Thinking about the way he established the alpha role after some countless effort and times spent in their presence was too fascinating to pass up a doodle. Him and his raptors are awesome!

PRATTS FACE

IM DYING

Great art btw

buT THAT FACE DOE

Hm, elaborate please

His bedroom eyes

Ha, it's Pratt, 'nuff said

ye (lenny face)

i honestly wonder what chris things about all the porn he's starring in recently.
i'm really hoping someone ends up asking him about that in an interview xD

Wouldn't that make for an interesting reaction haha. Though, I don't think there's enough NSFW art starring him to really spark any general attention, so he doesn't need to worry because we all know who the real star is

Might be the kind of thing that would get sprung on him by Kimmel or Fallon for laughs. But other than that, you have the right of it, and such an instance would likely be the first time Pratt even found out such a thing existed.

Eeeeeeeee she's beautiful <3

so adorabu!

They're adorable until they start trying to eat you. ^^

she looks excited, i think i'll take her away from the suave human for a bit

Now hopefully she won't chew your arm off in the process

luckily i don't take advice from Cesar Millan.

Awwwwwwwwwwwwww <3 she looks so happy that's adorable!

that is one happy raptor

just an fyi betta = Siamese fighting fish, beta = phonic alphabet for B/ second in charge of a pack

Welp, and I'm baffled it took this long for someone to point out my mistake! Thanks for letting me know haha

I will be snuggling with Charlie ;)

D'awww it's perfect. He didn't seem to show as much emotional attachment during the movie as I thought he would, especially when one of his raptors went out Michael Bay style... Heat of the battle can be a tad distracting I guess.

That, and as far as the movie showed their bonds were mostly there to satisfy the instinctual needs of the raptors, like he said in the movie those dinos only care about feeding and breeding, but it's still awesome to amp up the possible emotional bonds.

http://postimg.org/image/kmu1ls51n/ clever girl OwO

One thing I always wondered: They have that scene in the original where Grant spends all that time stressing all the similarities dinosaurs have with birds, essentially establishing dinosaurs as the evolutionary link between reptiles and birds. . .

So, when filling in the blanks from the incomplete dinosaur DNA, why did they always "go backwards" and splice it with reptiles and amphibians? Why not instead "go forward" and splice it with DNA from social, tamable birds?

I get why they didn't do it in the first movie -- they were just trying to prove such a thing could be done period. But by the time of Jurassic World, they've got the science so refined that they actually created a new species altogether.

So why did they keep splicing them with dangerous, unpredictable reptiles and not something that loves to cuddle? Then moments like this in the movie could have actually appeared (and inspired a super-profitable plush toy line to go with them).