Its called a bullpup configuration. Pretty awesome. like the British SA 80, Isreali TAR-21, and French FAMAS G1 or G2 I forget. I notice that you keep defending your pictures as if they look too alike something in real life. Right Now I drew up 3 images of some Full Body Armor, after trial and error with some proto's. They all looked either too much like Starwars clones, Master Cheif from HALO, Gears of War, or from something form the PS3 game killzone. So I said fuck it.

I sound like i'm defending my art? I never noticed that. I felt i was just trying to say I was being original to sort of 'flag' that I'm not stealing idea's or claiming my concepts to be THE original's or anything.

Full Body armor? I may need to give them a look.

Ok probably not. Just in this and last one I commented. And I never uploaded those 3 pics yet for 3 reasons.

1.) I stopped uploading shit I drew because it is shitty as hell when taken with a camera (the only way I can get images on here)
2.) When I do take photos of my pics, I am not going to OCD and upload them ASAP. I am going to do what I did with a few of my images, and re draw them in MSpaint. It actually works.
3.) The camera is my freinds.

sad sad story.......

Ouch. Uploading is kinda the issue i had when i used to draw with pens/pencils. So i upgraded to MS paint. So far I don't have alot of complaints with the program, since i toy with a few ways of doing one thing before i get full into a project.

Hope you find some way to upload your hand drawn art.

I could never create a master peice in MSpaint. At least like you see poeple doing with tablets, and photoshop etc. I did something kinda like you did, with all these weapons, (but mine arent original, they are real guns around the world) and thats the best I think I ever did.

http://www.furaffinity.net/view/2315905/

All the FAMAS designs are bullpup. Other bullpups are the FN P90, the Barret M90 and M95 .50 rifles, the IWI Tavor and the H&K G11 (blech, H&K)

FN P90 is weird as fuck. Top loading, original, and weird.

The P90 is the only bullpup design I really love, but that could be due to my prejudice for the 5.7x28mm round. The top-loading design circumvents the common bullpup complaint of mags being in the way (though learning to reload one is probably a chore), it has a high round capacity compared to similar-sized PDWs and SMGs (most hold 20-40 rounds, the P90 holds 50) and the 5.7mm cartridge is a great armour-defeating round. The only major complaints I know of are that it's a little uncomfortable to hold if you have large hands... well, and people being sick of other people touting it as this god-weapon that can do everything. It's a PDW (or SMG if you don't care to acknowledge PDWs), that's what it's designed for, don't expect more than that.

well, hey I didnt mean to be BIas, P90 is one of my fav smg/pdw designs, along side the notorius MP5 and newer HK MP7

Like the work! It's a nice, simple sprite =3

I used to be in love with bullpup designs (the chamber and magazine feed positioned behind the foregrip) until I actually got my hands on one. I bought an airsoft version of the Steyr AUG, which, from all reviews, was actually a realistic replica as far as feel, balance and weight were concerned. The thing I noticed with it is that it's extremely annoying to handle when entering a prone position. The magazine would often make unnecessary contact with the ground when entering a prone position and felt really awkward while reloading from prone unsupported. The benefit of the design are still great, if you can get over the annoyances: longer barrel length in a shorter overall form.

Ah. I don't have any 'airsoft rifles' only a Co2 pistol, and a spring fire 6mm plastic pistol. I REALLY want a Echo1 MK36 (G36 replica) but I'm short on cash so I'm doing any and everything possible to get the money to get one. I can imagine the magazine would get in the way of some things. Just a random thought you could always roll onto your back while in prone position to switch out a mag. Just a random thought I dunno if it'd work or not, supported or unsupported. I'm still a noob as far as airsoft goes. Just need to get me an Airsoft rifle and I'm pretty set for 1 on 1 battles with friends.

In games ran like paintball matches, that would probably work fine, but I used to run mil-sim, where I would often end up under so much suppressive fire that I couldn't really move much in any direction. You would pretty much be stuck returning fire until someone moved, also had to reload or got hit.

