
I think I'm starting to get the hang of this perspective stuff.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / Still Life
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 600 x 552px
File Size 70.7 kB
That's a very nice piece of work.
You should try to do less on the angle effect of the left park of the desk (in the bottom). It goes too much "up".
Except for that, as I said, you did pretty much of a well done!
I appreciated giving you this comment and I liked viewing what you've done :3
*hug*
You should try to do less on the angle effect of the left park of the desk (in the bottom). It goes too much "up".
Except for that, as I said, you did pretty much of a well done!
I appreciated giving you this comment and I liked viewing what you've done :3
*hug*
*sigh* This was supposed to be a reply to you, but FA said "Nuh-uh!" So here we go again.
Actually, the left part of the desk matches up with the left vanishing point, I checked it a few times. I think one problem is I forgot to put in a line at the left front, to give an idea of how the trim comes out. I also should have done a vertical "thickness" line on the left side of those drawers. Ah, well. Next time.
Actually, the left part of the desk matches up with the left vanishing point, I checked it a few times. I think one problem is I forgot to put in a line at the left front, to give an idea of how the trim comes out. I also should have done a vertical "thickness" line on the left side of those drawers. Ah, well. Next time.
Actually, the left part of the desk matches up with the left vanishing point, I checked it a few times. I think one problem is I forgot to put in a line at the left front, to give an idea of how the trim comes out. I also should have done a vertical "thickness" line on the left side of those drawers. Ah, well. Next time.
Fixed width, there's very little variance in line weight. Better to use a very sharp "real" pencil instead, there's more opportunity to vary lines on the fly. My layout prof, who's also a working animator, recommends regular pencils over mechanical.
Plus, the leads don't break nearly so easy.
Plus, the leads don't break nearly so easy.
True, rulers tend to chew throught them quite a bit. But I never was too conscerned with line width, only having as small a point as possible to fit in the maximum detail...like this pic I drew a few years ago.
http://gr8fzy1.deviantart.com/art/D.....tails-23025426
I know the left front tire is huge, I didn't notice until I had finished. I was to busy with blades of grass and specks of mica in the rocks.
http://gr8fzy1.deviantart.com/art/D.....tails-23025426
I know the left front tire is huge, I didn't notice until I had finished. I was to busy with blades of grass and specks of mica in the rocks.
Yeah, but you trap yourself that way. Things further away have less detail, so if you put a lot of detail into the midground, you have to put a lot more into the foreground. But you still need to ease back in the background. If you have detail like that at all levels, then the pic ends up looking flat. For instance, I look at the level of detail on those tire treads, and my brain realizes I shouldn't see that much unless I was only a few feet from the tire itself.
Don't knock yourself out for nothing on stuff like that.
Don't knock yourself out for nothing on stuff like that.
I'm talking about extreme persespectives...Like a person sitting on a bench with one hand on the sitting area. The camera is level with the seat, and appears to be only a foot from the bench. The person's hand ends up looking like it's half the size of his body. Do you see what I'm talking about?
Comments