"She's my best friend... even if it can be hard sometimes, I have to do it for her."
"She's like my favorite pen. It's gonna run out eventually, and that'll suck, and I'm sure I can just get a new one in the same brand, but it's just, so MOLDED to fit your hand, so you're not really looking forward to replacing it! That's her!"
"She's like my favorite pen. It's gonna run out eventually, and that'll suck, and I'm sure I can just get a new one in the same brand, but it's just, so MOLDED to fit your hand, so you're not really looking forward to replacing it! That's her!"
Category All / All
Species Unspecified / Any
Size 1059 x 800px
File Size 134.1 kB
Listed in Folders
I mean, a person's thoughts are just, such, tiny dumb little things, we trick animals we own all the time, what's the big deal, really. Zunairah's feeling good about herself so I'm like, ethical green organic farming, Janet's Farm, farm-to-table more like vein-to-belly hahaha!
Realistically and this is what she'd argue if you get her guard down enough, really what else IS she going to do, she can only be awake when the sun is down, which impairs how much money she can make, being bitten drains your blood and soul and leaves you out of it for a few days so it isn't like she can really afford on her own to pay people, if the system made ANY room for her maybe she'd bother working with it but until then I mean so someone's gonna be calling out sick tomorrow it's no big deal...
I still have to do the comic I want to do when I have energy, where Zunairah realizes Janet's been hypnotizing her, and Janet just kind of laughs about it and explains she figures out she's been doing that once a week, and she just makes her forget it, and Zune is devastated and Janet reassures her they're best friends and she's just keeping it that way
I got tired of the modern idea of vampires that have no real downsides, like Twilight, where it's just "I'm immortal and hotter." But I also DO like the casual vampirism in modern life. So we get Janet, who has no soul and is incapable of actually caring about people, living out her life like a person mostly because it's easier than anything else.
I got tired of the modern idea of vampires that have no real downsides, like Twilight, where it's just "I'm immortal and hotter." But I also DO like the casual vampirism in modern life. So we get Janet, who has no soul and is incapable of actually caring about people, living out her life like a person mostly because it's easier than anything else.
I like this, it's tragic. The casual indifference is so much more powerful than the mustache twirling villian. And so much closer to home about how 'normal' people abuse and take advantage of each other. But that is a good point about the lack of soul, Janet is disabled, soul-difficency and such.
She thinks she's actually a nice person since she doesn't HAVE to be nice and she still CHOOSES to be
If she hypnotizes someone into stopping their complaint at the supermarket, well, she just stopped them from wasting their life, she's a good person, right?
She COULD just exploit people fully and not feel bad about it but she doesn't. So she's still good, right?
If she hypnotizes someone into stopping their complaint at the supermarket, well, she just stopped them from wasting their life, she's a good person, right?
She COULD just exploit people fully and not feel bad about it but she doesn't. So she's still good, right?
Well, I guess in the context it of this, it really then is going to boil down to what it means to not have a 'soul' and how much of this is free will. A wild dog that tears you to pieces, and another one that runs away scared, neither are good are evil if they're just animals acting on instinct. A person who has a brain tumor or is involuntarily drugged and this causes them to murder another person, they're not really evil even though what they do might be considered evil. And the subject of self control as a virtue or 'it could be worse'. In a sense yes, moderating ones negative impulses is probably a good sign, but on the other hand it could also be a game of control and dominance.
There was a character I had written who a Rat slave in a Cat principality, but her owner was wealthy and wanted the finest things, even the finest servants. So he dressed her in fine clothing, groomed her to look the best (at least as good as a rat could look to cats), educated her so she would be 'civilized', and essentially treated her more like a beloved pet than a slave. There was no abuse, no cruelty, no molestation. She was a game to the Cats, to show their restraint, to show their self control and civility. To have this creature among them they could tear to shreds without effort, yet here they are having it serve them tea or read them poetry as if there is no danger simmering just below the surface. She had to a point a better life than many of her kind, she was never hungry, she never lived in fear of her life, never had to sleep in some filthy hole, yet... Still property.
So then, is someone who has control of you, shows mercy, constraint, self control, whatever you want to call it, are they virtuous? In small doses, in little amounts, is this what 'normal' people do to each other? Just moderate how bad we can be? If the default state of nature is cruelty and indifference, is positively not indulging this a virtue or do we have to do more to claim that? If I had the answers and not just more questions...
It still is a sad situation, I have more feelings of sorrow for a trapped animal than a dead animal. The dead animal has just lost their life, the trapped animal lives still yet is certain to die, in that strange limbo of living and breathing yet already dead. But a leg hold trap is a pieces of steel with a spring, not someone you trust, someone you feel sympathy for, someone who is a thinking living creature with intelligence and you talk to about annoying customers you need to deal with.
Now i'm curious, Vampireism as a medial disorder, how does one catch this disease?
Anyway I'm rambling too much, it's such a simple thing, I make things too complex.
There was a character I had written who a Rat slave in a Cat principality, but her owner was wealthy and wanted the finest things, even the finest servants. So he dressed her in fine clothing, groomed her to look the best (at least as good as a rat could look to cats), educated her so she would be 'civilized', and essentially treated her more like a beloved pet than a slave. There was no abuse, no cruelty, no molestation. She was a game to the Cats, to show their restraint, to show their self control and civility. To have this creature among them they could tear to shreds without effort, yet here they are having it serve them tea or read them poetry as if there is no danger simmering just below the surface. She had to a point a better life than many of her kind, she was never hungry, she never lived in fear of her life, never had to sleep in some filthy hole, yet... Still property.
So then, is someone who has control of you, shows mercy, constraint, self control, whatever you want to call it, are they virtuous? In small doses, in little amounts, is this what 'normal' people do to each other? Just moderate how bad we can be? If the default state of nature is cruelty and indifference, is positively not indulging this a virtue or do we have to do more to claim that? If I had the answers and not just more questions...
It still is a sad situation, I have more feelings of sorrow for a trapped animal than a dead animal. The dead animal has just lost their life, the trapped animal lives still yet is certain to die, in that strange limbo of living and breathing yet already dead. But a leg hold trap is a pieces of steel with a spring, not someone you trust, someone you feel sympathy for, someone who is a thinking living creature with intelligence and you talk to about annoying customers you need to deal with.
Now i'm curious, Vampireism as a medial disorder, how does one catch this disease?
Anyway I'm rambling too much, it's such a simple thing, I make things too complex.
FA+

Comments