
Although its a 1993 piece, I coloured it just a few weeks ago. One of the Anticipation concom wanted a piece to use for a "special" pass. I'm still a little vague what a "special pass" is, and I later discovered they used the original black and white version. Still, I don't consider it a waste of time colouring this. I'd wanted to for years, but with colour pencils it was a daunting task. Colouring in Photoshop was also a challenge, but one I could tackle willingly.
I used photos from Apollo 17 as a reference for the colours of the lunar landscape. I used Saara as a model for her own colours...
I used photos from Apollo 17 as a reference for the colours of the lunar landscape. I used Saara as a model for her own colours...
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1000 x 742px
File Size 245.8 kB
Indeed it does- Namely, how the hell is she LISTENING to the boombox on a world whose native atmosphere (yes, the Moon does have one!) is so tenuous, that it makes Mars' thin atmosphere seem like Titan's or Venus', compared to the Earth...
d.m.f.
(Not stepping on a landmine about someone producing their own gas, nuh-uh! :) )
d.m.f.
(Not stepping on a landmine about someone producing their own gas, nuh-uh! :) )
I think it was entirely worth coloring. I think the blue highlights are a big part of Saara's charm. Your character style is simple, sometimes minimalist - an interesting contrast to your often lushly detailed backgrounds - and without color you're really losing a chunk of her design.
I used to try different techniques to do her fur in black and white, but nothing seemed to work. Stippling, cross-hatching, and zipatone never satisfied me. I could do her in greytones, but that was as unpublishable as full colour in them-thar days. So I just started leaving her blank -- that way I could colour her later, if I found time.
I've written a couple of articles and have been blogging on this topic. It seems likely that some amount of water has been found, though it may only be the hydroxyl decomposition product they've detected. More significantly, NASA has been extremely vauge about relatively how much water they think they've found. Their statements would make you think you need only stick a shovel in the dirt and turn up ice. Or at least enough ice crystals that you could process it for the water. But the few figures given seem suspicious to me. And the one quote I can repeat, "wetter than some deserts on Earth" isn't reassuring either. Wetter than almost completely dry isn't very wet. Who in their right mind would process Saharan sand for drinking water?
Comments