
Well it's been awhile so I felt the need to submit something :P
This is one of a couple little studies I've been doing to try and get my confidence up a little bit. I think I'll keep working on this one.
Also, I have two monitors. This picture looks fine on one and horrible on the other, and I can't figure out which monitor is bad and which one is good. Does anybody know how I can figure that out?
Also also, I have a drawing of Leon from The Professional to do. Expect that within another 20 days or so ;)
This is one of a couple little studies I've been doing to try and get my confidence up a little bit. I think I'll keep working on this one.
Also, I have two monitors. This picture looks fine on one and horrible on the other, and I can't figure out which monitor is bad and which one is good. Does anybody know how I can figure that out?
Also also, I have a drawing of Leon from The Professional to do. Expect that within another 20 days or so ;)
Category Artwork (Digital) / Portraits
Species Rabbit / Hare
Size 722 x 722px
File Size 103.7 kB
Yeah, I think there's a bit less leeway when it comes to human anatomy. People can pick up on mistakes much quicker if it's something they see every day, unless it's zombies. With zombies you can pretty much screw up any part of it and it still can look great... I love drawing zombies :P
Good work! Love the textures and colors. :]
Yeah, dual monitor setups usually have this problem - you can't hardware-calibrate them independently, so one is always inferior/secondary. Basicly the one that can show the widest range of values (try this: http://www.photofriday.com/calibrate.php) without evident banding is the better one. Though it requires some toying with contrast and brightness controls (sometimes even video card's color correction settings, if it can't be avoided (it often results in banding)) to try and achieve the best results. The one that you're having a hard time calibrating by hand would be better off as a secondary.
Yeah, dual monitor setups usually have this problem - you can't hardware-calibrate them independently, so one is always inferior/secondary. Basicly the one that can show the widest range of values (try this: http://www.photofriday.com/calibrate.php) without evident banding is the better one. Though it requires some toying with contrast and brightness controls (sometimes even video card's color correction settings, if it can't be avoided (it often results in banding)) to try and achieve the best results. The one that you're having a hard time calibrating by hand would be better off as a secondary.
Thanks! I worked with the links you gave me and I think I've got it down. I got my CRT calibrated pretty well now. This LCD screen is a lot sharper, but the values change across the screen depending on what angle I'm looking at it, so at any given time the lower portion is about 2 steps higher in value than the top. What type of monitor do you use?
Yeah, LCDs have this problem, especially the cheaper TN types. A decent LCD still costs a small fortune.
Don't get me started about this utterly narrow-minded "let's shut down all the CRT factories and go for horribly inferior LCDs, since people can't find 20cm of space on their tables, and image quality is the last thing they care for" consumeristic disaster... really, i could whine for hours...
Both of mine ar CRTs, but the secondary is dieing - i'll try finding a used one since my budget is limited. Some of them don't go dark with age as bad as the one i have, so they're still a viable alternative. In my experience, used LCDs are sometimes too close to mass-pixel-suicides, rendering them almost useless in a year.
Don't get me started about this utterly narrow-minded "let's shut down all the CRT factories and go for horribly inferior LCDs, since people can't find 20cm of space on their tables, and image quality is the last thing they care for" consumeristic disaster... really, i could whine for hours...
Both of mine ar CRTs, but the secondary is dieing - i'll try finding a used one since my budget is limited. Some of them don't go dark with age as bad as the one i have, so they're still a viable alternative. In my experience, used LCDs are sometimes too close to mass-pixel-suicides, rendering them almost useless in a year.
Comments