I've got Bonnie locked in a cell :3

I really don't know who you are, but this is still adorable.

Ooh, adoption :3 .....wait.....something's not right...... _{Stomach......adoption........} WHAT??? OnO'

I didn't even think of that. But don't worry, Deva's an endophile -- her stomach's essentially been reduced to all the functionality of her pouch.

But....I like pouches ......*hides in my box and whimpers*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1kw1RmzrPc this should clear up any questions about fnaf 2 that you have

Except even that theory is full of holes.

My theory: Scott wants everyone to think he's some diabolical mastermind of a storyteller when he's really just making shit up as he goes.

in scott's defense, the demand for a sequel was so high (due to 90% internet going apeshit over the first one, and several insanely famous you-tubers giveing the first game tons of praise) he probably didn't have nearly as much time to work on a sequel, and if you factor in that it's much harder to make a sequel. it's a miracle that Five Nights At Fready's 2 was as good as it was.

I thought the murders happened before 2 took place. True, that doesn't explain what's up with the Toy animatronics, since they're not the ones that are haunted. It is confirmed 2 takes place in 1987, and the Bite 87 takes place immediately after Night 6. I am unaware of any specific date inconsistencies related to that, though. One of my sources seems to suggest that more murders took place after the original 5, and that is possible since the murderer was still at large for a long time. ((spoiler warning) although I'm not sure why he came back to destroy the animatronics in the first place) Then again, it's also unclear what the fate of the countless night guards who also fell victim to these things was. Are they also haunting the animatronics? If so, there could be tons of them, but there's nothing to indicate that is so. In any case, (spoiler again) were they also released when the original 5 were finally put to rest?

I've been trying to figure out this whole thing myself and I never got too far. It doesn't help that 3 hasn't been analyzed enough to clarify things for me. Even from what I've seen, it doesn't really explain everything. Golden Freddy was made out to possibly be a key to this giant puzzle, but I'm confused on whether it had a connection to the original 5 or not, or what that connection was. The suggestion is that it was a force outside of the 5, but how in the world does that explain what it does? No answers are given.

The Phone Guy says in the Night 6 phone call that "somebody used one of the suits" and that the whole place is on lockdown, implying that the murders just happened. But as I said before, the original "withered" animatronics already had "the smell" on them, which was a characteristic associated with them having had corpses stuffed inside of them (a trait confirmed by the Give Gifts, Give Life minigame).

So the only way for Scott to establish a fully coherent timeline would be for there to have been two separate missing children incidents, as well as some plausible explanation for why only one of them was reported.

I've given up on trying to figure out "the truth" since I'm convinced Scott's just making it up as he goes, and instead can only go with my own personal interpretation, part of which is that whatever killed the second set of missing children did so with the explicit purpose of "giving life" to the Toy versions.

Ergo, since Scott all but completely forgot about the Toy versions in #3, I don't see any problem with "Deva adopted them all" being the answer to the question "What happened to the Toy versions?"

I have since gone over everything myself, and there are indeed a lot more inconsistencies than I thought, but yeah, the 5 murders that are central to the first 3 games did happen near the end of the 2nd game. Interesting point about the smell, though, the withered animatronics did still have it, but they were inactive and being used as spare parts at the time. It is possible that particular newspaper clip was talking about a later time, inbetween 2 and 1, and they were speaking of the restored classic animatronics, which would have had the bodies inside of them. Why did the withered animatronics and toy animatronics in 2 still have odd behavior, then? This is an unanswered question as far as I know, but I can't help but wonder about the earlier incidents with the company on this, which is what led to my confusion before. The Phone Guy speaks of some kind of tragedy happening at the previous location in 2, but we have not been told specifically what this tragedy was. One thing I DO know is that the crying child was murdered before the events of 2, but which one of the previous locations it was is unclear to me. We also know Purple Guy to have been an employee at one of these locations, and it's most likely the second one, since he was aware of the spring lock suits, which was after the chain became known as Freddy Fazbear's, and not the original location.

Here is where a lot of the inconsistencies start to show up. It's been implied by the games in 2 that Purple Guy was a guard, but one of those games also features the pizzeria of 2, in which it's not possible Purple Guy was there, since they speak of suspecting "previous employees", meaning that he was no longer an employee. HOWEVER, we do know that he caused the murders and was possibly behind meddling with the animatronics' facial recognition, resulting in their odd behavior. Though that is not a full explanation, as the animatronics aren't supposed to be messing around at night at all according to Phone Guy, facial recognition or not. Perhaps he once again posed as a guard in order to set things up for his scheme. This would not line up with another one of the games, though, where we once again see the Purple Guy lurking around while Foxy goes to greet some kids, only to find them murdered. For one thing, we know the murders to have happened in a back room, presumably the safe room that was put in all locations that is invisible to cameras and the animatronics. We know the animatronics cannot go there, as it induces an error. The rest of the game seems to make like this is a normal area of the pizzeria, though, as this is where he normally greets the kids. The "back room" was established in the first game, so this would be inconsistent even with this. Not to mention that Foxy was inactive when the murders were supposed to have taken place. As for the rest, I cannot guess what the context is, as why would Foxy go out to greet them at all and with Purple Guy there? This is either a mess or that game is not about the 5 murders we know, and instead has to do with the events of the previous location.

