FA+
Shop
3465
Views
Views
423
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Digital) / Scenery
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 733 x 1100
File Size 733.5 kB
Report this content
★
More from Corvuspointer
Cityscape...of...THE FUTURE
Photoshop CS.
Photoshop CS.
Category Artwork (Digital) / Scenery
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 733 x 1100px
File Size 733.5 kB
Trying to save John Conner has been old since the mid 90s. More so since the third movie where he, despite being impoverished, was a typical pretty white person with problems (PWPWP). I never imagined someone off the radar that many years to still dress like a high middle class teenager from 90210 with perfect white teeth and managed to land the hottest and perfect daughter type who he managed to spend time with from the previous movie. (not shown of course). And Hollywood is wondering why the third one tanked. I just hope he dies already. He is living proof that Darwin is wrong as heck. Is originality dead for this long. .
Lobosan
Yeah FWA was awesome :3 I've posted a lot of videos (just of the dances) onto Youtube (in HD): http://www.youtube.com/user/PsycoEwok
Oh my goodness Corv,
Is there anything you don't know how to make beautiful and breathtaking? If I keep looking at your pictures, I'm going to faint from lack of oxygen. ^_^
This would be awesome as a mural in your room. I'm thinking it should be on the ceiling, that way you can look at while lying in bed. X3
Is there anything you don't know how to make beautiful and breathtaking? If I keep looking at your pictures, I'm going to faint from lack of oxygen. ^_^
This would be awesome as a mural in your room. I'm thinking it should be on the ceiling, that way you can look at while lying in bed. X3
The future looks... really crowded.
Amazing detail and colour with your execution of the city, but I, um, like the sunset sky more. It's just that the cityscape is so incredibly busy, my eyes are instead pulled towards the pure beauty of the sun receding behind a curtain of cloud, slowly giving way to the starlit sky.
Which probably says more about my taste than your artistic acuity.
yes i know i'm weird
Amazing detail and colour with your execution of the city, but I, um, like the sunset sky more. It's just that the cityscape is so incredibly busy, my eyes are instead pulled towards the pure beauty of the sun receding behind a curtain of cloud, slowly giving way to the starlit sky.
Which probably says more about my taste than your artistic acuity.
yes i know i'm weird
A suggestion, don't make the buildings so complicated, (that mostly applies to the coloring) it gives the viewer visual fatigue as the brain tries to sort out the details and tries to place them on buildings so it can get a sense as to how many buildings there are. Its overwhelming when taken in as a whole. That's a point you have to balance as an artist, visual complexity. Complexity isn't always better, even if its more realistic. If you want to have more detail, use mostly shades to color it, as that allows for complexity with A. a more realistic result, and B. doesn't give visual fatigue to the viewer, and doesn't overwhelm them. You also used too many colors. The only other quip I have are the clouds. They could stand to have a lot more detail, they're too flat at the moment.
To sum it all up in some blanket statements, there's too high a contrast in the painting. Just because you CAN use every crayon in the box doesn't mean you should. Also there's too much glow in my opinion.
The coloring problem I mentioned prevents me from liking the piece, but I do respect the piece, as I can't do cityscapes/architecture very well. That sort of linear perspective is my weak point. I can do perspective fine on organic forms, but when it comes to straight lines, I hardly ever get it looking how it should.
To sum it all up in some blanket statements, there's too high a contrast in the painting. Just because you CAN use every crayon in the box doesn't mean you should. Also there's too much glow in my opinion.
The coloring problem I mentioned prevents me from liking the piece, but I do respect the piece, as I can't do cityscapes/architecture very well. That sort of linear perspective is my weak point. I can do perspective fine on organic forms, but when it comes to straight lines, I hardly ever get it looking how it should.
Wow, that's like... the longest comment I've seen in a while.
That aside though, I disagree with you because the thing that caught my attention and earned a +fav from me was the sheer amount of detail provided with the cityscape. The sky is blah, the sunset is okay - but the buildings? Awesomeness.
That aside though, I disagree with you because the thing that caught my attention and earned a +fav from me was the sheer amount of detail provided with the cityscape. The sky is blah, the sunset is okay - but the buildings? Awesomeness.
I still say the buildings are an eyesore, what with using every crayon in the box. There's no color scheme; no color theory was applied to this painting as far as I can tell, and if there was, the artist didn't do it right :/ I critique because I care :3 I'm not perfect either, I don't pretend I am, but that doesn't mean I don't know when something is off or wrong about a painting, it doesn't mean I don't know what I'm talking about ;) Red, blue, yellow, purple, magenta, blue-green, green, brown, orange and grayscale a color scheme does not make...aka, no color theory, resulting in an inharmonious image that's an eyesore. *shrugs*
Comments