lovely piece. indeed, i did about 10 illustrations to 'chants of maldoror' i'm almost not here and i'm not publishing my art, cause that site is really crappy. that picture here looks like ideological provocation. so revolted against 'academism' here - so - how you found me, mr. Kandinsky? you know me already? it looks like another mythological head of someone, who i knew before. that pipe suits you. i'm of course, ironic.

sir, what are these "sites" you speak of? so many terms i do not know.

from what i have gathered, looking around this....'cyberspace' people seem to title it the 'internet'. so much information going all over the place. fascinating. and terrifying.

this place, fa, is worst art service i've ever seen. happily, is a few different places, where people can dispute, instead gossiping. i dont see any important difference between the net, and real life, people in real life can be fake in similar way- in similar way, you dont have to like all of them, if you like few, its good.
so, you are a girl, and you knew me before from somewhere. maybe from gossip, if you mentioned 'information'...hmmmm
it was too easy, try something more difficult.

>>this place, fa, is worst art service i've ever seen.

Yet almost universally, the people who commented on your submissions were impressed by your work and grateful to see it. Many artists on the Web have never been so fortunate.

I'm sure that if you had allowed your best pictures to remain -- especially the illustrations for Lautréamont -- even more viewers here would have found them and added their praise. But you chose to run from that praise.

Perhaps your problem lies not with FA, but closer to home. Whatever that problem might be, I hope that you can resolve it, and allow your best work to be seen: it fully deserves an audience.



Mark

i dont need to show my pieces here - i'm showing my art somewhere else. i cant show my pieces on deviant art, cause d.a politic is extremely restricting in the eroticism issue. here is no restriction, but all what i can see is repeating the same patterns. its quite boring and uncreative - and it turns erotic art into usual porn. i dont want to see the same again and again. non-creative artwork = non creative, boring people. i dont need the praise, and popularity, because i'm already popular. that what i need is a contact with artists better than me - to watch their wonderful skills, and learn some. i cant find something influential here. that site is generally against artistic individuality.
i supposed, that picture above is stolen, i wasnt sure.

Then why not cancel your account? I would regret your leaving, but if you truly have nothing here, and if you would be happier elsewhere, then you might as well go.

Your passive-aggressive whining solves nothing.




Mark

i'm here because of art of my friend - i simply want to watch it, cause i like is very much. its only one reason of my presence here.

That's a very good reason. :)

I can only hope that someday, you'll feel comfortable enough to share your paintings with people on Fur Affinity. But until then, I wish you the best.



Mark

As much as I would love to see pictures by Kandinsky on FA, the administrators would probably object to this violation of the "Acceptable Upload Policy":

http://wiki.furaffinity.net/index.p....._Upload_Policy

So be warned, Василий Васильевич. Это неуместный. :(



Mark

By the way... you found this at Olga's Gallery, didn' t you? ;)



Mark

Yes. That is the gallery that seemed to have the best resolutions of my works.

as horrid as they are. even then.

Good scans of Kandinsky are painfully rare on the Web. It's a crime, I say. :)



Mark

I was wondering why the name struck me as familiar yet I couldn't assign a visual of the works to the artist.

Let me blow you, Wassily.

*facepalms*

why does one reply to a 'blow' with a 'facepalm'? is this a routine custom of the future?

He wishes to perform the act of fellatio upon you, and I'm showing my frustration/disbelief by covering my face with my hand, slowly shaking my head as I do so.

I suppose that, at least for myself, yes; it is a custom routine of the future to just feel defeated when an anthropomorphic dragon wants to perform sexual acts upon one of my life's greatest idols.

Armand has summed up it rather nicely, but I would like to point out the motivational factors involved. The dragon is expressing a wish to perform oral sex upon you as a sign of admiration. The facepalm, and the feeling of defeat, on the part of Armand is because this is an all-too-common, crude, and terribly silly way of attempting to express admiration.

Ah, yes, and it is called to 'blow' because frequently one blows air past the phallus during oral sex to provide stimulation. Hence 'blowing cock'. See also 'sucking cock'.

Blow? Sir, I do not understand this statement.

You should definitely make use of the time that have passed and try a remake featuring a TGV ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TGV )