That's a problem with mil-sim and paintball. Too many people want to bring hi-cap mags to the field, which result in overly-long firefights. I wish I could still play, especially with the changes the field I played at made (requiring only lo-cap mags and equipment modeled after real operator equipment*), but I can't afford it anymore... especially with having to buy new equipment.

* = the only disappointing thing about this, other than requiring me to spend more money, was that our local "mobster" could no longer show up with a Tommy gun, a c-mag and a pinstripe suit. Hilarity would ensue whenever he joined a battle looking like something out of a 20's mob film.

Ah, according to the rules i've read for Milsim's Lo-cap mags are only allowed. But most of what i read is from random websites and wikipedia. So idk if any of what i read is 100% true.

Wow. A mobster outfit. If they do Milsim type battles there should be certain kinds of time periods and stuff they should do. Like a Mobster theme'd battle or something. I also have to ask one thing, did your 'mobster' talk like a mobster? I can really picture someone randomly joining a airsoft/paintball battle wearing a pin stripe suit and a Thompson M1 submachine gun (tommy gun, street sweeper, chicago typewriters, etc.)

Mil-sim rules all depend on the field, the general ruleset adopted and how realistic you are trying to get. An example would be the field I was playing at. It was a rather new field, so they didn't have too strict rules just to get players to show. As the field gained popularity (we eventually got a few games as big as 30v30), they wanted to crank up the realism, since that is what the field's home team was into. We went from just running scenarios using Bo's Wounded Rule, but otherwise being a general play-how-you-want field to a highly-organised, have-to-look-feel-and-actlike-the-real-operators field by changing what was allowed.

I got kinda miffed with their newer equipment rules, though. I was one of the organisers behind the player-dubbed "terrorist" pickup team, since we provided the (rather ragtag) opfor for most of the scenarious. I don't like that a team based around taking whoever shows up and doesn't have a team was forced to obey the field rule of "it must be something a real operator uses or a knockoff thereof", since guerrilla forces tend to use what they can get.

As for the mobster: he tried to talk like a mobster, definitely had the right attitude and would usually be seen with a cigarette or cigar hanging out of his mouth while playing.

Wow. 30 vs 30, I bet it was complete chaos. As for the rules, I guess some people don't like the idea of having realistic ammunition like what'd be in a M14 or MP5 since you the bbs are so small you'd run through a 'realistic' mag ammount. I guess that's what spare mags and lots of BB containers are for.

I agree with you there. A terrorist uses whatever they can get so your 'terrorist' airsoft team should be able to use whatever you can. If the field organizers are making both teams use the same weapons or something along the lines of that then it may be because they are trying to keep both teams even weapon wise.

Wow, I think it'd be cool to be able to go that far to 'cosplay' a mobster for an event like that.

It wasn't same weapons, it was just that your equipment (BDUs, tac gear, eye protection, etc) had to match that of a real world operator. They tried going so far to have it all match up, including your gun, meaning I would have had to match either the Austrian or Australian forces with my Steyr AUG (weird coincidence that those two countries both field it), but, thankfully, there were too many people unwilling to buy new equipment just to match their choice of gun.

Ah, well i can see where that'd be a problem.

If you liked my battle rifle design, you might like some of my more recent drawings. I got a SMG concept and a 2 guns in one design both using bullpup configuration.

I have to apologise, I see gun talk and I go overboard. Apologies if I hijacked your picture's comments XD

No problem at all. I like to talk guns with people. My knowledge to 'guns' are limited but i know enough to make a decent conversation with.

Me 2

is the body of the gun one piece?

Not really sure myself. Probably not. I don't show alot of detail that would hint at it being in multiple pieces or being a single piece. I wouldn't really know how to show that without spending untold hours trying to make every little detail visible. I don't like doing alot of detail, I only do it when i feel like it really.

Nice, although I'm afraid I don't have any indsights or questions, the aesthetics of this seem to be both appealing and logically oriented.

It looks good but it may or may not be easy to use or carry. Still partially asleep at the moment.