FA+
Shop
228
Views
Views
0
Favorites
Favorites
Category
Artwork (Traditional) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 752
File Size 107.5 kB
Report this content
More from Blackevil915
(Originally posted on DA)
As i stated like a million times, Ajit Pai (a so-called "Chairman of FCC) wanted to killing off Net Neutrality and making various websites like a subscription TV Channel for payment in the vote of December 14th.
Because of that, everyone in US jumped on the bandwagon for protesting not just FCC, but Verizon as well (Since Pai was used to working with them). Like i said before, you expect he could respond positively to changing his plan, right?
Wrong! He refused to listen the supporters by saying "Its whats best for business for the government", calling supporters as "desperate for attention", and saying "Its bad for sick and disable people". In other words, he doesn't give a F***.
Not only internet users and internet companies find it so bad, and so does the commissioner of FCC, which she admitted that it was terrible. I mean, i expected if she could telling him to scrapping off, but no, he doesn't owe her attention. Its almost like she's being objectified by the so-called "Chairman".
And as you know, we still have plenty of sites for saving Net Neutrality with "BattleForTheNet.com", the obvious signing petitions and many more. Which im pretty its for calling the government to easily declining at FCC, because this is an idea of criminal for scamming and censorship from Pai. Either that or maybe in the vote, it'll easily saying "Repeal Net Neutrality is declined for good reasons".
But if Ajit Pai does win, the last thing he gets, is a freakin lawsuit. Which we don't wanna paying before accessing in websites from America, cause it'll easily get a lawsuit from either users or even internet companies for not just for censorship and scam, but also Defamation. Why i also added defamation? Its because he made it as "Innovation", because i find it completely meaningless, because "Innovation" is the idea to helping anyone for advancing plan with good reason. But this, its no "Innovation", this is a work of corporation who's desperate to make money for himself.
So once again, we have to spread the words as quick as possible that we need to telling them to leave Net Neutrality alone for freedom and of course, help to "Make Internet Great Again"!
https://danlev.deviantart.com/journ.....lity-717961509
https://www.battleforthenet.com/
https://www.change.org/p/save-net-n.....ity/u/20791888
https://act.freepress.net/sign/inte.....rn&t=1
Arts:
Blackevil915
As i stated like a million times, Ajit Pai (a so-called "Chairman of FCC) wanted to killing off Net Neutrality and making various websites like a subscription TV Channel for payment in the vote of December 14th.
Because of that, everyone in US jumped on the bandwagon for protesting not just FCC, but Verizon as well (Since Pai was used to working with them). Like i said before, you expect he could respond positively to changing his plan, right?
Wrong! He refused to listen the supporters by saying "Its whats best for business for the government", calling supporters as "desperate for attention", and saying "Its bad for sick and disable people". In other words, he doesn't give a F***.
Not only internet users and internet companies find it so bad, and so does the commissioner of FCC, which she admitted that it was terrible. I mean, i expected if she could telling him to scrapping off, but no, he doesn't owe her attention. Its almost like she's being objectified by the so-called "Chairman".
And as you know, we still have plenty of sites for saving Net Neutrality with "BattleForTheNet.com", the obvious signing petitions and many more. Which im pretty its for calling the government to easily declining at FCC, because this is an idea of criminal for scamming and censorship from Pai. Either that or maybe in the vote, it'll easily saying "Repeal Net Neutrality is declined for good reasons".
But if Ajit Pai does win, the last thing he gets, is a freakin lawsuit. Which we don't wanna paying before accessing in websites from America, cause it'll easily get a lawsuit from either users or even internet companies for not just for censorship and scam, but also Defamation. Why i also added defamation? Its because he made it as "Innovation", because i find it completely meaningless, because "Innovation" is the idea to helping anyone for advancing plan with good reason. But this, its no "Innovation", this is a work of corporation who's desperate to make money for himself.
So once again, we have to spread the words as quick as possible that we need to telling them to leave Net Neutrality alone for freedom and of course, help to "Make Internet Great Again"!
https://danlev.deviantart.com/journ.....lity-717961509
https://www.battleforthenet.com/
https://www.change.org/p/save-net-n.....ity/u/20791888
https://act.freepress.net/sign/inte.....rn&t=1
Arts:
Blackevil915
Category Artwork (Traditional) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1280 x 752px
File Size 107.5 kB
Comments