NZR "Model T Railcar" replica (RM Class of 1925)
A replica of an early experimental New Zealand Railways railcar at Pleasant Point Railway Museum, South Canterbury, New Zealand. This was based on a Ford "Model T" car, and the two originals were build in 1925-26 to provide passenger service to small towns in the Wairarapa and Southland.
Score one for Kiwi ingenuity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NZR_RM.....(Model_T_Ford).
Score one for Kiwi ingenuity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NZR_RM.....(Model_T_Ford).
Category Photography / Still Life
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1024 x 768px
File Size 211.5 kB
Listed in Folders
The T engine, while not high HP wise was 2.9 liters and the stroke gave it 80 or so lbs of torque at 900RPM.
Considering steam traction engines ranged from 15 to 40HP and they could pull just about anything you wished, abet slowly, I've little doubt this modified T could do a respectable 20mph.
The ride quality would be an issue I see here though (unequalized), plus wheel hunting as the front wheels rode their flanges would also impact passengers. Looks like this recreated example actually has some outriggers that ride the inside of the railhead to reduce that issue. The high cube would also make it a handful with wind and overall centre of gravity. The radiator from all appearances appears to be stock as well, and would be woefully inadequate for this duty.
I wager that on anything but really level track this railcar is 'um, . . an exciting ride, which would explain why it wasn't successful and adopted in greater numbers.
Considering steam traction engines ranged from 15 to 40HP and they could pull just about anything you wished, abet slowly, I've little doubt this modified T could do a respectable 20mph.
The ride quality would be an issue I see here though (unequalized), plus wheel hunting as the front wheels rode their flanges would also impact passengers. Looks like this recreated example actually has some outriggers that ride the inside of the railhead to reduce that issue. The high cube would also make it a handful with wind and overall centre of gravity. The radiator from all appearances appears to be stock as well, and would be woefully inadequate for this duty.
I wager that on anything but really level track this railcar is 'um, . . an exciting ride, which would explain why it wasn't successful and adopted in greater numbers.
here is another one, this time from germany. :)
(sorry, german only)
http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/galer.....bz%FCge~VT+01+(Schweineschn%E4uzchen).html
(sorry, german only)
http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/galer.....bz%FCge~VT+01+(Schweineschn%E4uzchen).html
the only thing I could find that is even remotely similar here in Queensland is this http://www.furaffinity.net/view/2419595/ which is on static display at the Workshops Rail Museum in Ipswich QLD
wanna see weird?
http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/galer.....bz%FCge~VT+01+(Schweineschn%E4uzchen).html
this is what we did in that context in the early 30's. Adolf didn't like it, since it was fired by two genuine Ford engines (one at each end), but tolerated it since it was all built in germany.
one of the reasons why Ford of Germany used to have so many Taunus models after the war was that they had to re-brand their vehicles during the NS reign. after the war it simply stuck, Ford had had the habit of naming vehicles after german cities and vicinities before. they also didn't officially use the plum logo until '76 except on parts engravings.
http://www.bahnbilder.de/name/galer.....bz%FCge~VT+01+(Schweineschn%E4uzchen).html
this is what we did in that context in the early 30's. Adolf didn't like it, since it was fired by two genuine Ford engines (one at each end), but tolerated it since it was all built in germany.
one of the reasons why Ford of Germany used to have so many Taunus models after the war was that they had to re-brand their vehicles during the NS reign. after the war it simply stuck, Ford had had the habit of naming vehicles after german cities and vicinities before. they also didn't officially use the plum logo until '76 except on parts engravings.
FA+

Comments