Foratin the genet, waiting seductively in her lingerie with a glass of wine.
Commissioned for
foratin's birthday, by several of his friends...
Done with micron pen and acrylic paints on 9"x12" illustration board.
Commissioned for
foratin's birthday, by several of his friends...Done with micron pen and acrylic paints on 9"x12" illustration board.
Category Artwork (Traditional) / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 604 x 800px
File Size 105.6 kB
No, it seems that the eye is actually misplaced, as if the socket or the skull itself were severely deformed. If you flip the image horizontally to simulate a mirror-image effect, you'll see just how extreme that facial distortion really is.
I have never before seen this kind of distortion in your work, and I must admit, it really surprises me.
Mark
I have never before seen this kind of distortion in your work, and I must admit, it really surprises me.
Mark
Kacey knows very well that eyes are set within sockets of bone, and that sockets of bone are set within a skull. For that reason, to point out that an eye seems unconvincing or distorted is hardly non-constructive, because figure-work depends upon construction.
When an artist takes the time and effort to construct a figure and to post it here on FA, then I think that we, as viewers, should take the time and effort to look closely at the result; I think that we should present an honest account of what we see. And if there seems to be an unusual technical flaw in the picture, then I think that we should be honest about that, as well. Otherwise, without candid feedback, how can the artist know that anyone has bothered to pause, to look, and to think about her work?
When an artist takes the time and effort to construct a figure and to post it here on FA, then I think that we, as viewers, should take the time and effort to look closely at the result; I think that we should present an honest account of what we see. And if there seems to be an unusual technical flaw in the picture, then I think that we should be honest about that, as well. Otherwise, without candid feedback, how can the artist know that anyone has bothered to pause, to look, and to think about her work?
I thought about what you said - but I couldn't see how I could make a mistake like that - and so I put the image into photoshop, lowered the opacity, and drew blue lines around the shape of the face as well as the eyes (i opened up the eyes in the blueline since they are half-lidded in the image) Link: http://pics.livejournal.com/ryokoki.....y/pic/0000bdte
I think that you are possibly being thrown off by the placement of the hair and maybe the glasses - but I don't see how her eye placement in her face is wrong...
I think that you are possibly being thrown off by the placement of the hair and maybe the glasses - but I don't see how her eye placement in her face is wrong...
Have you tried to flip the image horizontally? I think it would clarify that one socket is higher in relation to the muzzle than the other. What do you think?
As I've said, I have never seen this kind of placement in your work before, and for that reason, it really stands out. Something seems to be wrong....
As I've said, I have never seen this kind of placement in your work before, and for that reason, it really stands out. Something seems to be wrong....
No idea if this was mentioned to you already, but I think the glasses are a bit of a problem. The frame on the left side of subject, combined with perspective is a bit shortened when applying the view of the blue lines. Human eye can't parse animalistic face structure that well and uses glasses as frame of reference. They however don't convey as strong an angle as is actually present.
Yeah... looking at it again I think the bridge of the glasses is the issue - they aren't parallel with the line between the eyes - and they should be, as they should define the angle of the muzzle. And if the glasses are being used as the frame of reference, then they would make the eyes look wrong...
The glasses might be somewhat off-parallel; but if the right-hand eye socket were lowered to fit behind the lens, the face would then seem perfectly convincing... because the perspective of the sockets would be reinforced by the perspective of the glasses and of the muzzle.
A very simple technical solution. :)
A very simple technical solution. :)
FA+

Comments