Tougher than it looked....
Another old, old pic.
This one is of a Renault FT17 tankette of WW1 vintage, and the result of a dragon trying to take liberties...
Never assume its harmless because its small!
-Badger-
This one is of a Renault FT17 tankette of WW1 vintage, and the result of a dragon trying to take liberties...
Never assume its harmless because its small!
-Badger-
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 600 x 582px
File Size 76.3 kB
No.
Not enough room inside an FT17.
The engine/transmission took up most of the space, and the gunner/commander actually stood upright and moved the turret by pushing, using brute force.
It sat loose on the ring.
At least for the machine gun armed first model.
But I can't recall anything about adding a traverse mechanism for the short barreled cannon.
-Badger-
Not enough room inside an FT17.
The engine/transmission took up most of the space, and the gunner/commander actually stood upright and moved the turret by pushing, using brute force.
It sat loose on the ring.
At least for the machine gun armed first model.
But I can't recall anything about adding a traverse mechanism for the short barreled cannon.
-Badger-
Given the star, that is more likely to be a 6-ton tank, (the US built version of the FT-17), or a KS/MS series tank, (Russian).
As for the effect of the shell: They could also mount a 75mm gun, (firing HE would leave a decent blast), but those had a tendency to be rather dramatic when penetrated, (and given the thin armour was vulnerable to AT rifles and MGs...). So quick dragon: Fire back while backpedalling.
As for the effect of the shell: They could also mount a 75mm gun, (firing HE would leave a decent blast), but those had a tendency to be rather dramatic when penetrated, (and given the thin armour was vulnerable to AT rifles and MGs...). So quick dragon: Fire back while backpedalling.
FA+

Comments