyone's favorite - the dolphin. THESE guys are the major non-human candidates for sentience and higher intellect. It has been proven in both laboratory and natural settings that dolphins exhibit great deals of human-like behavior WITHOUT prompting or previous exposure to such from a human. They have also been show to have higher reasoning skills, as well as the ability to recognize abstract concepts such as the meaning of a question mark (though the fact that they can learn to communicate with symbols at all is astounding).
They have even been documented as showing signs of abnormal psychopathies (in individual cases much like humans) previously thought to be exclusive to us - for example, dolphins have been known to commit gang-rape, in which the female is OBVIOUSLY unwilling. This indicates that they have a similar concept of consent as humans, and therefore have some idea of themselves as individual beings. They are also one of the only other species that will have intercourse for the sole purpose of recreation, and will routinely engage in homosexual activity even with a female in the pod.
MOST animals are fucking retarded...
...However, there are several that are HIGLY intelligent, and one or two that even rival human intellect. Possibly even crossing the border into sentience and self-awareness.
Notably intelligent animals are canids (although it depends on the species and breed. A golden retriever or wolf can seem almost human at times, whereas one of those little yippy bastards will repeatedly run into the same wall over and over again), crows (specifically ravens), certain tipes of ape (ESPECIALLY orangutans... ...>.=.> And us, though even that's in doubt sometinmes...), and cetaceans.
And with cetaceans, you of course have everyone's favorite - the dolphin. THESE guys are the major non-human candidates for sentience and higher intellect. It has been proven in both laboratory and natural settings that dolphins exhibit great deals of human-like behavior WITHOUT prompting or previous exposure to such from a human. They have also been show to have higher reasoning skills, as well as the ability to recognize abstract concepts such as the meaning of a question mark (though the fact that they can learn to communicate with symbols at all is astounding).
They have even been documented as showing signs of abnormal psychopathies (in individual cases much like humans) previously thought to be exclusive to us - for example, dolphins have been known to commit gang-rape, in which the female is OBVIOUSLY unwilling. This indicates that they have a similar concept of consent as humans, and therefore have some idea of themselves as individual beings. They are also one of the only other species that will have intercourse for the sole purpose of recreation, and will routinely engage in homosexual activity even with a female in the pod.
I'm not saying that there aren't animals that are possibly nearly or equally intelligent to humans.
In fact, my point was mostly that: EITHER WAY, regardless of whether you feel that animals can be equally intelligent, or if you feel that they're just dumb animals, the whole fuss and flailing over bestiality is stupid.
If someone is saying that it is rape, and causes mental trauma to the animal, then that implies that the animal must have a minimal amount of human-like intelligence. If an animal has enough self-awareness and mental capacity to be mentally harmed by it, then I think it is idiotic to say in the same breath that they are incapable of showing nonverbal signs of consent.
If someone is saying they're just dumb animals and can't consent to it, and it's the human taking advantage of the bond of loyalty the animal shows them, which is the only reason the animal doesn't bite or otherwise show they don't want to do it, then what's the harm? Who's it >hurting?< Unless it's physically damaging to the animal (in which case I'm right there beside anyone wanting to beat the shit out of someone physically abusing an animal) then it isn't hurting them.
I don't like it when people want to say "that's wrong to do" about anything that isn't causing anyone any harm. If nobody is being negatively impacted in any way, then how can something be "wrong?" Maybe it isn't the best thing to do, maybe it isn't necessarily the "right" thing to do, but I think there's grey area for things that maybe aren't "right" but aren't necessarily "wrong" either.
Also: damn old conversation. XD
In fact, my point was mostly that: EITHER WAY, regardless of whether you feel that animals can be equally intelligent, or if you feel that they're just dumb animals, the whole fuss and flailing over bestiality is stupid.
If someone is saying that it is rape, and causes mental trauma to the animal, then that implies that the animal must have a minimal amount of human-like intelligence. If an animal has enough self-awareness and mental capacity to be mentally harmed by it, then I think it is idiotic to say in the same breath that they are incapable of showing nonverbal signs of consent.
If someone is saying they're just dumb animals and can't consent to it, and it's the human taking advantage of the bond of loyalty the animal shows them, which is the only reason the animal doesn't bite or otherwise show they don't want to do it, then what's the harm? Who's it >hurting?< Unless it's physically damaging to the animal (in which case I'm right there beside anyone wanting to beat the shit out of someone physically abusing an animal) then it isn't hurting them.
I don't like it when people want to say "that's wrong to do" about anything that isn't causing anyone any harm. If nobody is being negatively impacted in any way, then how can something be "wrong?" Maybe it isn't the best thing to do, maybe it isn't necessarily the "right" thing to do, but I think there's grey area for things that maybe aren't "right" but aren't necessarily "wrong" either.
Also: damn old conversation. XD
:/ eh. Honestly though using a non-sentient animal for sex pretty much amounts to degrading the animal to the status of a living sex toy. It's kinda demeaning. Frankly whether the animal knows that or not isn't the point, the point is that you're pretty much insulting something you portend to love.
Like I said, whichever stance you take, I don't see the issue of why it's this enormous "wrong" thing beyond just being something weird and "ew" and "dude, gross."
If you feel animals are just non-sentient things incapable of thinking for themselves, then they're not being hurt. It might make you a creepy weirdo for doing it, but you're not hurting anything, so I don't think it deserves more than a passing "ew." Certainly not the insane drama-flailing.
