FA+
Shop
862
Views
Views
10
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Music / General Furry Art
Species Dog (Other)
Size 120 x 120
File Size 2.02 MB
Report this content
More from DoggyDog
*yaaawwwnnnss*
sorry for being "not so excited" but... I just went throught a cold sickness, throath kinda hurts, and I'm not in a great mood.
You see... in spanish, I'm a lawyer! in english... a mutt >__> ...
... but... love ya guyz!
.... *shrugs*
*tags*
-DD
sorry for being "not so excited" but... I just went throught a cold sickness, throath kinda hurts, and I'm not in a great mood.
You see... in spanish, I'm a lawyer! in english... a mutt >__> ...
... but... love ya guyz!
.... *shrugs*
*tags*
-DD
Category Music / General Furry Art
Species Dog (Other)
Size 120 x 120px
File Size 2.02 MB
Bueno tengo varias cosas que decir:
1. La grabación esta muy buena, es un excelente micrófono ese que tienes.
2. Tu acento es mínimo al hablar ingles.
3. Tu pronunciación es mucho mejor que la mía, me dieron ganas de mejorarla.
4. Me imaginaba tu voz un poquito mas aguda.
5. Siento que entiendo mucho mejor tu personalidad después de oírte hablar.
6. Mejor me voy a dormir porque ya no se que decir. X3
1. La grabación esta muy buena, es un excelente micrófono ese que tienes.
2. Tu acento es mínimo al hablar ingles.
3. Tu pronunciación es mucho mejor que la mía, me dieron ganas de mejorarla.
4. Me imaginaba tu voz un poquito mas aguda.
5. Siento que entiendo mucho mejor tu personalidad después de oírte hablar.
6. Mejor me voy a dormir porque ya no se que decir. X3
Joer, tu que no lo querias hacer y mira, mogollon de favoritos! D:
Me he reido mucho con el detalle de la musiquilla de fondo xD Y la lectura del libro de procesal (que ajjjjjjco!). Ha sido muy interesante oirte hablar en español tambien ^^
Gracias por cumplir el tag! Eres un perro de honor :D Aunque ya lo sabia ^^
Me he reido mucho con el detalle de la musiquilla de fondo xD Y la lectura del libro de procesal (que ajjjjjjco!). Ha sido muy interesante oirte hablar en español tambien ^^
Gracias por cumplir el tag! Eres un perro de honor :D Aunque ya lo sabia ^^
1. Thanks. :3 I thought it was "Spanish Fleat" at first.
2. You fail. :P
"it is a country apparently (I thought it was PART of china)
but yeah, still, it isn't the best one"
Rebuttal: http://www.heritage.org/Index/ ; http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/HongKong
Economic freedom ftw, shorty.
http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/ElSalvador <- Fail.
2. You fail. :P
"it is a country apparently (I thought it was PART of china)
but yeah, still, it isn't the best one"
Rebuttal: http://www.heritage.org/Index/ ; http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/HongKong
Economic freedom ftw, shorty.
http://www.heritage.org/Index/Country/ElSalvador <- Fail.
not fail, if it lets you run a company in where you can exploit your employees and get tons of money out of it
while in countries to developed you can't get out with that
You see.. I am a person who has had 2 sport cars and a rolex at the age of 18, and loving it!
you have to go to the horrible gold mine! not to the legal factory
it gives more!
*win*
while in countries to developed you can't get out with that
You see.. I am a person who has had 2 sport cars and a rolex at the age of 18, and loving it!
you have to go to the horrible gold mine! not to the legal factory
it gives more!
*win*
That post didn't make much sense.
I'll respond to what I was able to glean from it.
"not fail, if it lets you run a company in where you can exploit your employees and get tons of money out of it"
You don't know what economic freedom is, do you?
Economically free means that lower taxes, less regulation, government spending, corruption, property rights, etc.
In the countries with higher scores, there is less regulation, allowing for more growth, so the people who aren't born with a silver plate can work their way up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAa6.....e=channel_page (description of what a free economy is. Also, try reading Irwin Schiff's "How an Economy Grows" to see why evil greed, can actually be useful in free economy, if the video isn't detailed enough.)
As for "worker exploitation" what you're referring is an increase in working conditions.
For example, in the USA during the late 19th century the children being "exploited" went from working on a farm with dangerous equipment for over 16 hours a day to working in a factory for 12 hours a day. As the wealth increased, the children no longer had to work to support their families. The exploitation you are referring to is a natural increase in wealth from 3rd to 2nd world countries economies.
"while in countries to developed you can't get out with that"
It would be better if we could/did (and the freest economies do allow that, to allow people to engage in transactions of mutual consent which prevent the poor from starving without stealing money from the rich via taxation and make both parties wealthier).
"You see.. I am a person who has had 2 sport cars and a rolex at the age of 18, and loving it!"