Another weird thing is that 2 is referred to as a summer job, when your paycheck is for November. Now, you could handwave it as being Australia or New Zealand, but I will also mark that the murders take place in this game, and the newspaper of 1 states they were in June. I cannot rectify this mistake, as it seems within the course of the game itself that things turned around and ended up not matching up. Also, the paper says the person who committed the murders was found and captured. We know Purple Guy to have still been at large after even after the events of 1. This is another unanswered conundrum, but it is possible that he had someone else take the fall for him. How Purple Guy found out about the animatronics' odd behavior, though, is a mystery to me. Phone Guy had been monitoring them for years, and then Mike shows up. There's no room for any other murders to occur, which is the most obvious thing that would've led Purple Guy to return to deal with them. How did he discover the animatronics had gone haywire, then? Not to mention that the company had an oddly specific procedure for dealing with the bodies should the animatronics had done something to them. Then again, Phone Guy only mentions he had been there for the previous week. Perhaps he had others fill in for the interim time and didn't spend all of those years there himself.

The last one has caused a lot of problems for myself and others, and that is where Golden Freddy fits in all this. It is HEAVILY implied it was the suit used for the murders, and even ended up possessed by one of the children. Then, in 3, we find out about the Springtrap suit and that it could also be what was used. We are even shown the two together in one of the games to rescue the children. Now, it is said that two spring lock suits were available and it is possible they were kept in the safe room for all that time, but Phone Guy is also aware there was a suit in the back, and after the murders take place, that is when Golden Freddy starts to appear. So why did he know of one suit and not the other one, unless Purple Guy only stored up Golden Freddy for this one, and used Springtrap later when he dismantled the animatronics. Many have also pointed out that there is a characteristic that sets Springtrap apart from all other animatronics and thus tells that it is a spring lock suit: It has five fingers, and everyone else, including Golden Freddy, has only four. This would make it seem like Golden Freddy is not a spring lock suit, but it is almost irrefutable that it was behind the murders. It's characteristic line of "It's me" even points to this.

There's probably even more than this, but this is what stands out to me. Junk either doesn't add up properly or in the case of 2's dates, it is flat out inconsistent and can't be worked out. A lot of this, though, is due to games coming out after them that would contradict them. I think that you're right that he may just be making this up as he goes along, but he has at least some idea of the things he intends to reference, even if between games, they don't match up. I would think someone would be better able to keep all of that straight, though. I've spun worse webs than this and it all made sense in the end. I'd be inclined to think that the most recent version of the events is the most correct one except for the matter of when the core 5 murders took place, since it is plain he intended for it to be the middle of the year, but how the paycheck ended up being for November is anyone's guess. It will all have to depend on whether another Golden Freddy will show up, since "the" Golden Freddy is gone now. It is also only my personal theory that the Purple Guy may have committed an earlier act than the one we know, as it would be the easiest way to explain all the things that may have happened earlier, save for the failure of the spring lock suits, as that was the company's own fault. The newly revealed "Nightmare" animatronics share qualities with Springtrap, which leads me to believe that we will have an answer to this matter, but I could be mistaken. I've proposed a way in which this could all be explained, but I'm not certain of that, either.

You may be right, but I am at least going to see how the rest of this plays out.

Oh, I didn't answer the original question, did I? Ummm...I have no idea why the toy animatronics took the fall as opposed to the originals. Well, it may have a lot to do with the matter that the Toy animatronics were the only ones they thought were active at the time, and they didn't know that the kids were put into the originals. That's flipping fishy, though, since how would you not find out about dead corpses in your animatronics? It may have to do with the same reason as to why they haven't been cleaned in years. Like I mentioned above, though, I have no explanation for the toy animatronics' behavior either. There is definitely something going on there.

In other words, I still believe 2 was a prequel to 1, showcasing the events around the murders themselves, but what happened before then is what I want to know. Something DID happen before, and I am not convinced it was JUST the crying child. This is what I await to be answered, and I'll be buggered if it isn't answered.

cute, we need to se more if mangle with deva

has she seen kecha wacha from monster hunter?

She looked it up after you mentioned it and said it looked like something she remembered seeing on The Muppets.

I assume that means she thought it was cute and would adopt one if it would let her.

his name is so fun, kecha wacha guna getcha!!!

it would be nice to see mangle up and running

Fav for both the art and the FNAF commentary. :)

That's a nice lookin roo. I tend to find a handful of monstery characters cute too.