If you feel animals are capable of love and bonds and some degree of intelligence, then if the animal goes along with it, then that's just more bonding or whatever. Like you said, humans aren't the only species that have sex beyond just procreation. Again, it might make someone creepy "ew" weirdo guy, sure. But putting someone in jail? Destroying their life and tossing them in with thieves, rapists, drug dealers and killers? How does that make a shred of sense?
I guess my point is just perspective. The absolute worst amount of "wrong"ness to it is still, to me, worlds short of what people treat it as. You want to think the guy is gross or weird or whatever and avoid him, hey sure fine, nobody should blame you for that. When people act like someone needs to have something bad happen to them because of it, like they need to be put in jail, or have their entire lives destroyed by public announcement of what they do in private, that's when I say people need to be punched.
If you feel animals are just non-sentient things incapable of thinking for themselves, then they're not being hurt. It might make you a creepy weirdo for doing it, but you're not hurting anything, so I don't think it deserves more than a passing "ew." Certainly not the insane drama-flailing.
If you feel animals are capable of love and bonds and some degree of intelligence, then if the animal goes along with it, then that's just more bonding or whatever. Like you said, humans aren't the only species that have sex beyond just procreation. Again, it might make someone creepy "ew" weirdo guy, sure. But putting someone in jail? Destroying their life and tossing them in with thieves, rapists, drug dealers and killers? How does that make a shred of sense?
I guess my point is just perspective. The absolute worst amount of "wrong"ness to it is still, to me, worlds short of what people treat it as. You want to think the guy is gross or weird or whatever and avoid him, hey sure fine, nobody should blame you for that. When people act like someone needs to have something bad happen to them because of it, like they need to be put in jail, or have their entire lives destroyed by public announcement of what they do in private, that's when I say people need to be punched.
*nodnods* Yeah, that's why I said if you just think it isn't right and don't want to associate with it, like how you consider it demeaning or insulting, sure, fine, cool, nobody should try and tell you that you can't feel that way.
But the earlier discussion had been mostly about the severity of most peoples' response to it, which is usually calling for people to be crucified more or less, and that's when people are just being silly.
But the earlier discussion had been mostly about the severity of most peoples' response to it, which is usually calling for people to be crucified more or less, and that's when people are just being silly.
XD
See, without actual verbal communication, it's guesswork at best. Most dog owners would say their dog is every bit as smart as a human (except those with stupid dogs of course) but other people would say differently.
Regardless, there's better stuff to make a fuss over if someone just wants to make a fuss over something. X3
See, without actual verbal communication, it's guesswork at best. Most dog owners would say their dog is every bit as smart as a human (except those with stupid dogs of course) but other people would say differently.
Regardless, there's better stuff to make a fuss over if someone just wants to make a fuss over something. X3
I do not want to post my art here, so I wont waste my time making my own icon in photoshop too. I just grabbed the best icon that matches my opinion of some furry activities allowed here. (full comic explanation in my profile).
Anyway Happy new Year and made a lot of achievements/thropies! :)
Anyway Happy new Year and made a lot of achievements/thropies! :)
*giggles* On FA and many other places on the internet, the most innocent and non sexual submissions (as intended by the poster) can quickly be turned around and made sexual. *nodnod*
I love it how this comment thingy quickly turned into a Zoophilia/beastiality discussion. I personally don't know what to think on that...but sex with most animals is dumb...however [dumb logic]...its possible to safely do it with a few species without harming it or you...and with a degree of consent...Dogs are able to rip balls off *nods sagely* [/dumb logic]
I love it how this comment thingy quickly turned into a Zoophilia/beastiality discussion. I personally don't know what to think on that...but sex with most animals is dumb...however [dumb logic]...its possible to safely do it with a few species without harming it or you...and with a degree of consent...Dogs are able to rip balls off *nods sagely* [/dumb logic]
This is another sad thing that makes me cry, 'cause it's true.
See also: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1085499/
See also: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1085499/
I accept this stereotype of furries with a lawlz. ;p
However, I don't accept the people that are mortified and claim to deny ties to being a furry... yet they still act the same: they're still furries. For example, the stereotype of being an American is being a brain-dead overweight inconsiderate asshole, but I don't live in the States and claim to not be American. Geez. :x Can't be part of the group and avoid the stereotypical labeling.
However, I don't accept the people that are mortified and claim to deny ties to being a furry... yet they still act the same: they're still furries. For example, the stereotype of being an American is being a brain-dead overweight inconsiderate asshole, but I don't live in the States and claim to not be American. Geez. :x Can't be part of the group and avoid the stereotypical labeling.
it happens. I dont mind it really tho
lol..sounds like a conversation I had
example of "great" comments on my dog photo : http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1735419/
lol..sounds like a conversation I had
example of "great" comments on my dog photo : http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1735419/
Hardcore furries give everybody in the fandom a really bad rap.
I love animals, but not THAT way.
I don't get why everbody has to be into a lot of weird and creepy stuff in the furry fandom, but like any culture or subculture, we have the people against the stereotypes and those who perpetuate them.
I lol-ed at the character's expression, though. XD
I love animals, but not THAT way.
I don't get why everbody has to be into a lot of weird and creepy stuff in the furry fandom, but like any culture or subculture, we have the people against the stereotypes and those who perpetuate them.
I lol-ed at the character's expression, though. XD
Comments