Bottomless District for sure.

I need that top xD

Such adorably awesome doodlework here. :D

AWWWWW

she is pretty !

oboi

Such a cuty

Cute wolfie wolf ^^

And er..."probably won't be posted on FA" <.< Should I be sorry for her now or later?

Super! ^^

adorbs! yush yush

Aww, well, where else can I find you? ^_^

I hope nobody will put her down for being bottomless. Not like she's showing anything.
Also, she's super adorable! ^w^

Only someone hung up on stupid things.
Just looks like a cute pup off to school in a world not run by humans.

But you'll inform us as to where we can find it, yes?

Watch my IB, I guess? I can't really link to things like that directly.

Shrug.

Much politics, very biggus dickus contestum.

Isn't that all that matters today? Who has the biggest dick?

i would love to visit this bottomless district and it's inhabitants ;3

Good to see how even the younger characters are allowed to follow the social norms despite their young age.
Still, very very cute.

I love the concept of bottomless district. Hoping this might appear over at some other hereinnotmentioned art site instead?

It's a good bet

"Probably won't be posted on FA."

Its time for the Inkbunny

Given that this bottomless district covers all ages and various aspects of life (e.g., social gatherings, sports), I'm guessing its basically like nudism/naturism, but they still wear their shirts and tops?

I'd love that idea!

Putting such art here might be quite risky, y'know? Still, tis is pretty cute.

I'm guessing it's not that risky if you have 60754 watchers and are part of the team trying to rewrite FA's code.

If you put it that way...

I think I am in love with this art love Labradors!
You nail the Labrador specially the tail! So meany make a Labrador tail moor like a golden retriever tail.
Love it and hope to see meny moor Labradors

this looks promising

Awe she's a cutie, man. I like how ya disappear for awhile and come back with some amazing artwork hehe.~

if not Fa then where?

Awwww so cute!!

I knew you like a smaller framed bodies , but you're really are running for that taboo boarder.

Shut it.

How would you know. Are you his sockpuppet?

I thought you meant I wouldn't be able to reply to that dude anymore (which I am, because faggotry).

To be honest, I don't think having a handful of cub porn images makes one a creepy pedo. Being attracted to actual children makes one a pedo. As long as you're only dealing with animals, it's all ok I guess. And hell, there's some digimon porn from ten years ago I saved as a teen that could probably fit the actual definition of drawn child porn (need to go find and destroy that shit), but I don't think any of us here are actually attracted to real goddamn kids. It's just fiction. Let it be.

If you want to pick on Zaush, do it for real-world reasons, such as being all buddy buddy with the admins to the extent that he (allegedly) flaunts the TOS. But hey, if you want to punish him for THOUGHTCRIME and drawing shit you don't like...

Welp this is one hell of a deep hole that was left here, none the less this was a share opinion, not a hate comment. I saw what I saw from his submission and responded to it, nuff said. -3-;

Running? He's SPRINTING. Can't keep his hands off the kiddies in his fantasies....

@  buibuiboota
Nice one replying to me and then adding me to your block list like a little coward. I suppose you're the mature one here, right.

But do go on making assumptions about people of having broken the law just because they like drawing animals too young.

fictional dog-person ≠ actual real-world child

I know you're trying to say that Zaush is a real pedo, but hey man, you can't go assuming that, just because he draws cub. You can't even be sure what his non-furry real world sexual habits are. Have you even asked him? I don't give a shit, she could be literally 3 years old for all I care (dog years ). You're arguing over the age of something that does. not. exist.

Also, I don't care about Zaush in particular. He's a fuckin knob and his ego is too big. But he draws decently and I think he should have the freedom to draw absolutely anything he wants without any legal consequences. He's not hurting anyone by drawing little dog-girls taking it up the butt. And people like you are detrimental to artistic freedom in general, wanting to police their content and shame them into not drawing what they really want to draw.

And oh, at least unblock me if you still have the nerve to reply.

michaljacksonpopcorn.gif

Thank the lord above for screenshots

Eh, I got caps too. But it's just some thinkpol wannabe blowing off steam, accusing people of secretly being pedos and pissing on artistic freedom while at it.
I bet they were just projecting their own insecurities on other people.