Good. I take it that means your parents are well off, presumably investors, and/or who own a company.
See page 23 of http://freedom-school.com/money/how.....nomy-grows.pdf (The book I mentioned earlier).
In a free market economy, the only way for the rich's wealth as investors can increase is by loaning it out to others, thereby increasing the standard of living for the whole community (or country, etc).
So your wealth means more money in the bank, which means more capital goods or need for them, or more spending which means more jobs. Even if you all hoarded your wealth, and put it in a vault inside your home (not loaning it out because that's how savings in a bank works) it would merely pull the capital out of circulation, causing the value of the dollar to increase, meaning that my dollars are a bit more valuable than once before.
"you have to go to the horrible gold mine! not to the legal factory. It gives more! *win*"
What does that even mean? If you're referring to government regulations, minimum wage laws and so on make me better off, you're wrong: http://www.ruwart.com/Healing/chap3.html and http://www.epionline.org/news_detail.cfm?rid=180 http://jim.com/econ/chap19p1.html from here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-fZ_jHMwFE ("America's Political False Dichotomy - HD version" by Shanedk)
The minimum wage only leads to unemployment for the poor, and especially poor minorities.
Government regulation only serves to stiffle economic growth, by taking up more of the workers salaries.
Regulation via private industry, such as from UL (Underwriters Laboratory) provide more efficient standards without all the red tap for a fraction of the cost.
As for environmental regulation, that too would be better off through the common law protection of property rights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xta4c731F-Y ("Re: Deep Thoughts From an Intellectual Lightweight" by Shanedk)
Bonus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWxflErVWk ("RE: Deep Thoughts From an Intellectual Lightweight (Part 1)" by Shanedk) How an increase of property rights, other things equal, can result in an increase of wealth for everyone in that social system.
I'll respond to what I was able to glean from it.
"not fail, if it lets you run a company in where you can exploit your employees and get tons of money out of it"
You don't know what economic freedom is, do you?
Economically free means that lower taxes, less regulation, government spending, corruption, property rights, etc.
In the countries with higher scores, there is less regulation, allowing for more growth, so the people who aren't born with a silver plate can work their way up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAa6.....e=channel_page (description of what a free economy is. Also, try reading Irwin Schiff's "How an Economy Grows" to see why evil greed, can actually be useful in free economy, if the video isn't detailed enough.)
As for "worker exploitation" what you're referring is an increase in working conditions.
For example, in the USA during the late 19th century the children being "exploited" went from working on a farm with dangerous equipment for over 16 hours a day to working in a factory for 12 hours a day. As the wealth increased, the children no longer had to work to support their families. The exploitation you are referring to is a natural increase in wealth from 3rd to 2nd world countries economies.
"while in countries to developed you can't get out with that"
It would be better if we could/did (and the freest economies do allow that, to allow people to engage in transactions of mutual consent which prevent the poor from starving without stealing money from the rich via taxation and make both parties wealthier).
"You see.. I am a person who has had 2 sport cars and a rolex at the age of 18, and loving it!"
Good. I take it that means your parents are well off, presumably investors, and/or who own a company.
See page 23 of http://freedom-school.com/money/how.....nomy-grows.pdf (The book I mentioned earlier).
In a free market economy, the only way for the rich's wealth as investors can increase is by loaning it out to others, thereby increasing the standard of living for the whole community (or country, etc).
So your wealth means more money in the bank, which means more capital goods or need for them, or more spending which means more jobs. Even if you all hoarded your wealth, and put it in a vault inside your home (not loaning it out because that's how savings in a bank works) it would merely pull the capital out of circulation, causing the value of the dollar to increase, meaning that my dollars are a bit more valuable than once before.
"you have to go to the horrible gold mine! not to the legal factory. It gives more! *win*"
What does that even mean? If you're referring to government regulations, minimum wage laws and so on make me better off, you're wrong: http://www.ruwart.com/Healing/chap3.html and http://www.epionline.org/news_detail.cfm?rid=180 http://jim.com/econ/chap19p1.html from here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-fZ_jHMwFE ("America's Political False Dichotomy - HD version" by Shanedk)
The minimum wage only leads to unemployment for the poor, and especially poor minorities.
Government regulation only serves to stiffle economic growth, by taking up more of the workers salaries.
Regulation via private industry, such as from UL (Underwriters Laboratory) provide more efficient standards without all the red tap for a fraction of the cost.
As for environmental regulation, that too would be better off through the common law protection of property rights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xta4c731F-Y ("Re: Deep Thoughts From an Intellectual Lightweight" by Shanedk)
Bonus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWxflErVWk ("RE: Deep Thoughts From an Intellectual Lightweight (Part 1)" by Shanedk) How an increase of property rights, other things equal, can result in an increase of wealth for everyone in that social system.
Comments