FA+
Shop
5532
Views
Views
212
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Traditional) / Transformation
Species Dinosaur
Size 1280 x 791
File Size 275.1 kB
Report this content
More from Cervelet
o, many, many years ago, when the idea of a new Jurassic Park movie was ludicrous, I made this picture, which I uploaded on Deviantart:
http://cervelet.deviantart.com/art/.....k-IV-135747839
It proved to be rather popular and I see it pop up in the favourites with tremendous regularity. So for giggles, here's a sequel drawing : P
http://cervelet.deviantart.com/art/.....k-IV-135747839
It proved to be rather popular and I see it pop up in the favourites with tremendous regularity. So for giggles, here's a sequel drawing : P
Category Artwork (Traditional) / Transformation
Species Dinosaur
Size 1280 x 791px
File Size 275.1 kB
Funny how that movie is outdate by the new paleontology information i.e. feathered dinosaurs.
:I Not at all happy about the new one not including feathered dinosaurs. After it has been proved many dinosaur including all theropods especially dromaeosaurid (the family of dinosaurs that had Velociraptor in it) had Feathers.
Sorry, I just get angry at the mainstream sometimes. I do remember you have included feather dinosaurs especially feathered Velociraptor in your comic.
:I Not at all happy about the new one not including feathered dinosaurs. After it has been proved many dinosaur including all theropods especially dromaeosaurid (the family of dinosaurs that had Velociraptor in it) had Feathers.
Sorry, I just get angry at the mainstream sometimes. I do remember you have included feather dinosaurs especially feathered Velociraptor in your comic.
I am partial to the theory that the Jurassic Park dinosaurs were not actual dinosaurs, but animals genetically modified to look like the common perception of dinosaurs. It explains pretty much everything: why the Velociraptors are bigger than the actual ones were and have no feathers, how they could have laid their hands on dino DNA (they didn't they just bullshitted their way through) and so on.
But yeah otherwise I say GO FLUFFY THEROPAUDS, hence the fluffdinos in Addictive Science.
But yeah otherwise I say GO FLUFFY THEROPAUDS, hence the fluffdinos in Addictive Science.
Turns out it may not be bulshit after all http://news.discovery.com/animals/d.....dna-160316.htm
And more dinosaurs may have had feathers, or at least the genetic code for producing feathers, than previously antecipated http://www.iflscience.com/plants-an.....s-had-feathers
And more dinosaurs may have had feathers, or at least the genetic code for producing feathers, than previously antecipated http://www.iflscience.com/plants-an.....s-had-feathers
That's not a good link. It just sent me to your front page on DA. This should be better because it should send you directly to the picture. http://cervelet.deviantart.com/art/.....k-IV-135747839
Nonono, there are only females of course, the good scientists made sue of that. After all, you wouldn't want an uncontrolled amount of dinos running around. Let's just hope some of them didn't turn male because of some frog DNA or so, but what could possibly go wrong, eh?
Comments