
Endless Realms bestiary - Fungal Ooze
Bestiary artwork for Endless Realms, a D&D-like "pen and paper" fantasy RPG I'm working for.
Mould monster! Another ooze concept, although I actually did the original sketch for this over a year ago (the design got put on hold and replaced with another, more urgently needed monster at the time instead). This one I imagine doesn't actually have much in the way of active physical attacks - I more see it as a slow, unstoppable thing that only grows more powerful the longer you leave it, breaking down and consuming the areas (and creatures) it passes by. The sort of creature that uses debuffs, movement snares, status changes and damage-over-time, poison and erosion, as its spores spread and grow.
Sounds frustrating :b so... perfect for a monster concept!
Concept & Artwork © 2014-2017 Lunar Games Inc.
Endless Realms FAQ: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5774483/
Mould monster! Another ooze concept, although I actually did the original sketch for this over a year ago (the design got put on hold and replaced with another, more urgently needed monster at the time instead). This one I imagine doesn't actually have much in the way of active physical attacks - I more see it as a slow, unstoppable thing that only grows more powerful the longer you leave it, breaking down and consuming the areas (and creatures) it passes by. The sort of creature that uses debuffs, movement snares, status changes and damage-over-time, poison and erosion, as its spores spread and grow.
Sounds frustrating :b so... perfect for a monster concept!
Concept & Artwork © 2014-2017 Lunar Games Inc.
Endless Realms FAQ: http://www.furaffinity.net/journal/5774483/
Category Artwork (Digital) / Fantasy
Species Exotic (Other)
Size 800 x 800px
File Size 644.7 kB
Listed in Folders
Well, they don't necessarily erode everything like acid or anything like that. I was more thinking like a sped-up version of how mushrooms are often part of decomposition, consuming and spreading. But yeah, I was thinking there was probably some kind of debuff or damage-over-time element to it, but it's not really my job to come up with the lore, so it's me just thinking out loud :)
I just find it so funny to see a mix of ooze and fungus, with the whole thing I mentioned with another ooze about how there exist actual creatures IRL that are fungus that are mobile and ooze-like. They are called SlimeMolds. They are a mold spewing slime-like fungal creature that rolls slowly along the ground consuming dead debris... and anything tiny enough to get stuck in them and die as they 'crawl'... typically small insects... native to tropical jungles and forests...
I wish Slime-Molds grew mushrooms on them... but it won't kill or badly hurt them if they have a slice of their body cut off... funnily sometimes these slices grow to life as well like starfish arms! Weird right? A lot like Oozes from P&P and video games...
I wish Slime-Molds grew mushrooms on them... but it won't kill or badly hurt them if they have a slice of their body cut off... funnily sometimes these slices grow to life as well like starfish arms! Weird right? A lot like Oozes from P&P and video games...
Yeah, that's sort of what inspired it, really :b I'm no myconologist by any stretch of the imagination, but I definitely encountered them in my adventurers getting my B.Sc! Plus yeah, I love science and nature stuff (which would explain why I ended up getting a B.Sc in it :b) :3
I've kinda had a nature obsession too... but my knowledge is far more extensive with mycology than botany. Also, my knowledge with the new adapted form of mycology they began teaching a few years ago is not good, and I've better understanding of mycology with times that used different methods to determine a specific species and even when looking entire genus's. Old age mycology from well over a decade ago... I wish they weren't rapidly discovering new methods and instantly applying them on such large scale acts. If you take mycology from three decades ago with the present day almost every known species is renamed and in general categorized as different species. Botany is a more stable science... maybe I shoulda focused on that...
It can be frustrating, for sure, but I like when you can actually easily see and track advancements in the field like that. Like, when I was in university studying immunobiology, the professors talked about the potential of using engineered viruses in the treatment of cancer, that that was what they were looking at doing in the future, and "in this professor's opinion," it would be how cancer will be cured.
Then, years later, it eventually filters down into public knowledge as the scientific body of knowledge about it has grown. In this case I'm about to link, it was discovered by accident, but illustrates the same premise: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art.....les/300939.php
* * *
Heh, I roomed with a "botanist" - he had a degree in forestry and basically worked as a greenskeeper for golf courses, but you could tell he was really passionate about it. Loved trees and plants and could tell you the species of everything and a bit of their history.
With trees, in particular, it would make sense that the body of knowledge would be more stable, especially given their generation times! But yeah, some fields seem to make sense as being faster changing than others, but to be honest, watching my husband go through the process of getting his PhD, there's a lot of active correspondence that happens between experts on a regular basis. One year a paper will be put out, and the next year, there'll be multiple responses to it, and the year after, more responses in turn, and that's just the "stream of consciousness" following a single person's ideas, let alone the academic community as a whole. It's just something the lay person never sees because they only typically have access to the "tried and true" stuff that's already been through their paces.
Then, years later, it eventually filters down into public knowledge as the scientific body of knowledge about it has grown. In this case I'm about to link, it was discovered by accident, but illustrates the same premise: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art.....les/300939.php
* * *
Heh, I roomed with a "botanist" - he had a degree in forestry and basically worked as a greenskeeper for golf courses, but you could tell he was really passionate about it. Loved trees and plants and could tell you the species of everything and a bit of their history.
With trees, in particular, it would make sense that the body of knowledge would be more stable, especially given their generation times! But yeah, some fields seem to make sense as being faster changing than others, but to be honest, watching my husband go through the process of getting his PhD, there's a lot of active correspondence that happens between experts on a regular basis. One year a paper will be put out, and the next year, there'll be multiple responses to it, and the year after, more responses in turn, and that's just the "stream of consciousness" following a single person's ideas, let alone the academic community as a whole. It's just something the lay person never sees because they only typically have access to the "tried and true" stuff that's already been through their paces.
Comments