And a trio of pretty ladies
Category Artwork (Traditional) / General Furry Art
Species Housecat
Size 389 x 573px
File Size 58.5 kB
That's kind of my point.
I don't see the difference in principle. I understand the difference in the law, but I'm curious as to why you avoid drawing anything adult, but don't mind drawing adult contexts.
Especially since you've drawn fetish art: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1696338/
I don't see the difference in principle. I understand the difference in the law, but I'm curious as to why you avoid drawing anything adult, but don't mind drawing adult contexts.
Especially since you've drawn fetish art: http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1696338/
I could if I wanted to draw nipples on my girls' breasts, but I feel that doing so would push it into a context that I wouldn't like it to be in.
If you want to know about the paw thing, the guy who it was drawn for doesn't attribute sexual connotations to feet at all. He just likes feet, a lot. I don't feel that his liking feet has to be innately adult, any more than anyone liking macros or, you know, furries.
Likewise, I still like anatomy of bodies, and I like friendship and closeness, and I like hugs and cuddles, and I don't think that 'adult contexts' in and of themselves are wrong or anything.
But you might be surprised how often a lack of nipples or genitals will prevent people from filing something innocent in the 'porn' category. So, I don't do that.
Though if you want to keep pointing out a number of my borderline cases . . . well, erm, nobody's perfect. I apologize.
If you want to know about the paw thing, the guy who it was drawn for doesn't attribute sexual connotations to feet at all. He just likes feet, a lot. I don't feel that his liking feet has to be innately adult, any more than anyone liking macros or, you know, furries.
Likewise, I still like anatomy of bodies, and I like friendship and closeness, and I like hugs and cuddles, and I don't think that 'adult contexts' in and of themselves are wrong or anything.
But you might be surprised how often a lack of nipples or genitals will prevent people from filing something innocent in the 'porn' category. So, I don't do that.
Though if you want to keep pointing out a number of my borderline cases . . . well, erm, nobody's perfect. I apologize.
I wasn't trying to be accusatory. I just see a lot of people doing the same thing (some of them taking it a lot farther, drawing clearly sexually based subject matter but thinking it "doesn't count" when there aren't nipples), and was curious about the reasoning behind it, or why people honestly even care what gets filed under "porn" and what doesn't.
FA+

Comments