FA+
Shop
518
Views
Views
28
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Horse
Size 483 x 700
File Size 80.9 kB
Report this content
More from Sighthoundlady
My half of the trade with JNFerrigno (Burakkubara), this is Jawar a dapple grey Andalusian stallion.
I find dapple a very hard color to pull off!
Edit: Oh for goodness sake, people, get your mind OFF the genitalia! I know this is FA and all but geez. For everybody’s information, I try to keep my art “family friendly” as much as possible.
I find dapple a very hard color to pull off!
Edit: Oh for goodness sake, people, get your mind OFF the genitalia! I know this is FA and all but geez. For everybody’s information, I try to keep my art “family friendly” as much as possible.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Animal related (non-anthro)
Species Horse
Size 483 x 700px
File Size 80.9 kB
You draw the best darn braidwork... that running braid is awesome. His mane has real weight to it, real thickness, and looks like it's falling like it should across his neck.
No kidding - dapple grey is a terribly hard color to pull off; dapples are a bane to make look right. I still think I can't do it, and I love how you did it here - the irregularities in the sizes are perfect, that's a mistake I see a lot of folks make is that the dapples are all the same size. I love that his legs shade to a charcoal and not a true black; it really appears realistic and soft, like the shading should.
No kidding - dapple grey is a terribly hard color to pull off; dapples are a bane to make look right. I still think I can't do it, and I love how you did it here - the irregularities in the sizes are perfect, that's a mistake I see a lot of folks make is that the dapples are all the same size. I love that his legs shade to a charcoal and not a true black; it really appears realistic and soft, like the shading should.
Very nice picture but why can't you see more of his... just kidding
May I ask why we can't see his hind hoofs? Shouldn't they be there even when his tail is so fluffy? I mean...there should be some more of his hind legs and his hoofs.
In the pose he is showing there we should be able to see his hooks and nearly everything below I think.
May I ask why we can't see his hind hoofs? Shouldn't they be there even when his tail is so fluffy? I mean...there should be some more of his hind legs and his hoofs.
In the pose he is showing there we should be able to see his hooks and nearly everything below I think.
"May I ask why we can't see his hind hoofs? Shouldn't they be there even when his tail is so fluffy? I mean...there should be some more of his hind legs and his hoofs.
In the pose he is showing there we should be able to see his hooks and nearly everything below I think."
You're on an artwork focused website and have been for more than a few days, quite obviously. I don't even know where to start describing this, but your question is so ridiculous it's almost painful.
The reason why the legs aren't showing isn't because the artist is incompetent and doesn't understand what she's doing. It's called doing artwork and making use of the canvas and composition. If she were to draw the legs I personally feel it would unbalance the drawing.
Besides that, have you ever taken a glance at any artbook with fantasy themed pictures? A lot of characters are drawn to make use of a frame, It's like asking why this drawing isn't 'finished' because only one corner contains the fairy and background: http://www.wtv-zone.com/califPamela.....s-1/fairy6.jpg
In short, you're the first person in 7 years I've ever seen ask this question and I'm baffled you're taking anatomy so literally. There are things called concepts, compositions and artistic influence. A lot of drawings don't include certain bodyparts to pull focus towards what's important. Some people leave them out because they won't look right.
A little bit of artistic insight on these things might be of use when you question an artist about their art.
In the pose he is showing there we should be able to see his hooks and nearly everything below I think."
You're on an artwork focused website and have been for more than a few days, quite obviously. I don't even know where to start describing this, but your question is so ridiculous it's almost painful.
The reason why the legs aren't showing isn't because the artist is incompetent and doesn't understand what she's doing. It's called doing artwork and making use of the canvas and composition. If she were to draw the legs I personally feel it would unbalance the drawing.
Besides that, have you ever taken a glance at any artbook with fantasy themed pictures? A lot of characters are drawn to make use of a frame, It's like asking why this drawing isn't 'finished' because only one corner contains the fairy and background: http://www.wtv-zone.com/califPamela.....s-1/fairy6.jpg
In short, you're the first person in 7 years I've ever seen ask this question and I'm baffled you're taking anatomy so literally. There are things called concepts, compositions and artistic influence. A lot of drawings don't include certain bodyparts to pull focus towards what's important. Some people leave them out because they won't look right.
A little bit of artistic insight on these things might be of use when you question an artist about their art.
Sorry but I can just smile about your more that strange comment here.
My question is painful? I would say the same to your more than stupid command here. It was a quiet normal question I have asked. And YOU are not the artist so why are YOU answering to me? If you don't like my questions than ignore them or go cry but don't bother me with your garbage.
I have never said that the artist is incompetent. Did I? I think I have just asked why.
And if I am the first person in 7 years YOU see asking this kind of question or not is very unimportant for me.
Why I'm taking anatomy so literally? Because the rest of the horse is drawn very good in his anatomy that I was wondering why just these little part of his hind legs are missing.
I think I have said enough to show you that you are really not the person I have asked my question so just shut up and go do you thing. But don't bother me with you baby game.
Have a nice day.
My question is painful? I would say the same to your more than stupid command here. It was a quiet normal question I have asked. And YOU are not the artist so why are YOU answering to me? If you don't like my questions than ignore them or go cry but don't bother me with your garbage.
I have never said that the artist is incompetent. Did I? I think I have just asked why.
And if I am the first person in 7 years YOU see asking this kind of question or not is very unimportant for me.
Why I'm taking anatomy so literally? Because the rest of the horse is drawn very good in his anatomy that I was wondering why just these little part of his hind legs are missing.
I think I have said enough to show you that you are really not the person I have asked my question so just shut up and go do you thing. But don't bother me with you baby game.
Have a nice day.
Comments