I'm genuinely surprised Zaush let my own comments stay. I will defend his right to create whatever his pencil can draw on paper, but I haven't been exactly free of criticism.
I suppose he pays more attention to reading between the lines than I thought.

Do you keep scanning the page looking for new comments to reply to? That's the only way I can imagine you would have seen my comment.

I reload it every now and then :3

(took me about 2.5h to get the previous reply in tho)

You don't have to like me, or know me. You are entitled to your opinion. Some people are interested in putting the spotlight on themselves without listening, and they come to some pretty disturbing conclusions. Those are the people who get blocked.

Sounds reasonable to me :)

You know what? No. That is a cop out. I jack off to Lolicon. Does that mean I'm not a pedo? Regardless of if its drawn or not
its still a sexual depiction of a child. It does mean you are sexually attracted to children. End of argument.

No.

Children don't have tails and claws and fur, LAST TIME I CHECKED.

its not an assumption, cub is illegal in some parts of the world.

Interesting drama in the above posts, and very rude. What they are doing is no different than if they were being called "creepy" and made fun of for being into furry art. I don't think this picture is breaking any rules. It makes me wonder what gets people to go out and cause trouble for others... for a drawing, no less. Usually it's because they have something of their own to hide. If you don't like it, don't look.

Cool picture, though!

THIS is controversial on this site?

Not the tentacle monster eating a mouse which is literally shown being dissolved in it's stomach , no thats fine.

But oh no , look out guys , a 5th grader!

which by the way , is 70 in dog years

lol zaush and little girls isn't anything new, nothing to see here xD

It sucks when an artist you've liked for years for their skill in the craft is going down a road you just can't follow. People aren't into "furry bondage", they are into furries and bondage. People aren't into "furry cross-dressing", they are into furries and cross-dressing. People into "furry kids" are not special cases in this regard. Adam as always is free to draw what he likes. People need to get over calling him a hypocrite or whatever and admit that the Adam they thought they knew was a projection of what they wanted him to be, and need to choose to move on to other artists.

This is prep for a commission, which will indeed have stuff that is not for everyone. If people don't like it they are free to look elsewhere and probably knew from the thumbnail wether it was their cup of tea. It's a small facet of what I'm okay with drawing and find interesting as subject matter.

When people use the comment section to grandstand about how this is a reflection of me as a person, then I know they're only interested in directing attention at themselves, not in who I am. If they wanted to know my stance on what I find acceptable in reality vs fantasy, they would have asked me.

"If they wanted to know my stance on what I find acceptable in reality vs fantasy, they would have asked me."

I don't think they're saying you don't know fantasies from reality, I think they're saying that you have the fantasies of a pedophile.

I guess they're free to think whatever they like. Sticks and stones.

its not a matter of taste or aesthetic Zaush, but whatever helps you sleep at night.

You're right. It doesn't make Adam a hypocrite. But it does make him a pedophile.

D'awwwwwww she's precious ^_^

I don't care about cub artwork - but why did you argue so long a few months back that this character wasn't underaged? You argued SO long on it, and all you should have done is just delete it. It's not like it wouldn't get seen on IB. I mean, you post cub stuff on IB anyway, it won't kill you to be honest and just put it over there where it belongs.

This is a completely different character

ah, okay!

row row fight the power

Daawah

11 but sure.

77 in dog years

Fourth upload since...

Well, think it's safe to say you're officially back?

Nice.

Looks like my girl. As an older kangaroo this is rather hot.

wow

I really hope this isn't breaking any rules by being posted here

no bits, no problem

Its still a sexual depiction of an underage fur. If Dragoneer really cared about enforcing his rules he would make you remove it.

According to him I'm not breaking any rules. I also fail to see how this is sexual.

dragoneer doesn't seem to mind if they're popufur enough.

its sexual because its an underraged character with no pants on....really not that hard to understand.

Every other character who is pants less tends to have exaggerated cartoon style (Donald Duck) ie if you brought this to disney and said its safe, they'd laugh your butt out the door.

How have I not Favorited this one...

Welp I fixed that!

I like her, she's not bad and flat chest ^^

Ooh I wanna move to bottomless district