Heh. Kinda reminded of Ganesh in the Digger webcomic.

http://diggercomic.com/blog/2007/02/06/digger/

Here is a fun bit from "ancient" times - the Quran of the 1400s considered violence and attacking as a wrong thing. Essentially, gpod guys never attack, try to see diplomatic solutions and Allah does not like bullies. This got "somehow" dropped... I wonder why.
Similarly, there were aggressive buddhist sects, claiming that aggressive and forced expansion is good for you and your karma.

It is as if religious power would be useful for someone nasty, to back up their political/militaristic agenda or such...

Just wipe out 14,000 Antifa assholes to even things out and the world is instantly improved!

Sir, am I to expect that you are a threat to my safety? If you intend to kill antifascists let me know now so I can get a restraining order.

If you're enough of an asshole that you feel threatened by the prospect of being cut down by a vengeful Ashley with a chainsaw, well, might I respectfully suggest you review your worldview and attitudes?

I was talking to you. "Soldiers of Odin" is a fascist organization. You made a statement about violence against antifascists. If you don't know the difference perhaps your worldview is the one that needs review?

Nah, mine is pretty realistic.

See, you think of yourself as a heroic fighter against evil, whereas I know you're a cowardly bully who wishes to suppress all thought disagreeing with his worldview.

Come back when you've had real world experience with real evil.

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/178666310199603398/

Yes, because we all know how tolerant Nazis are of opposing views! Honestly, how long can you play that tired old chestnut? Tolerance isn't an absolute, it's a peace treaty. Tolerance of the intolerant is a self-defeating proposition. Next time take a look at how many of the people on your side are waving around swastikas and ranting about Jews, blacks, and Mexicans, will you? Not a pretty picture.

Im with you. Im sorry but i kept rubbing my head with my palm just reading that guys comments.

(Since Threetails has bravely blocked me, I daresay Robin Williams' dictum about letting the asshole have the last word applies here.)

(This, incidentally, proves my point concerning his abject cowardice and his desire to block all speech not conforming to his dictates. The pettiest of petty tyrants, indeed.)

I didn't block you. But since you're the sort of person who can't win an argument without lying, I will now.

And a liar to boot. What a maroon. Oh, well. I'll live.

Is he the unheard 6th member of maroon 5?

I doubt they'd have him.

But he is a writer (says so on his profile at least) so he could at least type moron and not maroon. Also im sorry, but that first comment you gave in this submission is the reason why i dont want to go to cities as much anymore; in fear that a guy with your ideas think itll be okay to punch a white guy who only disagrees and disapproves with his. I would so hate to see my own cities trashed and see the streets burned because some people think Nazis still exist (or at least as big as they were before) and think they are allowed to destroy and harm others. I may be gay, but im still white and dress as 'normal and casual' as most others my age so im sure a guy like you somewhere in the country would take me for something im not and would feel no regret for harming me.

Ah! I can clear up the "maroon" bit, at least; that's a deliberate phraseology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo Deliberate mispronounciation of "moron" for comedic effect.

I'm afraid I can't parse the remainder of your statement , and I suspect your own thinking on the subject may be somewhat less than clear.

Less than clear? Well we all have our own sources, but i cant deny there is clear violence and words that promote such things towards white people. White genocide mentioned in tweets and your "some people just need killing" phrase. There are a select few that deserve that and usually they were involved in war or are mass murderers, but the people that get punched these days dont deserve it. If ya got to hear/see even half of the stories (which were supported by uncut videos mind you) i see, you could at least get an idea why i have my fear.

I wouldn't worry on my account. The family name used to be "Marmelstein", I lost about half my father's side of the family in concentration camps during WWII, and I save my animus for the truly deserving bullies and fascists, regardless of whether they wear white hoods or Guy Fawkes masks...

As long as your description of fascist isnt as blurred as some people i've seen, then good. Im sorry to hear what happened to those on your father's side. I can only hope that those events dont happen again.

Hear hear. And thanks.

Actually, "Maroon" refers to slaves who escaped their owners and set up their own settlements in the then-open American interior. They were understandably somewhat cut off from the latest fashions, so they were as someone who'd been marooned on a desert island. "Maroon" refers to an ignorant, out-of-touch person (fairly or not).

In Bugs's (and my) case, it's a comic mispronunciation, as that definition is a bit too obscure for 1940s Warner Brothers cartoons.

I feel as though I am blissfully unaware of what some of these groups you speak of are. And I will remain blissfully unaware of these comments north 'o here

Ah, Sri Ganesha, the Lord of Obstacles. One of my fave Hindu deities.

Let us worship old Ganesha
He's no ordinary crea-sha
A precludin' kind of prea-cha
That's good enough for me!

Me and a friend disagree on the validity of murdering some problems away. He believes all human life is too valuable for that. I believe that the value of human life is the subject of intense scrutiny.

In the parlance of the Old West, "Some folks jes' need killin'."

I believe you and your friend should be exposed to some of the questions that have been plaguing humanity and philosophers for eons, like this famous 'what about the criminals?' one.

Should a criminal pay for his crime with his life, to atone for the lives he's taken? If killing even a criminal is inhumane, is keeping him in prison until the end of his life anymore humane? Or should we release him on the streets, and risk another murder from his hands?

I do, personally, believe that killing is the more merciful and humane thing to do in some specific cases. Especially if you do it quickly and swiftly. France, my country, has invented a very swift and painless method to kill someone called the guillotine. Blade falls, head detaches, and the person slips into unconsciousness as the brain suffocates in a minute or two.

Honestly in our conversation I was more referring to Republicans. I can't think of a single reason for them to go on living. My stance on crime is actually a bit more mellow. I think we focus too much on punishment when we should focus on rehabilitation. But that's a conversation I don't particularly want to have here and now.

I am an actual, registered worshiper of Odin and his merry crew. He would like it known that these jerks are NOT his soldiers, so would they please stop using his name?

I don't know that I can explain in this little box how it warms my heart to see those words, love. Between the "soldiers of Odin" Woten's warriors" and all the various other "We're not racist hate-groups except for all of us who will proudly say we are as they gleefully threaten all manner of violence upon people they don't like"-folkes, it's good to see the genuine article, rather than... that.

I do mean this in all seriousness. After a fashion I pride myself on my honesty and integrity *removes her hat, smiles*. Thank you for being you.

Hmm.

Regarding the 'Soldiers of Odin'.

Have only looked up a bit about them, thus far not seeming so bad. Obviously will need to look further into it to form a complete opinion. Judging by the information readily available, it mostly seems to be smear campaigns against the group, rather than legitimate issues. However, there do seem to be a minority of the group who are horrible individuals (as per most groups).

BUT! I wonder. If that statement you put forward were to be put against another group. That has a large minority being horribly violent, believe that their way of living should be forced on all others and the majority from that group support the views of the minority in all current questionnaires that have been answered.

Lets see how that goes:

"I believe that murder is wrong, unilaterally.
That said, I still can't help but feel that if we wiped out those jerks from the 'followers of Islam' it'd be a Karmic wash."

How about another group, that the majority are happy with violence to push a political point, happily segregate different groups and force only their view.

"I believe that murder is wrong, unilaterally.
That said, I still can't help but feel that if we wiped out those jerks from the 'anti-fascists' it'd be a Karmic wash."

Eh'. I disagree with the concept.